Rogue Nation: Own Up to Tiananmen Massacre

At 28th Anniversary of Bloodshed, Repression Outweighs Reform
HRW

People fill Tiananmen Square in front of the Mausoleum of late Chinese chairman Mao Zedong and the Monument to the People's Heroes in Beijing, on May 17, 1989.

New York – The Chinese government should acknowledge its role in the massacre of untold numbers of peaceful pro-democracy demonstrators around June 4, 1989, and hold perpetrators to account, Human Rights Watch said today. 

Authorities should allow commemorations of the occasion, and release those imprisoned for having done so in the past.
“While Xi Jinping preaches openness on the world stage, his government buries the truth about the Tiananmen Massacre through silence, denial and persecution of those who mark the occasion,” said Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch. 

“Until Beijing reverses course and owns up to its past atrocities, Xi’s calls have little credibility.”
As in past years, to preempt dissent and commemoration of the Tiananmen Massacre, Chinese authorities have heightened surveillance and control of activists as June 4 draws closer. 

In May, the police in Guangzhou repeatedly harassed human rights lawyer Huang Simin and her partner, writer Li Xuewen, forcing them out of the city. 

Guangzhou police also broke up a gathering of activists at a restaurant, including Wang Aizhong, who was detained and interrogated for hours after the gathering at a police station. 

Over a dozen police officers in Shandong Province blocked a group of activists from going to retired professor Sun Wenguang’s home to attend a gathering to commemorate the Tiananmen Massacre.
Over the past year, a number of activists have been detained, charged, or sentenced for commemorating the Tiananmen Massacre. 

In March, authorities in Chengdu, Sichuan’s capital, charged Chen Bing, Fu Hailu, Luo Fuyu, and Zhang Junyong with “inciting subversion of state power” for producing and selling a liquor named “Eight Liquor Six Four,” a homophone for “89.6.4,” the numerical date of the massacre. 

In March a Chengdu court sentenced activist Chen Yunfei to four years in prison for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” after he organized a memorial service for victims of the massacre. 

In April, Guangzhou-based activist Liu Bing was detained on suspicion of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” after he held up a poster in public calling for people to go to the street to protest on June 4.
While the last individual known to have been imprisoned for his involvement in the 1989 pro-democracy protests was released in October 2016, many other participants have been re-incarcerated for their continuing pro-democracy activism, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, Sichuan activists Liu Xianbin and Chen Wei, and Guangdong activist Guo Feixiong. 

Under Xi, the Chinese government has aggressively cracked down on a broad array of human rights, targeting civil society activists, further constricting freedom of expression and religion, as well as increasing ideological control.
While the Chinese government continues to ignore international and domestic calls for justice for the Tiananmen Massacre, foreign governments have adopted new measures to bring accountability for human rights violations around the world. 

In December 2016, the US Congress passed the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, which will allow the US to impose sanctions and deny visas to individuals credibly alleged to be responsible for human rights violations. 

In the UK, legislators will also be voting on proposals similar to the Magnitsky Act which, if passed, will enable the UK government and private entities to apply for the freezing of assets of human rights abusers around the world. 

In May 2017, the Canadian government announced that it will support a Senate bill that would expand Canadian sanctions legislation against human rights abusers, freezing their assets and denying them visas.
“New mechanisms to act against rights violators abroad are renewing hopes that one day those responsible for the Tiananmen Massacre could be held accountable,” said Richardson. 

“This should give pause to Xi and other Chinese leaders who continue to commit serious rights abuses.”

Background: Bloodshed in 1989
The Tiananmen Massacre was precipitated by the peaceful gatherings of students, workers, and others in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square and other cities in April 1989, calling for freedom of expression, accountability, and an end to corruption. 

The government responded to the intensifying protests in late May 1989 by declaring martial law.

On June 3 and 4, the military opened fire and killed untold numbers of peaceful protesters and bystanders. 

In Beijing, some citizens attacked army convoys and burned vehicles in response to the military’s violence. 

Following the killings, the government implemented a national crackdown and arrested thousands for “counter-revolution” and other criminal charges, including disrupting social order and arson.
The government has never accepted responsibility for the massacre or held any officials legally accountable for the killings. 

It has been unwilling to conduct an investigation into the events or release data on those who were killed, injured, forcibly disappeared, or imprisoned. 

The nongovernmental organization Tiananmen Mothers, consisting mostly of family members of those killed, has established the details of 202 people who were killed during the suppression of the movement in Beijing and other cities. 

