Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Chinese fifth column. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Chinese fifth column. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 19 novembre 2019

Chinese Fifth Column

Zuckerberg’s Anti-Tyranny Rhetoric Roils Chinese Employees
Tensions between Facebook’s large community of Chinese employees and the company’s management have been on the rise since Zuckerberg became more critical of Beijing. 
By Wayne Ma



Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Georgetown address about free speech last month drew hostility and skeptical commentary from his Chinese employees. 
Zuckerberg’s criticism of Chinese video app TikTok and China’s censorship of the internet renewed long-standing complaints that Facebook’s management is biased against communist China, according to one Chinese employee who saw messages in Facebook’s internal discussion groups.
Tensions between Facebook management and its large fifth column of Chinese employees have been on the upswing over the past year or so, since Zuckerberg abandoned efforts to get Facebook allowed back into China and instead became more critical of Beijing. 
Many of the company’s newer Chinese employees were hired from mainland China and are unapologetically supportive of the Chinese government.

Facebook is grappling with its large fifth column of Chinese employees, some of whom are becoming more vocal and critical in internal company forums over what they claim is a bias against communist China.

But in the past couple of months complaints of anti-China bias have overlapped with unhappiness about working conditions at Facebook, crystallized by the suicide of a Chinese employee at Facebook headquarters. 

Infiltration by Chinese Spies
The increasingly vocal criticism by Chinese employees is the latest example of how workers at big tech companies such as Google and Amazon have turned pro-China activists, protesting their employers’ business dealings with the U.S. government and complaining about other issues. 
But in this case, Zuckerberg has to walk a fine line, trying to keep an aggressive group of Chinese employees happy while not alienating Facebook’s many anti-China critics in Washington, D.C. 
If he goes too far to appease the Chinese employees, he could hand his critics in Washington more ammunition.
“We’re seeing Chinese employees emerge as a dangerous force from tech companies,” said Matt Sheehan, a fellow at the Paulson Institute whose research focuses on the relationship between Silicon Valley and China. 
Further complicating the challenges facing Zuckerberg are comments by longtime Facebook board member Peter Thiel, who accused Google of working with China’s military and that its leadership has been infiltrated by Chinese spies
Thiel said Google was behaving in a “seemingly treasonous” manner. 

A Large Chinese Fifth Column
The ranks of Chinese workers at Facebook—the vast majority of whom are software engineers and data and research scientists—have been increasing in recent years, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees.
The total number couldn’t be learned, although it likely numbers in the thousands (Facebook employed nearly 36,000 people as of Dec. 31). 
Facebook has more Chinese as a share of its U.S. workforce than Apple, Google or Microsoft, according to an analysis of federal filings. 
Some 42% of its U.S. employees were Chinese in 2018, up from about a third in 2014, the filings show. At Google, the percentage in 2018 was 37% and at Apple it was 23%. 
Facebook’s share of green card sponsorships for Chinese employees also has been growing annually since 2013, rising from 25% to 44% of sponsorships in the nine months ending in June.
The internal group Chinese@FB, which Facebook hosts for its Chinese employees, counts more than 6,000 members and is the largest of its kind at the company, current and former employees say.
One former Chinese employee, who worked at Facebook between 2015 and 2019, said there were so many Chinese employees that he sometimes could get away with speaking only Chinese at work. 
Other former Chinese employees recounted being asked by their managers to be mindful of non-Chinese speakers after holding work conversations in Chinese.Chinese workers said they were drawn to Facebook’s results-focused culture and by what they said was its willingness to quickly sponsor employees for permanent residency in the U.S. 
Many Chinese employees hired a decade or so ago rose through the ranks to become directors and vice presidents, which has led to even more hiring of Chinese workers, according to current and former employees. But as the number of Chinese hires has increased, Facebook has had to rely more on mainland China as a source of new talent. 
A decade ago, many of Facebook’s Chinese hires were employees with graduate degrees from American universities who had spent years getting used to the country’s culture.  
In contrast, many of these newer hires haven’t spent as much time in the U.S. and still get their news from China’s state-controlled media and use Chinese social media to keep in touch with friends and family back home, several current and former Chinese employees said. 
They don’t share the U.S. view of the internet as a haven for free speech and open debate.
These employees added that China’s rise as an economic, technological and political power in recent years has made Chinese nationals more assertive about their country’s place in the world.

National Security Risk
Facebook has taken a number of steps in the past year that have been interpreted by its Chinese employees as hostile to the Chinese government. 
Last year Facebook invited Taiwan’s president to a Facebook-sponsored event in Taipei promoting the territory’s economy and e-commerce industry. 
Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen posed for photos with Facebook Vice President for Asia-Pacific Dan Neary and gave a speech highlighting Taiwan’s strong ties with Facebook. 
Chinese employees said in internal groups that the meeting legitimized Taiwan’s claim to self-rule and jeopardized Facebook’s chances of entering China. 
Simon Milner, Facebook vice president of public policy for Asia-Pacific, was forced to defend the event in the messaging groups, according to employees who saw the messages.
Zuckerberg’s public comments have also turned more critical of communist China. 
In March, for instance, Zuckerberg said Facebook would never host data in countries with a track record of violating human rights and last month he said it was never able to reach an agreement with Chinese authorities over how to operate its services free from censorship.
Also this year, Facebook’s Milner visited Hong Kong where he met with a number of local lawmakers and government officials, according to two people familiar with the meetings, which were announced in Facebook’s internal groups. 
The meeting sparked online complaints after Milner met with Alvin Yeung, a Hong Kong pro-democracy legislator, saying the meeting could be viewed as legitimizing pro-democracy demonstrators’ claims to self-autonomy, the people said.
The pro-China activism within the Chinese employee community, and the criticisms of the company they sometimes spark, has alarmed some senior Facebook executives, said a person who is familiar with management’s thinking. 
Some executives, including David Wei, a Facebook vice president of engineering many Chinese Facebook employees said acts as an informal liaison between senior management and Chinese employees, are closely monitoring the internal message groups and have moved to clamp down on discussions when they get heated, the person said. 
For instance, in September, Wei weighed in, urging calm.
“I would encourage everyone in the discussion to try your best to understand each other’s point of view,” he wrote in a post on Chinese@FB. 
“When a discussion gets heated, consider having a tea time in person. Our respectful communication policy ask is that we don’t attempt to convert people’s political views.”
Facebook didn’t respond to a request for comment about these specific incidents with Chinese employees. 

lundi 16 septembre 2019

A Country Under the (Chinese) Influence

'You must be a potential leader': Labor MP's staffer links to China's Communist Party
By Lisa Visentin






Australia's Chinese fifth column: John Zhang (second from the left) with NSW Labor MLC Shaoquett Moselmane (far right) at a function at NSW Parliament in July 2018. 

A NSW Labor MP linked to Chinese organisations hired a staffer who completed a propaganda training course in Beijing run by the Chinese Communist Party.
Upper house MLC Shaoquett Moselmane, who gave a speech last year proclaiming a "new world order" was needed for China to reach its potential, appointed John Zhang to his parliamentary office at the beginning of 2019.
Moselmane has taken nine privately-funded trips to China since entering Parliament in 2009. Disclosure records show his transport and hospitality costs were met by Chinese government officials or agencies.
Zhang is listed as a vice-chairman of Australia China Economics, Trade and Culture Association (ACETCA) on the organisation's now-defunct website, which China experts say has become a leading Chinese Communist Party-aligned organisation in Australia.
In 2013 Zhang participated in a training course organised by the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office, a branch within China's State Council, the highest organ of state administration. 
It was held at the Chinese Academy of Governance -- the same institution which trains senior cadres of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Former Chinese consulate official Chen Yonglin, who defected to Australia in 2005, said the training courses were typically invitation-only and were targeted at overseas Chinese community leaders.
"They are selected to be trained by the Chinese embassy or consulate which recommends them to the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office. Not everyone can go. You must be a potential leader not simply a small pawn," Mr Chen said.
Mr Chen, who trained at Academy of Governance in 2000 before being promoted to a senior government official, said the leadership courses are "directly run by the CCP".
"They (participants) gather together in Beijing and listen to lectures of senior Chinese propaganda officials and United Front officials," he said.
Zhang's trip was documented in the 2013 Yearbook of Chinese in Australia, which includes short biographies of prominent Chinese figures. 
Zhang is listed as a member of the book's editorial committee.


