Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Mitch McConnell. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Mitch McConnell. Afficher tous les articles

mercredi 13 novembre 2019

US senators push for vote on Hong Kong rights bill as police violence rises

  • The chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee said on Tuesday he wanted the Senate to pass legislation to support pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong.
  • Republican Senator Jim Risch noted that he is a co-sponsor and strong proponent of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which would place Hong Kong’s special treatment by the United States under tighter scrutiny.
Reuters

Hong Kong protesters call for US lawmakers to pass human rights bill.

The chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee said on Tuesday he wanted the Senate to pass legislation to support pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, as violence rose in the Chinese-ruled city rocked by months of unrest.
Republican Senator Jim Risch noted that he is a co-sponsor and “strong proponent” of the “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act,” which would place Hong Kong’s special treatment by the United States under tighter scrutiny.
“We want it moved,” Risch said during a discussion on China at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives unanimously passed the bill in mid-October.
Risch’s Foreign Relations committee approved a similar measure in September, but it has not been scheduled for a vote by the full Senate, which must pass the bill before it can be sent to President Donald Trump.

The world needs to see that the United States will stand up and say this is wrong, we stand with the people of Hong Kong.                                         
Sen. Jim Risch, CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS

The White House, which is engaged in intense trade negotiations with China, has yet to say whether he would sign or veto it.
Police in Hong Kong battled pro-democracy protesters at several university campuses on Tuesday in sometimes savage clashes, as parts of the city were paralyzed including Hong Kong’s financial district, which was tear-gassed for a second day running.
Those flare-ups occurred a day after police shot an unarmed protester at close range.

Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., left, and James Risch, R-Idaho, attend the Senate Foreign Relations Committee confirmation hearing of Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson in Dirksen Building, January 11, 2017.

Risch and fellow Republican Senator Marco Rubio are to meet on Wednesday with Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to discuss the possibility of getting floor time for a vote on the bill, aides said.
“The world needs to see that the United States will stand up and say this is wrong, we stand with the people of Hong Kong,” Risch said.
Asked of McConnell would allow a vote in the Senate, a spokesman pointed to his remarks in the Senate on Tuesday expressing concern about the violence.
“I’m eager to continue working with colleagues such as Senator Risch, Senator (Lindsey) Graham, Senator Rubio, and others toward a strong and procedurally workable solution,” McConnell said.
The legislation has 37 Republican and Democratic co-sponsors in the 100-member Senate. 
Backers say it is expected to pass easily if McConnell schedules a vote.

jeudi 17 octobre 2019

A Fierce Slap to Chinese tyrants

U.S. Senators Press Ahead With Hong Kong Bill
After House passage, legislation awaits action in Senate
By Daniel Flatley and Dandan Li

Hong Kong Bill Will Pass in the Senate, Says Rep. Chris Smith

Republican senators said Wednesday they want to move quickly on legislation to support pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong despite a "threat" of retaliation from China.
Hong Kong is a high priority for me,” said GOP Senator Jim Risch, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. 
“We’re going to move on it as rapidly as we can.”

Senator Jim Risch

Senator Roy Blunt, a member of the Senate GOP leadership, said there haven’t been any discussions about the timing for a vote on Hong Kong legislation similar to a measure that passed the House Tuesday. 
That bill would subject the city’s special U.S. trading status to annual reviews and provides for sanctions against officials deemed responsible for undermining its “fundamental freedoms and autonomy.”
There is broad backing in both parties in Congress to show support for the protesters and punish China for any crackdown. 
The White House declined to comment on whether Trump would sign the Hong Kong legislation, but there are enough votes in the House to override a veto and no significant opposition in the Senate.
The next step will be up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who’ll set the schedule for a vote, and he’s being pressed by his Republican colleagues.
“I think we’re going to get it up on the floor here fairly soon,” Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a China critic, told reporters.
South Dakota Senator John Thune, another member of Republican leadership, said that while he hasn’t looked closely at the four bills the House passed Tuesday, there are a number of senators “interested in making a strong statement on Hong Kong.”
Maryland Senator Ben Cardin, a Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said the main House bill, the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, has deep bipartisan support, but there might be some Republicans who object to the bill being passed by unanimous consent without a floor vote.
Cardin said the fact that the House passed their four bills separately, rather than bundling them together, means the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act has a better chance of getting a vote in the Senate.

Demonstrators wave U.S. flags during a rally in support of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, Oct. 14.

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang warned American lawmakers to stop "meddling" in China’s internal affairs.
Both Trump and Chinese dictator Xi Jinping have so far prevented the international uproar over Hong Kong from scuttling their trade talks. 
The two sides went ahead with negotiations and reached some broad agreements last week, even though the House vote was widely expected at the time.
A spokesman for the Hong Kong government “expressed regret” over the House action, which came hours before Chief Executive Carrie Lam addressed a raucous session of the Legislative Council. 
She barely managed a few words before pro-democracy lawmakers forced her to stop talking. 
She ended up delivering her annual policy address via video instead.
While the pro-democracy bloc only comprises about a third of lawmakers, Wednesday’s display showed they have the ability to shut down debate on major economic initiatives. 
That spells even more trouble ahead for an economy sliding into recession as protests against Beijing’s grip over the city grow increasingly violent.
China’s retaliation threat against the U.S. roiled markets during Asian trading, at one point wiping out a 0.8% rally in the regional equity benchmark.
U.S. lawmakers have embraced the Hong Kong protesters’ cause as the yearlong trade war fuels American support for pushing back against China, and they have hosted Hong Kong’s pro-democracy activists on Capitol Hill in recent weeks. 
The National Basketball Association’s struggle to manage Chinese backlash against a Houston Rockets executive’s support for the movement has only focused wider attention on the debate.
On Tuesday, the House passed H.Res. 543, a resolution reaffirming the relationship between the U.S. and Hong Kong, condemning Chinese interference in the region and voicing support for protesters. 
Lawmakers also passed the Protect Hong Kong Act, H.R. 4270, which would halt the export to Hong Kong of crowd-control devices such as tear gas and rubber bullets.

Joshua Wong arrives to speak on Capitol Hill on Sept. 17.

Representative Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican and a sponsor of the main Hong Kong bill, dismissed the threats from Beijing.
Retaliation, that’s all they ever talk,”
Smith told Bloomberg TV. 
“They try to browbeat and cower people, countries, presidents, prime ministers and the like all over in order to get them to back off. We believe that human rights are so elemental, and so in need of protection. And that’s why the students and the young people are out in the streets in Hong Kong virtually every day.”
The House also adopted a resolution by Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel of New York and the panel’s top Republican, Michael McCaul of Texas, urging Canada to start U.S. extradition proceedings against Huawei Technologies Co. executive Meng Wanzhou
The resolution, H.Res. 521, also calls for the release of two Canadians detained in China and due process for a third sentenced to death for drug smuggling.

Ted Cruz

mardi 15 octobre 2019

What’s Happening With the Hong Kong Protests?

The demonstrations created the city’s worst political crisis in years, ensnaring Beijing, Washington and foreign businesses. Here’s a guide to what’s happening.
By Daniel Victor and Mike Ives

Hundreds of thousands of people in Hong Kong, a city of about seven million, protested a contentious extradition law on June 9.

At first, the hundreds of thousands of peaceful Hong Kong demonstrators who took to the streets this June were focused on contentious, local legislation that would have allowed extraditions to the Chinese mainland.
But as the list of demands grew in the semiautonomous territory, and as clashes between the police and the protesters increased, the movement took on greater global importance.
China has viewed the protests as a challenge to its power, while democracy supporters worldwide have cheered what they see as a poke in the eye of the autocratic Chinese government. 
It all comes amid a rancorous trade war between China and the United States, and some international businesses have found themselves stuck in a political mess they wanted no part of.
How did we get here?
Here’s a primer on what’s happening in Hong Kong, and how the protests have unfolded over several months.

