Affichage des articles dont le libellé est money laundering. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est money laundering. Afficher tous les articles

vendredi 8 novembre 2019

American Quislings

U.S. Company Illegally Sold Chinese-Made Security Products To Military
By PAOLO ZIALCITA

U.S. Attorney Richard P. Donoghue announces charges against Aventura Technologies, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019, in the Brooklyn borough of New York. The New York company has been charged with illegally importing and selling Chinese-made surveillance and security equipment to U.S. government agencies and private customers.

A New York-based security products company and seven of its employees are being charged with fraud, money laundering and illegal importation of equipment manufactured in China.
Several U.S. agencies, including the FBI and the IRS, allege that Aventura Technologies Inc. falsely claimed that its products were made in the U.S. and also misrepresented itself as a woman-owned small business in order to gain access to federal contracts set aside for those businesses.
"Aventura imports its products from other manufacturers, primarily manufacturers located in China, at times with false 'Made in the U.S.A.' labels already affixed to the products or displayed on their packaging," a Justice Department court filing said.
Officials say Aventura's actions endangered military personnel on U.S. Navy ships and military bases by selling them Chinese products with known cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
"Greed is at the heart of this scheme, a reprehensible motive when the subjects in this case allegedly put into question the security of men and women who don uniforms each day to protect our nation," said FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William Sweeney.
"There is no mistaking the cyber vulnerabilities created when this company sold electronic surveillance products made in the People's Republic of China, and then using those items in our government agencies and the branches of our armed forces."
According to court documents, Aventura has held multiple contracts with the federal government, selling about $20.7 million of security equipment to the various military factions between 2006 to 2018. 
These contracts prohibited Aventura from providing goods from a wide array of countries, one of which is China.
Among the seven employees arrested is Jack Cabasso, Aventura's managing director, and his wife, Frances Cabasso, the purported CEO.
The couple is being accused of lying in order to extend and obtain government contracts reserved for women-owned businesses. 
The DOJ says Frances has little or no role at the company, making its claim as a woman-owned small business false.
The Cabassos are also being accused of siphoning millions of company dollars through shell companies and intermediaries. 
In addition, Aventura paid $1 million to fund the Cabasso's 70-foot luxury yacht.
Federal agents confiscated the yacht at the gated community where the couple live. 
Agents also seized $3 million dollars from several bank accounts.
The government intercepted shipments carrying Chinese manufactured goods several times, which agents later linked to Aventura's operations, according to the Justice Department.
Founded in 1999, Aventura self-describes itself as an "innovative designer, developer and manufacturer" of security products. 
The DOJ says the company has been misleading customers since 2006.

mardi 15 octobre 2019

A Tale of Two Nazisms

Inside a Brazen Scheme to Woo China: Gifts, Golf and a $4,254 Wine
By Michael Forsythe, David Enrich and Alexandra Stevenson

The towering International Commerce Center houses Deutsche Bank’s offices in Hong Kong. Confidential documents detail how the company’s hiring practices in China curried favor with the state.

It was a brazen campaign to win business in China by charming and enriching the country’s political elite.
The bank gave a Chinese president -- Jiang Zemin -- a crystal tiger and a Bang & Olufsen sound system, together worth $18,000.
A premier -- Wen Jiabao -- received a $15,000 crystal horse, his Chinese zodiac animal, and his son got $10,000 in golf outings and a trip to Las Vegas.
A top state banking official, a son of one of China’s founding fathers, accepted a $4,254 bottle of French wine — Château Lafite Rothschild, vintage 1945, the year he was born.
Millions of dollars were paid out to Chinese consultants, including a business partner of the premier’s family and a firm that secured a meeting for the bank’s chief executive with the president.
And more than 100 relatives of the Communist Party’s ruling elite were hired for jobs at the bank, even though it had deemed many unqualified.
This was all part of Deutsche Bank’s strategy to become a major player in China, beginning nearly two decades ago when it had virtually no presence there.
And it worked.
By 2011, the German company would be ranked by Bloomberg as the top bank for managing initial public offerings in China and elsewhere in Asia, outside Japan.
The bank’s rule-bending rise to the top was chronicled in confidential documents, prepared by the company and its outside lawyers, that were obtained by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. The previously undisclosed documents, shared with The New York Times, cover a 15-year period and include spreadsheets, emails, internal investigative reports and transcripts of interviews with senior executives.
The documents show that Deutsche Bank’s troubling behavior in China was far more extensive than the authorities in the United States have publicly alleged. 
And they show that the bank’s top leadership was warned about the activity but did not stop it.
Josef Ackermann, the bank’s chief executive until 2012, said in an interview with The Times and separately in answers to written questions that he was not familiar with many of the details contained in the documents.
But he defended the bank’s broader practices.
“This was part of doing business in this country,” Mr. Ackermann said.
“At the time, this was the way things were done.”

Josef Ackermann, the bank’s chief executive until 2012, said in an interview that China was “a relationship country,” and that “of course we cultivated these people.”

