Affichage des articles dont le libellé est sovereignty. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est sovereignty. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 7 janvier 2020

Chinese Aggressions

Indonesia Will Not Negotiate Its Sovereignty in South China Sea
  • Indonesia will never recognize China’s fallacious claims
  • Indonesia has plans to develop fishing grounds near Natuna
By Arys Aditya and Philip Heijmans
Natuna Islands

Indonesia will not compromise on its sovereignty in the South China Sea amid the recent sighting of Chinese fishing vessels near the Natuna Islands, which lie between Malaysia and Borneo, President Joko Widodo said.
Speaking at a plenary cabinet session in Jakarta Monday, Jokowi, as Widodo is known, said the increased presence of Chinese ships in the disputed waters since December was a violation of international law. 
He said in a statement posted on the cabinet secretariat website there would be “no negotiation when it comes to our sovereignty.”
Jokowi is scheduled to visit Natuna on Wednesday, according to Defrizal, head of communications at the Natuna regency who goes by one name, while the Indonesian Air Force had deployed four F-16 fighter jets to the islands, Detik news site reported on Tuesday.
Indonesia has also stepped up patrols in the gas-rich area, deploying five ships and two aircraft last week. 
On Monday, the navy dispatched additional warships to the area, Channel News Asia reported citing Commander Fajar Tri Rohadi, a public affairs officer with the First Fleet Command of the Indonesia Navy.
“This is our sovereign right,” Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi said after the cabinet meeting, urging China to comply with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
 “Indonesia will never recognize nine dash lines or unilateral claims made by China that do not have legal reasons recognized by international law.”
The latest conflict follows accusations by the U.S. and other coastal states in Southeast Asia that China was taking a more aggressive stance on its claims to more than 80% of the lucrative waters in the South China Sea.
China has said it’s operating legally, and has called on the U.S. to stop interfering in the region.
There were several reported incidents involving Chinese coast guard vessels entering waters controlled by other claimants last year, including one that resulted in a nearly four-month-long standoff with Vietnam.
Malaysia also drew an objection from Beijing on Dec. 12 when it issued a submission to the UN defining its continental shelf.
 
Sovereignty Battle
The incident began more than two weeks ago when Chinese coast guard vessels escorting dozens of fishing vessels were spotted in Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone, the Jakarta Post reported, triggering the foreign ministry to send a diplomatic protest to Beijing on Dec 30.
Last year, the Indonesian government announced plans to develop the lucrative fishing grounds near Natuna in part to assert its sovereign authority there.
It also pledged to build new cold-storage facilities to turn the area into a functional fishing hub by the year’s end.
In addition to the navy, Mahfud MD, coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs, said on Monday 120 fishing vessels had been called in to further reinforce patrols.
“Aside from using your rights as a citizen, you are also obligated to help defend the country, showing that this is ours,” Mahfud said in a statement on the coordinating ministry website.
This is not the first time the two sides have faced conflict near Natuna.
Indonesia has for years fended off Chinese fisherman caught poaching in its waters -- confiscating and destroying hundreds of boats.
While Indonesia has sought to remain neutral in the wider dispute, Jokowi also offered a similar statement on Indonesia’s sovereignty in May 2016 following several incursions by Chinese fishing boats and its coast guard.
“This is how it has responded since the 2016 incursions. So if there was posturing, it was back then,” said Aaron Connelly, a research fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Southeast Asian Political Change and Foreign Policy program.
“Indonesian policy has been remarkably consistent on this issue.”— With

jeudi 28 juin 2018

China’s social credit system interferes in other nations’ sovereignty

System, criticised as an Orwellian tool of mass surveillance, is shaping behaviour of foreign businesses, report says
By Kelsey Munro
China’s social credit system, a big-data system for monitoring and shaping business and citizens’ behaviour, is reaching beyond China’s borders to impact foreign companies, according to new research.
The system, which has been compared to an Orwellian tool of mass surveillance, is an ambitious work in progress: a series of big data and AI-enabled processes that effectively grant subjects a social credit score based on their social, political and economic behaviour.
People with low scores can be banned or blacklisted from accessing services including flights and train travel; while those with high scores can access privileges. 
The Chinese government aims to have all 1.35 billion of its citizens subject to the system by 2020.
But a new report by US China scholar Samantha Hoffman for the ASPI International Cyber Policy Institute in Canberra claims the system’s impact beyond China’s borders has not been well understood, and is in fact already shaping the behaviour of foreign businesses in line with Chinese Communist party preferences. 
It has the “potential to interfere directly in the sovereignty of other nations”, she said.
She said recent incidents where Chinese authorities pressured international airlines in the US and Australia to use Beijing’s preferred terminology to refer to Taiwan and Hong Kong were high-profile examples of this new extension of the social credit system rules to foreign companies.
The civil aviation industry credit management measures that the airlines are accused of violating were written to implement two key policy guidelines on establishing China’s social credit system,” she explains. 
Social credit was used specifically in these cases to compel international airlines to acknowledge and adopt the CCP’s version of the truth, and so repress alternative perspectives on Taiwan.
As of 1 January 2018, all companies with a Chinese business licence – a necessity for operating in the country – were brought into the social credit system through the new licence requirement to have an 18-digit “unified social credit code”. 
Through this business ID number, the Chinese government keeps track of all businesses, reporting transgressions on its National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, Hoffman said. 
The system extends to non-profits, NGOs, trade unions and social organisations after 30 June.
“Companies don’t have a choice but to comply if they want to continue doing business in China,” Hoffman told the Guardian Australia.
Sanctions for companies so far have come in the form of fines, she said, citing the example of the Japanese retailer Muji, which was fined 200,000 yuan in May for labelling on products sold in China that listed Taiwan as a country. 
The fine cited a violation of PRC advertising law banning activity which damages “the dignity or interests of the state”, but the violation was also recorded on the social credit system’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. 
This listing can trigger further fines from other state agencies, Hoffman said.
It is not clear whether foreign companies have access to the information kept on their social credit record, nor if foreign citizens could find out if their nation’s companies have made concessions or changed their behavior as a result.
Guardian Australia unsuccessfully sought comment from Qantas, which announced earlier this month it would change the language used on its global websites in accordance with the Chinese government’s preferred terminology for Taiwan.
Hoffman is a visiting academic fellow at the Mercator Institute for China Studies in Berlin. 
Her report, Social Credit: Technology-enhanced Authoritarian Control with Global Consequences, was published on Thursday by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a security-focused thinktank which has urged the Australian government take a harder line on Chinese government interference in its democracy.
The report comes amid a difficult period in Australia-China relations; in the same week Australia’s parliamentary committee released a bipartisan report paving the way for the passage of new draft laws against covert, coercive or corrupt foreign interference.

What is the social credit system?

China’s social credit system is an Orwellian tool of social monitoring and political repression.
People can be blacklisted for transgressions such as smoking on trains, using expired tickets or failing to pay fines, as well as spreading false information or causing trouble on flights, according to statements released by China’s National Development and Reform Commission in March.
Citizens with high credit scores can access better hotels, rental homes and even schools; while those with low credit scores can be temporarily or permanently banned from taking planes or trains, as happened to 6.15 million people in 2017, on the government’s own figures. 
A pilot version of the scheme run this year in Hangzhou City reportedly saw citizens with high social credit ratings get free access to gym facilities and shorter public hospital waiting times.
On the business side, the Brookings Institute has reported that businesses that pay tax on time and “abide by government demands” will get better loan conditions and easier access to public tenders; noncompliant businesses will face more difficult business conditions.
But researchers believe its power and reach may be overstated.
Queensland University of Technology researcher Meg Jing Zeng has said that while the social credit system can be used to punish political dissenters such as journalist Liu Hu, it may have positive benefits because government officials can be blacklisted for corrupt behaviour. 
Over 1,100 officials were on restricted lists at December 2017, according to the state media organisation People’s Daily.
An academic study of the social credit system released last month by Belgian researcher Rogier Creemers said that while the Chinese government had high ambitions for the system, at present it remained a relatively crude tool.

jeudi 8 mars 2018

Chinese Peril


Africa should avoid forfeiting sovereignty to China over loans: Tillerson
By Aaron Maasho


African Union (AU) Commission Chairman Moussa Faki, of Chad, and U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson hold a news conference after their meeting at African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia March 8, 2018.