What is Hong Kong’s relationship with China?
Hong Kong, an international finance hub on China’s southern coast, was a British colony until 1997, when it was handed back to China under a policy known as “one country, two systems.”
The policy made Hong Kong part of China but let it keep many liberties denied to citizens on the mainland, including free speech, unrestricted internet access and the right to free assembly. 
The territory has its own laws, system of government and police force under a mini-constitution known as the Basic Law. 
China promised that this system would remain in place until at least 2047.
But Beijing is chipping away at Hong Kong's autonomy, and the local government does its bidding. 
The territory’s top leader, the chief executive — currently Carrie Lam — is appointed by a pro-Beijing committee. 
And she recently used her emergency powers to single-handedly enact a ban on face masks at protests, bypassing the partially elected legislature.

What’s driving the protests?

Protesters threw back tear gas canisters fired by police outside the Legislative Council building in Hong Kong on June 12.

In February, the local government introduced a bill, since scrapped, that would have allowed people accused of crimes to be sent to places with which Hong Kong had no extradition treaty — including mainland China, where the courts are controlled by the Communist Party. 
Lam argued that the bill was needed to guarantee justice in cases like a man who was accused of killing his girlfriend in Taiwan, then evaded prosecution by fleeing to Hong Kong. 
Critics said the bill would allow Beijing to target dissidents in Hong Kong with phony charges, exposing activists to China’s opaque legal system.
Hundreds of thousands of people, including elderly residents and families with children, joined a peaceful march to oppose the bill on June 9. 
But on June 12, the discussion and demands changed when the police used pepper spray, batons and more than 150 canisters of tear gas to disperse thousands of protesters, a small number of whom had thrown projectiles at the police.
Irate at the police response, protesters demanded an independent investigation of the police force — a demand leaders have refused. 
Anger toward the police has grown precipitously since then, as has violence on both sides.

Why have the demonstrations turned violent?

Protesters throw bricks and molotov cocktails at riot police.

Fueled by anger toward the police, as well as the slow erosion of civil liberties, the largely leaderless protests morphed into a broader, more complicated movement about protecting freedoms, democracy and Hong Kong’s autonomy. 
The list of protesters’ demands has grown to include amnesty for arrested participants and direct elections for all lawmakers and the chief executive.
Only one of their demands has been met: the withdrawal of the extradition bill. 
So protesters have continued to take over streets, and have adapted their tactics in hopes of forcing the government’s hand.
While the vast majority of participants have been nonviolent, clashes between the police and young protesters in hard hats, masks and black T-shirts have escalated sharply. 
The police have used water cannons, tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets while dispersing crowds, and their tactics have been criticized by protesters and international watchdogs. 
Videos of particularly brutal arrests have infuriated protesters, especially a scene from October in which a police officer shot a protester in the chest with a live round.
Having felt their peaceful rallies were ineffective, a minority of protesters has become increasingly aggressive.
They have thrown bricks and Molotov cocktails, and in one case stabbed a police officer. 
The police say that one homemade bomb has been detonated during a protest. 
And there has been property damage to the train system, which support the police, and pro-China businesses.
Still, nonviolent protests have continued. 
The demonstrators have staged strikes, surrounded police stations, shut down the airport and formed huge marches, while the city’s creative class has turned protest into art and song.

What are the implications for China?

The N.B.A. flagship retail store in Beijing last week.

Much of the international intrigue is based on closely examining how China responds to the protests, and how much democracy its leaders can stomach in its efforts to prove its model works.
Thus far, fears of a Tiananmen-style crackdown have not borne out. 
The Chinese military has a garrison in Hong Kong, but its deployment is widely seen as a worst-case scenario that all sides want to avoid. 
The international business community would likely see a military intervention as the end of “one country, two systems,” and an exodus of businesses could soon follow.
Instead, China has tried to turn public opinion against the protesters. 
The state media has depicted them as violent separatists.
The state media fanned the flames of a backlash against the N.B.A. after a team executive expressed support of the protests on Twitter.
The issue has added another layer of intrigue to the ongoing trade discussions between the United States and China. 
Democratic and Republican politicians have been largely united in support of the protests, but Trump has been more muted.

Why is there bipartisan agreement in the United States on supporting the protesters?

A rally in Hong Kong on Monday evening calling for the US Congress to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act.

It’s a rare source of across-the-aisle unity. 
There aren’t many issues that would bring together Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Democrat from New York, but they were among a bipartisan coalition to sign the same letter in support of the protesters. 
Other politicians, including leaders Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, and Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican majority leader, have been in virtually unanimous agreement.
It stems from a shared distrust of the Chinese government, a much broader issue that often creates agreement between Republicans and Democrats. 
China’s authoritarian model is considered a wide-ranging threat to the United States, and the pro-democracy, anti-China sentiment of the protests aligns with popular American attitudes.
The protesters’ supporters in the United States, and elsewhere in the world, see them as being on the right side of a battle between democracy and authoritarianism. 
They view supporting the protesters as supporting the concept of democracy.

jeudi 12 septembre 2019

Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act

Congress needs to show the Hong Kong protesters it’s on their side
Washington Post

Hong Kong protesters wave U.S flags outside the U.S. Consulate on Sunday. 

IT’S NOT often that Congress is lobbied by tens of thousands of marchers in a foreign city who wave American flags and sing “The Star-Spangled Banner” while demanding action on a specific piece of legislation. 
But that’s pretty much what happened last weekend in Hong Kong, where a mass pro-democracy movement, after 13 consecutive weeks of demonstrations, has grown savvy about the challenge it faces in seeking concessions from the Communist regime in Beijing.
Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, has belatedly withdrawn the extradition legislation that prompted the initial protests. 
But her boss, Chinese dictator Xi Jinping, has taken a hard line against conceding to the protesters’ more substantive demands, including free elections for the territory’s government — something that Beijing promised when it took over the former British colony in 1997. 
Instead, the regime is accusing the mostly peaceful demonstrators of employing “terrorism” and has threatened a massive crackdown, either by Hong Kong’s police or by mainland troops.
The pro-democracy forces know they couldn’t fight martial law or an invasion, but they aren’t willing to give up their demands. 
Hence, their appearance Sunday outside the U.S. Consulate. 
They are hoping that the United States will employ its considerable leverage over Xi and Lam to deter the threatened repression.
Though it hasn’t been able to force Xi to make concessions on trade or stop fortifying islets in the South China Sea, the Trump administration has far-reaching influence over Hong Kong. 
More than 1,200 U.S. companies do business there, and 60 percent of foreign investment in China flows through the city, thanks to a U.S. law that designates it as a separate economic entity with the privileges of an open economy.
Unfortunately, Trump has responded weakly to the protests and China’s threats. 
After weeks of praising his "friend" Xi for tolerating “riots ” and expressing confidence that the Chinese dictator could quickly orchestrate a “happy and enlightened ending,” he reluctantly conceded late last month that a crackdown might make a trade deal impossible — not because of him, mind you, but because of “political sentiment.”
No wonder the demonstrators are appealing to Congress. 
They delivered a petition to the consulate calling for passage of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which is pending in both the House and Senate. 
The measure would require an annual review of Hong Kong’s special economic status, and it would mandate sanctions on officials found to be suppressing basic freedoms in the territory. 
The sanctions might slow the recent wave of arrests of opposition leaders, while the reporting requirement signals that, as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a sponsor, says, the “nuclear option” of canceling Hong Kong’s special status will be on the table in the event of a larger crackdown.
The legislation appears to have bipartisan support: Both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have spoken favorably about it. 
They should move swiftly to pass the bill, and Trump should sign it. 
Now is the time to send a clear message of deterrence to Beijing — and to show Hong Kong’s democracy movement that the United States is unambiguously on its side.

lundi 9 septembre 2019

Hong Kong Democratic and Human Rights Act

Hong Kong protesters beg Trump: "Liberate our city"
By Eileen Ng and Alice Fung

Protesters shout slogans during a protest in Hong Kong, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019. Demonstrators in Hong Kong march to the U.S. Consulate on Sunday to drum up international support for their protest movement, a day after attempts to disrupt transportation to the airport were thwarted by police. 