For years, Deutsche Bank has been a poster child for misconduct in the finance industry. 
Regulators and prosecutors around the world have imposed billions of dollars in penalties against the bank for its role in a wide range of scandals. 
Most recently, the bank has been under investigation for the facilitation of money laundering in Russia and elsewhere.
Deutsche Bank — which for two decades was the primary lender to Trump — also has been under scrutiny by two congressional committees and by state prosecutors in New York who are investigating Trump’s finances.
In August, the bank agreed to pay $16 million in a settlement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission related to allegations that it had used corrupt means to win business in both China and Russia, violating anti-bribery laws, though it did not admit wrongdoing.
That penalty, the documents show, amounted to a small fraction of the revenues gained in China from business stemming in part from the activities. 
The bank’s outside lawyers had warned executives in 2017 that they could face a penalty of more than $250 million from the S.E.C. related to China. 
There is no evidence that German regulators investigated the bank’s activities in China, though they were alerted to some of it, according to the documents.
Reasons for concern appear throughout the documents, which include internal investigations conducted by two law firms, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Allen & Overy, at the time of the S.E.C.’s action.
Deutsche Bank, the documents show, dispensed hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure meetings for top executives with China’s leadership.
An obscure company received $100,000 to arrange a 2002 meeting between Ackermann and Jiang Zemin, then the country’s president.
In all, the documents show, the bank paid seven consultants more than $14 million, including for help buying a stake in a Chinese bank and winning coveted assignments from state-owned companies. Some of the payments were flagged internally as problematic but allowed to go through.
On multiple occasions, according to the documents, Deutsche Bank tried to win business by collaborating with family members of Wen Jiabao, China’s premier from 2003 to 2013.
The Wens’ enormous accumulation of wealth was the focus of a 2012 investigation by The Times that found family members had controlled assets worth at least $2.7 billion.

Winning Over the Wens
Among its many ties to China’s political elite, Deutsche Bank cultivated a deep relationship with the family of Wen Jiabao during his term as premier of China.
Wen himself received gifts from the bank valued at more than $15,000.
But it was a family affair, involving his son, daughter and their spouses, as well as a close business associate of the family.

Wen Jiabao
Zhang Beili
Premier
2003-13
Diamond expert
WIFE
Wen family
EMPLOYED
SON-IN-LAW
DAUGHTER
DAUGHTER-IN-LAW
SON
Liu
Chunhang
Wen
Ruchun
Yang
Xiaomeng
Winston
Wen
GOLF
PARTNER
Co-founder of the
New Horizon Capital
private equity firm
RECOMMENDED
ACQUAINTANCE
RECOMMENDED
Huang
Xuhuai
Liu
Lina
Jane
Jin
Jean
Kang
FRIEND
GIFTS
HIRED
INVESTED
HIRED
Josef Ackermann provided Mr. Wen with a crystal horse sculpture valued at more than $15,000.
Deutsche Bank hired several job candidates referred to them by members of the Wen family.
Deutsche Bank invested in Winston Wen’s private equity firm, as well as paying for golfing vacations for him.
Lee Zhang hired Mr. Huang as a consultant in 2005 and again in 2006, paying him more than $5 million.
Deutsche Bank
Josef Ackermann
Lee Zhang
Chief executive
2002-12
Head of corporate
finance in Asia
2004-10
Source: Documents compiled in internal Deutsche Bank investigation.
The bank, at least in part through its hiring of people with political connections, won hundreds of millions of dollars in Chinese deals. 
Such hires can be illegal if they are done in exchange for business. 
The bank’s outside lawyers calculated that just 19 of its so-called relationship hires helped bring in $189 million in revenue, including a plum assignment in 2006 managing a state bank’s market debut, then the biggest initial public offering in history.
Most of the Chinese government officials entangled in the bank’s activities have since retired, among them Jiang and Wen. 
But two parents of people the bank employed are now members of the Politburo Standing Committee, the country’s pinnacle of power. 
And the country’s vice president, Wang Qishan, accepted gifts from the bank when he held previous positions, such as mayor of Beijing.
Efforts by The Times and Süddeutsche Zeitung to reach Jiang, Wang and Wen — as well as other Chinese officials, executives and relatives mentioned in the documents — either were unsuccessful or received no response. 
Several current and former Deutsche Bank employees declined to comment.
Tim-Oliver Ambrosius, a spokesman for the bank, did not respond to specific questions about the documents. 
In a written statement, he said that the company had “thoroughly investigated and reported to authorities certain past conduct,” adding that the bank had “enhanced our policies and controls, and action has been taken where issues have been identified.”
“These events date back as far as 2002 and have been dealt with,” the statement said.
Ackermann said that he had cautioned the bank’s staff that “no business is worth risking the bank’s reputation.” 
Though he pushed employees to increase revenue and profits, he said, “feeling pressure cannot excuse violating compliance rules and regulations or the law of the land.”

