Affichage des articles dont le libellé est European Commission. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est European Commission. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 9 octobre 2018

Europe raises flags on rampant China’s cyber espionage

By LAURENS CERULUS 

The EU is gearing up to confront China on alarming levels of Beijing-linked cyber espionage on European industry.
The European Commission’s department for industry is drafting a document that would sum up Europe’s worries on the issue, two sources briefed on the plan told POLITICO, and could still come up with new measures to defend European trade secrets during this mandate, which ends in May next year.
The European Commission Thursday met a group of national government experts, foreign affairs officials and industry lobbyists to go over a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Commission department that is likely to lead to EU action in coming months.
The study, an executive summary of which was obtained by POLITICO, offers a peek into “public and private sector concerns about the increasing risks associated with cyber-theft of trade secrets in Europe.”
In the manufacturing sector, it said, industrial espionage and cybertheft of trade secrets constitute up to 94 percent of all cyberattacks. 
The summary cites estimates that Chinese cyber espionage is costing Europe up to €60 billion in economic growth — a figure that would rise as European companies digitize their services.

Previous reports have consistently pointed fingers at Beijing as the world’s most active government on cyber espionage.

PwC will finalize the report later this month, it said at Thursday’s meeting, after which the Commission would release it and work on its own follow-up.
The Commission’s initiative comes as Bloomberg Businessweek on Thursday published a extensive investigation into how manufacturing subcontractors in China implanted chips as tiny as a grain of rice in parts of servers that make their way onto the global market and into the server centers of cloud services giant Amazon Web Services, Apple and other tech firms. 
The microchips would give Chinese actors access to data touching the servers.
Previous reports have consistently pointed fingers at Beijing as the world’s most active government on cyber espionage. 
A 2013 study by Mandiant raised flags across the world and governments have sought to strike deals with China to stop the practice.
The U.S. struck a deal with China in 2015. 
But intelligence officials have complained that Chinese counterparts have failed to abide by the terms of the agreement. 
On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security warned industry that the Beijing-linked “Cloudhopper” hacking group is again launching a widespread campaign on technology service providers to hack and steal industrial secrets.
The PwC study recommends that the European Union, as well as member countries, engage in talks similar to the U.S.-China dialogue. 
It also says that the EU could broaden its requirement to report cyber incidents to companies outside of critical infrastructure sectors. 
It adds that 60 percent of respondents that agree with the need for notifications said that such a notification system should be made mandatory across the EU.
Compared to national governments in and beyond Europe, the EU has in the past been cautious about wading into the debate. 
It lacks an intelligence agency, and is still struggling with the question of whether and how it can attribute cyberattacks to third countries — a naming-and-shaming power that is currently the purview of member countries and not Brussels.
European industry is getting increasingly anxious about the issue, however.
The PwC study says people working in industrial sectors in Italy, France, Germany and the Netherlands are most concerned about cyber espionage. 
Germany is most affected, the study says, as 17 percent of companies reported the theft of sensitive data between 2015 and 2017.
Europe’s largest business lobby BusinessEurope released a statement Thursday in which it asks the EU to come up with a “strategy to deter hostile actors” like China. 
“Diplomatic action or economic retaliation could be considered,” the group says, adding that “the EU could seek to cooperate with the United States, Japan and other OECD economies to apply political pressure.”

mardi 3 octobre 2017

Chinese Dumping

EU e-bike makers make complaint against Chinese imports
Reuters 

A fuel station for e-bikes is pictured in the historic city centre of the western German city of Koblenz, March 1, 2016. 

BRUSSELS -- European producers of electronic bikes (e-bikes) have filed a complaint with the European Commission against cheap Chinese e-bike imports, saying that they are sold in the bloc at excessively low prices with the help of unfair subsidies.
The European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) lodged the complaint alleging dumping of e-bikes by Chinese companies which they say are flooding the market at prices below the cost of production.
The Commission has until late October to determine whether to start an investigation.
The EBMA is also preparing a related complaint alleging illegal subsidies and asking for registration of Chinese e-bike imports, which could allow eventual duties to be backdated.
Such an investigation would be the latest in a string of probes into Chinese exports ranging from solar panels to steel and could raise trade tensions with Beijing, particularly with a subsidy inquiry into the support provided by the Chinese state.
Bicycles have already been a flashpoint. 
The EU blamed China last December for scuppering a global environmental trade deal by insisting that bicycles be included as a tariff-free green product. 
Chinese conventional bicycles have been subject to EU anti-dumping duties since 1993.
The EBMA says more than 430,000 Chinese e-bikes were sold in European Union in 2016, a 40 percent increase on the previous year, and forecasts the figure will rise to around 800,000 in 2017.
EBMA secretary-general Moreno Fioravanti said Europeans buy some 20 million bicycles per year, of which about 10 percent are now e-bikes, with the potential to rise to a quarter within five years.
European companies had pioneered the pedal-assist technology that e-bikes use and had invested about 1 billion euros ($1.2 billion) last year, he said, but was risking losing its industry to China.
“Today the European bikes are the best in the world and we have to invest every year to renew the range. The Chinese are getting the money from the government and the subsidies have an impact of 30, 40, even 50 percent of the price of the product,” Fioravanti said.
“You have subsidies, which generate overcapacity, which generate dumping,” he said.

