Chinazism

President Trump's China criticism turns harsh at U.N., says won't take 'bad deal'
By Jeff Mason and David Lawder

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S.

UNITED NATIONS -- U.S. President Donald Trump delivered a stinging rebuke to China's trade practices on Tuesday at the United Nations General Assembly, saying he would not accept a "bad deal" in U.S.-China trade negotiations.
Four days after deputy U.S. and Chinese negotiators held inconclusive talks in Washington, Trump's remarks were anything but conciliatory and emphasized the need to correct structural economic abuses at the heart of the countries' nearly 15-month trade war.
He said Beijing had failed to keep promises it made when China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001 and was engaging in predatory practices that had cost millions of jobs in the United States and other countries.
"Not only has China declined to adopt promised reforms, it has embraced an economic model dependent on massive market barriers, heavy state subsidies, currency manipulation, product dumping, forced technology transfers and the theft of intellectual property and also trade secrets on a grand scale," President Trump said.

"As far as America is concerned, those days are over."
Although President Trump held out hope that the United States and China could still reach a trade deal, he made clear he wanted a deal that would rebalance the relationship between the two economic superpowers.

"The American people are absolutely committed to restoring balance in our relationship with China. Hopefully, we can reach an agreement that will be beneficial for both countries," President Trump said. 

"As I have made very clear, I will not accept a bad deal."

President Trump also recently said he was not interested in a "partial deal" to ease tensions with China, saying that he would hold out for a "complete deal."
U.S. stocks gave up modest gains and fell into negative territory after President Trump's U.N. address. 

President Trump's speech highlighted the plight of U.S. memory chip maker Micron Technology, which has become a symbol of U.S. assertions that China fails to protect American intellectual property and steals it or forces the transfer of it. 

Two years ago Micron accused a Chinese state firm of stealing its chip designs.

"Soon, the Chinese company obtains patents for nearly an identical product, and Micron was banned from selling its own goods in China," Trump said, "But we are seeking justice."
He added that the United States lost 60,000 factories and 4.2 million manufacturing jobs since China joined the World Trade Organization.
"The rhetoric around China and President Trump's speech was as harsh as we have heard," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at brokerage National Securities Corp in New York.
The tone of President Trump's speech was at odds with some recent steps by China to meet his request for purchases of more American farm products. 

On Monday, Chinese importers bought about 10 shiploads of U.S. soybeans -- about 600,000 tonnes.
China's customs commission will exclude certain amounts of U.S. soybeans, pork and other products from its retaliatory tariffs, the official Xinhua news agency said on Tuesday.
The purchases were made following last week's trade talks, which both the U.S. and Chinese sides characterized as "productive." 

People familiar with the trade talks said no new Chinese proposals were presented, and the countries agreed to continue minister-level talks in early October.
In his U.N. speech, President Trump also drew a link between resolving the U.S.-China trade dispute and Beijing's treatment of Hong Kong. 

Washington was "carefully monitoring the situation in Hong Kong," he said.

"The world fully expects that the Chinese government will honor its binding treaty made with the British and registered with the United Nations, in which China commits to protect Hong Kong’s freedom, legal system and democratic ways of life," President Trump said. 

Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997.

"How China chooses to handle the situation will say a great deal about its role in the world in the future. We are all counting on Xi as a great leader," Trump added.
President Trump also touched on trade with Japan in his speech, saying that he and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Wednesday would "continue our progress in finalizing a terrific new trade deal."
It remains unclear whether the two countries will sign the deal at their bilateral meeting or whether Japanese requests for assurances that Trump won't hit them with autos tariffs will delay the final agreement.

Sina Delenda Est

At the UN President Trump should call for a total economic boycott of China
By Steve Hilton 

On Monday President Trump will address the United Nations General Assembly. 

It will be another opportunity for the president to set out his "America First" agenda and to explain that it's better, and more democratic, for sovereign nations to work together to solve problems than to hand over power to remote and unaccountable international bureaucracies.
His approach is a stark contrast to the globalist ideology that has held sway for far too long -- the idea that individual countries should subordinate their own national interest to some vague notion of the "global interest."
This was the thinking that led to the biggest foreign policy mistake of the last two decades: the globalists' insistence on engagement with China. 

Mesmerized by their own fantasy of an economically borderless world -- convenient for global corporations but disastrous for American workers -- the elitists have helped bring China’s brutal, authoritarian Communist regime to the brink of achieving its long planned-for attempt at world domination.
We often hear about how we’ve been losing out to China economically -- and that’s true. 

But the case against China is a moral one too.
UN and U.S. officials have estimated that China has literally imprisoned one million Muslims in internment camps. 

Reports include brainwashing to force Muslims to worship dictator Xi Jinping instead of Allah.
China’s vile "social credit" system is using the world’s most sophisticated technology in an Orwellian effort to monitor, track and control every Chinese citizen and punish those who step out of line.
And the dictators of Beijing are now spreading their poison internationally, colonizing countries around the world with an imperialist aggression far worse than anything in history.
President Trump should now reject in its entirety the failed China strategy of his globalist predecessors. 

