Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Theresa May. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Theresa May. Afficher tous les articles

jeudi 13 juin 2019

UK PM May says Hong Kong extradition must be in line with Sino-British declaration

Reuters

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May leaves Downing Street, London, Britain June 12, 2019. 

LONDON -- British Prime Minister Theresa May said extradition rules in Hong Kong had to respect the rights and freedoms set out in the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
“We are concerned about potential effects of these proposals particularly obviously given the large number of British citizens there are in Hong Kong,” May told parliament.
“But it is vital that those extradition arrangements in Hong Kong are in line with the rights and freedoms that were set down in the Sino-British joint declaration.”

jeudi 22 juin 2017

Perfidious Albion

Britain is looking away as China tramples on the freedom of Hong Kong – and my father
By Angela Gui

Angela Gui: ‘My father’s case is only one out of many that illustrate the death of the rule of law in Hong Kong.’ 

Iam too young to remember the handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997 and its promise for the new world I would live in. 
But I have lived to see that promise trampled.
The Sino-British Joint Declaration, signed to pave the way for the handover, was supposed to protect the people of Hong Kong from Chinese interference in their society and markets until 2047. 
Yet as the handover’s 20th anniversary approaches, China muscles in where it promised to tread lightly while Britain avoids eye contact.

Gui Minhai: the strange disappearance of a publisher who riled China's elite
As Xi Jinping has consolidated his grip on Chinese politics since he took office in 2013, Beijing has increasingly ignored the principle of “one country, two systems” on which the handover was based and actively eroded the freedoms this was supposed to guarantee.
In October 2015, my father Gui Minhai and his four colleagues were targeted and abducted by the agents of the Chinese Communist party for their work as booksellers and publishers. 
My father – a Swedish citizen – was taken while on holiday in Thailand, in the same place we’d spent Christmas together the year before. 
He was last seen getting into a car with a Mandarin-speaking man who had waited for him outside his holiday apartment. 
Next, his friend and colleague Lee Bo was abducted from the Hong Kong warehouse of Causeway Bay Books, which they ran together. 
Lee Bo is legally British and, like any Hong Konger, his freedom of expression should have been protected by the terms of 1997.
Their only “crime” had been to publish and sell books that were critical of the central Chinese government. 
So paranoid is Beijing about its public image, that it chooses to carry out cross-border kidnappings over some books. 
Causeway Bay Books specialised in publications that were banned on the mainland but legal in Hong Kong. 
The store’s manager, Lam Wing-kee, who was taken when travelling to Shenzhen, has described Causeway Bay Books “a symbol of resistance”
In spite of Hong Kong’s legal freedoms of speech and of the press the store is now closed because all its people have been abducted or bullied away. 
Other Hong Kong booksellers are picking “politically sensitive” titles off their shelves in the fear that they may be next; the next brief headline, the next gap in a family like my own.
I continue to live with my father’s absence – his image, messages from his friends, the cause he has become. 
Turning 53 this year, he spent a second birthday in a Chinese prison. 
Soon he will have spent two years in detention without access to a lawyer, Swedish consular officials, or regular contact with his family.
My father’s case is only one of many that illustrate the death of the rule of law in Hong Kong. 
Earlier this year, Canadian businessman Xiao Jianhua – who had connections to the Chinese political elite – disappeared from a Hong Kong hotel and later resurfaced on the mainland. 
In last year’s legislative council elections, six candidates were barred from running because of their political stance. 
The two pro-independence candidates who did end up getting elected were prevented from taking office. 
If “intolerable political stance” is now a valid excuse for barring LegCo candidates, then it won’t be long before the entire Hong Kong government is reduced to a miniature version of China’s.
The Joint Declaration was meant to guarantee that no Hong Kong resident would have to fear a “midnight knock on the door”. 
The reality at present is that what happened to my father can happen to any Hong Kong resident the mainland authorities wish to silence or bring before their own system of “justice”. 
Twenty-one years ago, John Major pledged that Britain would continue to defend the freedoms granted to Hong Kong by the Joint Declaration against its autocratic neighbour. 
Today, instead of holding China to its agreement, Britain glances down at its shoes and mumbles about the importance of trade. 
It is as if the British government wants to forget all about the promise it made to the people of Hong Kong. 
But China’s crackdown on dissent has made it difficult for Hong Kongers to forget.
Theresa May often emphasises the importance of British values in her speeches. 
But Britain’s limpness over Hong Kong seems to demonstrate only how easily these values are compromised away. 
I worry about the global implications of China being allowed to just walk away from such an important treaty. 
And I worry that in the years to come, we will have many more Lee Bos and Gui Minhais, kidnapped and detained because their work facilitated free speech. 
Hong Kong’s last governor, Lord Patten, has repeatedly argued that human rights issues can be pushed without bad effects on trade
Germany, for example, has shown that this is entirely possible, with Angela Merkel often publicly criticising China’s human rights record. 
With a potentially hard Brexit around the bend, a much reduced Britain will need a world governed by the rule of law. 
How the government handles its responsibilities to Hong Kong will be decisive in shaping the international character of the country that a stand-alone Britain will become. 
I for one hope it will be a country that honours its commitments and that stands up to defend human rights.

lundi 24 octobre 2016

Theresa May slammed as 'naive' for failing to block higher tariffs on Chinese steel by EU boss

The EU Commission chief warned failure to protect Europe's steel industries from Chinese dumping would fuel anger
By Jack Blanchard

Brussels boss Jean Claude-Juncker has slammed “naive” Theresa May for blocking higher tariffs on Chinese steel.
The EU Commission chief warned that failure to protect Europe's steel industries from Chinese dumping would fuel populist anger across the continent.
“I cannot accept that the Americans are protecting their industry and we are the naïve guys wanting to charm the others,” he raged.
Mr Juncker was speaking at the end of Mrs May's first EU summit as Prime Minister where she continued to argue that tariffs should not be raised.
The EU Commission and other major steel producers including Germany and France want swingeing US-style trade tariffs to protect their industries from cheap Chinese steel.
Jean-Claude Juncker has slammed Theresa May
But Britain has been blocking reform of the EU's 'lesser duty rule' – which keeps tariffs low - since 2013, despite the near-collapse of the British steel industry and the loss of thousands of jobs.
At the same time Britain supports giving China 'market economy' status within the EU which will allow the Asian giant to carve out even more of the market.
The Mirror revealed that even Mrs May's most trusted Downing Street adviser, chief of staff Nick Timothy, has slammed the lack of high tariffs as “unthinking liberalism”.
Save Our Steel campaign

Mr Juncker said if Europe does not act to protect its steel industry it will pour fuel on the anti-EU anger which has swept across the continent.
“If you want to fight against stupid populism, you have to create the pre-conditions for this fight to be successful,” he said.
“If we are telling the entire world that now China will receive market economy status without us improving our trade defences… then we are preparing the way for populists to attack the European Union.”
Mr Juncker will put forward concrete proposals on reforming the EU's 'trade defences' next month and the row will continue between British and Brussels officials over the coming weeks.
But Mrs May made clear she will not change her stance and said tariffs must be “balanced” to protect firms who buy cheap steel.
“We've had a discussion about the modernisation of trade defence instruments," the PM said as the summit finished.
"What we've agreed around the table is that we look at all of those instruments and we do that in a balanced way.
“And that's what's important. It's important to balance the interests of users, of producers and of consumers.”