Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Occupy Central. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Occupy Central. Afficher tous les articles

lundi 17 juin 2019

Freedom Fighters

For Hong Kong’s Youth, Protests Are a Matter of Life and Death
By Mike Ives and Katherine Li
Protesting against the proposed extradition law in Hong Kong on Sunday.

HONG KONG — They are on the front lines of every demonstration, dressed in black T-shirts and pumping their fists as they march through Hong Kong’s sweltering streets.
They organize on encrypted messaging groups and hand out helmets and goggles at rallies. 
When the police fired tear gas at them, they chased the smoke-emitting canisters and doused them with water.
Hong Kong’s youth are at the forefront of protests this month that have thrown the city into a political crisis, including a vast rally on Sunday that was perhaps the largest in its history. 
Organizers contend that close to two million of the territory’s seven million people participated, calling on the government to withdraw proposed legislation that would allow extraditions to mainland China.
For the many high-school and university-age students who flooded the streets, the issue is much bigger than extradition alone. 
As they see it, they are fighting a “final battle” for some semblance of autonomy from the Chinese government.
“The extradition law is a danger to our lives,” said Zack Ho, 17, a high school student who helped organize a boycott of classes. 
“Once this passes, our rule of law would be damaged beyond repair.”
They are a generation that has no memory of life under British rule, but they have come of age amid growing fears about how the encroachment of China’s ruling Communist Party — and an influx of people from mainland China — are transforming Hong Kong and what they believe is special about it.
Such fears stem from the ousting of opposition lawmakers, the disappearance of several individuals from Hong Kong into custody in the mainland and the intensifying competition for jobs and housing in a city with soaring inequality. 
Many young protesters see the extradition bill as hurting the territory’s judicial independence — in their view, the last vestige of insulation they now have from Beijing’s influence.
Youth activism in Hong Kong had ebbed in recent years, after protests demanding a direct say in the election of the territory’s chief executive ended in failure in 2014. 
The most prominent leaders of what became known as the Umbrella Movement or Occupy Central were jailed, and their legions of young supporters were left bitterly disenchanted.

Joshua Wong, who became the face of the Umbrella Movement protests in 2014, was released from prison in Hong Kong on Monday.

But the extradition legislation pushed by Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, has re-energized young people. 
Residents express worry that Beijing will use new extradition powers to target dissidents and others who run afoul of Communist Party officials on the mainland.
The young people driving the Umbrella Movement fought for the cause of universal suffrage, said Leung Yiu-ting, the student union president of Hong Kong Education University. 
But the extradition fight, he added, is “a matter of life and death.”
Compared with older generations, young people in Hong Kong feel less affinity with mainland China and are more likely to see themselves as having a distinct Hong Kong — as opposed to Chinese — identity. 
Beijing’s efforts to grapple with this have backfired; when officials tried to impose a patriotic education curriculum in schools in 2012, young people led the protests against it.
That was the beginning of this generation’s political awakening, which has accelerated along with the erosion of the civil liberties promised to Hong Kong upon its return to Chinese government in 1997. Those freedoms have long set Hong Kong apart from the mainland, and as they have begun to fray, young people say they feel the threat more sharply.
No one has emerged as the face of the current youth movement as Joshua Wong, then 17, did during the Umbrella protests five years ago. (Mr. Wong was released from prison Monday after serving a month of his two-month prison sentence.)
That is at least in part because of fear. 
“Who’s going to be quite so willing, openly, to take six years of jail as the prize for the protests?” said Claudia Mo, a pro-democracy Hong Kong lawmaker, referring to a sentence handed down last year to Edward Leung, a local activist, for his role in a 2016 clash between protesters and the police.
Instead, organizers have operated behind the scenes by spreading messages about protests and other acts of civil disobedience through social media, word of mouth and secure messaging apps like Telegram.

Students taking part in a strike at Tamar Park in Hong Kong on Monday.