ADDIS ABABA -- U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on Thursday that African countries should be careful not to forfeit their sovereignty when they accept loans from China, the continent’s biggest trading partner.
Tillerson is using his first diplomatic trip to the continent to bolster security alliances on a continent increasingly turning to Beijing for aid and trade.
He may also seek to smooth relations after U.S. President Trump reportedly dismissed some African nations as “shithole countries” in January. 
Trump later denied making the comment.
“We are not in any way attempting to keep Chinese dollars from Africa,” Tillerson told a news conference in the Ethiopian capital. 
“It is important that African countries carefully consider the terms of those agreements and not forfeit their sovereignty.”
The United States is the leading aid donor to Africa but China surpassed it as a trade partner in 2009. Beijing has pumped billions into infrastructure projects, though critics say the use of Chinese firms and labor undermines their value.
Tillerson said Chinese investments “do not bring significant job creation locally” and criticized how Beijing structures loans to African government.
If a government accepts a Chinese loan and “gets into trouble”, he said, it can “lose control of its own infrastructure or its own resources through default.” 
He did not give examples.
The growing Chinese lending to the continent has also attracted criticism from some Africans, who say China’s agenda is to feed its appetite for African raw materials like oil, timber and minerals, and secure contracts for its firms.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, visiting Zimbabwe on Thursday, told reporters it was inappropriate for Tillerson to criticize China’s relationship with African countries.
“It was not appropriate to criticize the relations of his hosts — when he was a guest there — with another country,” he said. 
Many African governments enjoy close ties with both Washington and Beijing.
Kenya, for example, inaugurated a $3.2 billion railway funded by China last year. 
For the last three years, Kenya has received more than $100 million annually in U.S. security assistance.
Asked about Tillerson’s criticism of China’s approach on the continent, Kenya’s foreign affairs minister Monica Juma said: “This country is engaging with partners from across the world driven by our own interests and for our own value.”

OPAQUE CONTRACTS

Tillerson arrived in Ethiopia, Africa’s second most populous nation, on Wednesday and visited the African Union headquarters on Thursday. 
The complex was funded and built by China and is seen as a symbol of Beijing’s thrust for influence and access to the continent’s natural resources.
Ethiopia is home to some of Beijing’s biggest investments, from a railway to Djibouti that opened last year to factories and industrial parks.
Earlier this week, Tillerson criticized China’s approach to Africa which encouraged dependency through opaque contracts and predatory loan practices.
Ethiopia’s prime minister resigned suddenly last month and a state of emergency was imposed but protests in the restive Oromia region have continued.
The secretary of state met Hailemariam Desalegn, who resigned as prime minister but is still acting in the post awaiting a replacement. 
Details of their discussions were not released.
Tillerson said after meeting his Ethiopian counterpart Workneh Gebeyehu that the answer to political turmoil in Ethiopia was greater freedoms.
“It is important that the country moves on past the state of emergency as quickly as possible,” he said.
Tillerson reiterated previous calls for African states to cut ties with North Korea.
North Korea has more than a dozen embassies on the continent. 
The Trump administration has said that Pyongyang earns hard currency from arms deals with African government and the trafficking of wildlife parts from Africa.
Tillerson is due to fly to Djibouti, host to military bases owned by the U.S., China, Japan, France, and Italy.
He will then visit Kenya, a key U.S. ally in the fight against al Shabaab Islamist militants in Somalia, before traveling to Chad and Nigeria, which are also battling to contain Islamist insurgents.
Analysts say Trump has focused mainly on security concerns in Africa at a time when China, Turkey and other nations are ramping up diplomatic and business links.
“When you look at the set of countries that are being visited I think it kind of reinforces the perception that security, indeed, is the overwhelming focus,” said Brahima Coulibaly, the director of the Africa Growth Initiative at Brookings Institution.

samedi 30 décembre 2017

The Iron Lady

Taiwan’s president pledges stronger defense to counter China
By Ralph Jennings 

Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen delivers a speech during the year-end media event at the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology in Taoyuan county, Taiwan, Friday, Dec. 29, 2017. Tsai pledged Friday to step up military spending to defend the self-ruled island’s sovereignty in the face of China’s growing assertiveness in the region. 

TAOYUAN CITY, Taiwan — Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen pledged Friday to step up military spending to defend the self-ruled island’s sovereignty in the face of China’s growing assertiveness in the region.
Beijing has rattled its neighbors including Taiwan, which communist mainland leaders claim as their territory, as well as Japan and South Korea by sending military aircraft close to their airspace in recent months.
“China’s attempt to expand militarily in the region is more and more obvious,” Tsai said at a news conference at a military research center.
“Taiwan needs to stand up for its sovereignty, and it wants to protect regional peace, stability and prosperity.”
China and Taiwan split in 1949 after Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalists fled the mainland following a civil war. Beijing insists the two sides must unite, but surveys show most Taiwanese oppose that.
The mainland is expanding its regional reach by developing aircraft carriers and building artificial islands to enforce Beijing’s claim to large swaths of the South China Sea.
“This situation is, put simply, not just a problem facing Taiwan,” Tsai said at the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology. 
“It’s one that countries are facing around the whole region.”
Tsai gave no details of possible military spending increases, but a national security official said in October that the government would seek at least 2 percent each year.
Beijing increased military spending by 7 percent this year compared with 2016. 
For much of the past two decades, the People’s Liberation Army has been awarded increases of at least 10 percent each year.
Tsai has emphasized domestic development and production of weapons. 
The U.S. government approved a $1.4 billion arms sale to Taiwan in June but, in an effort to mollify Beijing, has been reluctant to supply everything the island’s leadership wants.
“We can’t rely on others,” said Tsai. 
“As the president, I have the responsibility to protect our sovereignty and the responsibility to maintain peace and stability in the region.”
Tsai, a 61-year-old law scholar who took office in May 2016, has irritated Beijing by rejecting its idea that both sides belong to “one China” as a condition for formal dialogue.
China has tried to punish the island by scaling back tourist travel to Taiwan, according to travel agents in Taipei. 
The island’s government also suspects that Beijing has persuaded two foreign governments to end diplomatic recognition of Taiwan since 2016.
The institute where Tsai spoke has developed missile and radar systems and was picked by the defense ministry this year to develop trainer jets. 
The ministry also has signed up Taiwanese manufacturers to develop a $3.3 billion submarine.
“Don’t for a minute underestimate Taiwan’s domestic ability” to develop weaponry, the president said.
Tsai suggested that countries in East Asia “with similar ideas” communicate about China’s military movements. 
But she expects officials in Beijing to shun the use of force.
“I believe any reasonable policymaker — and I believe the current Chinese leader is a reasonable policymaker — would not want to use military force at this time or at any time to resolve the Taiwan issue and that this wouldn’t be his current strategy,” she said.
Over the past two years, Chinese warplanes have flown near Taiwan’s military defense zone some 10 times, according to a former Taiwanese defense minister, Andrew Yang.
In November, bombers and other aircraft were spotted in the Miyako Strait north of Taiwan and in the Luzon Strait separating the island from the Philippines, the defense ministry said. 
It said Chinese aircraft flew through the two straits again on Dec. 11.
“Psychologically and politically, it certainly sends a message,” Yang said.
China’s aircraft are testing Taiwan’s resolve to defend itself, said Shane Lee, a political scientist at Chang Jung Christian University.
After President Trump signed a law this month that opened the way for U.S. Navy ships to visit Taiwan, a Chinese diplomat quoted by state media said the mainland would attack the day that happened.

jeudi 8 juin 2017

Timeo Sinesos et dona ferentes

ASIO investigation targets Communist Party links to Australian political system
A joint Four Corners-Fairfax investigation by Nick McKenzie, Chris Uhlmann, Richard Baker, Daniel Flitton, Sashka Koloff

China's fifth column: Huang Xiangmo (second from left) with Ernest Wong, former prime minster Julia Gillard and Sam Dastyari. Huang has provided large donations to the major political parties.