Playing Catch-Up
When Ackermann was picked in 2000 as the next chief executive, his ambition was for Deutsche Bank to be universally recognized as a global leader. 
And he wanted it done fast.
China was critical. 
It was the most populous country in the world and on its way to becoming the second-largest economy. 
Yet Deutsche Bank was far behind its rivals there.
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had been at the forefront of helping China modernize its moribund financial system and network of state-owned businesses. 
In 1995, Morgan Stanley helped set up the country’s first investment bank, China International Capital Corporation. 
Goldman won the rights in 1997 to bring China Telecom, the country’s phone monopoly, to the international market through an initial public offering in Hong Kong.
Ackermann had to play catch-up.
A first step for the bank was poaching Lee Zhang, the head of Goldman Sachs’s Beijing office. 
Zhang was fluent in the ways of both China and Western business. 
Born and raised in China, he had studied in Canada and later moved to California, where he worked for Hewlett-Packard and studied business administration. 
He then went to Hong Kong, eventually landing at Goldman.
Zhang’s mandate was to transform Deutsche Bank into a player in China. 
That required winning over the Communist Party.
Zhang began hiring aggressively. 
Many of his recruits — dozens and dozens of them, according to spreadsheets compiled by the bank’s lawyers — were young, inexperienced and well connected. 
They came to know him as Uncle Zhang.
Ma Weiji, whose parents were senior executives at state-owned companies, interviewed for a job in 2007. 
It did not go well. 
A senior Deutsche Bank executive emailed Zhang that Ma “was probably one of the worst candidates.”
He got the job nevertheless. 
Soon, Ma was using his family connections to secure meetings for the bank with his parents’ companies, according to a memo by Allen & Overy.
Another job candidate was a son of Liu Yunshan, then China’s propaganda minister
He “cannot meet our standard,” a Deutsche Bank employee wrote in an email about the company’s equity capital markets group. 
He was offered a job anyway.
The younger daughter of Li Zhanshu — now a top member of the Politburo Standing Committee — was judged unqualified for the bank’s corporate communications team. 
She got an offer, too.
Even for qualified candidates, political connections were taken into account.
Wang Xisha, whose father was the top official in Guangdong Province when she applied in 2010, was a veteran of the rival bank UBS and had also interned at Goldman Sachs. 
During her recruitment process, one banker noted that she would “have access” to a state-owned automaker, according to Allen & Overy. 
Her father, Wang Yang, is now a member of the Politburo Standing Committee.
In 2006, Deutsche Bank began to engage in what it called referral hiring. 
The goal was to drum up business for the bank by doling out personal favors to current and prospective clients, the S.E.C. found
Premier Wen Jiabao’s son-in-law, who was a senior official at China’s banking regulator, referred one candidate. 
Wen’s daughter-in-law referred another. 
Both were hired.
A state railway executive in China referred the son of a judge on the Supreme People’s Court. 
The assistant president of the oil refiner Sinopec referred a candidate, too. 
So did the general manager of the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.
Zhang, reached by phone, declined to be interviewed for this article. 
He also did not respond to written questions sent through a business associate.
“It’s a relationship country,” Ackermann said in the interview. 
“Of course we cultivated these people.”

Cashmere Overcoats
The roster was set. 
The first nine foursomes to tee off at Deutsche Bank’s Beijing golf invitational in October 2003 were a predictable mix of German and Chinese executives.
The 10th group was different. 
It included Winston Wen, son of the newly appointed premier, as well as Huang Xuhuai, a close business associate of the Wen family. 
They were joined by a top official from PetroChina, a state-owned oil company.
The fourth player was Zhang. 
The following month, he, Huang and Wen would be off to Thailand for more golf, and later to Germany, according to documents compiled for the bank’s internal investigation.
The relationships that Zhang built with the golfers were microcosms of how the bank made a name for itself in China beyond its strategic hiring. 
They were showered with gifts. 
They were enlisted to introduce Deutsche Bank executives to Chinese decision makers. 
And they were hired as consultants to help win the bank work.
Among dozens of gifts to political leaders and heads of state-run companies, the oil executive received golf clubs and a bag valued at more than $2,500.
Executives at China Life Insurance, which picked Deutsche Bank to help manage its I.P.O. in 2003, were treated to Louis Vuitton luggage, cashmere overcoats, golf clubs, even a sofa, totaling more than $22,000, according to a memo by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
The bank prohibited gifts to public officials unless the legal and compliance departments signed off, and Gibson Dunn found that Zhang, who generated many of the expenses, had violated that policy.
The law firm’s research showed that from 2002 to 2008, bank officials gave more than $200,000 in gifts to Chinese officials, their relatives and executives of state-owned companies. 
More than a fourth went to people on the Politburo or their relatives, including Jiang Zemin, the president; and Wen Jiabao, the premier.
Some of the gifts, like the crystal tiger for Jiang Zemin, who was born in 1926, the year of the tiger, were “provided” by Ackermann, according to the internal investigation.
Ackermann said that while he didn’t recall personally giving the items, he was aware that the bank’s staff thought it a good idea. 
He has not been accused of wrongdoing in China.
“They said that’s what Goldman and JPMorgan are doing, so we should do it,” Ackermann said in the interview. 
“I don’t think Wen Jiabao would be somehow influenced by a gift of a few thousand.”
In 2016, JPMorgan was fined $264.4 million by the Justice Department for its Chinese hiring. 
Other banks were also known to engage in similar practices. 
The Swiss bank Credit Suisse paid $77 million last year in criminal penalties and other fines. Goldman Sachs has not been accused of wrongdoing in its China business.