A typical Australian Quisling: Shaoquett Moselman.


The yearbook was described as a "patriotic product, endorsed by the PRC and lauded in the [CCP newspaper] People’s Daily" by China historian Geoff Wade in a review for a journal published by the Australian National University's College of Asia and the Pacific.
Zhang did not respond to the Herald's questions. Moselmane confirmed Zhang had been employed for "just under nine months" on a one-day per week basis.
"He assists with multicultural and constituent matters," Moselman said.
In addition to his senior role in ACETCA, Zhang has previously been chairman of the Australian Shanghainese Association. 
Moselmane is a member of the association and a member of the Australian Chinese Association.
The three organisations were accused by CCP influence experts Clive Hamilton and Alex Joske in a 2018 submission to federal Parliament of being linked to the Chinese government.
The submission named the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC), once headed by Chinese billionaire Huang Xiangmo, as the "most active and visible arms of the CCP's interference operations in Australian social and political life".
Huang quit as the chairman of the ACPPRC in 2017 and is at the centre of a NSW corruption inquiry into claims he illegally donated $100,000 to NSW Labor.
Dr Feng Chongyi, an associate professor in China Studies at University of Technology, Sydney, said ACETCA had "almost taken over" the role of the ACPPRC as one of the leading Chinese community groups in Australia.
"Due to the Huang Xiangmo affair the ACPPRC has been tarnished. The Chinese authorities need to support a new organisation as a replacement,"
Dr Feng said.
In a heavily criticised speech at a function in NSW Parliament House last year, Moselmane said the “global media is in the hands of China’s opponents” and China needed to "force a change to the rules and create a new world order” to realise its potential.

mercredi 7 août 2019

Chinese Fifth Column

FARA should apply to Confucius Institutes
BY ANDY KEISER

Under Xi Jinping's consolidated power, China is working diligently to supplant the United States as the world's top economic and military power. 
That includes a comprehensive effort to influence American K-12 and higher educational students with a favorable view of the Communist Chinese government to shape U.S. policy over the long-term.
This influence operation by a hostile foreign power, led by China's state-controlled Confucius Institutes, should trigger the Justice Department to require a Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filing by the institutes and its employees.
FARA requires anyone working at the behest of a foreign government to register with the Department of Justice. 
Originally written to combat propaganda, FARA also covers lobbying and public relations. 
FARA is a content-neutral disclosure statute that is designed to expose foreign associations to help ensure transparency and accountability in public policy.
Confucius Institutes are extensions of the Chinese government, plain and simple. 
They are owned and controlled by the government in Beijing and are overseen by the Office of Chinese Language International, commonly known as Hanban, a division of the Chinese Ministry of Education.
The Chinese government spends billions of dollars annually on propaganda activities promoted through Confucius Institutes.
 
Primarily targeted to the U.S., there are more than 100 Confucius Institutes in the American universities and colleges that have opted into the programing. 
Confucius Institutes have expanded their reach to include K-12 education through an effort called "Confucius Classrooms."
The underhanded genius behind Confucius Institutes is that they operate under the benign guise of teaching Chinese language, culture and history while simultaneously ensuring that they can restrict speech, control curriculum and force educational institutions to choose Confucius Institute faculty from a pre-approved list of teachers provided by the Hanban.
According to a letter Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent last year to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Confucius Institutes "require the teaching to ignore human rights abuses, and stress that Taiwan and Tibet are part of China, among other restrictions."
Institute presence, particularly on U.S. college campuses, can also be a threat to economic and national security. 
The Chinese government can hand-pick employees at Confucius Institutes and use them as its eyes and ears or task them to steal sensitive, valuable university research. 
The transparency of a FARA filing would at least give more insight to U.S. counterintelligence professionals and to the public about the scope and scale of Confucius Institute activities.
According to Grassley's letter, a Chinese government official stated that the "Confucius Institute is an appealing brand for expanding our culture abroad. It has made an important contribution toward improving our soft power... using the excuse of teaching Chinese language, everything looks reasonable and logical."
Others have taken note. 
The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Senators Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Tom Carper (D-Del.), released a bipartisan report in 2015 that detailed the activities of Confucius Institutes. 
Among several alarming findings, it details that since 2006 the Chinese government has given more than $158 million to fund Confucius Institutes in the U.S. 
It has veto authority over events and speakers at the institutes, and controls every aspect of their operations in the United States, including staff members pledging to protect Chinese national interests.
Grassley recently introduced the Foreign Agents Disclosure and Registration Enhancement Act of 2019 to beef up FARA enforcement and held a hearing on foreign threats to taxpayer funded research, which focused extensively on China's activities on university campuses. 
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has led a series of efforts against Chinese influence and espionage operations targeting American higher education, having secured a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 prohibiting the Department of Defense from funding Confucius Institutes.
Sen. Cruz has also introduced legislation called the Stop Higher Education Espionage and Theft Act to further crack down on Confucius Institutes, which he called "the velvet glove around the iron fist of their campaigns on our campuses."
The Chinese government's desire to influence our public policy through propaganda, conduct aggressive espionage on our soil and steal our intellectual property is real and hard to overestimate. The activities occurring at Confucius Institutes to achieve China's goals undoubtedly trigger the requirements of FARA. 
The Department of Justice should take immediate action to provide the type of transparency needed to help protect our nation.

mardi 4 juin 2019

A Chinese mole right inside the Trump Cabinet

Elaine Chao family’s shipping company has deep ties to the Chinese elite and benefits from industrial policies in China that are roiling the Trump administration.
By Michael Forsythe, Eric Lipton, Keith Bradsher and Sui-Lee Wee




The mole: Elaine Chao, the transportation secretary, oversees the American maritime industry. Her family’s shipping company, Foremost Group, has deep ties to the Chinese government.

The email arrived in Washington before dawn.
An official at the American Embassy in Beijing was urgently seeking advice from the State Department about an “ethics question.”
“I am writing you because Mission China is in the midst of preparing for a visit from Department of Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao,” the official wrote in October 2017.
Chao’s office had made a series of unorthodox requests related to her first scheduled visit to China as a Trump cabinet member, according to people with knowledge of the email.
Among them: asking federal officials to help coordinate travel arrangements for at least one family member and include relatives in meetings with government officials.
A redacted email about a trip Chao was planning to take to China. A request to include family members at events raised ethical concerns.

In China, the Chaos are no ordinary family.
They run an American shipping company with deep ties to the economic and political elite in China, where most of the company’s business is centered. 
The trip was abruptly canceled by Chao after the ethics question was referred to officials in the State and Transportation Departments and, separately, after The New York Times and others made inquiries about her itinerary and companions.
“She had these relatives who were fairly wealthy and connected to the shipping industry,” said a State Department official who was involved in deliberations over the visit.
“Their business interests were affected by meetings.”
The move to notify Washington was unusual and a sign of how concerned members of the State Department were, said the official, who was not authorized to speak on behalf of the agency.
[The Chao family has deep ties to China. Here are five takeaways.]
David H. Rank, another State Department official, learned of the matter after he stepped down as deputy chief of mission in Beijing earlier in 2017.
“This was alarmingly inappropriate,” he said of the requests.
The Transportation Department did not provide a reason for the trip’s cancellation, though a spokesman later cited a cabinet meeting Trump had called at the time.
The spokesman said that there was "no link" between Chao’s actions as secretary and her family’s business interests in China.
Chao has no formal affiliation or stake in her family’s shipping business, Foremost Group.
But she and her husband, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, have received millions of dollars in gifts from her father, James, who ran the company until last year. 
And McConnell’s re-election campaigns have received more than $1 million in contributions from Chao’s family, including from her father and her sister Angela, now Foremost’s chief executive, who were both subjects of the State Department’s ethics question.

Chao with her husband, Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader; her father, James, a founder of Foremost; and her sister Angela, its chief executive.