The cold Canberra air had yet to be tempered by the dawn when plain-clothes agents from ASIO and a locksmith assembled outside an apartment in the upmarket suburb of Kingston.
The locksmith's work done, the agents filed past two wooden Chinese artefacts standing like sentries at the entrance, and up a single flight of stairs into the apartment. 
The living room was decorated with exquisite porcelain vases and a dozen half-melted candles on a table.
The apartment belonged to Roger Uren, a tall, bookish man with thinning silver hair. 
Before resigning in August 2001, Uren was the assistant secretary of the Office of National Assessments, the agency that briefs the prime minister on highly classified intelligence matters.
Uren's speciality was China. 
Foreign affairs sources in Canberra say he was regarded as one of Australia's leading sinologists. 
In 2011, prime minister Kevin Rudd was reportedly considering appointing him as Australia's ambassador in Beijing.
A close friend of Uren describes him as eccentric. 
Under the pseudonym "John Byron", he had penned a book on Mao Zedong's feared intelligence chief, Kang Sheng, who amassed a collection of erotic art that was seized by his Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. 
Uren shared Sheng's taste in art.
"When we visited the markets in Beijing, the erotic art sellers would call out his name because he was a regular customer," the friend recalls. 
Some of these artworks were on display as the agents from Australia's counter-intelligence agency searched the apartment in the early hours of October 7, 2015.
This raid was a small piece of a much larger picture. 
It reflects deep concern inside ASIO about China's attempts to influence Australia's politics.
The issue of foreign interference has exploded into prominence globally since the revelations of Russia's influence over the American election in favour of Donald Trump.
In Australia, it is the Chinese Communist Party causing the greatest concern, and Beijing's attempts at influence potentially extend to political players as senior as Labor's Sam Dastyari and the Liberal Party's Andrew Robb.
But neither of those men, nor even Uren himself, were the target of ASIO's 2015 raid which, until now, has remained one of Canberra's most closely guarded secrets. 
The agents were searching for evidence about somebody else entirely -- Roger Uren's wife.
Chinese mole Sheri Yan and her husband, Roger Uren

Sheri Yan 'a dynamic, active person'
Sheri Yan arrived in the United States in 1987 with $400 sewn into her clothes and a fierce desire to make something of herself. 
She met Uren, who was working as a diplomat at Australia's Washington embassy, and helped him research his Kang Sheng book.
By the time Uren returned to Australia to join the ONA in 1992, he and Yan were a couple. 
They moved together to Canberra. 
As Uren climbed the ranks of the intelligence assessment agency, Yan was forging a reputation as a fixer and lobbyist, able to open doors in Beijing for Australian and US businesses seeking access to Communist Party cadres.
She also sold her services to Chinese entrepreneurs wanting to build their fortunes overseas. 
By the time Uren resigned from the ONA in 2001 and moved with Yan to Beijing, her network was flourishing.
John Fitzgerald, a former Ford Foundation director in Beijing said he received a warning from an "old friend in Australia's security establishment" to "stay away from Yan".

Former Australian ambassador to China, Geoff Raby, who lived in the same exclusive St Regis apartment block as Yan in Beijing, described her as a "dynamic, active person, [who] speaks both languages perfectly, is charming, and comes from a well-connected background".
Yan's business network includes the US software tycoon Peter Norton, high-flying Australian corporate figure and Australia's former New York consul general, Phil Scanlan, and former ABC chairman Maurice Newman
She also knew several senior Australian politicians.
But not everyone trusted Sheri Yan. 
John Fitzgerald, a former Ford Foundation director in Beijing turned Swinburne University China expert, told Four Corners and Fairfax Media of a warning he received from an "old friend in Australia's security establishment" to "stay away from Yan".
"I understand that Sheri Yan is very closely connected with some of the most powerful and influential families and networks in China," Mr Fitzgerald said.
"Once you know that, you don't need to know much more."
Among Yan's Chinese clients was billionaire property developer, Chau Chak Wing
Chau is known in Australia for his large political donations, philanthropy and for buying the nation's most expensive house, James Packer's Sydney mansion, for $70 million, sight unseen.
He gave $20 million for the construction of the business school University of Technology, Sydney, which was designed by Frank Gehry, and is called the "Chau Chak Wing building".
And over the years, Chau donated more than $4 million to Labor and the Coalition. 
Among his contacts were senior politicians on both sides of the aisle, including John Howard and Kevin Rudd.
As ex-prime ministers, both have visited Chau's palatial conference centre and resort, Imperial Springs, in the thriving Guangdong province in China's south.
According to a close friend of Yan, Chau engaged her as a business consultant for 18 months around 2007 and again in 2013, when she helped entice global A-listers to his conference centre.
Then it all came tumbling down.

Bribery scandal unfolds across Pacific

The covert ASIO raid of Yan and Uren's Canberra property in October 2015 was timed to coincide with events across the Pacific. 
In New York, Yan and several other Chinese business people were being arrested by the FBI for running a bribery racket in the United Nations.
According to US District Attorney Preet Bharara, Yan and her co-accused had paid kickbacks to the president of the United Nations general assembly, John Ashe, and in return, Ashe performed certain services for wealthy Chinese businessmen.
"For Rolex watches, bespoke suits and a private basketball court, John Ashe, the 68th President of the UN General assembly, sold himself and the global institution he led," Mr Bharara told journalists at a briefing announcing the arrests.
UN greed: For Rolex watches, bespoke suits and a private basketball court, John Ashe, the 68th President of the UN General assembly, sold himself and the global institution he led.

ASIO suspected, though, that Yan's activities extended well beyond bribery. 
Classified material shared between FBI counter-espionage officials and ASIO prior to the Canberra raid suggested Yan was working with Chinese intelligence.
And a Four Corners-Fairfax Media investigation has established that, in the apartment she shared with Uren, ASIO agents located highly classified Australian documents
Uren had apparently removed them from the ONA prior to his departure in August 2001.
The documents contained details of what Western intelligence agencies knew about their Chinese counterparts.
ASIO called in the federal police to launch an inquiry. 
Well-placed sources have confirmed Uren may face criminal charges.
But it is understood the documents are not the main game for ASIO. 
While the agency never comments publicly on its operations, it is understood the investigation into Yan involves suspicions she may have infiltrated or sought clandestine influence in Australia and the US on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.
In his brief interview, Uren labelled the notion "pure fantasy" concocted by the FBI.
"They think anyone who is Chinese is a spy," he said.
But professor Rory Medcalf, who directs the Australian National University's National Security College, says the ASIO raid would not have occurred without "the authorisation of the Attorney General" and input from "many parts of the Australian national security community."

Potential to cause harm to nation's sovereignty
Professor Rory Medcalf speaks with Four Corners
Professor Rory Medcalf says ASIO has a "real concern" about the Chinese Communist Party's influence in Australia.