HONG KONG — Thousands of demonstrators in Hong Kong urged President Donald Trump to “liberate” the semiautonomous Chinese territory during a peaceful march to the U.S. Consulate on Sunday, but violence broke out later in the business and retail district after protesters vandalized subway stations, set fires and blocked traffic.
Protesters flooded a park in central Hong Kong, chanting “Resist Beijing, Liberate Hong Kong” and “Stand with Hong Kong, fight for freedom.” 
Many of them, clad in black shirts and wearing masks, waved American flags and carried posters that read “President Trump, please liberate Hong Kong” as they marched to the U.S. Consulate nearby.
“Hong Kong is at the forefront of the battle against the totalitarian regime of China,” said Panzer Chan, one of the organizers of the march. 
“Please support us in our fight.”
Hong Kong has been rocked by three months of unrest sparked by a proposed law that would have allowed criminal suspects to be sent to mainland China for trial. 
Many saw the extradition bill as a glaring example of the erosion of civil liberties and rights promised under a “one country, two systems” framework when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
Hong Kong’s government promised this past week to formally withdraw the bill, but that failed to appease the demonstrators, who have widened their demands to include calls for direct elections for the city’s leaders and an independent probe into thuggish police brutality against protesters.
The unrest has become the biggest challenge to Beijing’s rule since Hong Kong’s return from Britain. Beijing and the entirely state-controlled media have portrayed the protests as an effort by "criminals" to split the territory from China, backed by "hostile foreigners".
Protesters on Sunday urged Washington to pass a bill, known as the Hong Kong Democratic and Human Rights Act, to support their cause. 
The bill proposes sanctions against Hong Kong and Chinese officials found to suppress democracy and human rights in the city, and could also affect Hong Kong’s preferential trade status with the U.S.
A group of protesters sang “The Star-Spangled Banner” before handing over an appeal letter to a U.S. Consulate official.
Just before the rally ended, violence broke out after riot police detained several people and chased protesters out of the nearby Central subway station. 
Angry protesters smashed glass windows and sprayed graffiti at the station’s exits.
Protesters burned cardboard boxes and other debris to start a fire at one of the exits. 
A barricade was set on fire at a nearby street, but firefighters quickly snuffed it out.
The government said some protesters also blocked traffic at a major thoroughfare near City Hall in the area, paralyzing traffic. 
Riot police chased groups of protesters down several roads as night fell, searching dozens of young people on the street and at the next two subway stations after Central.
The U.S. State Department said in a travel advisory Friday that Beijing has undertaken a propaganda campaign “falsely accusing the United States of fomenting unrest in Hong Kong.” 
It said U.S. citizens and embassy staff have been the target of the propaganda and urged them to exercise increased caution.
American legislators are pressing Trump to take a tougher stand on Hong Kong. 
But Trump has said little in public since recommending on Twitter in mid-August that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping “meet directly and personally” with the protesters.
Political analysts suggest Trump’s response has been muted because he doesn’t want to disrupt talks with Xi’s government over their tariff war.
The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, said last week that he would recommend Trump take “more forceful action” if Chinese authorities crush the demonstrations. 
The protests are an embarrassment to China’s ruling Communist Party less than one month before the Oct. 1 celebration of its 70th anniversary in power.
Sunday’s rally followed violent clashes the previous two nights between protesters and police at several subway stations.
Separately, well-known activist Joshua Wong said in a statement through his lawyer that he was detained at the airport early Friday for breaching bail conditions. 
Wong, a leader of Hong Kong’s 2014 pro-democracy protest movement, was among several people detained last month and was charged with inciting people to join a protest in June.
Wong, who just returned from Taiwan, where he gave speeches on Hong Kong’s protests, and is due to visit Germany and the U.S., said the court had approved his overseas trips.
He described his detention as a procedural hiccup and said he expected to be released Monday. 
His prosecution comes less than two months after his release from prison for a two-month sentence related to the 2014 protests.

mercredi 4 septembre 2019

SEN. MITCH MCCONNELL WARNS CHINA IS 'PLAYING WITH FIRE' IN HONG KONG

SEN. MITCH MCCONNELL WANTS PRESIDENT TRUMP TO TAKE 'FORCEFUL ACTION' IF BEIJING CONDUCTS TIANANMEN-STYLE MASSACRE
BY SHANE CROUCHER 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) answers questions following the weekly Republican policy luncheon on July 30, 2019 in Washington, D.C. McConnell said he would urge President Donald Trump to take "forceful action" if China cracks down violently on the protests in Hong Kong.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell warned China that it is "playing with fire" in Hong Kong and said he would push President Donald Trump to take "more forceful action" if Beijing uses violence to put down the protests.
Hong Kong, a self-governing Chinese territory, is rocked by waves of demonstrations against the government that started with a controversial extradition bill that would allow suspects to be whisked away to the communist-controlled mainland where human rights groups say there are regular abuses.
Police are meeting the escalating protests with increasing brutality. 
The Chinese military is massing around Hong Kong, sparking international concern that Beijing is preparing to move in and put down the protests by means similar to 1989's infamous Tiananmen Square massacre.
Sen. McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, appeared on Hugh Hewitt's radio show Tuesday. 
Hewitt referred to previous remarks by GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas that if China moved militarily against the demonstrators in Hong Kong it would be a "grievous mistake of historic proportion," and asked if Sen. McConnell agreed.
"I do. In fact, I passed the Hong Kong Policy Act way back in 1992, which requires an annual report from the State Department on whether or not the Chinese are keeping the agreement they made with the British prior to the handover," Sen. McConnell said.
"And in the last few years, those reports have been very critical. I'm going to be supporting legislation to enhance those requirements. And I think this is a pivotal moment for the Chinese… This is a seminal moment, and it'll be interesting to see how the Chinese manage it."
Hewitt asked Sen. McConnell what he would recommend to the president if China responds in a similar way to the student protests in Tiananmen Square, which is still surrounded by mystery. 
Western estimates put the death toll as high as the thousands.
"Well, I think it requires a significant response from us, in my opinion," Sen. McConnell said. 
"I think that if the Chinese do crush this what I would call peaceful attempt to maintain their rights, it requires, it seems to me, America, which is known internationally for standing up for human rights, to speak up and to take more forceful action. That's what I would recommend to the president. Obviously, that's his decision in the end."
The senator said he would "look at all the options," including the expulsion of Chinese students from the United States: "You know, we have 75,000 Americans who live and work in Hong Kong as well. That's truly an international city that has enjoyed a Western-style freedom for a very long time. I think the Chinese are playing with fire here, and hopefully they will not go too far."
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond immediately to Newsweek's request for comment.

vendredi 30 août 2019

The Chinese Strike Back

Democracy activists Joshua Wong, Agnes Chow and Andy Chan are arrested in Hong Kong
By Shibani Mahtani and Gerry Shih

Democracy activist Joshua Wong addresses crowds outside Hong Kong’s legislature during a demonstration against the extradition bill on June 17.

HONG KONG — Authorities widened a crackdown on the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong with the arrests of prominent activists, underscoring Beijing’s growing intolerance of sustained street protests that have convulsed the Chinese territory and revived calls for universal suffrage.
Joshua Wong and Agnes Chow, who rose to eminence as the student leaders of pro-democracy demonstrations five years ago, were detained early Friday, ahead of what was expected to be another weekend of clashes in the city.
Police said the pair would face charges of participating in an unauthorized assembly and inciting others to participate in an unapproved assembly, while Wong would face an additional charge of organizing an unapproved assembly.
The charges relate to a June 21 protest where demonstrators surrounded police headquarters.
A third activist, Andy Chan, the leader of a banned pro-independence party, was arrested at the city’s airport late Thursday while trying to board a plane.
Police said he was detained on suspicion of rioting and assaulting a police officer.
The arrests come at a tense time in the semiautonomous Chinese territory, where an official proposal to allow extraditions to mainland China triggered months of protests that have descended into street battles with police.
As demonstrations have turned violent, and grown to encompass a broader push for democracy in Hong Kong, authorities have stepped up arrests and the use of force.
The dissent coincides with a politically sensitive moment for the ruling Communist Party, as the clock ticks down to the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China in October.
China’s government has issued increasingly strident threats in an effort to quell the unrest.
A day earlier, it sent a new batch of troops in to Hong Kong to reinforce the People’s Liberation Army garrison in the city.