Over the years, Chao has repeatedly used her connections and celebrity status in China to boost the profile of the company, which benefits handsomely from the expansive industrial policies in Beijing that are at the heart of diplomatic tensions with the United States.
Now, Chao is the top Trump official overseeing the American shipping industry, which is in steep decline and overshadowed by its Chinese competitors.
Her efforts on behalf of the family business — appearing at promotional events, joining her father in interviews with Chinese-language media — have come as Foremost has interacted with the Chinese state to a remarkable degree for an American company.
Foremost has received hundreds of millions of dollars in loan commitments from a bank run by the Chinese government, whose policies have been labeled by the Trump administration as threats to American security. 
The company’s primary business — delivering China’s iron ore and coal — is intertwined with industries caught up in a trade war with the United States. 
That dispute stems in part from the White House’s complaints that China is flooding the world with subsidized steel, undermining American producers.
Foremost, though a relatively small company in its sector, is responsible for a large portion of orders at one of China’s biggest state-funded shipyards, and has secured long-term charters with a Chinese state-owned steel maker as well as global commodity companies that guarantee it steady revenues.
In a rarity for foreigners, Angela and James Chao have served on the board of the holding company for China State Shipbuilding, a state-owned enterprise that makes ships for the Chinese military, along with Foremost and other customers.
Angela Chao is also on the board at the Bank of China, a top lender to the shipbuilder, and a former vice chairman of the Council of China’s Foreign Trade, a promotional group created by the Chinese government.
James Chao was not made available for an interview; a representative of the company received written questions from The Times two weeks ago, and the company responded with a fact sheet on Friday.
Though Foremost worked in the late 1960s on American government contracts to ship rice to Vietnam, according to James Chao’s biography, it has almost no footprint left in the United States, save for a modest corporate headquarters in Midtown Manhattan.
It registers its ships in Liberia and Hong Kong and owns them through companies in the Marshall Islands.
Since Elaine Chao became transportation secretary, records show, the agency budget has repeatedly called to cut programs intended to stabilize the financially troubled maritime industry in the United States, moving to cut new funding for federal grants to small commercial shipyards and federal loan guarantees to domestic shipbuilders.
Her agency’s budget has also tried to slash spending for a grant program that helps keep 60 American-flagged ships in service, and has tried to scale back plans to buy new ships that would train Americans as crew members. (In China, Chao’s family has paid for scholarships and a ship simulator to train Chinese seamen.)

The Chao family has provided funding for a ship simulator at Shanghai Maritime University and backed scholarships for training programs.

Congress, in bipartisan votes, has rejected the budget cuts, some of which have been offered up again for next year.
One opponent of the cuts has been Representative Alan Lowenthal, a California Democrat whose district includes one of the nation’s largest cargo ports.
“The Chinese government is massively engaged in maritime expansion as we have walked away from it,” he said in an interview.
“There is going to come a crisis, and we are going to call upon the U.S. maritime industry, and it is not going to be around.”
Elaine Chao declined to be interviewed.
The department spokesman said The Times’s reporting wove “together a web of innuendos and baseless inferences” in linking Chao’s work at Transportation to her family’s business operations.
Agency officials said the department under Chao had been a champion of the American maritime industry, adding that several proposed cuts had been made by previous administrations and that the Trump administration had since moved to bolster funding.
Chao, 66, was born in Taiwan to parents who had fled mainland China in the late 1940s and later settled in the United States when she was a schoolgirl.
She worked at Foremost in the 1970s but has had no formal role there in decades.
As her political stature has grown — she has served in the cabinet twice and has been married to McConnell for 26 years — Beijing has sought to flatter her family.
A government-owned publisher recently printed authorized biographies of her parents, releasing them at ceremonies attended by high-ranking members of the Communist Party.
On a visit last year to Beijing, Chao was presented with hand-drawn portraits of her parents from her counterpart in the transportation ministry.

On an official trip to Beijing last year, Chao received portraits of her parents from the Chinese transport minister, Li Xiaopeng, center left.

The Chao family’s ties to China have drawn some attention over the years. 
In 2001, The New Republic examined them in the context of the Republican Party’s softening tone toward the country.
When Chao was nominated as transportation secretary, ProPublica and others highlighted the intersection of her new responsibilities with her family’s business.
And in a book published last year, the author Peter Schweizer suggested the Chaos gave Beijing undue influence.
The Times found that the Chaos had an extraordinary proximity to power in China for an American family, marked not only by board memberships in state companies, but also by multiple meetings with the country’s former top leader, including one at his villa. 
That makes the Chaos stand out on both sides of the Pacific, with sterling political connections going to the pinnacle of power in the world’s two biggest economies.
Chao’s father, a founder of Foremost in 1964, has for decades cultivated a close relationship with Jiang Zemin, a schoolmate from Shanghai who rose to become China’s president. 
As the schoolmates crossed paths again in the 1980s, the Chaos reaped dividends from a radar company linked to Jiang that targeted sales to the Chinese military, documents filed with the Chinese government show.
Though Chao’s financial disclosure statements indicate she receives no income from Foremost, she made at least four trips to China with the company in the eight years between her job as labor secretary during the George W. Bush administration and her confirmation as transportation secretary in January 2017. 
And her father accompanied her on at least one trip that she took as labor secretary, in 2008, sitting in on meetings, including with China’s premier, one of the country’s top officials.
Public records show that she has benefited from the company’s success.
A gift to Chao and McConnell from her father in 2008 helped make McConnell, the Republican majority leader, one of the richest members of the Senate. 
And three decades worth of political donations have made the extended family a top contributor to the Republican Party of Kentucky, a wellspring of McConnell’s power.
This is a family with financial ties to a foreign government that is a strategic rival,” said Kathleen Clark, an anti-corruption expert at Washington University in St. Louis.
“It raises a question about whether those familial and financial ties affect Chao when she exercises judgment or gives advice on foreign and national security policy matters that involve China.”

A Family Business on the Rise


Elaine Chao, the transportation secretary, has been a steadfast booster of her family’s shipping business, which transports raw materials to fuel China’s heavy industries. 
In January 2017, as the Senate voted to confirm Chao, a bulk carrier ship sailed from Canada with a shipment of iron ore.
The ship, the Bao May, is owned by her family’s business, Foremost Group.
Its destination: an iron ore transfer terminal on Liangtan Island, south of Shanghai.
Two weeks later, after unloading its cargo in China, the Bao May set sail for Brazil to collect another shipment of iron ore, weaving through the Strait of Malacca and crossing the Indian Ocean.
The size of three football fields, the Bao May is too big to pass through the Suez or Panama Canals, so it must sail around the southern tip of Africa on its voyages to Atlantic Ocean destinations.
For the last two years, the Bao May has repeatedly made the round-tip journey between China and ports in Brazil and Canada.
On this trip, it arrived in Brazil in May 2017, docking at the Ponta da Madeira Maritime Terminal in São Luís, where ships load up with iron ore from Brazil's interior.
The Bao May was built in a Chinese shipyard and financed with loans from the Export-Import Bank of China, owned by the Chinese government. 
At the launch ceremony in Shanghai in 2010, the guest of honor was Chao. 
For years, the ship has been chartered by a state-owned Chinese steelmaker, giving Foremost a steady supply of revenue.
It is one of 19 ships owned by Foremost, which was founded by Chao’s father, James S.C. Chao, and is now run by her sister Angela.
While Foremost has its headquarters in Midtown Manhattan, its fleet is overwhelmingly focused on China. 
About 72 percent of the raw materials it has shipped since the beginning of 2018 has gone to China, according to figures from VesselsValue, a London-based firm that analyzes global shipping data.
Each year, Foremost ships transport hundreds of millions of tons of iron ore, coal and bauxite to China from ports around the globe. 
The shipments feed China’s industrial engine, especially its steel mills, whose products are part of an escalating trade dispute between China and the United States.

Four enormous gantry cranes rise on the banks of the Yangtze River near the East China Sea.
In their shadow thousands of workers assemble cargo ships, each about as long as three football fields.
It is here, at the Shanghai Waigaoqiao shipyard, that Foremost Group’s newest ship, the Xin May, was built. 
Six similar ships are set to be built in the next several years, all part of an order by Foremost announced in December 2017 at the Harvard Club in New York.
Foremost first placed an order with the state-owned company in 1988 and over the decades has been its biggest North American customer, according to the shipbuilder. 
The relationship is so tight that Foremost’s offices in Shanghai are in the shipbuilder’s 25-story tower.
We are committed to continuing to build ships in China,” Angela Chao said at the Harvard Club announcement, which was attended by the top official in China’s New York consulate.
“My father was a pioneer in internationalizing the Chinese shipbuilding market, and it has been over 30 years that he has continuously ordered ships in China.”

