Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Qualcomm Inc.. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Qualcomm Inc.. Afficher tous les articles

jeudi 2 août 2018

U.S. Pressures China With Punitive Trade, Defense Measures

President Trump administration threatens to more than double proposed tariffs while Congress backed curbs on Beijing’s economic and military activity
By Bob Davis and Lingling Wei

The U.S. considers 25% tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese imports. Above, a worker checks equipment at specialized steel company in Dalian, China. 

WASHINGTON—The U.S. turned up the heat Wednesday on China, with the Trump administration threatening to more than double proposed tariffs on imports while Congress passed a defense bill designed to restrict Beijing’s economic and military activity.
The moves come as Beijing and Washington have failed to ease an escalating trade dispute, prompting the administration to seek additional leverage. 
The administration, which has already affixed tariffs on billions of dollars in Chinese imports, said it would consider more than doubling proposed tariffs on a further $200 billion worth of Chinese goods to 25%, up from an original 10%.
Meantime, the Senate approved a defense-policy bill that both tightens U.S. national-security reviews of Chinese corporate deals and revamps export controls over which U.S. technologies can be sent abroad. 
The bill, which also restricts Beijing in areas ranging from cultural activity to military exercises, passed the House a week earlier and President Trump is expected to sign it into law.
While Mr. Trump has sparred with some Republicans in Congress over the wisdom of trade conflicts with allies such as Canada, Mexico and the European Union, the goal of confronting China—if not the White House tactics—has achieved a degree of unanimity at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Behind the consensus is a fear that China’s rise is coming at America’s expense, as it pursues the acquisition of sensitive technology and evolves into a U.S. military rival.
Administration officials are confident they have the upper hand in the trade fight because the U.S. economy is strengthening while the Chinese economy shows signs of growing slack
Moreover, China is more dependent on trade than the U.S.
But that confidence so far hasn’t translated into action. 
Preliminary talks by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Chinese Liu He haven’t produced even a plan for additional trade negotiations.
“Communications remain open,” said a senior administration official in briefing reporters. 
“There are conversations about whether to have fruitful negotiations or not.”
Relations between China and the U.S. have been tense over the Trump administration’s efforts to address a $376 billion trade imbalance between the nations. 
President Trump has threatened to apply tariffs to all $505 billion in Chinese goods entering the U.S. if the two are unable to reach a settlement. 
Washington has already applied tariffs to $34 billion worth of Chinese imports, with another set of duties on $16 billion in goods scheduled in the days ahead.
The U.S. threatened Wednesday to make the next round of tariffs more punitive. 
In a Monday White House meeting, Mr. Trump dismissed the original administration plan for a 10% tariff on $200 billion in imports—the next step in Mr. Trump’s escalation—and had his team bump up the levy to 25%.
Senior administration officials said they would ask for comments from industry on both a 10% tariff and a 25% tariff. 
A final decision on the rate isn’t expected until September at the earliest.
The administration didn’t spell out a particular rationale for increasing the tariff. 
People familiar with White House discussions say the reasons include anger over the Chinese government’s failure to approve the merger of U.S.-based Qualcomm Inc. and Dutch chip maker NXP Semiconductors, which forced the companies to scrap a deal aimed at boosting Qualcomm’s reach into new markets.
Industry officials who have discussed the move with the White House say another reason for the increase is to compensate for the decline in the value of the yuan by about 6% over the past two months. 
A weaker Chinese currency makes Chinese products more competitive on world markets.
“It’s important countries refrain from devaluing currencies for competitive purposes,” said a senior administration official, though he didn’t accuse China of acting in that fashion.
Higher-than-anticipated tariffs could encourage Beijing to let the yuan slide even further, raising the prospect that a trade fight turns into a currency battle
“It’s an increasing risk,” said Brad Setser, a currency expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.
China’s central bank isn’t actively driving the currency down, say traders, analysts and Chinese government advisers. 
Rather it is letting the currency slide as investors bid the yuan down on expectations that China will roll out more measures to back economic growth.
To be sure, the People’s Bank of China can control the pace of the yuan’s depreciation if it wants. 
The central bank sets a daily official rate for the yuan, known as the fix, and can tap its vast foreign-exchange reserves to prop up the currency. 
For now, the central bank has largely stayed its hand.
But Chinese authorities can take a more active stance. 
“We’ve been told by regulators to be on high alert for any impact of the trade war on the real economy,” said a senior executive at a Big Four state-owned bank in Beijing. 
The bank, the executive said, has received “window guidance” from China’s central bank to step up its corporate lending.
The White House's trade battle has a twofold purpose: to reduce the $376 billion U.S. trade deficit with China by $200 billion, and force China to change its industrial policies, including those that pressure U.S. companies to transfer technology to Chinese businesses.
The administration has relied mainly on tariffs to get China to change its trade policies, prompting Beijing to retaliate tit for tat. 
So far, the U.S. has imposed tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, mainly machinery and components. 
China has retaliated with tariffs on the same amount of U.S. exports, especially farm products.
The administration has also said it would hit China with tariffs on an additional $16 billion of goods shortly—and China has said it would retaliate in kind.
Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said GOP lawmakers are unified when it comes to China. 
As for the additional tariffs, “I hope it gets their attention and brings them to the negotiating table,” he said.
Economists note that the impact of China’s retaliatory tariffs mainly hits Republican strongholds, especially farm states.
“Most certainly we’re concerned about retaliation,” said Sen. Mike Rounds (R., S.D.). 
China buys “about 25% of the entire soybean crop in the United States. Today, soybeans are down about a dollar and a half per bushel—that’s before any formal announcement, so naturally we have concerns.”
The White House has won some praise on Capitol Hill from a tentative deal with the European Union to ease trade tensions with the bloc and work together to press China on trade and investment issues.