Agnes Chow, right, and Joshua Wong outside government offices in Hong Kong in June. The pair were arrested Friday in a widening crackdown on the pro-democracy movement.

Friday’s arrests, combined with the Hong Kong garrison rotation and rumors that Hong Kong may invoke emergency laws, were “extremely alarming,” said Samantha Hoffman, a fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute who studies Chinese politics.
“At the very least, it is clear that Beijing is attempting to intimidate the people of Hong Kong. The Chinese Communist Party places political protests very high on its list of threat perceptions,” she said.
“The party will protect itself before it defends the objective interests of China, the Chinese people, and Hong Kong and its people. Therefore, it is hard to imagine a solution where the party backs down in any meaningful way.”
In a report after the roundup of the Hong Kong activists, China’s official Xinhua news agency said more arrests were expected.
Hours later, Xinhua posted a picture on its social media account with a pair of handcuffs and images of the detained trio with the caption “What goes around comes around.”
A local pro-democracy councilor, Rick Hui, was also arrested Friday, his office said.
Charges against him were not immediately known.
With Hong Kong’s leader, Carrie Lam, unwilling to compromise on demonstrators’ demands, the continued unrest is taking a toll on the economy.
Police have arrested more than 800 people in connection with protests that have rocked the city since June, some of them on riot charges that can attract a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
Organizers of a planned march in Hong Kong this weekend called off the rally on Friday after police refused to authorize it.
“Our first principle is always to protect all the participants and make sure that no one could bear legal consequences for participating in the protest,” said Bonnie Leung, a convener of the Civil Human Rights Front.
Wong, 22 years old, became known as the face of the 2014 Umbrella Movement, a 79-day street occupation aimed at securing universal suffrage for Hong Kong.
He was charged and sentenced several times in connection with those protests, and served three stints in jail.
Most recently, on May 16, Wong was sentenced to two months in prison after losing an appeal against a prison term for contempt of court.
He was released in June.

Policemen pull out their guns after a confrontation with protesters in Hong Kong on Aug. 25. Police have escalated their use of force in trying to quell demonstrations. 

Along with Chow and another activist, Nathan Law, Wong went on to found political group Demosistō, which advocates self-determination for Hong Kong.
The three were arrested in 2017 ahead of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping’s visit to the city.
This time, the protest movement in Hong Kong has taken a leaderless form — in part to avoid arrests and detentions that plagued its leaders in the past, and to empower a broader base of participants. Unlike in 2014, members of Demosistō have not delivered speeches at rallies, nor have they been prominent faces on the front lines, but have used the group’s social media presence to promote their cause globally.
“We’ll use our influence and connections with the international community to tell the world about what’s happening,” Chow said in an earlier interview with The Washington Post. 
“It’s still very important.”
On Friday, Wong was seized at roughly 7:30 a.m. “when he was suddenly pushed into a private car on the street,” Demosistō, said.
Chow was arrested a short time later at her home, Demosistō added.
Both are being held in the Hong Kong police headquarters in the Wan Chai district.
The group has sought help from its lawyers.
Wong and Chow were due to travel to Washington next month, where they were to meet with lawmakers and participate in a congressional Executive Committee on China hearing on the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act
The bill, which has bipartisan support, including from House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), seeks to punish those who suppress freedoms in Hong Kong including through the use of sanctions and visa bans to the U.S.

Anti-extradition bill protesters take cover from tear gas canisters as they clash with riot police on Aug. 25. 

Chan, who founded a party that advocates for Hong Kong independence, was also arrested in August on suspicion of possessing offensive weapons and bombmaking materials.
Hong Kong operates under a “one country, two systems” arrangement within China, under which the city is supposed to enjoy a high degree of autonomy for 50 years following its return to Chinese rule in 1997.
In recent years, concerns have grown that Beijing is tightening control over the territory and working to erode the freedoms and autonomy that distinguish Hong Kong from mainland China.
In a tweet the night before his arrest, Wong wrote that “Being born in uncertain times carries certain responsibilities.” 
He linked to a website outlining protesters’ demands.

jeudi 22 août 2019

Mitch McConnell slams China over Hong Kong, threatens a global confrontation that could tank the finance hub

  • Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wrote a blistering op-ed calling out China for various human rights violations and a crackdown on Hong Kong.
  • He said the US could revisit the 1992 Hong Kong Policy Act, which gave the city special access to the US market and poured billions into Beijing's pockets. The act allows the US to trade with Hong Kong on better, more favorable terms than it affords the Chinese mainland.
  • Doing this would punish China, but also Hong Konge as the island could lose its status as a global financial hub.
By Alex Lockie


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wrote a blistering op-ed calling for the world to stand up to and confront China over a variety of human rights concerns and a violent response to 11 weeks of largely peaceful protests in semi-autonomous Hong Kong.
"Sooner or later, the rest of the world will have to do what the protesters are doing — confront Beijing," McConnell wrote in the Wall Street Journal.
In the article, McConnell also called for a punishment that could demolish Hong Kong's status as a global financial hub and a cash cow for Beijing.

Hong Kong on fireThe emblem of communist China is seen vandalized on the Chinese Liaison Office after a march to call for democratic reforms, in Hong Kong, China July 21, 2019. 

When the British returned Hong Kong to China in 1997, it did so with an internationally recognized treaty wherein China promised to respect Hong Kong's system of government, which allows greater freedoms than the mainland's strict communist rule.
But China has steadily eroded the freedoms people in Hong Kong enjoy, partially due to a creeping takeover of its government, and partly due to techno-authoritarianism enabling an unparalleled surveillance state. 
The recent spate of protests in Hong Kong kicked off when the local government proposed a bill that would allow China to deport Hong Kongers to the mainland for trials.
Hong Kongers responded to the bill with perhaps the largest protests in human history, and carried them out in a notably peaceful and orderly way for weeks, despite documented police brutality and brutal beatings from mainland-linked gangs.
McConnell described China's often violent response to Hong Kong as "authoritarian rulers seeking to repress the innate human desire for freedom, self-expression and self-government" on par with historical massacres of freedom-seekers in the former Soviet Union and under former Chinese dictator Mao Tse-tung.
McConnell goes on to shred China's brutal oppression of ethnic and religious minorities, including in Tibet and East Turkestan, where more than 1 million Chinese citizens have been detained, re-educated in party propaganda, and often made to renounce their religion.

The US could hurt China over Hong KongA demonstrator sits down in front of riot police during a demonstration to demand authorities scrap a proposed extradition bill with China, in Hong Kong, China June 12, 2019.

Perhaps most significantly, McConnell threatened a move that would destroy Hong Kong's special appeal to global finance by revisiting the 1992 Hong Kong Policy act.
The act allows the US to trade with Hong Kong on better, more favorable terms than it affords the Chinese mainland.
"This special access to the U.S. and other nations helped drive the investment and modernization that have enriched Hong Kong, and Beijing by extension," wrote McConnell. 
"Beijing must know the Senate will reconsider that special relationship, among other steps, if Hong Kong's autonomy is eroded."
He then went on to say that he had instructed various Senate committees to examine Beijing's actions in Hong Kong and increase funding for pro-Democracy movements in Asia.
"Revoking the 1992 Hong Kong Policy Act is a double-edged sword and one that should be wielded cautiously," Mike Fuchs, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a progressive DC think tank, told Business Insider.
Ending the policy "would hurt Beijing by closing off a backdoor through Hong Kong to receive preferred economic treatment because of the status that it has," said Fuchs. 
For reference, the US did $67.3 billion worth of business with Hong Kong in 2018.
Matthew Henderson, the director of the Asia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society, told Business Insider that the 1992 act allows the US to revisit the policy if China gets too involved in Hong Kong policy.
"From a Western perspective, it makes sense to remind Beijing that loss of benefits conferred under the Act would harm Hong Kong as a global financial and commercial centre — and also harm China's prosperity, to which Hong Kong still makes a very big contribution," Henderson said. 
"So Beijing would be wise not to erode Hong Kong's autonomy to the point that the Act's conditions cease to apply."
But both Henderson an Fuchs agreed, if the US does revoke the 1992 act, Hong Kongers will feel the effects first and foremost.

mardi 13 août 2019

U.S. Senate leader: Any violent crackdown in Hong Kong would be 'completely unacceptable'

By David Brunnstrom, Jeff Mason

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks with reporters following the weekly policy luncheons on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 7, 2019. 