The newest addition to the Foremost fleet, the Xin May, is one of multiple ships the company has ordered from the Shanghai Waigaoqiao shipyard.

Foremost has relied on the Export-Import Bank of China, or China EximBank, to finance at least four ships in the past decade. 
Its loans often come with lower interest rates and more generous repayment schedules than those made through some commercial lenders.
As of 2015, the bank had made at least $300 million available to Foremost, it said at the time.
Angela Chao, in the interview with The Times, said that 2015 was the last year the company borrowed from the lender, describing its terms as less attractive than those of non-Chinese banks.
She said the company never borrowed — “not even close” — $300 million, a figure she had not previously heard.
“They are not a big part of our financing,” she said.
The Chao family’s connections run deep with the Chinese leadership, documents in China show.
As civil war raged across the country in the 1940s, Mr. Chao attended Jiao Tong University in Shanghai.
A schoolmate was Jiang Zemin, who stayed in China after the Communist victory and ultimately became president.
Chao went with the defeated Nationalists to Taiwan, where he became the youngest person to qualify as a ship’s captain, according to his biography.
Chao left for the United States in 1958, but a thaw in relations sparked by Richard M. Nixon drew him back to his homeland in 1972, the first of a flurry of trips that established him as a successful member of the Chinese diaspora.
Chao got exceptional access.
In 1984 he was invited to Beijing to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the People’s Republic and meet with the country’s top leader, Deng Xiaoping, according to materials at a museum in Shanghai dedicated to Chao’s wife, Ruth Mulan Chu Chao, who died in 2007.
Also in 1984, as China emerged from decades of political and economic turmoil, Ruth Chao bought a stake in a Chinese company that manufactured marine equipment, including radars, in partnership with Raytheon, the American defense contractor, according to Chinese corporate documents.

In 1984, the Chao family took a stake in a marine electronic equipment company that targeted the Chinese military for sales. The venture was linked to Jiang Zemin, James Chao’s former schoolmate and a future president of China.

The investment, not previously reported, was held by a Panamanian company.
The Chinese company, documents show, praised the “support for the construction of the nation” shown by Ruth Chao, identifying her as James’s wife and both of them as American citizens.
The now-defunct company targeted the Chinese military for sales of some of its gear, and a principal partner was a state-owned factory under the Ministry of Electronics Industry, which was led at the time by Jiang, according to corporate documents and a former employee.
The employee, Zheng Chaoman, recalled the involvement of “the father of Elaine Chao.”
Within months, it generated enough revenue for Chao to donate profits to a foundation he had established in Shanghai, according to an announcement by the local government. 
The foundation sponsors training scholarships for merchant seamen, his wife’s biography said.
In the aftermath of the deadly suppression of pro-democracy demonstrations on Tiananmen Square in June 1989, the Chaos asked to divest their 25 percent stake in the company.
Two months earlier, Elaine Chao had been confirmed by the Senate to a senior political appointment, as deputy transportation secretary under George H. W. Bush.

Chinese AmnesiaThe Transportation Department spokesman said Chao did not know anything about the venture. Angela Chao, in the interview, said her father did not “remember any ownership, and we can’t find anything on it.”
The family’s other business ties in China remained, including work that year by China State Shipbuilding on two new cargo ships for Foremost.

Chao in 1989, when she was deputy transportation secretary under George H.W. Bush. She would also serve in the cabinet of George W. Bush, as labor secretary.

That August, Chao met with Jiang, who had been named general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, the country’s most powerful position.
Their hourlong meeting inside the leadership compound adjacent to the Forbidden City, together with the head of the state shipbuilding company, was described as “friendly” in the official People’s Daily newspaper.
The two former schoolmates would meet at least five more times during Jiang’s tenure as general secretary, according to a review of publicly available documents.

A Celebrity Face for the Company
As the first Chinese-American to serve as a cabinet secretary — eight years as labor secretary — Elaine Chao became an instant celebrity in China during the George W. Bush administration.
Her family was a beneficiary of her newfound fame.
During a trip to China in August 2008 to represent the United States at the closing of the Olympic Games, Chao took her father to several official meetings with Chinese leaders, including one with the country’s premier, Wen Jiabao, according to diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.
At the time, Chao was chairman of Foremost and a board member of China State Shipbuilding.
When she left government during the Obama years, she continued to put her celebrity status to use on behalf of the family business.

Chao at a 2009 interview in Wuhan, where she was appointed an international adviser.

In 2010, she traveled to Shanghai with her father for the delivery ceremony of a cargo ship, the Bao May. 
The ship soon became a workhorse for Foremost, hauling raw materials to China from around the world under a seven-year charter with a subsidiary of a state-owned steel maker. 
Foremost paid for the Bao May and another ship with up to $89.6 million in loans from China EximBank, corporate records in Hong Kong show.
The next year, Chao was back in Shanghai for the launch of another ship, and in 2013, she traveled to Beijing with her father and her sister Angela for a meeting with the chairman of China State Shipbuilding, according to a company announcement.
Chao joined her family two years later at the signing of a loan for Foremost at China EximBank’s grand hall in Beijing.
The loan, for $75 million, was made jointly with a Taiwanese lender to build two cargo ships.

China EximBank’s website celebrates a 2015 loan signing with Foremost. The event was attended by Chao and members of her family.

The Transportation Department spokesman said it was “probably appropriate” for Chao to take her father to meetings in 2008 as her “plus-one,” and said her visits were done as a private citizen.
Angela Chao said her sister attended Foremost events “as a family member.”
“Foremost was founded in 1964; the company is 55 years old,” she added.
“We were around and we were well respected well before Elaine was in anything. We predate her; she doesn’t predate us.”
The flurry of visits coincided with Foremost’s growing contributions to China’s globalized steel and shipping industries.
Today, Foremost’s fleet primarily serves the Chinese market, hauling bulk cargo such as iron ore, coal and bauxite. 
Of the 152 voyages made by its ships between Jan. 1, 2018, and April 12, 2019, 91 have been to or from China, accounting for 72 percent of Foremost’s total tonnage during that period, according to figures compiled by VesselsValue, a company that tracks shipping data.
Angela Chao said that Foremost did not “control where the ships go, so we’re like a taxicab.”
During her eight years out of government, Elaine Chao extended her connections in China, according to a review of Chinese websites and other public materials.
For example, she was appointed in 2009 to an advisory group in Wuhan, where the steel maker with the Foremost charter is based.
Such appointments are sought after for the access they provide to local leaders.
That same year, she was granted an honorary professorship at Fudan University, and in 2010, she was awarded an honorary doctorate from Jiao Tong University.
With Trump’s election, Chao was asked to join the administration.
During her confirmation hearing she did not discuss her family’s extensive ties to the Chinese maritime industry, and she did not disclose the various Chinese accolades she had received. 
The Senate’s written questionnaire requires nominees to list all honorary positions.

Destroying American Shipbuilding IndustryChao has spoken repeatedly about her commitment to the American maritime industry, including during her confirmation hearing in 2017.
“I’m of an age where I have seen two wars in pivotal areas of the world,” she told the Senate Commerce Committee, with her father seated behind her.
“If we did not have the merchant marine assets to assist the gray hulls on these campaigns, the military naval campaigns, our country would not have been able to supply our troops, bring the necessary equipment.”
But without Congress putting up roadblocks, the Trump administration’s budgetary actions proposed during her tenure would have reduced federal funding for programs that support the shipbuilding industry and ships that operate under American flags.

Chao at the White House after Trump signed an executive order on the transition of service members into the Merchant Marine.