lundi 20 février 2017

EU sets collision course with China over ‘Silk Road’ rail project

Probe of Beijing-funded Belgrade-Budapest link hits Xi’s hallmark scheme 
By James Kynge in London, Arthur Beesley in Brussels and Andrew Byrne in Budapest

Serbian prime minister Aleksandar Vucic, left, and China's National Development and Reform Commission deputy head Wang Xiaotao launch the Belgrade-Budapest railway project in Novi Sad, Serbia, in 2015

Brussels is investigating a showcase Chinese rail project that aims to extend Beijing’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative into the heart of Europe, potentially putting the European Commission at loggerheads with China.
The commission’s probe is into a planned 350km high-speed railway between Serbia’s capital, Belgrade, and Budapest in Hungary.
The railway is billed as a hallmark scheme under “One Belt One Road”, a $900bn project championed by Xi Jinping, to build infrastructure and win diplomatic friends in Europe, Asia and Africa.
European officials told the Financial Times that the investigation was assessing the financial viability of the $2.89bn railway and looking into whether it had violated European Union laws stipulating that public tenders must be offered for large transport projects
“The commission services are assessing the compliance of the project with EU law. The dialogue with the national authorities is ongoing,” said a European Commission spokeswoman.
Any legal setback to China’s first railway project in Europe would be a diplomatic embarrassment for Beijing, which made the railway its cornerstone offering to win support from central and eastern European nations during a summit attended by the countries in 2013. 
At issue for the commission are separate agreements signed by the Hungarian and Serbian authorities. 
But the main focus is on Hungary, an EU member state that is subject to the full rigour of European procurement law. 
As a prospective member of the bloc, Serbia is subject to looser rules.
Failure to comply with EU tender laws may be punished by fines and proceedings to reverse infringements. 
“If push comes to shove and if it turns out that the Hungarians have awarded a public works contract of a particular dimension without tender they will of course have infringed EU legislation,” said a senior EU official.
No contract for the $1.8bn Hungarian section of the railway appears to have been made public. However, a treaty between Hungary and China, dated last year and seen by the FT last week, stipulates that companies designated by each government should “co-operate for the development” of the project.
It adds that two state-owned Chinese companies — the China Railway International Corporation and the Export-Import Bank of China — should act as contractor and financier for the project, which is due to be implemented by the Hungarian State Railways company. 
On Friday, the Hungarian government did not deny the commission’s probe but said it had signed the agreements with China, including an annex explaining how it had complied with EU procurement law, following consultations with Brussels.
Official Chinese media reports have said “a contract” for the high-speed railway between Belgrade and Budapest was signed during a meeting of the “16+1” — which unites China with central and eastern European countries — in Latvia in November.

Disruption to the rail project could sap the impetus behind the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, which Xi hopes will bind China, Europe, the Middle East and Africa more closely by building roads, railways, ports and other links to recreate the spirit of connectivity that prevailed along the ancient Silk Road.
“This railway is a big part of the ‘One Belt, One Road’ project,” said Tamas Matura, assistant professor at Corvinus University in Budapest.
“The Hungarian section is supposed to serve as a masterpiece to show that the Chinese can build according to EU standards,” he added.
The planned railway, which is supposed to cut journey times from Belgrade to Budapest down to about three hours from the current eight, is also important to China in a practical sense.
It comprises a crucial section of a so-called “Land Sea Express Route”, which China agreed in 2014 to build with Hungary, Serbia and Macedonia.
This route is aimed to link up with Piraeus, a Chinese-owned Greek port on the Mediterranean.
Without the Serbian-Hungarian rail link, China could struggle to realise its aim of being able to export products by rail to Piraeus and thereafter by sea to destinations in Europe, Africa and beyond, analysts said.
The Brussels probe into Hungary’s tender procedures is not unprecedented.
Viktor Orban, the prime minister, attracted EU scrutiny in 2014 for awarding contracts to build a €12.5bn Moscow-funded nuclear project to Russian state-owned energy company Rosatom, also without holding a public tender. 
The commission launched infringement proceedings against Budapest on suspicions that the project breached internal market rules.
But it closed the probe last December, accepting Hungary’s arguments that only the Russian operator could provide the specific technologies required.
The project is still subject to a separate state aid investigation.