Mr Medcalf believes the targeting of Yan reflects a small part of a "deep and real concern" inside ASIO about the Chinese Communist Party's secret interference to influence operations in Australia.
Eight serving government officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, broadly confirmed Mr Medcalf's assessment.
Several of these officials also confirmed that in the months leading up to the ASIO raid, the agency had been collating intelligence suggesting Australia was the target of an opaque foreign interference campaign by China on a larger scale than that being carried out by any other nation.
The Chinese Communist Party was working to infiltrate Australian political and foreign affairs circles, as well to gain more influence over the nation's growing Chinese population.
ASIO feared the campaign was succeeding. 
In comments to a Senate committee at the end of May (which were overshadowed by a controversy about refugees and terrorism), director general Duncan Lewis appeared to confirm this.
"Espionage and foreign interference continue to occur on an unprecedented scale and this has the potential to cause serious harm to the nation's sovereignty, the integrity of our political system, our national security capabilities, our economy and other interests."
Mr Lewis didn't name Beijing. 
But ASIO's serious concern about the Chinese Communist Party were on clear display when analysts working for Mr Lewis prepared an extraordinary document in the weeks before the Sheri Yan raid in October 2015.
It was created so that Mr Lewis could show it to the senior officials of Australia's Liberal, Labor and National parties to warn them about accepting political donations from China.
A number of people who have seen the document described it -- at the top was a diagram representing the Chinese Communist Party with lines connected this diagram to photos of two Chinese-born billionaires.
These two men were known to dislike each other. 
Both had amassed significant wealth in China. 
Both are significant donors to Australia's political parties. 
One of them was a businessman called Huang Xiangmo
The other was Sheri Yan's sometime employer, Chau Chak Wing.

Chau Chak Wing takes legal action against media

Chau Chak Wing was given the codename 'CC3' in a sealed indictment in a New York court. 

Chau Chak Wing is not directly named in court documents unsealed by US officials in the Sheri Yan UN bribery case, but he is referred to by a pseudonym, "CC3".
CC3 was an "old friend" of Yan whose firm had wired $200,000 to UN chief John Ashe to make the payment organised by Yan. 
There is no evidence that Chau knew it was illegal to pay a speaking fee to a UN official.
The money was paid to secure Ashe's appearance in his official capacity at Chau Chak Wing's palatial Imperial Springs conference centre. 
Several former politicians would be there, including Bill Clinton.
Under US bribery laws, Ashe's status as a serving UN official meant it was illegal for him to receive payments. 
He was charged alongside Yan, but "died" last year, shortly before a guilty plea from Yan led to her jailing for 20 months.
While she is still in prison, Chau Chak Wing has faced no criminal charges. 
He has taken legal action against Australian media outlets for any suggestion he is involved in impropriety and his representatives have assured his Australian political contacts that Chau has no connection to the wrongdoing of others targeted by the FBI.
Chau Chak Wing declined to answer questions put by Four Corners and Fairfax Media, and he appears to have shrugged off the matter. 
Two weeks after "CC3" was identified in FBI documents, former prime minister Kevin Rudd attended Chau Chak Wing's Guangdong conference centre to speak at a global leadership event.
Kevin Rudd in talks with Chau Chak Wing: There is not yet evidence that Rudd received money from Chau.

Chinese donors are channels to advance Beijing's interests
ASIO chief Duncan Lewis's document picturing Chau Chak Wing and Huang Xiangmo was essentially a prop. 
Three times he removed it from a black briefcase to display to three different men -- Brian Loughnane, the Liberal Party's federal director; George Wright, Labor's national secretary; and Scott Mitchell, the National Party's federal director.
ASIO's Duncan Lewis warned politicians of the risks associated with Chinese donations. 

They were at the time the most senior administrative officials of Australia's major political parties, and Mr Lewis's document conveyed a strong message: be wary of Chinese donors.
''[Lewis] said 'be careful','' says a source who is aware of what the trio were told.
"He was saying that the connections between these guys and the Communist Party is strong," says another political figure briefed about the content of the ASIO warning.
ASIO also warned this connection meant the donors could be channels to advance Beijing's interests.
In his briefings, Mr Lewis was careful to stress that neither Chau Chak Wing nor Huang Xiangmo was accused of any crime and that Mr Lewis wasn't instructing the parties to stop taking their donations. 
But he described how the Chinese Communist Party co-opts influential businessmen by rewarding those who assist it.
This meant there was a risk Chau Chak Wing's donations, which are made via the Australian citizen's companies, might come with strings attached.
Chau's ownership of a newspaper in China places him in effective partnership with Communist Party propaganda authorities, while his membership of a provincial-level People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) is also telling.
CPPCCs ostensibly oversee China's political and policy making system, but in reality they are used to entrench the Communist Party's monopoly power and advance its interests in China and abroad.
People such as Chau who make the cut as members of a CPPCC are screened by the Communist Party's United Front Work Department, a unique agency that aims to win over friends and isolate enemies in order to further the party's agenda.
In May 2015, Xi Jinping publicly championed the United Front and the CPPCC, describing their mission as "persuading people… to expand the strength of the common struggle".
"We have to assume that individuals like Chau have really deep, serious connections to the Chinese Communist Party," Mr Medcalf said.
"Even if they're not receiving any kind of direction, they would feel some sense of obligation, or indeed to make the right impression on the powers that be in China, to demonstrate that they're being good members of the party, that they're pursuing the party's interests."
Mr Medcalf said ASIO's decision to come out of the shadows and identify Chau in its briefings to the Coalition and Labor is "certainly unusual" ... "it would reflect very real concern," he said.

Political donations are made 'with a purpose'
The most recent head of Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Peter Varghese is also troubled by the willingness of political parties to take foreign money. 
He warns political donations are made "with a purpose" and large Chinese companies act in accordance with the interests of the Communist Party.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Secretary Peter Varghese during a Senate Estimates hearings at Parliament House in Canberra
Peter Varghese says Australia is on the cusp of significant changes.

"The Chinese system is such that the dividing line between a state decision, and a decision by a company that may be anticipating what is in the interests of the state, is rather blurred," he said.
The former DFAT chief is encouraging debate about Chinese interference because the stakes are so high. 
Any influence sought by Beijing may ultimately be aimed at advancing the strategic interests, activities and values of an authoritarian, one party state.
Australia is one of the few western countries that accepts political donations from foreigners, although the fact that Chau is an Australian citizen shows that a ban on donations from non-citizens may not mitigate the risk identified by Mr Varghese.
"It goes back to how we want to frame our laws on political donations and making sure people reveal their connections back to China if they are taking a position on a particular policy issue," he said.
If Chau has taken a position on any policy issue in Australia, he's not done so publicly. 
All he appears to have sought via his donations is access to some of Australia's most powerful men and women. 
But for the Chinese Communist Party, access to the right networks may be worthwhile in and of itself.
This is why Sheri Yan sought to compromise UN chief John Ashe, according to former CIA officer turned China-watcher Peter Mattis.
Mr Mattis said figures such as Yan who know how to cultivate networks of influence are "useful not only for getting things done, not only for injecting Chinese perspectives into [the networks], but also for being able to say, 'here are the players, here are the people who are important, here are their personal foibles'."
Chau Chak Wing may only ever have sought access, but the same can't be said of the second billionaire pictured alongside him in the ASIO briefing document.