Plans drafted during the Obama administration had called for building up to five new, state-of-the-art ships big enough to train 600 cadets each to help the American military move equipment and supplies worldwide, especially during wartime.
But after Chao became secretary, the agency’s budget proposed buying old cargo ships instead and renovating them.
Congress balked at the cost-cutting measure — one Democratic lawmaker mocked the agency’s plan to “buy a bunch of rusty old hulks” — and restored the funding.
More recently, the agency budget pushed to shrink the size of one of the new ships, again provoking bipartisan protests from Congress.
“Given the administration’s strong commitment to American manufacturing and to being sure that we can adequately control the seas, the targeting of programs that help the maritime industry remain strong doesn’t make sense to me,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the Republican who leads the panel overseeing the Transportation Department budget.
“It is inconsistent with the administration’s overall goals.”
The agency budget in 2017 and 2018 also proposed reducing annual grants for the Maritime Security Program, which help American ships pay crews and cover the cost of meeting safety and training requirements.
It also moved in the last three years to eliminate new funding for a grant program that helps small shipyards stay in business, as well as a program that provides loan guarantees for the construction or reconstruction of American-flagged vessels.
Agency officials noted that many of the cuts were forced on the department by the White House, and that some of the same programs had been previously targeted, only to see the money restored by Congress, as happened with the Trump cuts.
But objections continue, including questions about why, despite repeated promises, Chao has not issued a detailed strategic plan for stabilizing the United States’ shrinking fleet.
Fair Kim, a retired Coast Guard deputy commander who works at an association that promotes the American shipping industry, said Chao had a disappointing maritime record.
“If you preach America first, why not promote the U.S.-flagged fleet at the expense of foreign-flagged ships?” he asked.
“This administration should be very friendly to us.”

A China-Friendly Approach
The Trump administration has made the rivalry with China a core tenet of American foreign policy, concluding that decades of accommodation has reinforced the country’s authoritarian rule and undermined the interests of the United States.
“Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic and military tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the United States,” Vice President Mike Pence said during a speech in October.
None of that, however, has kept Chao from maintaining China-friendly relations, including engaging with the Chinese media about her family’s shipping business and multiple other subjects. 
During a televised interview, one prominent Chinese reporter, Tian Wei, described Chao as “a bridge” between Beijing and the Trump administration.
Chao’s official calendar, obtained by The Times through a public records request, shows at least 21 interviews or meetings with Chinese-language news organizations in her first year as transportation secretary.
In November 2017, she met for lunch at her office with Ma Jing, then the top official in the United States for CGTN, the China state television network.
The network has been under growing pressure from the Justice Department to detail its ties to the Chinese state as part of a stepped-up enforcement of foreign influence laws, and in March, Ma and a dozen other CGTN employees in Washington were reported to have been recalled to China.
In an interview in April 2017, Chao was photographed with her father next to a Transportation Department flag.
Her father told the reporter how he had traveled on Air Force One and discussed “business” with the president.
He also took the opportunity to talk up his daughter’s new role in the administration.
“It’s an honor for us Chinese,” Chao said to The China Press, a publication in the United States.
【Interviewed With Elaine Chao & James Chao】美国交通部长赵小兰与父亲赵锡成专访CreditCreditVideo by 侨报 The China Press
The interview was first highlighted by Politico, which noted that Chao had made multiple media appearances with her father.
Chao’s schedule also shows that she attended an August 2017 event in New York celebrating the signing of a Foremost deal with Sumitomo Group, a Japanese company with mass transit projects in the United States, including California and Illinois, that fall under her oversight. 
The spokesman said she attended in a "personal" capacity and did not discuss agency business.
Marilyn L. Glynn, a former general counsel at the Office of Government Ethics, questioned Chao’s proximity to Foremost, saying she should recuse herself from decisions that broadly impacted the shipping industry.
“She might be tempted to make sure her family company is not adversely affected in any policy choices, or it might even just appear that way,” Ms. Glynn said.
Chao’s first trip to China as transportation secretary was made last April amid an escalating trade war, six months later than originally planned.

Chao meeting with Li, the Chinese transport minister, in Beijing last year.

The original trip had been described by the department as a “bilateral meeting” with Chao’s Chinese counterpart to discuss disaster response, infrastructure and related subjects.
Eight days before the planned start of the October 2017 trip, when contacted by The Times, Chao’s office said it could not provide a list of who would accompany her.
But the embassy in Beijing had received requests to accommodate Ms. Chao’s family members, according to interviews with State Department officials involved in the planning, as well as a redacted email obtained by The Times through a public records lawsuit.
Angela Chao said in the interview that she was already planning to be in Beijing to attend a Bank of China board meeting, and that her husband, the investor Jim Breyer, also had business in the Chinese capital.
But she said she was unaware of her sister’s travel plans.
Angela Chao was among the family members mentioned in the State Department discussions about the visit, according to a United States official.
The email, with the subject “ethics question,” had come from Evan T. Felsing, a senior economic officer for the State Department in Shanghai.
Mr. Felsing, now based in India, declined to comment.
Other correspondence also signaled unease among American diplomats over whom Elaine Chao intended to take on the trip and the topics they would discuss with Chinese officials. 
Emails indicate that ethics lawyers in both the State and Transportation Departments weighed in.
“They would not have raised a question like this about a cabinet secretary unless it was something really serious,” said Mr. Rank, the former deputy chief of mission in Beijing.
The agency spokesman confirmed a request on behalf of Chao’s relatives, but did not say in his written response to questions whether they were scheduled to attend official government events.
When Chao finally traveled to China last April, no relatives were present.
She met with top leaders, including the premier, Li Keqiang.
While there, she sought to soothe hard feelings between China and the Trump administration in an interview with a government-run broadcaster.
She suggested some of the tensions resulted from cultural differences.
“America is a very young country — it’s very dynamic — it doesn’t have a long period of history,” she said in an interview with CGTN.
“So there are not so many rules and regulations in terms of behavior, whereas some other countries that have long histories, it may be a little bit more different. We have to understand the Chinese and how they see things, and I think the Chinese need to understand how America sees things.”
Even this trip did not proceed entirely by the book.
Chao broke with the standard practice for government employees and flew on a Chinese state airline instead of an American carrier.
Chao’s economy-class round-trip ticket with Air China cost $6,784, according to information obtained through a public records request.
The flight was booked through a code-share arrangement with United Airlines.
A less expensive ticket was available on a nonstop United flight, according to an airline official.
The agency spokesman would not say what class Chao flew in, only that the ticket was booked in economy.

A Windfall for Mitch McConnell
When a delegation of local Chinese Communist Party leaders visited Washington in 2017, Chao’s office arranged for them to be photographed with Chao and her father.
Her aides pulled another string.
“U.S. Capitol Tour for VIP Guests,” read the subject line of an email sent by Chao’s aides to the staff of her husband, McConnell.
The senator’s staff obliged, arranging an “off limits” tour for Chao’s guests, who were visiting from the home region of her mother.
“The delegation was thrilled to get the VIP treatment by your office and were particularly excited to hear that the leader’s office was normally off limits to normal guests,” an aide to Chao later wrote to McConnell’s staff.
It was a small favor, but one that reflected the political partnership at the center of the marriage between Chao and McConnell.

The Chao family has been a wellspring of support for McConnell over the years, contributing over $1 million to him and to political action committees associated with him.

In 1989, shortly after their first date (at the Saudi ambassador’s home near Washington), McConnell was preparing for a re-election campaign.
Greetings from Chao came in classic Washington fashion: a string of campaign donations, totaling $10,000, from Chao, her father, her mother, her sister May and May’s husband, Jeffrey Hwang, according to Federal Election Commission records.
Over the next 30 years, the extended Chao family would be an important source of political cash for McConnell, himself one of the most formidable Republican fund-raisers in American politics.
The extended Chao family is among the top donors to the Republican Party of Kentucky, giving a combined $525,000 over two decades.
One of Chao’s sisters, Christine, the general counsel at Foremost, was the second-biggest contributor to the super PAC Kentuckians for Strong Leadership in 2014.
She gave $400,000 to the organization, which identified McConnell’s re-election as its highest priority that year.
In all, from 1989 through 2018, 13 members of the extended Chao family gave a combined $1.66 million to Republican candidates and committees, including $1.1 million to McConnell and political action committees tied to him, according to F.E.C. records.
“I’m proud to have had the support of my family over the years,” McConnell said in a statement.

