dimanche 21 mai 2017

Chinese aggressions

China's Threat Of War Against Philippines Is Baseless Scare Tactic
By Anders Corr

On Friday, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said Xi Jinping threatened war if Duterte started developing Philippine oil and gas resources in the South China Sea. 
The Philippines has every right to do so, per the award of an international arbitral tribunal in the Hague last year. 
After describing Xi’s threat, Duterte told his Philippine military audience, “What more could I say?” 
I sympathize. 
The Philippines is a much smaller country militarily, economically, and in diplomatic power, than is China. 
As Duterte points out, war with China would be a “massacre and it will destroy everything,” starting in Palawan, a long Philippine island bordering the South China Sea.

A US air force personnel looks at a Philippine flag patch he exchanged with his Philippine counterpart after the closing ceremony of the annual joint US-Philippines military exercise in Manila on May 19, 2017. The Philippines and the United States launched annual military exercises on May 8 but the longtime allies scaled them down which focuses only on counter-terrorism and disaster relief in line with President Rodrigo Duterte's pivot to China and Russia. 

But let’s consider a few options that show this threat of war for what it is: a baseless scare tactic. First, Duterte could hang tough and seek a stronger stance on the issue by the U.S., which is a Philippine ally per the Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951
In his defense, Duterte and his predecessor Benigno Aquino may already have sought such help from the U.S. and gotten turned down or dissuaded. 
That would be a stain on U.S. honor. 
But redoubling his efforts, for example reaching out to Trump and bringing the threat before the United Nations General Assembly, is constitutionally required according to Philippine Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio.
The U.S.-Philippine alliance failed to defend the Philippine EEZ when China occupied Mischief Reef in 1995, and Scarborough Shoal in 2012. 
That is a fact. 
Every day that China continues its occupation, the alliance fails anew.
The U.S. and Philippines together, could easily have defended these locations. 
The Philippines tried briefly at the Scarborough standoff of 2012, but U.S. ships did not join, and then the U.S. and China brokered a deal in which the Philippines backed off, and China stayed. 
Why didn’t the U.S. and Philippines return in force when they realized they had been tricked? 
It was a startling admission, one gotten when I surprised them with the question. 
But I bet it is true, even today. 
That would be militarily and economically damaging, if not catastrophic, to both countries. 
Therefore a Chinese war against the Philippines is unlikely to happen as long as the alliance with the U.S. is healthy. 
President Duterte could make this clear to the public in both nations by visiting the White House, and inviting Trump to Malacañang Palace, rather than amplify China’s scare tactics.


Vietnamese protesters hold up posters while shouting anti-China slogans in front of the Chinese embassy in Hanoi on July 8, 2012. Hundreds of people staged the anti-China protest, the second one in a week, after the China National Offshore Oil Corporation announced last month that nine offshore blocks were available for exploration, and said it was seeking bids from foreign companies. Vietnam contends that the blocks 'lie entirely within Vietnam's 200-mile exclusive economic zone.' 

More likely than war would be Chinese attempts to interdict Philippine commercial vessels trying to drill for oil, and offering to sell Philippine oil rights. 
China did this to Vietnam in 2012
When Vietnam tried to tow sonar in its EEZ, looking for oil and gas, a Chinese boat ran over the cables and cut them. 
Also in 2012, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) tried to auction blocks for oil exploration that were within Vietnam's EEZ. 
The Philippines could protect its oil exploration and drilling with its own Coast Guard, perhaps accompanied by U.S., European and Japanese Coast Guard.

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire