Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Izumo helicopter carrier. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Izumo helicopter carrier. Afficher tous les articles

jeudi 23 mars 2017

Chinese Aggressions

Japan Has Ambitious Plans To Be Asia's Next Superpower, Thanks To China
By Ralph Jennings

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe delivers a speech during the graduation ceremony of the National Defense Academy in Yokosuka, Kanagawa prefecture on March 19, 2017.
Japan has lived by a peacetime constitution since 1947, two years after its World War II surrender. The constitution obligates it to groom armed forces only for defense, no first strikes on another country. 
Japan has done just about everything but add outright offensive forces to vie with China as Asia’s chief superpower. 
Its military ranks No. 7 in the world, four notches below China, the statistical data base Global FirePower.com says. 
They would probably do all right in battle: Japan has been known throughout history for rigorous training of soldiers to defend the island nation from Russia even before World War II, according to this historical take
The country also has a 66-year-old military treaty with the United States, obligating it to give U.S. troops a staging ground for any action in East Asia, in return for getting help in any new war from the world’s most powerful armed forces.
Three years ago the government recast the way it sees Constitution Article 9 – which renounces war – so Japan could defend not only itself but its allies if needed. 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe says Article 9 needs an update for his people’s protection.
Abe means protection from China, you could securely say. 
China is the chief reason Japan hopes to build toward regional superpower status. 
North Korea is threatening Japan with missiles, four of which it fired into a shared sea earlier this month, and China supports the Kim Jong-un regime in Pyongyang. 
China sends military aircraft near Japanese outlying islands and Japan's uninhabited Senkaku archipelago. 
Last year China also passed ships near the Senkaku chain over more than 30 days last year. 
That means Japan needs to scramble its own planes whenever the Chinese approach.
These incidents normally raise voices in Japan for a stronger military.
Japan needled China last week with word it would send a ship into its own oceanic backyard. 
It would send its Izumo helicopter carrier into the Beijing-dominated South China Sea from May through August for port calls, on its way to the Indian Ocean for drills with the United States. 
A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson told Japan to “refrain from causing trouble in the region,” Beijing’s official Xinhua News Agency says.
The two countries are vying to be the chief economic superpower in Asia, as well. 
That's particularly obvious in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a bloc of 10 countries and about 600 million people. 
Chinese aid is hard to quantify but included $20 billion in loans in 2014 and a late 2015 pledge of $10 billion for infrastructure lending. 
Programs such as its “Maritime Silk Road” and the Beijing-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank pave way for that funding. 
Japan has donated development aid since the 1950s and announced an increase last year to Southeast Asia. 
China is keen to use the region’s natural resources, while Japan sees Southeast Asia as a site for low-cost factories. 
Japanese investment in the region rose three times to $181 billion from 2011 to mid-2016. 
Both countries hope to sell to Southeast Asian consumers. 
And both want ASEAN governments to be long-term allies in their quest for control in Asia, a reason Japanese aid to Vietnam includes patrol boats.
“For many decades, Japan has played an important role in providing development and humanitarian aid to countries throughout East and Southeast Asia, but it was long ‘hindered,’ so to speak, by its pacifist defense policy,” says Jonathan Spangler, director of the South China Sea Think Tank in Taipei. 
“It can now become more directly engaged in regional securitization efforts. This is reassuring.”

jeudi 16 mars 2017

Chinese Aggressions

Julie Bishop backs Japanese right to sail through troubled South China Sea
By David Wroe and Kirsty Needham

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has backed "the right of all nations" to sail through international waters after Japan decided to send its biggest naval warship through the South China Sea.
The move by Japan to send its Izumo helicopter carrier through the waters where Beijing has been expanding strategic control signals clear fears even among close US allies about Donald Trump's commitment to Asia, leading Australian experts said.
Ms Bishop, when asked for her views on the reports of Japan's planned naval transit, said: "The Australian government supports the right of all nations and their vessels to traverse international waters according to international law."
Overnight, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said China had seen the media reports about Japan's actions, but hadn't heard Japan's official explanation.
Strategic scholars meanwhile said the Trump administration needed to do more than make vague, reassuring statements if it is to calm nervous Asian nations -- including Australia -- who worry the US might withdraw from the region.
The Japanese warship Izumo will tour the South China Sea for three months.

US acting Assistant Secretary of State Susan Thornton said on Monday night that the Trump administration would ditch the Obama-era US language of a "pivot" or "rebalance", which described a long-term plan to focus more military, diplomatic and economic attention on the Asia-Pacific region.
Ben Schreer, the head of Macquarie University's Department of Security Studies and Criminology, said Japan's decision to send the 248-metre long Izumo through the South China Sea reflected Tokyo's wish to signal to Washington that it would do more militarily in Asia.
This in turn was aimed at encouraging the US to stay involved, underscoring the nervousness among Washington's allies in Asia, including Australia, that the superpower would pull back.
"[The Izumo] is their most powerful warship so it sends a message and it sits within Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's policy of signalling to the Americans that Japan is within limits willing to do more … and getting American reassurance in return," Professor Schreer said.
Ms Bishop in a speech in Singapore on Monday said that many countries in Asia were in a "strategic holding pattern" as they waited to see whether the US would remain committed to the region. 
She called on the Trump administration to "play an even greater role as the indispensable strategic power in the Indo-Pacific".
Euan Graham of the Lowy Institute said the Japanese move was "a bold move" but how bold would depend on whether it sailed with US naval ships nearby or within disputed waters.
That would be "a significant up-tempo shift – one that would inevitably raise expectations of Australia", he said.
Andrew Shearer, a former adviser on national security to Tony Abbott and John Howard, now with the US Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said Japan was taking another step in a stronger security posture under Mr Abe, which came on top of a decision to conduct exercises with the US in the South China Sea.
"To me, this underlines Japan's commitment to upholding freedom of navigation, its growing concern about tensions in the South China Sea -- an international waterway that is vital to its economy as well as Australia's - and the extent to which other countries in the region are anxious about China's growing assertiveness".
Dr Graham and Professor Schreer said it was striking that Ms Bishop had so pointedly highlighted the wait-and-see attitude in Asia about Mr Trump's commitment to Asia.
Ms Thornton's remarks about the pivot or rebalance being "a bumper sticker" that was used to describe "the Asia policy in the last administration" might be damaging because there was nothing so far to replace it, they said.
"Until the US does more to fill the policy void … scepticism is inevitable about how far the inner core around President Trump are willing to buy into those as US interests," Dr Graham said.
Professor Schreer said: "If it's not the rebalance or the pivot, what is it? What remains of the engagement?"
Ms Bishop said of Ms Thornton's remarks that she was "encouraged during my recent meetings with the United States Administration, including with Vice-President Pence, Secretary of State Tillerson and National Security Adviser General McMaster that the US intends to remain engaged in the Asia Pacific region".