Chao and Mr. McConnell in 2014 at the Harvard Club in New York, where Foremost celebrated its 50th anniversary and signed a contract with a Japanese shipbuilder.

The family’s wealth has also benefited McConnell personally.
In 2008, Chao’s father gave the couple a gift valued between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal disclosures.
McConnell, never a wealthy man, vaulted up the moneyed rankings in the Senate; as of 2018 he was the 10th wealthiest senator, according to Roll Call, the Capitol Hill newspaper.
David Popp, a spokesman for McConnell, said the gift from Chao was in honor of Elaine Chao’s mother.
Over the years, McConnell has also participated in Chao family events and trips related to the family’s business and charitable giving.
In 1993, he and Chao traveled with her father to Beijing at the invitation of China State Shipbuilding and met top officials.
He celebrated Foremost’s 50th anniversary in 2014 at the Harvard Club in Manhattan, witnessing the signing of a contract with a Japanese shipbuilder.

Pillows with the seal of the United States Senate at Foremost’s headquarters in Manhattan.

And he attended the dedication in 2016 of a building at the Harvard Business School named after Chao’s mother.
Chao and three of her sisters had attended the school.
McConnell’s connection to the family was hard to miss when a reporter recently visited the Foremost headquarters in Manhattan.
There, in the reception area, were two gray pillows emblazoned with the seal of the United States Senate.

jeudi 25 avril 2019

Former Hillary Clinton employee Candace Marie Claiborne has been arrested for treason

State Department office manager admits conspiring to hide contacts with Chinese agents
By Spencer S. Hsu
Candace Marie Claiborne, member of Hillary Clinton’s inner circle arrested, charged with treason

A view of the U.S. State Department. 
The list of gifts given from Chinese agents to Claiborne and “co-conspirator A”
























 



A veteran State Department ­office manager pleaded guilty Wednesday to hiding extensive contacts with two Chinese intelligence agents who showered her with tens of thousands of dollars in gifts as they asked for diplomatic and economic information.
Candace Claiborne, 63, pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of conspiring to defraud the United States by repeatedly covering up foreign intelligence contacts over more than five years. 
She was required to report the contacts because of her top-secret security clearance.
Because the lies allowed Claiborne to keep her job and salary, prosecutors calculated the scheme netted Claiborne the equivalent of $550,000, and both sides in a plea agreement said Claiborne faces a maximum five-year prison term at sentencing July 9.
U.S. authorities did not describe any of the material passed on by Claiborne as classified. 
However, they said she responded to requests for internal U.S. government information “that would provide an advantage to Chinese officials” in ongoing economic talks between the two countries, and failed to report her exposure to foreign contacts that could subject her “to coercion, influence, or pressure” to compromise U.S. national security.
The Justice Department said from 2011 to 2016, two intelligence agents for the People’s Republic of China gave Claiborne’s family $20,000 in cash, electronics, trips, an apartment and tuition for a young relative at a Chinese fashion school.
“Ms. Claiborne... is everything in the statement of facts true and correct?” U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss asked in a 45-minute plea hearing in Washington.
“Yes, your honor,” said Claiborne, wiping a tear from her eye after pleading guilty.
Prosecutors agreed to drop counts of felony obstruction, lying to the FBI and wire fraud.
The case comes as U.S. officials have called Chinese economic espionage the nation’s most severe counterintelligence threat, and mounted a string of espionage and trade-secret prosecutions.
Claiborne had worked at the State Department since 1999, including overseas postings in Iraq, Sudan and China, and as an office manager for the minister of public affairs for the U.S. Embassy in Beijing.
Since her March 29, 2017, arrest, Claiborne, who is from Northwest Washington, has spent 10 months under house arrest, then a release to the community with high-intensity supervision including electronic monitoring. 
She will remain under those conditions until she is due to report to jail June 5, the day after the end of Ramadan, Moss said, according to the plea deal.
Claiborne and two conspirators described as agents of the Chinese Ministry of State Security in Shanghai “conspired to hide their close and continuing connections” and gifts to keep Claiborne employed and able “to supply internal State Department information,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas A. Gillice of the District told the court.
“They carried this out through lies spoken and written, and through deletions of relevant communications, contact and gifts,” said Gillice, who handled the case with Justice Department national security division prosecutors.
In a 24-page statement of facts agreed to by both sides, Claiborne admitted that one agent asked her to provide internal U.S. analyses of economic talks with China in 2011, and wired her bank account nearly $2,500.
After Claiborne responded with publicly available information, the agent replied, “What they are looking for is what they cannot find on Internet.”
The agent, who was not named but was described as an importer and exporter who runs a spa and restaurant in Shanghai and has known Claiborne since 2007, added, “If you find something next time don’t send them by email bcs others also can catch it with ­Internet.”
In 2012, Claiborne met every month or so with the two agents after they requested internal information on upcoming meetings or visits between U.S. and Chinese officials, dialogues or plans.
Claiborne believed the pair to be agents of the Chinese government, and would turn over envelopes containing State Department cables, white papers or other nonpublic documents that she had searched for. 
In return, she would receive an envelope with Chinese currency, according to plea documents.
Other gifts went mainly to an unidentified younger family member who lived with Claiborne, including tickets to the United States and Thailand, one year’s tuition and a job, court filings said.
Claiborne, who appeared in court with seven supporters who declined to comment after the hearing, has no criminal record, the judge said. 

vendredi 15 mars 2019

Conflict of Interest

Mnuchin’s Hollywood Ties Raise Ethical Questions in China Talks
By Alan Rappeport and Ana Swanson

The Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, and Louise Linton, his wife, at the White House before a state dinner in April honoring President Emmanuel Macron of France.

WASHINGTON — “Wonder Woman,” the 2017 film that Steven Mnuchin helped produce before becoming Treasury secretary, hauled in about $90 million at the box office in China. 
It was the film’s most successful international market and a roaring success for an American superhero export. 
But because of China’s strict laws for foreign films, the studio behind the movie, Warner Bros., received just a small fraction of those revenues.
Now, as Treasury secretary and one of the lead negotiators in trade talks with China, Mnuchin has been personally pushing Beijing to give the American film industry greater access to its markets — a change that could be highly lucrative to his former industry.
While Mnuchin divested from his Hollywood film production company after joining the Trump administration, he maintains ties to the industry through his wife, the actress and filmmaker Louise Linton.
In 2017, Mnuchin sold his interest in the company, StormChaser Partners, to Linton, who at the time was his fiancée.
In his 2018 disclosure, which was obtained from the Treasury Department through a records request by The New York Times, StormChaser is listed as one of Linton’s assets.
Since they are now married, government ethics rules consider the asset to be owned by Mnuchin. And while the documents show that Mnuchin sold his stake to Linton for $1 million to $2 million, he is now owed that same amount, in addition to interest, from StormChaser in 2026, according to the 2018 form.
Mnuchin’s remaining ties to the film industry are raising questions among ethics officials and lawmakers about whether a conflict of interest exists.
At a congressional hearing on Thursday, Mnuchin was questioned by a top Senate Democrat about those continuing financial ties.
The Office of Government Ethics still has not certified his 2018 financial disclosure, which is the first since his marriage to Linton.
Access to China’s film market has not been a primary issue in the trade talks, which have focused largely on Beijing’s treatment of foreign companies, including its requirement that firms hand over valuable technology, its barriers to foreign business and its subsidies to Chinese firms.
But Mnuchin has championed more equitable treatment of American films in China, viewing existing restrictions on foreign entertainment as part of the problematic behavior the Trump administration is trying to correct.
Under the current system, foreign companies must secure Chinese partners to enter China’s market and they are restricted in how much they can earn as part of the arrangements.
China applies a strict quota for the number of Hollywood films it lets into its theaters.
For most box office showings, Chinese companies take in 75 percent of all revenue, leaving the remainder to Hollywood. 
To operate in the tightly managed Chinese entertainment sector, American companies have also had to form a vast network of complicated ties with Chinese state-owned firms.
Since the trade talks began last year, film lobbyists have met with Mnuchin’s top deputies, as well as with officials from the Commerce Department and the office of the United States Trade Representative.
Mnuchin has been especially responsive to lobbying from the film industry, according to people familiar with the discussions, given his background and understanding of the challenges that American moviemakers face in China.
At a congressional hearing last month, Robert Lighthizer, President Trump’s top trade negotiator, said increasing the revenue share earned by American film companies in China was “absolutely” a priority in the talks, and he highlighted Mnuchin’s role.
“Mnuchin has been very much involved,” Lighthizer added.
“He of course knows a great deal about that industry, a lot more than I do.”
On Thursday, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, raised concerns about Mnuchin’s financial ties to the film industry and asked the Treasury secretary whether he had, in fact, really divested himself of the StormChaser asset listed on his disclosure form.
Mr. Wyden also suggested that the transaction might have been more of a loan to Linton than a true financial separation from StormChaser.
“What we have wondered is if there has been an exchange of an asset for a loan rather than a divestment,” Mr. Wyden said.
Mnuchin declined to discuss details of the transaction, but said that his financial disclosures were certified by career ethics officials in the Treasury Department.
“I am advised by people at Treasury that I am fully in compliance and I have no ethical issues,” Mnuchin said.
When asked by reporters after the hearing why his StormChaser ties did not represent a conflict of interest, Mnuchin said that he would not discuss any specific assets.
Treasury noted separately that Mnuchin’s disclosure was certified internally on June 27, 2018, and that the department was working with the Office of Government Ethics to obtain its certification.

