As US welcomes Dalai Lama, China media blames 'meddling Indians'

The Dalai Lama last week was invited to deliver the annual commencement address at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) in June.
By Shraddha Jandial

China's state media has launched a scathing attack targeting overseas Indians for "meddling" in China-United States relations after the Dalai Lama was invited to speak in the US later this year.
Although the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader has been warmly received by leading U.S. senators as well as leaders in European capitals, a commentary by a prominent strategic affairs expert in China's Party-run Global Times instead pointed the finger squarely at overseas Indians, warning they would "bear political consequences".
The Dalai Lama last week was invited to deliver the annual commencement address at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) in June.
Xu Liang, who is the Executive Director of the Indian Studies Center at Beijing International Studies University, wrote: "What is laughable is that the person behind the infamous invitation was campus Chancellor Pradeep Khosla, an Indian American."
Khosla, incidentally, is an internationally recognised and renowned scientist and computer engineer.

THE INVITE
The invite, the Global Times commentary said, "shows how some Indian Americans agitate China-India and China-US relations." 

It said "he is not the first and the only person to take such action", and claimed that "in recent years, as Indian authorities gradually offset the support for the Dalai Lama, some public organizations supporting the Buddhist monk have become more active".
The paper claimed "some Indians in European countries have also tried to lobby local officials for more opportunities for the Dalai Lama to speak to an international audience. With a clear knowledge of the Chinese government's stance toward the issue, these Indians overseas are deliberately opposing China."

The commentary ended with a warning for the new Trump administration, saying that if it "wants to alter the consensus reached between China and the US after the end of WWII over Tibet, they will thoroughly embarrass themselves."
While the Global Times pointed the finger at "overseas Indians" for invitations to the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, in fact, has been received by leading U.S. senators and members of Congress alike.

DALAI LAMA LEADS OPENING PRAYERS
In 2014, the Dalai Lama even led opening prayers in a landmark event at the Senate Chamber.
Moreover, the Dalai Lama's recent welcomes have received bipartisan support. 

Just last year, Republican Speaker Paul Ryan and Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, both of whom have been vocal about the Tibetan issue, hosted a lunch for the Dalai Lama at the U.S. Capitol during a 15-day visit to the U.S.
Pelosi, a leading Democrat, said then the "bipartisan luncheon is a tribute to the deep respect His Holiness enjoys on both sides of the aisle for the message of peace, compassion and responsibility he brings to the world."
"Every time His Holiness visits the Capitol," Pelosi said, "he reminds us that 'change comes through action,' and that Congress must do our part to help the Tibetan people in their fight to preserve their language, culture and religion."

How Congress Can Help a Chinese Dissident

Honor Liu Xiaobo—a Nobel winner—with a street sign in front of China’s Embassy.
By JARED GENSER

In the waning days of the current Congress, House Speaker Paul Ryan has an opportunity to send a message to Beijing about the value Americans place on human rights. 

He can bring to the floor for a vote a bill adopted unanimously in the Senate to rename the street in front of the Chinese Embassy for Liu Xiaobo, China’s jailed Nobel Peace Prize laureate.
Mr. Liu was arrested in December 2008 after penning a series of essays and participating in the drafting of a pro-democracy manifesto known as Charter 08. 

The government held him in solitary confinement without charge or access to legal counsel before ultimately sentencing him to 11 years in prison for “inciting subversion.”

The dissident in April 2008.

Shortly after Mr. Liu won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010, his wife, Liu Xia, was placed under house arrest. 

She has been held in her apartment in Beijing without charge or trial for more than five years. 

A guard is posted outside her door 24 hours a day.
When Chinese dissidents organize and challenge the one-party system, Beijing responds with an iron fist, imprisoning and torturing those who dare to speak out. 

Chinese authorities highlight Liu Xiaobo’s case to many of these troublemakers, pointing out that the world won’t help even Nobelist Liu Xiaobo.
Obama has raised Mr. Liu’s case publicly just twice. 

But neither he nor anyone from the White House has publicly mentioned Liu Xia’s name let alone challenged China’s claim that she is free. 

If Obama has made any private efforts on behalf of the Lius, they have had no discernible effect.
In February the Senate adopted a bill to rename the street in front of the Chinese Embassy. 

This legislation followed the bipartisan tradition of a bill adopted by Congress in 1984 and signed into law by President Reagan renaming the street in front of the Soviet Embassy for dissident Andrei Sakharov, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975.
Speaking after the Senate action, State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner indicated that the president would veto the bill if it reaches his desk. 

“We view this kind of legislative action as something that only complicates our efforts, so we oppose this approach,” he said.
Meanwhile, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee, agrees with the administration and is blocking the bill from being considered in his committee. 

Speaker Ryan has the authority to move the bill to an immediate vote on the House floor, where it would likely pass by a bipartisan, veto-proof majority.
Surely the United States should celebrate the courage of individuals who stand up to authoritarian regimes. 

If Obama wants to veto this bill and stand with China against his fellow Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo, then let that be his legacy on human rights.