This means not just continuing, through tariffs, to pressurize the Chinese regime on issues like the theft of vital technology from American companies.
He needs to go bigger, and bolder. 

At the UN and beyond, he should rally the whole world behind a simple but audacious goal: to topple Xi Jinping's regime by turning China into a pariah state.
It must start with economics. 

For a long time, our economic interaction with China was minimal. 

That all changed when, with U.S. backing, China joined the World Trade Organization in 2000.
The elitists argued that by integrating China into the world economy, we would benefit financially through increased, mutually beneficial trade and investment; and that we would benefit strategically by moving China away from communism towards openness and maybe even democracy.
Of course the exact opposite happened, on both fronts. 

Over the next few years, manufacturing jobs in America were destroyed on a massive scale as China used its newfound access to “dump” its state-subsidized exports into the American and world markets.
And instead of moving towards democracy, China has become ever more authoritarian and aggressive. 

The only difference is that now, it is incomparably richer and more empowered to assert its hegemonic mania -- thanks to the elitists’ catastrophic misjudgment.
Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama pathetically failed to stand up to China’s economic imperialism and global expansionism. 

Neither had the backs of working Americans; instead, they just wanted to look like good global players to their big business donors and foreign policy experts -- all of whom are now utterly humiliated as the true scale of the establishment’s China debacle becomes apparent.
The greedy, foolish elites were mesmerized by the prospect of untold riches from China’s untapped consumer markets -- little realizing that China would never be as stupid as we were, and allow foreign competitors to get the edge. 

The gullible and naive ‘Asia experts’ labored under the impression that if we gave China the Olympics, if we engaged on China’s terms, if we got China into the trading system, then China would become more democratic, human rights would improve, and we would all be a lot richer.
Well the Chinese got richer. 

And the elites in America got richer. 

But is China any more democratic? 

No; it has regressed, if that is possible, from communist oligarchy to an increasingly totalitarian state. Is China playing by the rules? 

No; it is quite literally taking islands from its neighbors, ignoring intentional rulings, and flouting agreed maritime boundaries. 

Instead of playing by the established rules of the international community it is actively setting its own, creating a network of quiescent countries -- including in Europe -- through its One Belt, One Road infrastructure initiative. 

Its aggressive cyber-warfare against America has included not only industrial espionage but the theft of Americans’ personal data on a massive scale.
Meanwhile, Chinese industry continues to undercut American manufacturing, totally disproportionate tariffs are levied on foreign imports to China and currency manipulation has further put our exporters at an unfair disadvantage. 

Even when China does allow American corporations to compete in its markets, it’s entirely on the regime’s terms: American companies cannot own their own Chinese businesses, they can only operate through joint ventures. 

And for technology companies, a condition of operation is to hand over commercial secrets in vital areas like AI and quantum computing. 

The Chinese have turned intellectual property theft into a weapon of war.
I hate to say I told you so -- but I told you so.
Against the grain of the elite’s embarrassing China swoon, I argued all along that no good would come of this. 

While I was working in Downing Street I typically stayed away from foreign policy but I did have one early victory as I persuaded David Cameron, in the teeth of frantic protests from the Foreign Office and Treasury, that his first major international visit as Prime Minister should be to India not China. 

Of course the corrupt apparatchiks of Beijing, by now accustomed to over a decade of craven kowtowing by the supine West, were infuriated.
And sure enough, the China-skeptic posture I advocated was reversed in an instant, culminating in the abject humiliation of a lavish state visit to Britain for the brutal dictator Xi Jinping, paraded through the streets of London in a gold carriage while goons from the Chinese Embassy beat up pro-democracy protesters just a few feet away.
Well now we know. 

We can’t pretend that China wants anything less than world domination -- economically, technologically, politically, militarily. 

We can't waste time hoping it will play by our rules. 

It won't. 

The sooner we realize that, the sooner we can take the aggressive stance we need to isolate this rising giant of a rival. 

We put all our might into fighting and winning the Cold War against the Soviets; the Chinese regime is an infinitely bigger threat because unlike the Soviet Union it is an economic powerhouse. 

Military conflict between China and America isn't inevitable, and I'm not advocating that we go down that path. 

But for our long term prosperity, and for a world run according to the values of openness and democracy, we must take aggressive action now, even at the cost of short-term pain.
Yes we have to get tough on our trade imbalances with China, as President Trump has been doing. But we can and should go further than that. 

When I was at Oxford, I proudly joined protests against apartheid South Africa. 

They were rightly an international pariah for their despicable treatment of the majority of their people.
It’s time for a complete economic boycott of China. 

We can start by imposing exactly the same conditions on Chinese companies in America as the ones imposed on American companies in China: no independent operations, compulsory joint ventures and the forced handover of intellectual property. 

How long do you think Chinese companies would stay here on that basis? 

Next: no American company or investor should be permitted to support China's various schemes for world domination like One Belt One Road. 

All U.S. companies in China should pull out, and no new investments should be made.
Yes this seems drastic but in the long run it is our only hope of putting sufficient pressure on the vile Beijing regime that it might collapse from within. 

China is our enemy, not our “partner,” and we need to start acting like it.