Huang known by two formal identities
As with many men able to drop $100,000 at a casino or on a political donation, Huang Xiangmo is used to getting his way.
So it was with some consternation that, in early 2016, the lively businessman who sports a comb-over became worried his application for Australian citizenship was progressing more slowly than anticipated.
One thing bothering immigration authorities was the curious fact Huang Xiangmo had two separate formal identities -- he's also known as Huang Changran. 
But there was another reason for the delay. 
Huang's application was being assessed by ASIO.
Huang had likely become of interest to ASIO for a range of reasons. 
One was his leadership of the Australian arm of the Chinese Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China.
Former US Defence department China specialist Mark Stokes, an expert on Chinese Communist Party influence operations, said the Beijing headquarters of that organisation manages a "global outreach" project overseen by the Communist Party's United Front Work Department.
The "peaceful reunification" work of the council involves undermining the Taiwan and Hong Kong independence movements and asserting China's fiercely disputed claims over the South China Sea. 
Mr Stokes has also documented the Beijing-based council's links to Chinese intelligence agencies.
Huang's role as president of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China places him at the vanguard of the United Front's lobbying in Australia.
"He's a key member supported by the Chinese authorities, including the embassy or the consulate here," said Sydney University of Technology's China academic and communist party critic Dr Feng Chongyi.
Huang told Four Corners and Fairfax Media in a statement that, while it supported the one China policy, the ACPPRC was "an autonomous, non-government organisation", and it was "incorrect to describe… [it] as an affiliate" of the United Front Work Department or the Chinese Communist Party. The organisation "supports economic and cultural exchange programs and charitable causes," he said.
But according to Dr Feng, Huang's council role affords him immense influence and status, as well as a launching pad into Australian politics.
Sydney University of Technology's China academic Dr Feng Chongyi said Mr Huang's council role affords him immense influence and status.

'Life was a struggle'

The way Huang built his Australian network is all the more remarkable given his humble beginnings in the back blocks of southern China's Guangdong province.
As a 15-year-old, Mr Huang left school for a year to look after his impoverished family after the sudden death of his father.
"Life was a struggle, especially with five children to feed," he recently told a Chinese magazine. "Despite the hardships we were a close family."
In 2001, he scraped together enough funds to form the Yuhu Investment Development Company in Shenzen, a buzzing metropolis in Guangdong. 
He built upmarket villas and apartment blocks before diversifying into energy and agriculture. 
He also formed the close Communist Party connections expected of any billionaire property developer in China.
In 2011, Mr Huang moved to Australia. 
He claims to have been seeking new business opportunities and a place to raise his children where the "people are warm and friendly and the air is clean, very clean".
Australia was also free of the endemic corruption and corresponding anti-graft purges of the Chinese Communist Party that created an uncertain and sometimes hostile business environment for entrepreneurs.
Huang Xiangmo poses with Bob Carr at the University of Technology Sydney.
Beijing's stooges: Huang Xiangmo donated $1.8 million to help build the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney headed by Bob Carr.

In 2012, one of Huang's key Communist Party contacts in his home-town of Jieyang was targeted for corruption, a fact Mr Huang has privately brushed off as irrelevant.
After arriving in Sydney, Huang developed a shopping centre and launched a philanthropy blitz, donating millions of dollars to medical research and universities, including $1.8 million to help found the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.
The institute is headed by Bob Carr, whom Huang claims he hand-picked. 
Carr (who declined an interview request) disputes this, although it's unquestionable that Huang's large donation provided an open channel to the former foreign minister and premier.
Huang quickly became known as a "whale" in political fundraising circles. 
The nickname was earned with his very first donation: $150,000 to the NSW branch of the ALP on November 19, 2012. 
That same day, two of Huang's close associates, Chinese businessmen and peaceful reunification members Luo Chuangxiong and Peter Chen, gave an additional $350,000.
Huang and his allies' large donations were initially handled by the then ALP NSW secretary Sam Dastyari, along with Chinese community leader and ALP identity Ernest Wong, who quickly became one of  Huang's point men in Labor.
As well as encouraging Huang's campaign fundraising, Dastyari requested the developer donate $5,000 to settle an outstanding legal bill he had accumulated as party secretary.
In the Liberal camp, Huang was also dealing with high-flyers. 
They included trade minister Andrew Robb, whose Victorian fundraising vehicle was given $100,000 by Huang, and Tony Abbott, who encountered Huang at Liberal fundraisers where, in the lead up to the 2013 selection, the Chinese businessman donated $770,000.
Huang moved with ease across the political aisle. 
Dastyari and Robb both effusively praised Huang's "philanthropy" at charity or community events organised by the developer.
Huang Xiangmo and Andrew Robb in September 2014
For sale: Andrew Robb in September 2014 with Hoang Xiangmo

"He is a man of many dimensions from what I've already been able to determine," said Robb at a December 2013 charity event.
"He's a very thoughtful, cerebral fellow. I've had many interesting conversations already with Huang on an endless range of topics."
Robb said Huang's donation to Bob Carr's Australia-China Relations Institute showed he was a "visionary".
"China is going to be an integral part of all of our futures, and it is absolutely imperative that we build the closest possible relationship," Robb said.

At least $2.6m donated to the major parties

Huang first turned his political connections into a request for a favour in early 2013. 
Court records show it involved a minor immigration matter. 
His ally, Ernest Wong, was at the time an ALP deputy mayor, who Huang would recruit as an advisor to his Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China (Wong had, years earlier, been part of the council under its previous leadership).
Wong wrote a letter of support to help Huang secure a work visa for a Chinese employee. 
The Migration Review Tribunal later rejected the application because the proposed job referred to was not genuine.
Mr Huang at the launch of the chinese new year lantern festival in suit and tie with government officials
Huang (circled) at the launch of the Association's Chinese New Year Lantern Festival with Chinese and Australian Government officials.

Shortly after Wong penned the letter in question, in May 2013, he was parachuted into a NSW state parliament upper house seat left vacant by the resignation of former Labor member Eric Roozendaal
It was a curious affair, if only for the timing.
Roozendaal was suspended from Labor on November 7, 2012 over a corruption scandal.
This meant his place on the ALP's upper house ticket would need to be eventually filled.
Twelve days later, Huang and two fellow Peaceful Reunification council members donated $500,000 to the NSW ALP. 
After Wong took Roozendaal's place in the upper house, Huang employed Mr Roozendaal to work in his development firm.
Huang's donations to both major parties continued. 
Records reveal that over four years, Huang and his close associates or employees gave at least $2.6 million to the major parties.
It was these donations, along with Huang's Communist Party ties, that led to him being featured in the briefing spy chief Duncan Lewis gave the three political party chiefs in 2015.
The same qualification that applies to Chau Chak Wing also covers Huang --  Huang's donations were legal, and ASIO said the parties were under no obligation to refuse them.
Huang declined to answer detailed questions, but has denied any wrongdoing. 
In the right company, though, Huang himself has made no secret of his political views. 
Around the time of the ASIO briefing, he spoke at an event at the Chinese consulate to celebrate 66 years of Communist Party rule.
"We overseas Chinese unswervingly support the Chinese government's position to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity [and] support the development of the motherland as always," he said.
Huang's desire to champion Beijing's territorial claims eventually led to a clash with ALP policy. 
But in the months leading up to the election, Huang's most pressing concern was his application to become an Australian citizen. 
It had been temporarily blocked as ASIO attempted to understand his relationship with the Chinese Communist Party and other discrepancies in his application.
Huang did not know that Australian authorities had concerns, at least not initially. 
All he knew was that his application was taking far longer than he believed it should. 
The answer, he believed, lay not with a migration agent or lawyer, but with the intervention of his political friends.
"In China, the system works like that," explains a well-placed source.
Huang attempted to recruit a number of politicians to his citizenship cause, including former prime minister Tony Abbott. 
Several politicians agreed to help, but it appears only one followed through -- Sam Dastyari.
On four separate occasions over the first six months of 2016, Dastyari or his office called the Immigration Department to quiz officials about the status of Huang's application. 
The senator made at least two of these calls personally.
An Immigration Department spokesperson said citizenship was only granted for people of good character who could meet identity requirements, and who were not subject to adverse ASIO assessments.
"The Department is not influenced by representations, no matter who they are from, if the applicant does not meet the requirements of the Citizenship Act."
As for Dastyari's calls on Huang's behalf, one official said: "It shows a pattern of conduct, beyond a single call the department might get from a politician about a constituent".