‘Red Flags’
The plan to increase Deutsche Bank’s clout in China also included buying a big stake in a midsize Beijing bank, Huaxia.
The acquisition plan, code-named Project Rooster, involved hiring Huang, one of Zhang’s golf partners. 
Huang had no experience in banking but had worked in a diamond company run by the wife of the premier, according to a background check that was done for the bank at the time. 
He was paid the equivalent of more than $2 million.
The bank’s compliance department didn’t stand in the way of the consulting role, but some senior executives were uneasy.
“Based on the information from the search firm, if this person is not known to the market and industry, why are we paying for the service and what are we paying for?” Polly Lee, the bank’s head of compliance in Hong Kong, wrote in an email to Till Staffeldt, a regional executive who was pushing for Huang’s hiring. 
“My concern is this individual is fronting for someone else.”
Staffeldt is now Deutsche Bank’s global chief operating officer for regulation, compliance and preventing financial crime.
Deutsche Bank’s bid for Huaxia was successful. 
In late 2005, the bank secured a 9.9 percent stake, which later increased to almost 20 percent. 
It was unclear what Huang did to help the deal go through, but Gibson Dunn later found that the circumstances around his hiring raised “red flags” that might have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, in part because of Huang’s ties to the family of the premier, Wen.
In 2006, Deutsche Bank again brought Huang on as a consultant. 
This time, his task was to “study in-depth the financial safety of China’s banking industry.” 
He received $3 million.
Inside the bank, concerns had been mounting about Zhang’s use of consultants to win business. 
Frank Nash, who ran the bank’s Asian corporate finance division until 2004, warned a top executive, Michael Cohrs, about the problematic use of politically connected consultants.
Cohrs shared those concerns with the bank’s lawyers, including Richard Walker, a general counsel. 
They concluded that Zhang was operating inside the law, three people familiar with those discussions told The Times.
Zhang kept going. 
In 2006 he turned to another consultant named Huang to help the bank secure a role in the I.P.O. of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. 
The stock offering was set to be the world’s largest ever. 
The banks handling the transaction reaped not only huge fees but also coveted bragging rights.
That man, Huang Xianghui, was lacking in banking experience, and a background check found that the Beijing company he claimed to work for did not appear to exist at the address on his business card. 
But what he did have, according to the bank’s documents, was a previous affiliation with PetroChina, the state oil company. 
Zhang hired him.
Huang’s original contract said he would receive $3 million for services that were “solely focused on the energy industry.” 
In a draft, someone crossed out “the energy industry” and wrote “ICBC,” a reference to the giant state-owned bank. 
Deutsche Bank went on to win a high-profile role in the I.P.O.
The success ingratiated Zhang with his superiors, especially Ackermann. 
Zhang would escort him to meetings with top Chinese leaders, including the president and premier, as well as to gatherings with cultural and academic experts, Ackermann said. 
While at Deutsche Bank, Zhang was appointed to a top government advisory body, signaling his insider status.
“He introduced me to all sorts of people,” Ackermann said in the interview. 
But Cohrs, who was the head of investment banking, warned the company’s lawyers that he was “scared of how Lee Zhang was doing business and whether there was money being passed around in envelopes,” the documents show.
There was reason to be concerned.

A Settlement, No Wrongdoing
In 2010, the head of I.C.B.C. approached Ackermann and said he wanted to hire Zhang, citing his excellent work at Deutsche Bank, according to Ackermann. 
He became senior executive vice president at the giant Chinese bank.
Two years later, Ackermann stepped down as chief executive. 
A top executive warned his successor, Anshu Jain, that the bank had grown overly reliant on winning business from state-owned companies, an area rife with corruption risks, according to a person with direct knowledge of the warning.
In 2013, when the United States began investigating JPMorgan’s hiring practices in China, Deutsche Bank initiated an internal review. 
It found a troubling pattern of politically connected hiring, and reported the findings to the S.E.C. and the Justice Department.
The S.E.C. subpoenaed the bank in April 2014. 
Months later, Deutsche Bank sued Zhang, accusing him of profiting from one of the consulting companies he had hired because it was owned by a relative. 
Zhang denied wrongdoing in the suit.
The Times and Süddeutsche Zeitung found two other consulting companies used by Deutsche Bank that appeared to be owned by Zhang’s wife.

Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $16 million this year in a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in part because of its activity in China.

Amazing Channel Holdings and Speedy Link Holdings, both registered in the British Virgin Islands, list Ji Zhengrong as the owner, according to documents found in the Panama Papers. 
Zhang’s wife has the same name, and her birth date, listed in Hong Kong court records, matches the birth date in the offshore company records.
Speedy Link was paid $3.65 million by Deutsche Bank to assist in its successful bid to help manage the I.P.O. of China Life Insurance Company in 2003, according to the bank’s documents. 
Amazing Channel Holdings was paid $100,000.
At the time, Deutsche Bank’s top lawyer was Walker, who had been warned of executives’ concerns about politically connected consultants in China.
Before joining Deutsche Bank, Walker had been the head of the S.E.C.’s enforcement division. 
Now, as the agency’s investigation unfolded, bank officials were feeling optimistic.
Lawyers for Deutsche Bank traveled to the S.E.C.’s office in Salt Lake City to give a presentation on the company’s internal investigation. 
They argued that its hiring of Chinese princelings was far less extensive and systematic than at other banks, according to a person briefed on the meeting.
The lawyers told Walker afterward that the S.E.C. seemed to share the bank’s perspective, the person said. 
The agency’s investigators had concluded that when the bank hired politically connected employees, they were generally well qualified — something the bank’s internal reviews had cast doubt on.
This August, the S.E.C. announced that it was closing its investigation and had settled with the bank without requiring an admission of wrongdoing. 
Asked about the previously undisclosed Deutsche Bank documents, Chandler Costello, an S.E.C. spokeswoman, said, “The S.E.C. does not comment on details of any investigation, but, as always, the S.E.C. is committed to pursuing violations of federal securities law, wherever or by whomever they may occur.”
Earlier this year, the bank disclosed that it remained under investigation by the Justice Department for its hiring practices and use of consultants in foreign countries.

jeudi 10 janvier 2019

China Offered to Bail Out Troubled Malaysian Fund in Return for Deals

The secret discussions show how China uses its  financial clout to corrupt and bolster its position overseas
By Tom Wright and Bradley Hope

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, third from left, in 2017 reviewed a model of a railway China agreed to build. Current PM Mahathir Mohamad has suspended the $16 billion project. 