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell warned China on Monday that any violent crackdown on protests in Hong Kong would be “completely unacceptable,” while Trump administration officials urged all sides to refrain from violence.
The people of Hong Kong are bravely standing up to the Chinese Communist Party as Beijing tries to encroach on their autonomy and freedom,” McConnell wrote in tweet.
“Any violent crackdown would be completely unacceptable. ... The world is watching.”
Increasingly violent demonstrations in Hong Kong have plunged the Chinese-ruled territory into its most serious crisis in decades, presenting Chinese dictator Xi Jinping with one of his biggest popular challenges and raising fears of direct intervention by Beijing.
Some Hong Kong legal experts say Chinese descriptions of some protesters’ actions as terrorism could lead to the use of extensive anti-terror laws and powers against them.
China’s People’s Armed Police have also assembled in the neighboring city of Shenzhen for exercises, the Chinese state-backed Global Times newspaper said.
On Tuesday, China’s state media said an unidentified official with the Foreign Ministry office in Hong Kong denounced the “arrogance and biases of some U.S. politicians”, adding that McConnell’s remarks sent protesters a “seriously mistaken signal”.
Donald Trump, who has been seeking a major deal to correct trade imbalances with China, drew criticism this month after he described the Hong Kong protests as “riots” and said they were a matter for China and Hong Kong to deal with as the territory was part of China.
On Monday a senior Trump administration official and a State Department spokeswoman urged all sides to refrain from violence, while stressing support for democracy.
The senior official reiterated Trump’s remark that it was a matter between Hong Kong and China, “with the understanding that ‘they’re looking for democracy and I think most people want democracy.’
“Societies are best served when diverse political views are respected and can be freely and peacefully expressed. The United States urges all sides to refrain from violence,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

CALL TO RESPECT AUTONOMY
A State Department spokeswoman repeated calls for Beijing to adhere to its commitments after its 1997 handover from British rule to allow Hong Kong a high degree of autonomy. 
She said it was important for the Hong Kong government to respect freedoms of speech and assembly
“We condemn violence and urge all sides to exercise restraint, but remain staunch in our support for freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly in Hong Kong,” she said.
“The ongoing demonstrations in Hong Kong reflect the sentiment of Hongkongers and their broad concerns about the erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy,” she added. 
“Freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly are core values that we share with Hong Kong; these freedoms must be vigorously protected.”
While some commentators have accused Trump of all but giving China a green light for a crackdown, Beijing has accused Washington of encouraging the protests and angrily denounced July meetings between Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence and Hong Kong publisher and democracy activist Jimmy Lai.
Trump has drawn criticism even from some normally supportive media. 
On Aug. 3, the conservative Washington Examiner called his Hong Kong remarks “a bizarre regurgitation of mainland Chinese propaganda” and added: “We hope this is Trump speaking off the cuff and not him selling out Hong Kong.”
On Monday, Trump’s national security adviser John Bolton told reporters on a visit to London he had talked about Hong Kong with British officials “as part of a general discussion about China.”
He rejected Chinese allegations that a U.S. diplomat was a “black hand” in the demonstrations as “ridiculous” and said it was “incumbent on the Chinese to live up to their obligations” on Hong Kong.
A spokesman for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said earlier that Britain was concerned about the latest violence in Hong Kong and called for calm from all sides.
Last week, State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus called China a “thuggish regime” for disclosing photographs and personal details of a U.S. diplomat who met with Hong Kong’s student leaders. 
On Friday, she said the reports had “gone from irresponsible to dangerous” and must stop.
Hong Kong’s airport canceled all flights on Monday, blaming demonstrators for the disruptions. China said the anti-government protests that have roiled the city through two summer months had begun to show “sprouts of terrorism.”

mardi 4 juin 2019

A Chinese mole right inside the Trump Cabinet

Elaine Chao family’s shipping company has deep ties to the Chinese elite and benefits from industrial policies in China that are roiling the Trump administration.
By Michael Forsythe, Eric Lipton, Keith Bradsher and Sui-Lee Wee




The mole: Elaine Chao, the transportation secretary, oversees the American maritime industry. Her family’s shipping company, Foremost Group, has deep ties to the Chinese government.

The email arrived in Washington before dawn.
An official at the American Embassy in Beijing was urgently seeking advice from the State Department about an “ethics question.”
“I am writing you because Mission China is in the midst of preparing for a visit from Department of Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao,” the official wrote in October 2017.
Chao’s office had made a series of unorthodox requests related to her first scheduled visit to China as a Trump cabinet member, according to people with knowledge of the email.
Among them: asking federal officials to help coordinate travel arrangements for at least one family member and include relatives in meetings with government officials.
A redacted email about a trip Chao was planning to take to China. A request to include family members at events raised ethical concerns.

In China, the Chaos are no ordinary family.
They run an American shipping company with deep ties to the economic and political elite in China, where most of the company’s business is centered. 
The trip was abruptly canceled by Chao after the ethics question was referred to officials in the State and Transportation Departments and, separately, after The New York Times and others made inquiries about her itinerary and companions.
“She had these relatives who were fairly wealthy and connected to the shipping industry,” said a State Department official who was involved in deliberations over the visit.
“Their business interests were affected by meetings.”
The move to notify Washington was unusual and a sign of how concerned members of the State Department were, said the official, who was not authorized to speak on behalf of the agency.
[The Chao family has deep ties to China. Here are five takeaways.]
David H. Rank, another State Department official, learned of the matter after he stepped down as deputy chief of mission in Beijing earlier in 2017.
“This was alarmingly inappropriate,” he said of the requests.
The Transportation Department did not provide a reason for the trip’s cancellation, though a spokesman later cited a cabinet meeting Trump had called at the time.
The spokesman said that there was "no link" between Chao’s actions as secretary and her family’s business interests in China.
Chao has no formal affiliation or stake in her family’s shipping business, Foremost Group.
But she and her husband, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, have received millions of dollars in gifts from her father, James, who ran the company until last year. 
And McConnell’s re-election campaigns have received more than $1 million in contributions from Chao’s family, including from her father and her sister Angela, now Foremost’s chief executive, who were both subjects of the State Department’s ethics question.

Chao with her husband, Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader; her father, James, a founder of Foremost; and her sister Angela, its chief executive.

Over the years, Chao has repeatedly used her connections and celebrity status in China to boost the profile of the company, which benefits handsomely from the expansive industrial policies in Beijing that are at the heart of diplomatic tensions with the United States.
Now, Chao is the top Trump official overseeing the American shipping industry, which is in steep decline and overshadowed by its Chinese competitors.
Her efforts on behalf of the family business — appearing at promotional events, joining her father in interviews with Chinese-language media — have come as Foremost has interacted with the Chinese state to a remarkable degree for an American company.
Foremost has received hundreds of millions of dollars in loan commitments from a bank run by the Chinese government, whose policies have been labeled by the Trump administration as threats to American security. 
The company’s primary business — delivering China’s iron ore and coal — is intertwined with industries caught up in a trade war with the United States. 
That dispute stems in part from the White House’s complaints that China is flooding the world with subsidized steel, undermining American producers.
Foremost, though a relatively small company in its sector, is responsible for a large portion of orders at one of China’s biggest state-funded shipyards, and has secured long-term charters with a Chinese state-owned steel maker as well as global commodity companies that guarantee it steady revenues.
In a rarity for foreigners, Angela and James Chao have served on the board of the holding company for China State Shipbuilding, a state-owned enterprise that makes ships for the Chinese military, along with Foremost and other customers.
Angela Chao is also on the board at the Bank of China, a top lender to the shipbuilder, and a former vice chairman of the Council of China’s Foreign Trade, a promotional group created by the Chinese government.
James Chao was not made available for an interview; a representative of the company received written questions from The Times two weeks ago, and the company responded with a fact sheet on Friday.
Though Foremost worked in the late 1960s on American government contracts to ship rice to Vietnam, according to James Chao’s biography, it has almost no footprint left in the United States, save for a modest corporate headquarters in Midtown Manhattan.
It registers its ships in Liberia and Hong Kong and owns them through companies in the Marshall Islands.
Since Elaine Chao became transportation secretary, records show, the agency budget has repeatedly called to cut programs intended to stabilize the financially troubled maritime industry in the United States, moving to cut new funding for federal grants to small commercial shipyards and federal loan guarantees to domestic shipbuilders.
Her agency’s budget has also tried to slash spending for a grant program that helps keep 60 American-flagged ships in service, and has tried to scale back plans to buy new ships that would train Americans as crew members. (In China, Chao’s family has paid for scholarships and a ship simulator to train Chinese seamen.)