$400,000 donation in question

Around the time of Dastyari's last call, and as the 2016 election neared, Huang promised the ALP another $400,000 in donations -- money the party desperately needed to fund its campaign. 
But then  Huang received some bad news. 
The ALP was publicly and unexpectedly challenging one of the core doctrines of Beijing's foreign policy.
At a lunchtime address on June 16, Labor shadow defence spokesman Stephen Conroy told the National Press Club that China's actions in the South China Sea were destabilising and absurd.
Labor, he said, was open to the Australian Navy conducting freedom-of-navigation exercises in the area.
In Beijing, the Chinese Communist Party viewed this as an unwelcome challenge. 
In Sydney, Huang decided to act.
He called ALP fundraising officials in Victoria. 
Mr Conroy's comments meant he could no longer deliver the promised $400,000 in donations. 
The ALP pushed for Huang to honour his commitment, but he stood firm. 
Mr Conroy had crossed the line and his comments would cost the ALP dearly.
Still Huang wasn't prepared to give up on Labor entirely. 
Just a day after Mr Conroy launched his South China Sea salvo, Dastyari and Huang spoke at adjacent lecterns at a press conference attended by the Chinese language media.
"The South China Sea is China's own affair," Dastyari stated. 
"On this issue, Australia should remain neutral and respect China's decision".
There is no suggestion Dastyari knew directly of the threat to the $400,000 donation.
Those comments cost Dastyari his frontbench job amid a storm of publicity after the election over why he had allowed Huang to pay for the $5,000 legal bill in 2014, and a second Chinese donor to contribute to pay a $1,670 office travel expense.
In response Dastyari said he had broken contact with Huang after "the events of last year".
Huang's use of a $400,000 donation as leverage over the ALP's foreign policy has remained hidden until now. 
It came about a year after ASIO had first put the political parties on notice about Huang's likely connections back in China.
"It's precisely the kind of example of economic inducement being turned into economic leverage or coercion," said Rory Medcalf from the ANU National Security College.
"It's a classic example of a benefit being provided, but then withheld as a way of punishment, and as a way of influencing Australia policy independence."
A few days after Huang said he would withdraw his offer of the $400,000 donation, he appeared at a Labor press conference to announce two Chinese candidates for the last two spots on the ALP's senate ticket.
One of the candidates was active ALP member Simon Zhou, a close associate and member of Huang's peaceful reunification council.
Zhou also helped raise funds for the NSW ALP, with two of his business associates donating $60,000 in May 2016. 
Huang also asked the NSW ALP to appoint Zhou as a multicultural adviser (the ALP insists he was appointed on merit).
At the event announcing Zhou and Han's candidacy, Huang told Chinese-language media "the Chinese realise that they need to make their voices heard in the political circle, so as to seek more interests for the Chinese, and let Australia's mainstream society pay more attention to the Chinese".
Huang's withdrawal of the 2016 donation is understood to have not only concerned some within Labor, but to have caused grave concern inside Australia's security community and the US embassy in Canberra.
Several sources have also confirmed that in September 2016, ASIO briefed Bill Shorten about Huang. 
Mr Shorten responded by directing his colleagues to cut ties to the donor. 
The opposition leader also issued a public call for a ban on foreign donations.

Call for reform on foreign donations
In Washington DC, Australia's role as one of the only western nations not to have banned foreign donations, continues to cause alarm.
But despite promises for donations reform from senior figures in both parties, nothing firm has happened. 
Many politicians still appear more interested in attracting foreign cash than ensuring the integrity of our political system.
It is clear the problem is not confined to donations and Australia's national security agencies continue to sound the alarm behind closed doors.
"There's an awareness of a problem, but the agencies themselves don't have the mandate or the wherewithal to manage the problem," Mr Medcalf warned.
"All they can do is sound the alarm and alert the political class. The political class needs to take a set of decisions in the interest of Australian sovereignty, in the interest of Australia's independent policy making, to restrict and limit foreign influence in Australian decision making."
After being briefed on the findings of the investigation by Fairfax Media and Four Corners and sent a list of questions, the Turnbull Government has stressed it is not only listening to the warnings but prepared to act.
In a statement, Attorney General George Brandis revealed Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had launched a major inquiry into Australia's espionage and foreign interference laws.
"The threat of political interference by foreign intelligence services is a problem of the highest order and it is getting worse," Mr Brandis said.
"Espionage and covert foreign interference by nation states is a global reality which can cause immense harm to our national sovereignty, to the safety of our people, our economic prosperity, and to the very integrity of our democracy."
Mr Brandis also flagged the introduction of new laws to "strengthen our agencies' ability to investigate and prosecute acts of espionage and foreign interference."
His statement is certain to rile Beijing. 
It will also concern certain political players in Australia, who will be hoping any inquiry is confined to finding gaps in the law and leaves alone the previous conduct of individuals.

Watch the Four Corners report "Power and Influence" on ABC iview.

mercredi 7 juin 2017

Australia's Chinese Fifth Column

China attempting to influence Australian society through cash, students, politics
Channel News Asia
The investigation explored the CCP’s influence on Australia’s estimated 100,000 Chinese students through university campuses and Chinese students’ and scholars’ associations.

SINGAPORE -- Attempts by China to exert influence in Australia are posing a threat to the nation’s sovereignty, according to an investigation released in articles and television programmes by Fairfax Media and ABC.
The joint Fairfax Media-ABC investigation, which was released on Monday (Jun 5), claimed that Beijing is active in Australia across a wide span of areas, from Chinese-linked donations to Australian politicians to threats to Australia-based Chinese dissidents and involvement with Chinese student associations.
Over the course of five months, the investigation said it uncovered how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was “secretly infiltrating Australia”.

BUYING ‘ACCESS AND INFLUENCE’
According to the ABC, business leaders “allied to Beijing” are using donations to major political parties in Australia to “buy access and influence, and in some cases to push policies that are contrary to Australia’s national interest”.
The report focused on two Chinese-born billionaires who were featured in a diagram drawn up by analysts working for the director general of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) Duncan Lewis, which showed the Chinese Communist Party connected with lines to the two men.
The diagram was reportedly created for Mr Lewis to show senior officials of Australia’s major political parties and to warn them about accepting political donations from foreign sources.
''[Lewis] said 'be careful','' said a source who was aware of what Mr Lewis told party officials, according to the report.
"He was saying that the connections between these guys and the Communist Party is strong," said another political figure briefed about the content of the ASIO warning.
ASIO also reportedly warned that the donors could be channels to advance Beijing's interests.
Mr Lewis sought to describe how Beijing coopted influential businessmen and rewarded those who assisted the Chinese Communist Party.

‘INFLUENCE AND CONTROL’
Outside of politicians and donors, the investigation also explored Beijing’s influence on ordinary Chinese living in Australia.
Some one million ethnic Chinese live in Australia and these people are targets of the CCP’s operations, either through influence or coercion, the investigation claimed.
The investigation explored the CCP’s influence on Australia’s estimated 100,000 Chinese students through university campuses and Chinese students’ and scholars’ associations.
These associations are “sponsored” by Chinese embassy and consular officials, and they are seen by the CCP as a way to maintain control over its overseas students.
When Li Keqiang visited Australia in March, Chinese embassy officials played an active role in organising a big student rally to welcome him.
The embassy provided flags, transport, food, a lawyer and certificates for students to help them find jobs back in China, Lupin Lu, president of the Canberra University Students’ and Scholars’ Association, told reporters.
However, she said that “I wouldn’t really call it helping”, but that “it’s more sponsoring”, adding that fellow students were at the rally because of their pride at China’s economic success.
When asked by reporters if she would alert the embassy if a human rights protest was being organised by dissident Chinese students, she said she “definitely” would, “just to keep all students safe… and to do it for China as well”.