mardi 13 mars 2018

Chinese Peril

How China's Huawei Killed $117 Billion Broadcom Deal
Bloomberg News
Blue light illuminates cables on an E9000 blade server rack, manufactured by Huawei Technologies Co.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s unprecedented move to block Broadcom Ltd.’s hostile takeover bid for Qualcomm Inc. reflects growing concern about China’s rising economic prowess.
At the heart of that decision to scupper what would’ve been the largest technology acquisition in history is Huawei Technologies Co., the world’s third-largest maker of smartphones and, by some reckonings, the biggest producer of telecommunications equipment.
Trump was acting on the recommendations of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., which vets deals for national security risks.
The agency suggested that the deal could curtail U.S. investments in chip and wireless technologies, handing leadership to an opaque Chinese company that’s funneling billions into developing next-generation wireless systems.

1. What is Huawei?
The Chinese company has in three decades grown from an electronics reseller into one of the world’s most important communications companies, with leading positions in telecoms gear, smartphones, cloud computing and cybersecurity.
With 2017 sales of about 600 billion yuan ($95 billion), Huawei generates more revenue than Home Depot or Boeing -- and twice as much as Broadcom and Qualcomm combined.

2. What role did Huawei have in the Broadcom/Qualcomm deal?
None.
Huawei -- never an aggressive acquirer -- had no direct role in the deal negotiations.
But it loomed over the talks because of its growing influence.

3. So why the worry about Huawei?
CFIUS is concerned that Broadcom would cut back on R&D funding at Qualcomm, strengthening Huawei at a time when rivals from Ericsson to Nokia are grappling with weak telecoms spending. That theoretically gives Chinese companies such as Huawei and closest rival ZTE Corp. the upper hand in steering the direction of wireless communications development, thereby -- so the argument goes -- jeopardizing U.S. national security.
CFIUS’s concerns over the deal are said also to stem from Broadcom’s ties to Huawei, which was blacklisted in 2012 along with ZTE when the U.S. House Intelligence Committee cited security risks posed by the companies.

4. What’s the link between Broadcom and Huawei?
Huawei uses Broadcom’s chips in networking products such as switches that direct data traffic between connected computers.
Qualcomm also works with Huawei.
The two said on Feb. 21 they completed testing on technology that advances faster 5G mobile services.
Under one envisioned scenario, wireless carriers may be forced to turn to Huawei or other Chinese companies for cutting-edge telecoms gear.
That’s unacceptable for a U.S. government that, concerned about the security of Huawei’s gear, has already blocked the sale of the Chinese company’s smartphones on American carriers’ networks.

5. Are there broader implications for Chinese companies?
The president’s order is the latest sign of Trump’s tough stance on foreign takeovers of U.S. technology, and dovetails with a broader move to contain China on trade and deal-making. Government officials and industry executives have long harbored suspicions that the closely held Huawei works for Chinese government interests, especially as it sells increasing amounts of critical telecoms infrastructure to Europe, Africa and the Middle East.

6. What exactly is Huawei’s connection with Beijing?
Founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, a former People’s Liberation Army engineer, Huawei has always enjoyed favorable treatment from a government that -- like the U.S. -- remains wary of employing too much foreign technology for vital communications.
In a report released by the U.S. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report in 2012, Huawei and ZTE were tagged as threats to security interests. 
The report questioned Huawei’s ties with the Communist Party and -- after multiple interviews including a sit-down with Ren himself -- it concluded that Huawei failed to properly explain that relationship. 
Chinese government policies enacted in the past year seen as favoring local providers have only intensified suspicion.

7. Will Trump’s move give the U.S. a lead in 5G?
Nothing’s for certain.
Along with ZTE, Huawei began ploughing billions of dollars into the field from 2009 and is now among China’s top filers of patents both internationally and domestically, covering everything from data transmission to network security.
Huawei, which may own a 10th of essential patents on 5G, is angling for full-scale commercialization of 5G networks by 2020.
Its rise coincided with the decline of competitors like Ericsson and Nokia, often undercut by Huawei and ZTE even as global telecoms rollouts slowed.
Huawei is now not just the leading provider in the world’s largest telecommunications equipment, but also a dominant player across the planet.
In a direct threat to Qualcomm, Huawei’s now designing its own chips.
The Chinese company’s Kirin series mobile processors, made via subsidiary HiSilicon, compete with the Qualcomm Snapdragon chip employed extensive by Samsung Electronics Co. and other global smartphone names.

8. What about the longer term?
China aims to lead the world in 5G -- a next-generation standard that will enable richer and faster video and open a whole new playground for mobile apps.
In an interview with China Central Television last week, the country’s minister for information technology said China is already preparing for the development of 6G technologies.

The Reference Shelf