The Chao family has provided funding for a ship simulator at Shanghai Maritime University and backed scholarships for training programs.

Congress, in bipartisan votes, has rejected the budget cuts, some of which have been offered up again for next year.
One opponent of the cuts has been Representative Alan Lowenthal, a California Democrat whose district includes one of the nation’s largest cargo ports.
“The Chinese government is massively engaged in maritime expansion as we have walked away from it,” he said in an interview.
“There is going to come a crisis, and we are going to call upon the U.S. maritime industry, and it is not going to be around.”
Elaine Chao declined to be interviewed.
The department spokesman said The Times’s reporting wove “together a web of innuendos and baseless inferences” in linking Chao’s work at Transportation to her family’s business operations.
Agency officials said the department under Chao had been a champion of the American maritime industry, adding that several proposed cuts had been made by previous administrations and that the Trump administration had since moved to bolster funding.
Chao, 66, was born in Taiwan to parents who had fled mainland China in the late 1940s and later settled in the United States when she was a schoolgirl.
She worked at Foremost in the 1970s but has had no formal role there in decades.
As her political stature has grown — she has served in the cabinet twice and has been married to McConnell for 26 years — Beijing has sought to flatter her family.
A government-owned publisher recently printed authorized biographies of her parents, releasing them at ceremonies attended by high-ranking members of the Communist Party.
On a visit last year to Beijing, Chao was presented with hand-drawn portraits of her parents from her counterpart in the transportation ministry.

On an official trip to Beijing last year, Chao received portraits of her parents from the Chinese transport minister, Li Xiaopeng, center left.

The Chao family’s ties to China have drawn some attention over the years. 
In 2001, The New Republic examined them in the context of the Republican Party’s softening tone toward the country.
When Chao was nominated as transportation secretary, ProPublica and others highlighted the intersection of her new responsibilities with her family’s business.
And in a book published last year, the author Peter Schweizer suggested the Chaos gave Beijing undue influence.
The Times found that the Chaos had an extraordinary proximity to power in China for an American family, marked not only by board memberships in state companies, but also by multiple meetings with the country’s former top leader, including one at his villa. 
That makes the Chaos stand out on both sides of the Pacific, with sterling political connections going to the pinnacle of power in the world’s two biggest economies.
Chao’s father, a founder of Foremost in 1964, has for decades cultivated a close relationship with Jiang Zemin, a schoolmate from Shanghai who rose to become China’s president. 
As the schoolmates crossed paths again in the 1980s, the Chaos reaped dividends from a radar company linked to Jiang that targeted sales to the Chinese military, documents filed with the Chinese government show.
Though Chao’s financial disclosure statements indicate she receives no income from Foremost, she made at least four trips to China with the company in the eight years between her job as labor secretary during the George W. Bush administration and her confirmation as transportation secretary in January 2017. 
And her father accompanied her on at least one trip that she took as labor secretary, in 2008, sitting in on meetings, including with China’s premier, one of the country’s top officials.
Public records show that she has benefited from the company’s success.
A gift to Chao and McConnell from her father in 2008 helped make McConnell, the Republican majority leader, one of the richest members of the Senate. 
And three decades worth of political donations have made the extended family a top contributor to the Republican Party of Kentucky, a wellspring of McConnell’s power.
This is a family with financial ties to a foreign government that is a strategic rival,” said Kathleen Clark, an anti-corruption expert at Washington University in St. Louis.
“It raises a question about whether those familial and financial ties affect Chao when she exercises judgment or gives advice on foreign and national security policy matters that involve China.”

A Family Business on the Rise


Elaine Chao, the transportation secretary, has been a steadfast booster of her family’s shipping business, which transports raw materials to fuel China’s heavy industries. 
In January 2017, as the Senate voted to confirm Chao, a bulk carrier ship sailed from Canada with a shipment of iron ore.
The ship, the Bao May, is owned by her family’s business, Foremost Group.
Its destination: an iron ore transfer terminal on Liangtan Island, south of Shanghai.
Two weeks later, after unloading its cargo in China, the Bao May set sail for Brazil to collect another shipment of iron ore, weaving through the Strait of Malacca and crossing the Indian Ocean.
The size of three football fields, the Bao May is too big to pass through the Suez or Panama Canals, so it must sail around the southern tip of Africa on its voyages to Atlantic Ocean destinations.
For the last two years, the Bao May has repeatedly made the round-tip journey between China and ports in Brazil and Canada.
On this trip, it arrived in Brazil in May 2017, docking at the Ponta da Madeira Maritime Terminal in São Luís, where ships load up with iron ore from Brazil's interior.
The Bao May was built in a Chinese shipyard and financed with loans from the Export-Import Bank of China, owned by the Chinese government. 
At the launch ceremony in Shanghai in 2010, the guest of honor was Chao. 
For years, the ship has been chartered by a state-owned Chinese steelmaker, giving Foremost a steady supply of revenue.
It is one of 19 ships owned by Foremost, which was founded by Chao’s father, James S.C. Chao, and is now run by her sister Angela.
While Foremost has its headquarters in Midtown Manhattan, its fleet is overwhelmingly focused on China. 
About 72 percent of the raw materials it has shipped since the beginning of 2018 has gone to China, according to figures from VesselsValue, a London-based firm that analyzes global shipping data.
Each year, Foremost ships transport hundreds of millions of tons of iron ore, coal and bauxite to China from ports around the globe. 
The shipments feed China’s industrial engine, especially its steel mills, whose products are part of an escalating trade dispute between China and the United States.

Four enormous gantry cranes rise on the banks of the Yangtze River near the East China Sea.
In their shadow thousands of workers assemble cargo ships, each about as long as three football fields.
It is here, at the Shanghai Waigaoqiao shipyard, that Foremost Group’s newest ship, the Xin May, was built. 
Six similar ships are set to be built in the next several years, all part of an order by Foremost announced in December 2017 at the Harvard Club in New York.
Foremost first placed an order with the state-owned company in 1988 and over the decades has been its biggest North American customer, according to the shipbuilder. 
The relationship is so tight that Foremost’s offices in Shanghai are in the shipbuilder’s 25-story tower.
We are committed to continuing to build ships in China,” Angela Chao said at the Harvard Club announcement, which was attended by the top official in China’s New York consulate.
“My father was a pioneer in internationalizing the Chinese shipbuilding market, and it has been over 30 years that he has continuously ordered ships in China.”

The newest addition to the Foremost fleet, the Xin May, is one of multiple ships the company has ordered from the Shanghai Waigaoqiao shipyard.

Foremost has relied on the Export-Import Bank of China, or China EximBank, to finance at least four ships in the past decade. 
Its loans often come with lower interest rates and more generous repayment schedules than those made through some commercial lenders.
As of 2015, the bank had made at least $300 million available to Foremost, it said at the time.
Angela Chao, in the interview with The Times, said that 2015 was the last year the company borrowed from the lender, describing its terms as less attractive than those of non-Chinese banks.
She said the company never borrowed — “not even close” — $300 million, a figure she had not previously heard.
“They are not a big part of our financing,” she said.
The Chao family’s connections run deep with the Chinese leadership, documents in China show.
As civil war raged across the country in the 1940s, Mr. Chao attended Jiao Tong University in Shanghai.
A schoolmate was Jiang Zemin, who stayed in China after the Communist victory and ultimately became president.
Chao went with the defeated Nationalists to Taiwan, where he became the youngest person to qualify as a ship’s captain, according to his biography.
Chao left for the United States in 1958, but a thaw in relations sparked by Richard M. Nixon drew him back to his homeland in 1972, the first of a flurry of trips that established him as a successful member of the Chinese diaspora.
Chao got exceptional access.
In 1984 he was invited to Beijing to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the People’s Republic and meet with the country’s top leader, Deng Xiaoping, according to materials at a museum in Shanghai dedicated to Chao’s wife, Ruth Mulan Chu Chao, who died in 2007.
Also in 1984, as China emerged from decades of political and economic turmoil, Ruth Chao bought a stake in a Chinese company that manufactured marine equipment, including radars, in partnership with Raytheon, the American defense contractor, according to Chinese corporate documents.