INFLUENCE ON CHINA NATIONALS
The reports also cited the experience of Tony Chang, a student at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) who was granted a protection visa by the Australian government after threats to his parents who were back in China.
In a sworn statement to Australian immigration authorities, Chang said that state security agents in China had approached his parents in Shenyang to warn them to rein in his activism, citing his involvement in Tibetan independence organisations and Chinese democracy movement organisations.
“The SBSS (Shenyang Bureau of State Security) agents pressed the point that my parents must ask me to stop what I am part taking (sic) in and keep a low profile in the coming days. The reason is that they were anticipating that I would be involved in Tiananmen Square Massacre remembrance events, and the fact that the Dalai Lama would be coming to Australia,” Chang said in his statement.
“This act of a direct threat by the SBSS solidifies my belief that if I return to China I will undoubtedly suffer serious harm at the hands of the Chinese government, which will amount to persecution.”
Don Ma, the owner of the independent Vision China Times publication, reportedly had 10 advertisers pull their advertising after being threatened by Chinese officials.
According to the investigation, this included a company whose Beijing office was visited every day for two weeks by China’s Ministry of State Security until it cut ties with the Vision China Times.
"The media here, all the Chinese media, was being controlled by China," Ma said in the reports.
"This is harmful to the Australian society. It is also harmful to the next generation of Chinese. Therefore, I felt I wanted to invest in a truly independent media that fits in with Australian values."

vendredi 21 avril 2017

Trump's Mongolism Syndrome

How a single Trump sentence enraged South Korea
By Kim Tong-Hyung 

SEOUL, South Korea —  Donald Trump’s apparently offhand comment after meeting with Xi Jinping — that “Korea actually used to be a part of China” — has enraged many South Koreans.
The historically inaccurate sentence from a Wall Street Journal interview bumps up against a raft of historical and political sensitivities in a country where many have long feared Chinese designs on the Korean Peninsula. 
It also feeds neatly into longstanding worries about Seoul’s shrinking role in dealing with its nuclear-armed rival, North Korea.
Ahn Hong-seok, a 22-year-old college student, said that if Trump “is a person capable of becoming a president, I think he should not distort the precious history of another country.”
Many here assume that Xi fed that ahistorical nugget to Trump, who also admitted that after 10 minutes listening to Xi, he realized that Beijing’s influence over North Korea was much less than he had thought.
Here’s why Trump’s comments strike a nerve in South Korea:

WRONG, BUT WHOSE MISTAKE?
It’s unclear whether Trump was quoting Xi or had misunderstood what he was told when he said Korea had been part of China.
It never was, historians outside of China say, although some ancient and medieval kingdoms that occupied the Korean Peninsula offered tributes to Chinese kingdoms to secure protection. 
And for a period during the 13th century, both China and Korea were under the rule of the Mongolian empire.
Throughout the thousands of years of relations, Korea has never been part of China, and this is a historical fact that is recognized internationally and something no one can deny,” Cho June-hyuck, a South Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman, said Thursday.

HISTORICAL FEUD
Trump stumbled into a long history dispute between the Asian neighbors; specifically, their views over the dominion of ancient kingdoms whose territories stretched from the Korean Peninsula to Manchuria.
South Koreans see these kingdoms as Korean, but China began to claim them as part of its national history in the early 1980s.
At the time, China’s state historians were exploring ways to ideologically support Beijing’s policies governing ethnic minorities, including the large communities of ethnic Koreans in the northeast, experts say.
In the early 2000s, a Chinese government-backed academic project produced a slew of studies arguing that the kingdom of Goguryeo (37 B.C.-A.D. 668) was a Chinese state. 
This infuriated South Korea, where nationalists glorify Goguryeo for its militarism and territorial expansion. 
Seoul launched its own government-backed research project on Goguryeo in 2007.
Some analysts say the argument is more political than historical as Goguryeo existed more than a thousand years before the foundation of modern states in Korea and China.

‘KOREA PASSING’
Several South Korean newspapers mentioned the Chinese claims over Goguryeo as they lashed out at Trump over the comments, and at Xi for feeding Trump Chinese-centric views.
Chosun Ilbo, South Korea’s largest newspaper, said China was looking to “tame” South Korea and weaken the traditional alliance between Seoul and Washington in an attempt to expand its regional influence.
Seoul has long worried about losing its voice in international efforts to deal with North Korea’s nuclear threat — something local media have termed “Korea Passing.” 
Seoul and Beijing are also bickering over plans to deploy in South Korea an advanced U.S. missile defense system that China sees as a security threat.
In the meantime, Trump has reportedly settled on a “maximum pressure and engagement” strategy on North Korea, which is mainly about enlisting the help of Beijing to put pressure on Pyongyang.
“It’s highly possible that China will try to solve the problems surrounding the Korean Peninsula based on a hegemonic stance that likens the Koreas to Chinese vassal states,” said the Munhwa Ilbo newspaper on Thursday. 
“If Trump has agreed with this view, you will never know what kind of a deal the two global powers will make over the fate of the Korean Peninsula.”
Insecurities about both China’s and Trump’s intentions in the region will be among the big issues as South Koreans vote next month for their next president.

jeudi 20 avril 2017

History's Stupidest President

Donald Trump accused of 'shocking ignorance' after suggesting Korea used to be part of China
By Rachel Roberts 
Résultat de recherche d'images pour "clown trump"
Feeble-minded: Donald Trump said in an interview that Korea "used to be part of China" following his meeting with Xi Jingping.

Donald Trump has been accused of “shocking ignorance” after stating that Korea used to be part of China after he met Xi Jingping earlier this month.
Speaking in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Mr Trump said that Mr Xi “Went into the history of China and Korea … and you know, you’re talking about thousands of years … and many wars. And Korea actually used to be a part of China.
Commentators believe Trump might have heard Xi’s potted history of the countries from a Chinese perspective as there is a growing school of nationalist thought in China that ancient Korean kingdoms were part of the Chinese empire.
Trump revealed the Chinese leader had explained the situation on the Korean Peninsular – divided into communist North Korea and capitalist South Korea following the Second World War -- which led him to conclude, “After ten minutes, I realised it’s not so easy.”
South Korean daily newspaper Korea Joonang Daily said in an editorial: “We are dumbfounded that the leader of 21st-century China made such a ridiculous claim. If Trump really conveyed Xi’s words correctly, it is nothing but a grave challenge to the identity of the Korean people. “
It added: “As China’s power has grown remarkably over the last three decades, China’s historical perception is increasingly taking a worrisome turn.”
Rah Jong-yil, a former South Korean ambassador to both London and Tokyo, told The Telegraph: “I suspect that Xi said, in effect, that Korea was part of China because it was overwhelmingly under Chinese influence historically and Trump bought that.
“It shows his shocking ignorance of the situation in north-east Asia. 
That is very disturbing to us.
"Somebody needs to enlighten Trump about the facts of the region and he should not fall for this sort of silly nationalism from the Chinese," Mr Rah added.
”It is true that the Korean peninsula was under the influence of China, but that was under the Ming dynasty -- which was a long time ago and nothing to do with the People's Republic of China.
“In the distant past, Korea may have looked up to China as a model of political or economic development, but today we consider the communist-led nation to be economically, politically and socially backward.”
Critics have repeatedly claimed there are gaping holes in Trump’s knowledge of world affairs and history.
Earlier this month, it was suggested he may not know the name of the leader of North Korea after he repeatedly referred to Kim Jong-un as “this gentleman” in a Fox News interview.
He also appeared to think he was dealing with the now deceased father of Kim Jong-un, Kim Jong-il, who was in power in North Korea during the Clinton presidency and for most of Barack Obama's first term.
He said: “You know, they’ve been talking with this gentleman for a long time. You read Clinton’s book, he said, ‘Oh, we made such a great peace deal,’ and it was a joke.
“You look at different things over the years with President Obama. Everybody has been outplayed, they’ve all been outplayed by this gentleman. And we’ll see what happens. But I just don’t telegraph my moves.”
Washington has been attempting to work out how to deal with the hard line communist state and its suspected nuclear arsenal for decades. 
Trump’s position appears to be hardening with his recent warning that, “if China is not going to solve North Korea, we will.”