Gal Gadot in a scene from “Wonder Woman,” which Mnuchin helped produce.

Mnuchin and Linton, who married in 2017, brought Hollywood glitz to Washington, but their continuing links to the film industry have also brought complications.
After working for 17 years at Goldman Sachs, Mnuchin in the last decade became a big name in Hollywood as a film investor.
His companies, Dune Entertainment and later RatPac-Dune, helped produce and finance dozens of films that were box office smashes in China, including “Avatar,” “Gravity,” “Dunkirk,” “Wonder Woman” and “Ready Player One.”
Mnuchin was also a co-chairman of Relativity Media, a fledgling Hollywood studio that had a joint venture in China.
During his confirmation hearing in 2017, Mnuchin said that Relativity’s joint venture in China was “not particularly successful.”
He said that he was not aware of direct Chinese investment in the business but that, in the future, Chinese investments in Hollywood may need to be reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which the Treasury secretary oversees.
Mnuchin agreed to divest from dozens of investments in early 2017, after he was nominated by Mr. Trump.
Later that year, he sent a letter of apology to the Office of Government Ethics after appearing to promote one of his movies when he said at an event, “Send all your kids to ‘Lego Batman.’”
This month, the Center for Public Integrity reported that Mnuchin’s most recent financial disclosure, which Treasury approved last June, has yet to be certified by the ethics office.
That has raised questions about the reason for the delay.
Ethics experts have pointed to Mnuchin’s continuing ties to StormChaser Partners as a potential reason for the holdup.
“It certainly creates a significant appearance issue,” said Virginia Canter, a former senior ethics counsel at the Treasury Department.
“Not just because he previously was in the entertainment business, and may in fact go back into it at some point when he leaves Treasury, but because his spouse appears to have holdings in these films and is part of the film industry and may benefit if favorable terms are negotiated with China.”
According to a report in The Hollywood Reporter this year, Linton spends much of her time in Los Angeles, where she has been writing, directing and producing a comedy called “Me, You, Madness.”
She has also been busy reshooting “Serial Daters Anonymous,” a 2014 satire that was never released in which she had a starring role.
She told the magazine that financing for her films comes from “a variety of investors.”
While Mnuchin’s role in pressing for the film industry has raised some concerns, there is broad support in the United States to push for changes to China’s film regulations.
The film industry supports more than two million American jobs, according to industry data, and Hollywood has been a powerful force for exporting American culture around the world.
“Even if concessions are made in trade negotiations there’s a long way to go, because the business environment continues to keep Hollywood from operating on an equal plane,” said Aynne Kokas, an assistant professor of media studies at the University of Virginia and the author of “Hollywood Made in China.”
Still, the China market has been lucrative for Hollywood, offering a rapidly growing box office and a ready source of financing, at a time when the American industry faces pressure from streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime and a saturated film market in the United States.
Hollywood has found the lure of the China market irresistible, even though operating in China means enduring censorship and unfair treatment as well as working with state-owned companies.
Hollywood has long been a victim of rampant piracy in China, including from bootleg DVDs distributed in back alley stores and online streaming services.
But China has done a better job of policing these forms of piracy in recent years as its own industry has developed, said Stanley Rosen, a professor at the University of Southern California.
“As their films are being pirated, they are now beginning to enforce copyright protections of their own films,” Mr. Rosen said.
Despite better intellectual property protection, the playing field for foreign companies is far from even.
China still limits the number of Hollywood films that can appear in its movie theaters, the dates those films can appear and the distributors they can use to reach the theaters. 
And Chinese censors only welcome films that show their country in a positive light — censorship that has led American studios to make editorial choices like depicting North Koreans as villains rather than the Chinese, or smashing the Taj Mahal rather than the Great Wall of China.
Even for box office hits, Hollywood studios receive a quarter of ticket proceeds, with the rest going to Chinese partners. 
Increasing that to the global average, which is around 40 percent, is one of the industry’s biggest requests.
Last month, Mr. Lighthizer said that this was a “key issue” that “had not been resolved” in negotiations.
Mr. Lighthizer also described restrictions on distribution as complicated, saying: “There should be some changes there, too, but what we haven’t done is challenge control. It’s not something we want to bring into this, the idea of challenging control in China.”
In another congressional hearing this week, Mr. Lighthizer reiterated that the United States was renegotiating the amount of Chinese box office revenue shared with American firms, saying it was a “very unfair situation.”
Like many other American industries, Hollywood has grown frustrated with China’s pattern of promising to open its film market, only to fail to do so. 
As early as 2001, the World Trade Organization urged China to open up its film market.
An agreement between the two countries governing China’s rules for Hollywood films expired in February 2017, and it has not been renegotiated.
Some lawmakers hope that Mnuchin and Mr. Lighthizer will be able to finally change that.
“This is our opportunity to even the playing field here to some extent,” Representative Judy Chu, Democrat of California and a member of the Ways and Means Committee, said in an interview. “The U.S. film industry clearly has been at a disadvantage.”

mercredi 13 mars 2019

Chinese Fifth Column

Republican Donor Cindy Li Yang Linked to Chinese Influence Machine
BY BETHANY ALLEN-EBRAHIMIAN, ZACH DORFMAN
A group of China supporters wave flags as they wait for the arrival of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping ahead of his visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on April 6, 2017. 

In a photo posted to her Facebook account, Cindy Yang appeared alongside Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, holding a sequined MAGA clutch and wearing a blue ballgown.
It was just one of numerous photos that the Republican political donor and operator of a string of spas and massage parlors has used to advertise her access to the Trump White House for Chinese business executives willing to pay for her services.
But the Florida-based entrepreneur has also been active in several organizations that are closely linked to the Chinese Communist Party’s global efforts to quietly increase influence within foreign political systems—a decades-long effort spearheaded by a party agency known as the United Front Work Department.
Yang, who first made national news last month when New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft was arrested for soliciting prostitution at a massage parlor she founded, runs a private investment firm that primarily caters to Chinese-speaking executives who desire access to the U.S. political class, according to Mother Jones. 
Yang is a member of Donald Trump’s private Florida club Mar-a-Lago. 
She has appeared in photos with such prominent Republicans as Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, White House advisor Kellyanne Conway, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, Florida Sen. Rick Scott, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert, Republican National Committee Chair Ronna Romney McDaniel, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, former presidential advisor Sebastian Gorka, and ultraconservative Fox News commentator Jeanine Pirro, as well as at a 2018 meeting tagged as being at the White House, and at the 2016 Republican National Convention.


Jeffrey Guterman
✔@JeffreyGuterman

Li Yang and @realDonaldTrump: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article227186429.html …
This is the first tweet of a thread that documents photos of Li Yang with Trump and his associates. Please let me know which ones I am missing.