Senior Chinese leaders offered in 2016 to help bail out a Malaysian government fund at the center of a swelling, multibillion-dollar graft scandal, according to minutes from a series of previously undisclosed meetings reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Chinese officials told visiting Malaysians that China would use its influence to try to get the U.S. and other countries to drop their probes of allegations that allies of then-Prime Minister Najib Razak and others plundered the fund known as 1MDB, the minutes show.
The Chinese also offered to bug the homes and offices of Journal reporters in Hong Kong who were investigating the fund, to learn who was leaking information to them, according to the minutes.
In return, Malaysia offered lucrative stakes in railway and pipeline projects for China’s One Belt, One Road program of building infrastructure abroad
Within months, Najib signed $34 billion of rail, pipeline and other deals with Chinese state companies, to be funded by Chinese banks and built by Chinese workers.
Najib also embarked on secret talks with China’s leadership to let Chinese navy ships dock at two Malaysian ports, say two people familiar with the discussions. 
Such permission would have been a significant concession to Beijing, which seeks greater influence across contested waters of the South China Sea, but it didn’t come to pass.
A Journal examination of the China-Malaysia projects, based on documents and interviews with current and former Malaysian officials, offers one of the most detailed accounts to date of the political forces at work behind China’s Belt and Road program, a signature initiative of building ports, railways, roads and pipelines in some 70 countries to generate trade and business for Chinese companies.
China is using the program to increase its sway over developing nations and trap them in debt while advancing its military aims. 
Several countries, including Pakistan and the Maldives, have been reviewing One Belt, One Road projects amid allegations deals unfairly advanced Beijing’s interests.
American national-security officials regard the Chinese efforts in Malaysia as Beijing’s most ambitious attempt to leverage the program for geostrategic gain, said a person familiar with U.S. discussions.
Minutes of the Chinese-Malaysian meetings say that although the projects’ purposes were political in nature—to shore up Najib’s government, settle the 1MDB debts and deepen Chinese influence in Malaysia—it was imperative the public see them as market-driven.
The Chinese government information office didn’t respond to requests for comment.

China's Infrastructure Initiative
China is building and financing a global network of trade and energy links to fill gaps in existing infrastructure spanning Asia, Europe and Africa.
China has said its Belt and Road projects promote development that benefits all sides. 
Nations wouldn’t welcome the program as they have if it carried the financial and geopolitical risks asserted by critics, China’s Foreign Ministry has said. 
It has denied that money in the program was used to help bail out the troubled Malaysian fund.
Documents reviewed by the Journal show Malaysian officials suggested that the infrastructure projects be financed at above-market values, generating excess cash for other needs. 
Investigators from the current Malaysian government, which replaced Najib’s last year, believe some of the money helped Najib finance his political activities and cover maturing debts of 1MDB, a fund he set up in 2009 to finance local development.
Najib was aware of the 2016 Malaysian-Chinese meetings, according to people familiar with them. Asked about them, the former prime minister issued a statement saying the rail project would have brought tens of thousands of jobs to Malaysia and stating that under his leadership, the country experienced nine years of continuous economic growth.
Current Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who ousted Najib in an election last May, put the Chinese projects on hold
Malaysia has since charged Najib with crimes that include money laundering and breach of trust. 
He has denied them, is free on bail and faces trial this year.

A tunnel approach for a $16 billion rail link China agreed to build for Malaysia. The government that took over in Malaysia last year has suspended the project. 

Malaysia, rich in natural resources and on a sea lane, is a prized ally in the U.S.-China contest for influence in Asia. 
The U.S. once courted Najib as it sought alliances in the region.
In July 2015, the Journal reported that $681 million of funds originating with 1MDB, known formally as 1Malaysia Development Bhd., had flowed into Najib’s personal bank accounts
Najib’s office said the money was a gift from a Saudi Arabian it didn’t identify and said most of it was eventually returned.
The U.S. Justice Department began investigating. 
Its probe damaged Washington’s relationship with Najib, according to officials in both countries, helping drive Malaysia into Beijing’s arms.
By 2016, Najib was in a bind because the fund had borrowed $13 billion it couldn’t repay. 
He turned to Jho Low—a Malaysian financier the U.S. Justice Department has alleged was the mastermind of a multibillion-dollar theft of 1MDB funds—to negotiate with China to resolve the crisis, according to current and former Malaysian officials.

Jho Low, a central figure in a multibillion-dollar scandal at a Malaysian development fund. A now-suspended Chinese ‘Belt and Road’ project in Malaysia has partially bailed out the fund’s debts. 

Mr. Low faces criminal charges in both Malaysia and the U.S. related to the Malaysian fund. 
Chinese officials have declined to comment on that.
Low drew up plans for Malaysian meetings with Chinese officials and attended some of them, according to current and former Malaysian officials.
Malaysia’s new government discovered the documents, including minutes from Chinese-Malaysian meetings over several months, after a sweep of Najib’s offices, according to members of the government. 
The Journal, besides reviewing the documents, interviewed people in position to know the events, among them a former official of Najib’s government.
The documents describe a plan proposed by Malaysian officials for Chinese state companies to build two large projects with funding from Chinese banks. 
One, the $16 billion East Coast Rail Link, would be a railway across Malaysia connecting two ports. 
The other, the $2.5 billion Trans Sabah Gas Pipeline, would be built partly on Malaysia’s portion of the island of Borneo.
Armed with a bottomless supply of cash, Jho Low staged the ultimate extravaganza. Leonardo DiCaprio, Pharrell Williams, Swizz Beatz, Jho Low, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian and Kanye West all attended the Vegas party.

The projects would provide “above market profitability” to the Chinese state companies, the documents say. 
The rail link should have cost only $7.25 billion to build, according to an earlier estimate by a Malaysian consultancy, said a Malaysian government official.
The public must believe “all initiatives are market driven for the mutual benefit of both countries,” Chinese official Xiao Yaqing said at a meeting on June 28, 2016, according to minutes of the meeting.
Xiao, chairman of China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, said he had “cancelled all his key engagements in Beijing to attend” because the matter “has been approved by President Xi Jinping, Premier Li Keqiang” and another senior Chinese official, according to the minutes. 
Xiao’s agency didn’t respond to requests for comment.
At a meeting the next day, Sun Lijun, then head of China’s domestic-security force, confirmed that China’s government was surveilling the Journal in Hong Kong at Malaysia’s request, including “full scale residence/office/device tapping, computer/phone/web data retrieval, and full operational surveillance,” according to a Malaysian summary of that meeting.