In 1984, the Chao family took a stake in a marine electronic equipment company that targeted the Chinese military for sales. The venture was linked to Jiang Zemin, James Chao’s former schoolmate and a future president of China.

The investment, not previously reported, was held by a Panamanian company.
The Chinese company, documents show, praised the “support for the construction of the nation” shown by Ruth Chao, identifying her as James’s wife and both of them as American citizens.
The now-defunct company targeted the Chinese military for sales of some of its gear, and a principal partner was a state-owned factory under the Ministry of Electronics Industry, which was led at the time by Jiang, according to corporate documents and a former employee.
The employee, Zheng Chaoman, recalled the involvement of “the father of Elaine Chao.”
Within months, it generated enough revenue for Chao to donate profits to a foundation he had established in Shanghai, according to an announcement by the local government. 
The foundation sponsors training scholarships for merchant seamen, his wife’s biography said.
In the aftermath of the deadly suppression of pro-democracy demonstrations on Tiananmen Square in June 1989, the Chaos asked to divest their 25 percent stake in the company.
Two months earlier, Elaine Chao had been confirmed by the Senate to a senior political appointment, as deputy transportation secretary under George H. W. Bush.

Chinese AmnesiaThe Transportation Department spokesman said Chao did not know anything about the venture. Angela Chao, in the interview, said her father did not “remember any ownership, and we can’t find anything on it.”
The family’s other business ties in China remained, including work that year by China State Shipbuilding on two new cargo ships for Foremost.

Chao in 1989, when she was deputy transportation secretary under George H.W. Bush. She would also serve in the cabinet of George W. Bush, as labor secretary.

That August, Chao met with Jiang, who had been named general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, the country’s most powerful position.
Their hourlong meeting inside the leadership compound adjacent to the Forbidden City, together with the head of the state shipbuilding company, was described as “friendly” in the official People’s Daily newspaper.
The two former schoolmates would meet at least five more times during Jiang’s tenure as general secretary, according to a review of publicly available documents.

A Celebrity Face for the Company
As the first Chinese-American to serve as a cabinet secretary — eight years as labor secretary — Elaine Chao became an instant celebrity in China during the George W. Bush administration.
Her family was a beneficiary of her newfound fame.
During a trip to China in August 2008 to represent the United States at the closing of the Olympic Games, Chao took her father to several official meetings with Chinese leaders, including one with the country’s premier, Wen Jiabao, according to diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.
At the time, Chao was chairman of Foremost and a board member of China State Shipbuilding.
When she left government during the Obama years, she continued to put her celebrity status to use on behalf of the family business.

Chao at a 2009 interview in Wuhan, where she was appointed an international adviser.

In 2010, she traveled to Shanghai with her father for the delivery ceremony of a cargo ship, the Bao May. 
The ship soon became a workhorse for Foremost, hauling raw materials to China from around the world under a seven-year charter with a subsidiary of a state-owned steel maker. 
Foremost paid for the Bao May and another ship with up to $89.6 million in loans from China EximBank, corporate records in Hong Kong show.
The next year, Chao was back in Shanghai for the launch of another ship, and in 2013, she traveled to Beijing with her father and her sister Angela for a meeting with the chairman of China State Shipbuilding, according to a company announcement.
Chao joined her family two years later at the signing of a loan for Foremost at China EximBank’s grand hall in Beijing.
The loan, for $75 million, was made jointly with a Taiwanese lender to build two cargo ships.

China EximBank’s website celebrates a 2015 loan signing with Foremost. The event was attended by Chao and members of her family.

The Transportation Department spokesman said it was “probably appropriate” for Chao to take her father to meetings in 2008 as her “plus-one,” and said her visits were done as a private citizen.
Angela Chao said her sister attended Foremost events “as a family member.”
“Foremost was founded in 1964; the company is 55 years old,” she added.
“We were around and we were well respected well before Elaine was in anything. We predate her; she doesn’t predate us.”
The flurry of visits coincided with Foremost’s growing contributions to China’s globalized steel and shipping industries.
Today, Foremost’s fleet primarily serves the Chinese market, hauling bulk cargo such as iron ore, coal and bauxite. 
Of the 152 voyages made by its ships between Jan. 1, 2018, and April 12, 2019, 91 have been to or from China, accounting for 72 percent of Foremost’s total tonnage during that period, according to figures compiled by VesselsValue, a company that tracks shipping data.
Angela Chao said that Foremost did not “control where the ships go, so we’re like a taxicab.”
During her eight years out of government, Elaine Chao extended her connections in China, according to a review of Chinese websites and other public materials.
For example, she was appointed in 2009 to an advisory group in Wuhan, where the steel maker with the Foremost charter is based.
Such appointments are sought after for the access they provide to local leaders.
That same year, she was granted an honorary professorship at Fudan University, and in 2010, she was awarded an honorary doctorate from Jiao Tong University.
With Trump’s election, Chao was asked to join the administration.
During her confirmation hearing she did not discuss her family’s extensive ties to the Chinese maritime industry, and she did not disclose the various Chinese accolades she had received. 
The Senate’s written questionnaire requires nominees to list all honorary positions.

Destroying American Shipbuilding IndustryChao has spoken repeatedly about her commitment to the American maritime industry, including during her confirmation hearing in 2017.
“I’m of an age where I have seen two wars in pivotal areas of the world,” she told the Senate Commerce Committee, with her father seated behind her.
“If we did not have the merchant marine assets to assist the gray hulls on these campaigns, the military naval campaigns, our country would not have been able to supply our troops, bring the necessary equipment.”
But without Congress putting up roadblocks, the Trump administration’s budgetary actions proposed during her tenure would have reduced federal funding for programs that support the shipbuilding industry and ships that operate under American flags.

Chao at the White House after Trump signed an executive order on the transition of service members into the Merchant Marine.

Plans drafted during the Obama administration had called for building up to five new, state-of-the-art ships big enough to train 600 cadets each to help the American military move equipment and supplies worldwide, especially during wartime.
But after Chao became secretary, the agency’s budget proposed buying old cargo ships instead and renovating them.
Congress balked at the cost-cutting measure — one Democratic lawmaker mocked the agency’s plan to “buy a bunch of rusty old hulks” — and restored the funding.
More recently, the agency budget pushed to shrink the size of one of the new ships, again provoking bipartisan protests from Congress.
“Given the administration’s strong commitment to American manufacturing and to being sure that we can adequately control the seas, the targeting of programs that help the maritime industry remain strong doesn’t make sense to me,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the Republican who leads the panel overseeing the Transportation Department budget.
“It is inconsistent with the administration’s overall goals.”
The agency budget in 2017 and 2018 also proposed reducing annual grants for the Maritime Security Program, which help American ships pay crews and cover the cost of meeting safety and training requirements.
It also moved in the last three years to eliminate new funding for a grant program that helps small shipyards stay in business, as well as a program that provides loan guarantees for the construction or reconstruction of American-flagged vessels.
Agency officials noted that many of the cuts were forced on the department by the White House, and that some of the same programs had been previously targeted, only to see the money restored by Congress, as happened with the Trump cuts.
But objections continue, including questions about why, despite repeated promises, Chao has not issued a detailed strategic plan for stabilizing the United States’ shrinking fleet.
Fair Kim, a retired Coast Guard deputy commander who works at an association that promotes the American shipping industry, said Chao had a disappointing maritime record.
“If you preach America first, why not promote the U.S.-flagged fleet at the expense of foreign-flagged ships?” he asked.
“This administration should be very friendly to us.”