Trump’s comments spark outrage in South Korea

By Victoria Craw

SOUTH Korean officials have demanded the White House confirm that remarks made by Donald Trump are accurate, after they sparked fury among political leaders in the country.
On Thursday the South Korean foreign ministry said it was working to find out whether Xi Jinping told Trump that the country “used to be part of China”.
The comments were quoted in a Wall Street Journal interview with the President where he was recounting what the Chinese leader had told him in a recent meeting.
While the comment was not used in the initial article, it was later posted in a transcript online with Trump saying about Xi: “He then went into the history of China and Korea. Not North Korea, Korea. And you know, you’re talking about thousands of years ... and many wars. And Korea actually used to be a part of China.”
A Quartz article later drew attention to it, calling the comment a “glaring historical inaccuracy that has, somehow, not yet enraged South Korea which is usually extremely defensive about suggestions that it is lesser than China or has ever been dependent on it.”
Since then, South Korean media has picked up the comment despite it being dismissed by the foreign ministry as “not worthy of a response” according to news agency Yonhap.
Candidates in the May 9 presidential elections have also demanded answers. 
Liberty Korea Party candidate Hong Joon-pyo called it a “distorition of history” and an “invasion” of sovereignty.
Democratic Party candidate Moon Jae-in and People’s Party leader Ahn Cheol-soo said it was regrettable in an international setting.
“Whether that is true or not, Korea hasn’t been a part of China for thousands of years and it is an historical fact that the international community acknowledges and no one can deny it,” a foreign ministry official said.

South Korean Air Force's F-15K fighters taxi for take off during an annual joint air exercise "Max Thunder" between South Korea and the US. 

History Professor Kyung Moon Hwang told Quartz despite attempts to place Korea as part of Chinese territory historically this is not technically correct.
The claims are complicated by the fact it’s unclear whether Trump was quoting the Chinese president verbatim, quoting his interpreter or simply paraphrasing.
However it comes in the wake of confusion over who really speaks for the Trump administration given glaring discrepancies between statements from the White House, State Department and the president himself.
That was highlighted by the recent example over the US aircraft carrier Carl Vinson which was reportedly part of an “armada” heading to North Korean waters but was actually found to be near the Indian Ocean days later.
It has also underscored the lack of geopolitical policy experience in the upper echelons of Trump’s team, many of whom come from business backgrounds including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said: “There is nothing for South Koreans to worry about.”
The US and South Korea are currently conducting war games on the Korean Peninsula amid escalating tension with North Korea over recent missile tests.

North Korean soldiers get off the backs of trucks as they arrive at the Central Zoo in Pyongyang, North Korea. 

South Korea Tells Trump It's Actually Never Been a Part of China

by Kanga Kong
Candidates for South Korea’s May 9 presidential election weighed in on the issue, which comes as the nation’s relations with China are already strained over moves to deploy a U.S. missile defense system on its soil. 

South Korea’s government wants to know whether Xi Jinping gave alternative facts on the nation’s history to Donald Trump.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal last week, Trump said Xi told him during a recent summit that “Korea actually used to be a part of China.” 
The comments sparked outrage in Seoul and became an issue in South Korea’s presidential race, prompting the foreign ministry to seek to verify what Xi actually said.
“It’s a clear fact acknowledged by the international community that, for thousands of years in history, Korea has never been part of China,” foreign ministry spokesman Cho June-hyuck said at a briefing in Seoul on Thursday.
Trump has sought to get China -- North Korea’s main ally and benefactor -- to do more to persuade dictator Kim Jong Un to stop conducting nuclear and missile tests. 
Xi’s explanation of the historical relationship made Trump realize that it’s “not so easy” for China to influence North Korea to give up its nuclear program, the newspaper quoted the U.S. president as saying.
Candidates for South Korea’s May 9 presidential election weighed in on the issue, which comes as the nation’s relations with China are already strained over moves to deploy a U.S. missile defense system on its soil.
“This is clearly a distortion of history and an invasion of the Republic of Korea’s sovereignty," conservative Liberty Korea Party candidate Hong Joon-pyo said through a spokesman.
A representative for Democratic Party of Korea candidate Moon Jae-in demanded to find out the full context of Xi’s comment. 
Ahn Cheol-soo’s People’s Party said that, if true, it would be regrettable for China to distort history in an international diplomacy setting.
Chinese dynasties invaded the Korean Peninsula repeatedly over the centuries and demanded tributes, but South Koreans reject the idea that their ancestors were ever ruled by their neighbor.

dimanche 6 novembre 2016

Indonesia’s Widodo Tells China No Compromise on Sovereignty

  • Widodo speaks with newspaper before postponed Australia visit
  • Tensions have risen over Natuna Island area fishing grounds
By Keith Gosman 

Joko Widodo

President Joko Widodo said his country would not compromise on sovereignty, pushing back against Chinese claims that waters near Indonesian islands are also traditional Chinese fishing grounds.
The gas-rich Natuna Islands are “our territory,” Widodo, better known as Jokowi, told the Sydney Morning Herald just a day before he postponed a planned visit to Australia after a rally in Jakarta turned violent. 
“You know, we have the Natuna regency there and there are 169,000 people out there and we want to build our fishery industry there."
Indonesia has sought to stay neutral in disputes between its neighbors and China over the nearby South China Sea, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes. 
It is not a claimant in that area. 
But incursions by Chinese fishing boats and its coast guard -- plus public comments by senior Chinese officials about access to waters near the Natunas -- risk drawing Indonesia into the broader maritime tensions.
“There is no compromise on sovereignty,” Jokowi told the newspaper. 
In recent months he has made several visits to the Natunas -- including holding a cabinet meeting on a warship there -- and the military has beefed up its presence. 
That’s even as new Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte sounds a more conciliatory tone over his country’s dispute with China in the South China Sea. 
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak in a visit to China this week signed a series of deals including one to buy warships.
Asked if China was a destabilizing factor for Southeast Asia, Jokowi said he had discussed the issue many times with Xi Jinping
“Because we need better economic growth and without stability, I said to him, there is no economic growth. And he agreed with my statement.”
China’s claims to more than 80 percent of the South China Sea were dented in July by an international tribunal that ruled it had no historic rights to the resources within the waters and that its actions there were aggravating tensions. 
China has rejected the ruling.
Jokowi has said he wants to transform Indonesia, a string of more than 17,000 islands that forms the world’s largest archipelago, into a maritime power and has in the past laid out a plan to develop the fishing industry, improve port infrastructure and bolster sea defenses.

Visit Postponed
Jokowi was scheduled to hold talks with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull before addressing Australia’s parliament Monday, with both leaders keen to strike a balance between China -- a major trading partner for both -- and the U.S., which has for decades been the dominant military presence in Asia.
Indonesia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on Saturday that “it is with the deepest regret” that President Widodo’s scheduled Nov. 6-8 visit to Australia “has now been postponed.”
“Current development has required the President to stay in Indonesia,” the statement said.
Police on Friday fired tear gas at Islamic protesters demanding Jakarta’s Christian governor be jailed for his comments about the Koran. 
About 200 people continued demonstrating into the evening and refused to leave an area near the presidential palace, with local media broadcasting running battles with police who also used water cannons to bring the situation under control. 
At least 70,000 people earlier held a largely-peaceful rally, National Police spokesman Boy Rafli Amar said, with about 20,000 riot police and military personnel deployed to the capital.
The president was prevented from returning to the palace until the unrest ended.