Chinese official Xiao Yaqing, seen at a June summit of China’s ‘Belt and Road’ program of building infrastructure in dozens of other countries. 

“Sun says that they will establish all links that WSJ HK has with Malaysia-related individuals and will hand over the wealth of data to Malaysia through ‘back-channels’ once everything is ready,” the summary reads. 
“It is then up to Malaysia to do the necessary.”
It couldn’t be determined whether China provided any information. 
Sun didn’t respond to requests for comment.
A Journal spokesman said, “We employ experts on security and cybersecurity to work with our journalists on safety and secure communications with sources of information.”

Derailed
Malaysia has frozen work on a Chinese-funded project called the East Coast Rail Link amid concerns its cost was inflated to divert money to help pay off the debts of 1Malaysia Development Bhd.
Sun also promised to use China’s “leverage on other nations” to get the U.S. and others to drop their 1MDB investigations, according to the meeting summary. 
The Justice Department investigation continued, as did probes in Singapore, Switzerland and elsewhere.
At one meeting, the Malaysians asked that the Chinese state company that would build the rail link assume $4.78 billion of 1MDB debt, a plan they hoped China would agree to quickly “due to the time sensitive nature” of the fund’s debts, according to the documents.
A Chinese negotiator worried this would be “very noticeable” in financial statements of the builder, China Communications Construction Co. , meeting minutes show.
A month later, the Malaysians proposed that Chinese state companies instead make payments that would “indirectly be used to repay 1MDB debt,” according to meeting minutes.
Notes of a discussion on Sept. 22, 2016, say the sides agreed to move ahead with the infrastructure deals even though “they may not have strong project financials.”
Participants needn’t “waste time studying the actual project financials to see if they can sustain the debt etc.,” because Malaysia’s government backed the deals for "strategic" reasons
, the documents say.
Notes from that meeting said Malaysia was working to enhance bilateral ties, citing support Najib voiced for China’s position in the South China Sea during a regional summit in Laos.
Two months later, Najib went to Beijing and signed the deals. 
Together with other projects, they made Malaysia the second-biggest recipient of One Belt, One Road funding after Pakistan.
Money was flowing by the middle of 2017 as the Export-Import Bank of China issued the first loans. By fall the bank had paid out 80% of the $2.5 billion pledged to state-owned China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau to build the pipeline, although little work had been done, according to Malaysian officials.

Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, center, suspended plans for Chinese companies to build costly rail and pipeline projects in Malaysia. 

When campaigning for Malaysian parliamentary elections began early in 2018, China openly sided with Najib, its ambassador at one point campaigning with members of his coalition. 
Against the odds, Mr. Mahathir, a prominent former prime minister then 92 years old, led his coalition to victory.
Now, Mr. Mahathir is negotiating with Beijing over potential new terms for the railroad project and seeking the return of Low. 
Excavators for the rail projects are idle, and workers’ quarters are vacant. 
Mr. Mahathir is expected to cancel the pipeline deal.

mardi 17 juillet 2018

China's Corruption Trap

The 'great-grandmother of all scandals' comes to China
By Michael Bristow
Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak arrives in court in Kuala Lumpur, following his arrest in connection with a corruption probe.

There is a new twist in the multi-billion-dollar financial scandal surrounding the Malaysian investment fund 1MDB -- Chinese involvement.
Malaysia's new government -- which took office only in May -- has suspended three major construction projects with Chinese firms.
A senior ministry official told the BBC that two of the contracts, for pipelines, were used to launder money for Malaysia's previous administration, led by the former Prime Minister, Najib Razak.
These allegations open a new front in the inquiries into 1MDB, which is already being investigated in the US, Switzerland and Singapore.
The finance ministry's accusations also represent a sharp change in mood in Malaysia towards China since Najib lost power.
The investigations into 1MDB are being led by Malaysia's finance ministry, housed in a vast curved building in Putrajaya, a purpose-built town to the south of Kuala Lumpur that has been the country's administrative capital for the past two decades.
Until the election in May, Tony Pua was an opposition MP who spent much of his time talking about 1MDB, which he calls "the great grandmother of all scandals".
He made a series of scurrilous videos about the fund and its connection to Najib.
The 1 Malaysia Development Berhad development company is being investigated in Malaysia, Singapore, Switzerland and the US

But now Mr Pua's party is in government and he has been employed as a special officer to the finance minister to look through the mountains of documentation related to 1MDB.
Before his current job, he said he worked with "dribs and drabs" of information about 1MDB -- but not any more. 
"Now, anything you ask for, the tap opens like a beer barrel," he told the BBC in an interview at the ministry.
Mr Pua said the new administration had been astounded by what it had found, which has extended the scope of what was previously known about 1MDB, including links to Chinese firms.
Earlier this month (6 July), the ministry announced that it had suspended three big contracts with Chinese companies.
Two of those are pipeline schemes worth a combined total of $2.3bn (£1.7bn).
The ministry's new leaders were staggered to discover that 88% of the contract cost had been paid to the Chinese company in charge, China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau -- but only 13% of the work had been completed.
Mr Pua said building work had not even started; only consultancy studies had so far been completed.
"The entire project smelt like a scam. [There were] clearly elements of money laundering taking place," he said.
"We were giving money out -- to a Chinese company -- and this money is being funnelled to parties related to the previous administration."
MP Tony Pua is leading the investigation into 1MDB