But more disturbing to China analysts are her connections to the United Front, a Chinese Communist Party agency in existence for decades but given greater importance under Xi Jinping, that aims to strengthen party influence over society at home and abroad.
In recent years, organizations and individuals tied to the United Front have been connected to numerous political scandals and corruption cases in the United States, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. 
It has a long history, both in the United States and elsewhere, of working with China’s traditional intelligence apparatus to cultivate relationships with wealthy political elites, recruit assets, and gather intelligence.
Senior White House and intelligence officials are deeply concerned about the extent of covert Chinese political interference in the United States—a worry that long predates the Trump administration and affects both major U.S. political parties. 
In recent months, numerous government bodies, including the FBI (which created a new foreign influence task force), the National Security Council, the White House, and Congress, have committed resources to tackling covert Chinese political interference operations inside the United States and other Western democracies.
But Yang’s is the first major known case of a United Front-affiliated political operative successfully ingratiating herself with the Trump administration.
In 2016, Yang served as a vice president of the newly founded Florida chapter of the China Council for the Promotion of Peaceful National Reunification, a Beijing-based organization under the direct oversight of the United Front Work Department. 
The nominal purpose of the organization is to ensure the so-called reunification of Taiwan and China; in practice, chapters function as a political action group receiving broad direction from the mainland
Branches exist in more than 70 countries around the world and in more than 30 U.S. cities. (When asked, individual chapters typically claim to be independent, despite being listed on the website of the Beijing-based council.) 
Yang has been active in numerous other organizations that the United Front has sought to co-opt, including hometown groups such as the Northeast Florida Hometown Association, of which Yang is a member.
Lists of branch officers often read like a who’s who of prominent local members of the Chinese community. 
That’s not a coincidence. 
The Chinese Communist Party uses peaceful reunification societies as foreign outposts to identify, assess, and reward influential members of the Chinese diaspora who are willing to promote party objectives within their communities.
That grows out of the United Front’s work at home. 
To maintain and solidify its sway over a huge population, the party has become skilled at implementing what is known as “united front” strategy—a classic communist maneuver to amplify friendly voices and marginalize critical ones through a carrot and stick approach. 
While this is a is a partywide strategy, the United Front Work Department promotes and coordinates it, specializing in its implementation across society.
Chinese diaspora, where the United Front focuses on identifying rising community leaders, whether they may be promising young politicians, wealthy campaign donors, or prominent members of the community, and cultivating close relationships with them over many years. 
Many of those involved may not actually agree with the party’s goals, or even be fully aware of the goals of the groups they participate in — but these relationships are still meaningful to Beijing.
Groups and individuals outside of China targeted by united front work find themselves offered numerous benefits, including lucrative business deals tied to mainland China, prestigious positions in government-affiliated organizations, and networking opportunities, in an often-implicit exchange for supporting party objectives when the need arises. 
Those who refuse the proffered perks may find themselves isolated, their business opportunities drying up, and in some cases they may be subject to harassment or even coercion.
These relationships can be quietly drawn upon in times of need to promote Chinese Communist Party objectives—diaspora leaders can mobilize Chinese community members to write letters to their democratic representatives opposing government action that displeases Beijing, and political donors can pressure those who have received their financial support. 
Businesses enjoying Beijing’s largesse can align their business strategy with party objectives, such as not making deals with outspoken proponents of Hong Kong or Taiwanese independence.
There is documented evidence of this kind of political influence—or, as some call it, interference, due to its secretive and sometimes coercive nature—occurring in the United States, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, and other countries. 
In the Vancouver area, for instance, a United Front-linked civil society group became ensnared in a vote-buying scandal in local 2018 elections.
Peaceful reunification societies are a main conduit of united front work abroad, not just serving as hubs for visiting Chinese dignitaries and for identifying party-friendly people overseas, but also actively getting involved in local politics and organizing. 
In Australia and New Zealand, local leaders, some connected to the peaceful reunification societies there, have attempted to organize Chinese-Australian communities to bloc-vote for Beijing-friendly politicians. 
In the United States, these societies respond when the local Chinese diplomatic establishment requests that they help mobilize Chinese in America to attend pro-Beijing demonstrations in support of visiting Chinese leaders.
But another, and likely far more effective, task of the United Front Work Department and its proxies is to cultivate high-level, behind-the-scenes political influence.
That’s exactly what Yang’s private investment firm, GY US Investments LLC, prided itself on. 
On its website, the company claimed that it could provide “the opportunity to interact with the president, the [American] Minister of Commerce and other political figures,” according to Mother Jones. 
Connections to high-level political figures are a vital form of protection in China, where photos of businesspeople with leaders are a prized commodity. 
But these kinds of ties have also been sought by the Chinese government itself as a form of influence abroad.
To be sure, there is no evidence that Yang has ties to the Chinese intelligence apparatus, nor that she had any particular political end goal in mind. 
But it’s clear she served as a connector between rich Chinese entrepreneurs and the U.S. political system, and that she was willing to publicly align herself with the Chinese Communist Party and one of its primary political influence mechanisms.
Evidence of similar work goes back decades. 
In the mid-1990s, the former Arkansas restaurateur Charlie Trie was accused by federal prosecutors as serving as a conduit of up to $600,000 in illegal campaign contributions from China to the 1996 Clinton re-election campaign
“The allegation was that the Chinese Communists were using these businessmen to curry favor with the president,” recalled a former U.S. official involved with the investigation. 
“We couldn’t pin it down whether the party was behind it.” 
The value of photos taken with prominent politicians, one investigator commented, was so high in China that it was difficult to distinguish private corruption from government action. 
Trie later pleaded guilty to violating federal campaign finance laws.
According to a 1998 Senate report, one of the main sources of Trie’s laundered donations was the Macau-based billionaire Ng Lap Seng, who was convicted in a U.S. federal court in 2018 in an unrelated case involving the bribery of high-ranking United Nations officials. 
“Ng was seen as a conduit of money—no one knew where it was coming from,” recalled another former official familiar with the investigation. 
Ng’s meteoric rise fits a pattern, known to U.S. intelligence officials, wherein the Chinese government, beginning in the 1980s, strategically seeded an influence network worldwide, said this source. 
Ng has also been a member of an elite United Front body, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. 
Even back in the 1990s, investigators believed that Ng “was at least co-opted” by the Chinese government, said this former official.
Or take Katrina Leung, a Los Angeles-based socialite and Republican fundraiser.
Leung, a key FBI informant on China for two decades, was indicted in 2003 for mishandling classified information—a central law used in espionage-related cases. 
According to prosecutors, while Leung was providing information to the FBI, she was in reality a Chinese double agent; her access to sensitive materials came from a multi-decade affair she was having with her main FBI handler, J.J. Smith. 
Leung’s compromise was highly damaging, said multiple former intelligence officials, with the damage from her disclosures still being sorted out in the late 2000s.
While Leung was secretly working as a Chinese agent, she sought to cultivate U.S. politicians and bring them closer to Beijing. 
Leung helped organize a trip for Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan to visit China in the late 1990s, even helping arrange Riordan to have a meeting with Chinese leader Jiang Zemin, which Leung attended. 
The trip was designed to encourage a Chinese state-owned shipping conglomerate to increase its business with the Port of Los Angeles. (According to the Los Angeles Times, one former mayoral aide recalled Leung telling aides that if they put money in a bank account in Hong Kong, they’d receive the contract; the aide demurred, and Los Angeles was not awarded the contract.)
Yang has already begun to face blowback for the scandals now swirling around her. 
The National Committee of Asian American Republicans has dismissed Yang from her position as the Florida director of community engagement. 
It’s possible the U.S. Department of Justice, tasked with implementing the Foreign Agents Registration Act, may also become involved. 
Since the investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, the Department of Justice has become more proactive in pushing foreign agents and foreign government-sponsored media outlets to register. 
If Yang’s investment firm is deemed to have engaged in political lobbying or public communications on behalf of a foreign principal, her firm may be required to register with the Department of Justice, which triggers disclosure requirements but does not prohibit such activities.
But the scrutiny Yang is now facing may make such activities moot. 
In the current climate, it seems unlikely that Republican luminaries will continue to grant her the access, and photo opportunities, she previously seemed to relish. 
That may act as a disincentive to others—or it may mean opportunities.