During the 28 years since the massacre, many members of the Tiananmen Mothers as well as participants who had been imprisoned – including Yu Zhijian, who served 12 years in prison for throwing ink onto Mao Zedong’s portrait at in Tiananmen Square – have passed away without seeing justice.
Human Rights Watch urges the Chinese government to mark the 28th anniversary of June 4, 1989, by addressing the human rights violations pertaining to the event. 

Specifically, the government should:

• Respect the rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, and cease the harassment and arbitrary detention of individuals who challenge the official account of June 4;
• Meet with and apologize to members of the Tiananmen Mothers, publish the names of all who died, and appropriately compensate the families of the victims;
• Permit an independent public inquiry into June 4, and promptly release its findings and conclusions to the public;
• Allow the unimpeded return of Chinese citizens exiled due to their connections to the events of 1989; and
• Investigate all government and military officials who planned or ordered the unlawful use of lethal force against peaceful demonstrators, and appropriately prosecute them.

Why Christmas time in China means jail for human rights activists

Beijing brings campaigners to trial when foreign observers are least likely to be paying attention.

By Benjamin Haas in Hong Kong

Pro-democracy demonstrators demand the release of mainland Christian rights lawyer Jiang Tianyong in a protest in Hong Kong on Friday. 

As people celebrate around the world, a new Christmas tradition is increasingly popular in China: jailing political prisoners, hoping the distraction of the holiday season will lead to less attention.
This year is no different. 

Three human rights activists will come to trial in the next few days when many foreign diplomats, journalists and NGO observers are away from their desks.
“When the most prominent human rights activists are put on trial during the Christmas period, that’s definitely deliberate,” said William Nee, a Chinaresearcher at Amnesty International. 

“The government doesn’t want international attention and they don’t want foreign observers, so they go to extreme lengths to avoid international scrutiny of these show trials.”

The disappeared: faces of human rights activists China wants to silence

Chen Yunfei will be tried on Boxing Day, after already languishing in police detention for the past 21 months. 

Charged with “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”, Chen organised a memorial for victims of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre during the holiday in which Chinese traditionally pay respects to the dead.
On the Friday 23 December police confirmed they were investigating prominent Christian rights lawyer Jiang Tianyong on suspicion of “inciting subversion of state power”. 

He had been missing since November 21 and his family still does not know where he is being held.
Jiang’s wife, Jin Bianling, said the couple had been unable to celebrate Christmas since 2012 because of harassment from the police. 

Jin moved to the United States three years ago, but this is the first Christmas she has not been able to speak to her husband.
“He used to call and send photos every year and tell me how much he missed me, he didn’t want me to feel alone on Christmas,” Jin said, choking back tears. 

“But this year we don’t even know where he is, and we fear he may spend Christmas being tortured.”
A United Nations human rights panel shared her fears in a statement earlier this month: “We fear that Jiang’s disappearance may be directly linked to his advocacy and he may be at risk of torture.”
On 21 December it emerged that Xie Yang, another rights lawyer, had his case transferred to the prosecutor’s office in preparation for him to be tried on charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “disrupting court order”.
Xie has been held since July 2015, part of a nationwide sweep that saw more than 300 lawyers and activist detained in what some have called a “war on law”.
In the most famous case, Nobel peace prize winner Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years in prison on Christmas Day 2009. 

Last year, free speech champion Pu Zhiqiang was given a three year suspended sentence on December 22 and Yang Maodong and Sun Desheng were both convicted during an all-night trial at the time of the American Thanksgiving holiday in November 2015.
“The Chinese government tries to give the impression that they don’t care about the world’s opinion,” Nee said. 

“In fact the government is very concerned about international public opinion and how people see the rule of law in China developing.”
Xi Jinping has made strengthening the “rule of law” a hallmark of his regime since coming to power in 2012. 

But for politically sensitive cases, the law is used as a tool to jail rights lawyers and activists with legal procedures often ignored.
In a sign that Chinese authorities are increasingly concerned about public opinion, both at home and abroad, a series of propaganda videos have circulated on social media.

One video titled “A Notice to Foreign Forces: We’ve Captured Jiang Tianyong!”was posted by the Communist youth league central committee just days before police officially announced they were investigating him.
The video uses cartoons, photos and even a scene from a Mr Bean film, describing Jiang as a “malefactor” who colluded and received money from unnamed “foreign forces”. 

Jiang’s detention is a reprisal for meeting with United Nations experts, according to Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.
“These videos are very significant because they are aggressively sending a message to the rights defense and human rights lawyers community,” Nee said. 

“It’s to frighten these people and say ‘If you stand up for Jiang Tianyong and sign petitions on his behalf, you could be next.’”