He said the ministry believes the money was being used to cover debts linked to 1MDB, which he said now stand at more than $12bn.
Emails to China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau about Mr Pua's allegations went unanswered.
Malaysia's finance ministry has also suspended the East Coast Rail Link, which is being built by the China Communications Construction Company.
It said the cost of the rail line, $20bn, "must be reduced significantly to make it viable financially".
The ministry said the suspension of both the pipelines and the rail link were not directed at "any particular country", but the new government in Malaysia has certainly brought about a change in attitude to links with China.Mahatir Mohamad was sworn in as Malaysia's prime minister on 10 May

The new Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, is expected to travel to China in August, when some of the suspended contracts could be renegotiated.
But China's nationalistic newspaper, the Global Times, warned Malaysia not to push China too hard.
"If [Mr] Mahathir wants to review big projects agreed to by his predecessor and damage the interests of Chinese companies, those companies have the right to claim compensation," it said in an editorial.
Professor Terence Gomez, of the University of Malaya, said the close relationship between China and Malaysia that existed until the election in May was convenient to both sides.
He said Najib needed foreign investment and China under Xi Jinping was willing to provide it as part of its Belt and Road initiative, which aims to connect the country with the rest of Asia and beyond.
"Two state governments, both authoritarian regimes, both single dominant party states with powerful leaders, had an agenda," he said.
Professor Gomez said there was still an appetite in the new government for Chinese money. 
He pointed out that one of the first businessmen to visit Mr Mahathir when he took office was the Chinese e-commerce billionaire, Jack Ma.
But some Chinese investments now appear to be tangled up with the investigations into 1MDB, which was set up by Najib Razak in 2009 to spur economic development in Malaysia.
So far, the only tangible product of 1MDB is a new business district being built in central Kuala Lumpur called Tun Razak Exchange, where workmen swelter in the heat to complete the project.
The Tun Razak Exchange - the only tangible project built with 1MDB funding.

As for Najib, earlier this month he appeared in Kuala Lumpur High Court charged with four counts of stealing a total of $10m from a subsidiary of 1MDB.
He denies the charges, and has always denied other wrongdoing related to the investment fund. 
Many of the hundreds of people who turned up for his first court appearance were supporters who believe in the former prime minister's innocence.
But the current government has already indicated that these are just the first of what could be many more charges brought against Najib.
"We have to pace ourselves to make sure we do not miss anything," said Tony Pua, before heading back to his office to study more documents.

lundi 4 septembre 2017

Axis of Evil

Trump Considering Embargoing China Over North Korea
By Gordon G. Chang

Late Sunday morning, President Trump tweeted an extraordinary statement. 
“The United States” he announced, “is considering, in addition to other options, stopping all trade with any country doing business with North Korea.”
And the president’s tweet does not appear to have been an off-the-cuff blast. 
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin continued the theme in his “Fox News Sunday” interview later in the day when he announced he was preparing a sanctions package that will sever “all trade and other business” with North Korea. 
“I will draft a sanctions bill and send it to the president,” Mnuchin said to Chris Wallace
“We will work with our allies. We will work with China. But people need to cut off North Korea economically.”
Cutting off North Korea economically sounds like an embargo. 
And North Korea’s No. 1 trading partner—the country that accounts for slightly more than 90% of Pyongyang’s two-way trade when illicit commerce is counted—is China.
An American embargo almost surely will result in friction with Beijing and Moscow, but discord could be the price for denying Kim Jong Un the resources for his weapons programs.
There are many ways an embargo can be put in place. 
The Trump administration could simply declare one and then go about enforcing it on its own.
An alternative route would be for the White House to tell Chinese and Russian leaders that the U.S. intended to submit an embargo resolution to the Security Council and then demand they accept it without delay.
Why would Beijing and Moscow accept an embargo when they have consistently resisted far less strict measures? 
With regard to China, Russia’s senior partner in crime when it comes to North Korea, the Trump administration retains overwhelming leverage.
Chinese banks, for instance, are vulnerable to U.S. criminal prosecution and, more important, sanctions. 
Bank of China, named in a 2016 U.N. report for money laundering for Pyongyang, is especially at risk. 
The U.S. Treasury could fine the bank or even designate it a “primary money laundering concern” pursuant to Section 311 of the Patriot Act.
Such a designation would deny the bank access to dollar accounts. 
In other words, a Bank of China would, as a practical matter, be cut off from the global financial system. 
Call it, in essence, a death sentence.
Up to now, China has not had an incentive to cooperate with the United States with regard to North Korea because American presidents were loath to impose costs on the Chinese state. 
The feeling was that Washington could appeal to the better instincts of China’s leaders, or at least convince them it was in their long-term interest to support American efforts.
This generous approach, unfortunately, has not in fact worked. 
So it is time to make sure that the Chinese, even though they do not see things the same way as Trump officials, have no choice but to be cooperative.
Unplugging a major Chinese bank is one of the few acts that can motivate Beijing to accept and enforce an embargo. 
And so could a severe remedy imposed as a result of the ongoing Section 301 investigation into China’s theft of American intellectual property
One “301” remedy would be an across-the-board tariff on Chinese goods. 
Another would be an import ban on any enterprise benefitting from stolen IP.
Chinese officials, of course, can retaliate against the U.S. for a Section 311 designation or a Section 301 remedy, but Beijing might decide not to take on a far-stronger America, which is in a better position to wage an intensified trade war.
In ordinary times, drastic remedies like an embargo would not be necessary. 
Yet Kim Jong Un has not in fact been deterred by the relatively mild penalties now in place. 
China and Russia have signed on to Security Council sanctions, like those contained in Resolution 2371, precisely because they know they would be ineffective.
Kim is making such fast progress in building his arsenal that sanctions that were considered extraordinary just a few months before are now beginning to look politically feasible today.
As Trump and Mnuchin made clear on Sunday, America is about to cut off the flow of funds to the Kim regime.
Washington, I believe, goes a long way to disarming North Korea when it convinces Chinese leaders they finally have to make a choice, that they cannot support the North and do business with the U.S. at the same time.