A China-Friendly Approach
The Trump administration has made the rivalry with China a core tenet of American foreign policy, concluding that decades of accommodation has reinforced the country’s authoritarian rule and undermined the interests of the United States.
“Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic and military tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the United States,” Vice President Mike Pence said during a speech in October.
None of that, however, has kept Chao from maintaining China-friendly relations, including engaging with the Chinese media about her family’s shipping business and multiple other subjects. 
During a televised interview, one prominent Chinese reporter, Tian Wei, described Chao as “a bridge” between Beijing and the Trump administration.
Chao’s official calendar, obtained by The Times through a public records request, shows at least 21 interviews or meetings with Chinese-language news organizations in her first year as transportation secretary.
In November 2017, she met for lunch at her office with Ma Jing, then the top official in the United States for CGTN, the China state television network.
The network has been under growing pressure from the Justice Department to detail its ties to the Chinese state as part of a stepped-up enforcement of foreign influence laws, and in March, Ma and a dozen other CGTN employees in Washington were reported to have been recalled to China.
In an interview in April 2017, Chao was photographed with her father next to a Transportation Department flag.
Her father told the reporter how he had traveled on Air Force One and discussed “business” with the president.
He also took the opportunity to talk up his daughter’s new role in the administration.
“It’s an honor for us Chinese,” Chao said to The China Press, a publication in the United States.
【Interviewed With Elaine Chao & James Chao】美国交通部长赵小兰与父亲赵锡成专访CreditCreditVideo by 侨报 The China Press
The interview was first highlighted by Politico, which noted that Chao had made multiple media appearances with her father.
Chao’s schedule also shows that she attended an August 2017 event in New York celebrating the signing of a Foremost deal with Sumitomo Group, a Japanese company with mass transit projects in the United States, including California and Illinois, that fall under her oversight. 
The spokesman said she attended in a "personal" capacity and did not discuss agency business.
Marilyn L. Glynn, a former general counsel at the Office of Government Ethics, questioned Chao’s proximity to Foremost, saying she should recuse herself from decisions that broadly impacted the shipping industry.
“She might be tempted to make sure her family company is not adversely affected in any policy choices, or it might even just appear that way,” Ms. Glynn said.
Chao’s first trip to China as transportation secretary was made last April amid an escalating trade war, six months later than originally planned.

Chao meeting with Li, the Chinese transport minister, in Beijing last year.

The original trip had been described by the department as a “bilateral meeting” with Chao’s Chinese counterpart to discuss disaster response, infrastructure and related subjects.
Eight days before the planned start of the October 2017 trip, when contacted by The Times, Chao’s office said it could not provide a list of who would accompany her.
But the embassy in Beijing had received requests to accommodate Ms. Chao’s family members, according to interviews with State Department officials involved in the planning, as well as a redacted email obtained by The Times through a public records lawsuit.
Angela Chao said in the interview that she was already planning to be in Beijing to attend a Bank of China board meeting, and that her husband, the investor Jim Breyer, also had business in the Chinese capital.
But she said she was unaware of her sister’s travel plans.
Angela Chao was among the family members mentioned in the State Department discussions about the visit, according to a United States official.
The email, with the subject “ethics question,” had come from Evan T. Felsing, a senior economic officer for the State Department in Shanghai.
Mr. Felsing, now based in India, declined to comment.
Other correspondence also signaled unease among American diplomats over whom Elaine Chao intended to take on the trip and the topics they would discuss with Chinese officials. 
Emails indicate that ethics lawyers in both the State and Transportation Departments weighed in.
“They would not have raised a question like this about a cabinet secretary unless it was something really serious,” said Mr. Rank, the former deputy chief of mission in Beijing.
The agency spokesman confirmed a request on behalf of Chao’s relatives, but did not say in his written response to questions whether they were scheduled to attend official government events.
When Chao finally traveled to China last April, no relatives were present.
She met with top leaders, including the premier, Li Keqiang.
While there, she sought to soothe hard feelings between China and the Trump administration in an interview with a government-run broadcaster.
She suggested some of the tensions resulted from cultural differences.
“America is a very young country — it’s very dynamic — it doesn’t have a long period of history,” she said in an interview with CGTN.
“So there are not so many rules and regulations in terms of behavior, whereas some other countries that have long histories, it may be a little bit more different. We have to understand the Chinese and how they see things, and I think the Chinese need to understand how America sees things.”
Even this trip did not proceed entirely by the book.
Chao broke with the standard practice for government employees and flew on a Chinese state airline instead of an American carrier.
Chao’s economy-class round-trip ticket with Air China cost $6,784, according to information obtained through a public records request.
The flight was booked through a code-share arrangement with United Airlines.
A less expensive ticket was available on a nonstop United flight, according to an airline official.
The agency spokesman would not say what class Chao flew in, only that the ticket was booked in economy.

A Windfall for Mitch McConnell
When a delegation of local Chinese Communist Party leaders visited Washington in 2017, Chao’s office arranged for them to be photographed with Chao and her father.
Her aides pulled another string.
“U.S. Capitol Tour for VIP Guests,” read the subject line of an email sent by Chao’s aides to the staff of her husband, McConnell.
The senator’s staff obliged, arranging an “off limits” tour for Chao’s guests, who were visiting from the home region of her mother.
“The delegation was thrilled to get the VIP treatment by your office and were particularly excited to hear that the leader’s office was normally off limits to normal guests,” an aide to Chao later wrote to McConnell’s staff.
It was a small favor, but one that reflected the political partnership at the center of the marriage between Chao and McConnell.

The Chao family has been a wellspring of support for McConnell over the years, contributing over $1 million to him and to political action committees associated with him.

In 1989, shortly after their first date (at the Saudi ambassador’s home near Washington), McConnell was preparing for a re-election campaign.
Greetings from Chao came in classic Washington fashion: a string of campaign donations, totaling $10,000, from Chao, her father, her mother, her sister May and May’s husband, Jeffrey Hwang, according to Federal Election Commission records.
Over the next 30 years, the extended Chao family would be an important source of political cash for McConnell, himself one of the most formidable Republican fund-raisers in American politics.
The extended Chao family is among the top donors to the Republican Party of Kentucky, giving a combined $525,000 over two decades.
One of Chao’s sisters, Christine, the general counsel at Foremost, was the second-biggest contributor to the super PAC Kentuckians for Strong Leadership in 2014.
She gave $400,000 to the organization, which identified McConnell’s re-election as its highest priority that year.
In all, from 1989 through 2018, 13 members of the extended Chao family gave a combined $1.66 million to Republican candidates and committees, including $1.1 million to McConnell and political action committees tied to him, according to F.E.C. records.
“I’m proud to have had the support of my family over the years,” McConnell said in a statement.

Chao and Mr. McConnell in 2014 at the Harvard Club in New York, where Foremost celebrated its 50th anniversary and signed a contract with a Japanese shipbuilder.

The family’s wealth has also benefited McConnell personally.
In 2008, Chao’s father gave the couple a gift valued between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal disclosures.
McConnell, never a wealthy man, vaulted up the moneyed rankings in the Senate; as of 2018 he was the 10th wealthiest senator, according to Roll Call, the Capitol Hill newspaper.
David Popp, a spokesman for McConnell, said the gift from Chao was in honor of Elaine Chao’s mother.
Over the years, McConnell has also participated in Chao family events and trips related to the family’s business and charitable giving.
In 1993, he and Chao traveled with her father to Beijing at the invitation of China State Shipbuilding and met top officials.
He celebrated Foremost’s 50th anniversary in 2014 at the Harvard Club in Manhattan, witnessing the signing of a contract with a Japanese shipbuilder.

Pillows with the seal of the United States Senate at Foremost’s headquarters in Manhattan.

And he attended the dedication in 2016 of a building at the Harvard Business School named after Chao’s mother.
Chao and three of her sisters had attended the school.
McConnell’s connection to the family was hard to miss when a reporter recently visited the Foremost headquarters in Manhattan.
There, in the reception area, were two gray pillows emblazoned with the seal of the United States Senate.