dimanche 27 août 2017

Rogue Banks

To Disarm North Korea, Cripple A Large China Bank
By Gordon G. Chang 


Tuesday, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on 10 entities and six individuals. 
The sanctioned parties are Singaporean, Russian, and Chinese and had, according to Treasury, aided North Korea’s ballistic missile and nuclear weapons efforts.
In addition, the Justice Department sought to forfeit $11 million from three entities—at least one connected to China—for laundering money for Pyongyang.
Beijing howled. 
The foreign ministry called the actions “wrong behavior,” and the Global Times, the tabloid controlled by People’s Daily, went further, stating in an editorial that the U.S. would “pay for unjust ban on Chinese firms” and that “Washington had better restrain itself.”
In reality, the U.S. had already restrained itself. 
Too much, in my view. 
Washington needs, at this time, to move beyond actions against minor bad actors and impose severe penalties on large institutions. 
First among the targets should be one of China’s so-called Big Four banks, perhaps the Bank of China.
While the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea perfects missiles and nukes at an accelerated pace, American administrations have been slow to impose costs on Pyongyang’s primary backer, Beijing, for, among other crimes, money laundering.
Experts, like former State Department sanctions coordinator Dan Fried, believe Washington should warn Beijing before moving against Chinese banks.
Washington, however, has already warned the Chinese—repeatedly. 
The Obama administration began to signal American impatience. 
On September 26 of last year, the Justice Department announced the forfeiture of funds from 25 Chinese bank accounts. 
The actions were announced at the same time Treasury moved against Dandong Hongxiang Industrial Development, its owner, and employees, in large part for handling North Korean cash.
Beijing, however, did not take the hint. 
Therefore, on June 29 President Trump’s Treasury Department, pursuant to Section 311 of the Patriot Act, designated Bank of Dandong a “primary money laundering concern.” 
The designation effectively cut off the institution from the global banking system.
Beijing still did not get the message, hence Tuesday’s forfeiture actions.
Actions against individuals and small-fry institutions are necessary, but they have been ineffective in getting Beijing out of money laundering and other illicit activities on behalf of the North Korean regime.
Therefore, it looks like time for Washington to move against Chinese institutions that matter, like Bank of China. 
Bank of China was, according to the Foreign Policy site, named in a 2016 U.N. report for devising and operating a money-laundering scheme for Pyongyang in Singapore. 
There are also hints the bank has been involved in dirty business in Dandong, the Chinese city on the Yalu River across from North Korea.
Bank of China, as large as it is, may not be the biggest Chinese money launderer. 
Anthony Ruggiero of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies thinks the U.S. could go after the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the world’s largest financial institution in S&P Global Market Intelligence’s annual asset rankings.
Bank of China, by the way, comes in at No. 4 on this list.
The U.S., of course, can fine these institutions, but that would be just another signal for Beijing to disregard. 
North Korea is too close to being able to nuke the American homeland for Trump to send signals Beijing may ignore.
What could not be ignored, however, is Washington shutting down the U.S. operations of the largest Chinese banks and, more importantly, denying their access to dollar accounts. 
Without the ability to handle greenback transactions, they would be put out of business everywhere outside China, and they would even lose some business inside that country as well.
Would the U.S. suffer by unplugging one or more Chinese banks? 
Yes, no doubt. 
In comments to Reuters, Joseph DeThomas, another State Department sanctions official, warns of “unpredictable” consequences. 
And as Gary Samore of Harvard’s BelferCenter told Bloomberg, “If we were to impose penalties on really big Chinese financial institutions, it would have major economic consequences on the U.S.”
Yet the willingness to endure “major economic consequences” is not an argument for refraining from crippling a large Chinese bank. 
On the contrary, it is the reason why imposing death sentences on China’s institutions would be so effective.
Chinese leaders need to see that Washington is determined to stop North Korea, and they are not going to take America seriously unless America is willing to accept costs to do so.
In any event, whatever the Trump administration thinks its China or North Korea policy should be, it has an obligation to enforce U.S. law. 
No one gets to use the American financial system to launder cash for Kim Jong Un, at least more than once.
At the moment, Trump officials are turning up the pressure slowly, in the hope that Beijing will come around. 
That sounds responsible, but unfortunately the approach has been completely ineffective
Once a Chinese individual, company, or bank has been sanctioned for money laundering, the activity simply moves to another. 
Going after Bank of Dandong, therefore, was a mistake.
Beijing, the master of ignoring signals, has to know what is going on. 
China’s banks are tightly controlled by both the Chinese central government and the Communist Party. 
The government and Party must know about the banks’ sensitive relationships, like those with North Korea. If they do not in fact know about them, it is only because they do not want to.
Beijing cannot run a police state and then disclaim responsibility for what happens inside that state, especially when the largest state institutions are involved.
Therefore, it’s time to go after the biggest Chinese banks in order to cut the head off this particular beast.
In all probability, the Trump administration will have to unplug only one big institution to make a lasting impression. 
Beijing will then, for the first time since 1994, realize that American officials place the safety and security of the American people above all else.
“China is not a small country that you can just squeeze and it will do whatever,”Yuan Zheng of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences told Bloomberg. 
“China won’t accept it and will take measures in response. The whole atmosphere of U.S.-China relations will get worse.”
Who cares? 
I, for one, care far more for the safety of Americans than friendly ties with those determined to launder money for North Koreans.