One result was that high schoolers and university students turned out in large numbers at a mostly peaceful march one week ago Sunday, and also occupied a highway on Wednesday outside the Legislative Council. 
Medical students and other volunteers provided first aid and free supplies from makeshift tents.
“They are compromising our future, and for what?” Terrence Leung, a recent college graduate, who like many others was demonstrating on Wednesday in a black T-shirt and a surgical mask, said of the pro-Beijing lawmakers who championed the extradition bill.
But in both protests, some among the young demonstrators challenged the authorities with force. 
The demonstrators tried to occupy the area outside the Legislative Council — or, in Wednesday’s case, tried to storm the complex — with force, pushing metal barriers and tossing bricks, bottles and sticks at riot police officers.
The police responded with pepper spray and batons. 
On Wednesday, police also fired 150 canisters of tear gas and, for the first time in decades, rubber bullets. 
Videos of officers beating protesters and firing volleys of tear gas that sent thousands fleeing drew wide condemnation across the city.
Public anger only grew when Lam compared her response to the opposition with that of a mother with a willful child.
Linda Wong, a barrister who organized a rally attended by women who described themselves as mothers opposed to how the police had responded to the young protesters, disagreed with Lam’s characterization.
“They came out not for personal interests but for the greater ideal of Hong Kong,” said Ms. Wong. “A good mother shall listen to her own child, and apparently Carrie Lam refuses to do so.”

A mass rally on Sunday. Organizers have spread messages about protests and other acts of civil disobedience through social media, word of mouth and secure messaging apps like Telegram.

The police said Monday that 32 people have been arrested since Wednesday’s event, including five for rioting.
“Fear is striking in all of our hearts,” said Mr. Leung, the student union president, referring to the possibility of being prosecuted.
Another risk is that the leaderless nature of the movement raises the possibility of more bloodshed. Analysts say that if demonstrations descend into violence, the authorities would have an easy excuse to prosecute young protesters, discredit them as radicals or attack them with a vengeance.
“If I were them, I would be cautious not to press the advantage too far,” said Andrew Junker, a sociologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who has studied the Umbrella Movement.
Faced with another enormous protest on Sunday, Lam issued a public apology for causing so much anger over the extradition law. 
Her apology came a day after she promised to shelve the plan indefinitely, but not withdraw it.
This was perceived as too little, too late, and it especially enraged younger protesters, who were bewildered that Lam seemed deaf to the concerns of more than a million demonstrators.
“Sometimes I think to myself, is it because I have not done enough? What else could have been done?” said So Hiu-ching, a 16-year-old high schooler who attended a student strike at a park near government offices on Monday morning.
“I go home and cry,” she said, “but after that, I have to get up and try to rally more people.”

Why This Time Was Different for Hong Kong

Support from business and the financial damage to China help explain how protesters prevailed in their battle against the extradition bill.
By Nisha Gopalan and Matthew Brooker


Hong Kong protesters have won a stunning victory.
Saturday’s suspension of an extradition bill that would allow criminal suspects to be sent to mainland China followed a day of violent clashes on Wednesday that saw the police use tear gas, pepper spray and baton charges.
In 2014, the police also used tear gas against demonstrators, prompting an occupation that paralyzed the central business district for more than two months.
Yet the government refused to budge, and the protest was eventually cleared by force.
It’s worth asking what was different this time.
The most obvious answer is the role of business.
Occupy Central had limited support from companies, and what sympathy there was clearly waned as the weeks wore on and the costs to business mounted.
By contrast, opposition to the extradition bill has united various strands of Hong Kong society, from civic and trade groups to religious organizations and the legal profession.
That’s even more evident after Sunday’s monumental protest, which drew 2 million people.
Business stalwarts such as HSBC Holdings Plc and Standard Chartered Plc were among multinationals that allowed flexible working hours last Wednesday, when protest organizers had called for a city-wide strike.
In 2014, by contrast, the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce and several foreign chambers spoke openly against the civil disobedience campaign, warning of the potential effects on the economy.
The first signs of cracks in the government’s facade of intransigence came on Friday as pro-establishment figures started to urge a rethink.
Among them were Bernard Chan, convenor of the Executive Council, Hong Kong’s de facto cabinet.
Tellingly, Chan said that he had underestimated the business sector’s reaction to the bill, in an interview with public broadcaster Radio Television Hong Kong,
A second key factor to consider is the role of China.
The 2014 protests called for full democracy and opposed Beijing’s formula for the election of Hong Kong’s leader, which would have left candidate selection in the hands of a committee controlled by pro-establishment interests.
In the case of the extradition bill, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam insisted repeatedly that the proposal had originated with the city’s government itself rather than Beijing.
While many will assume that the Hong Kong government would not have brought forward such a bill without at least the tacit approval and encouragement of Beijing, the extradition bill didn’t have China’s imprint on it in the same way as the 2014 election proposal.
The central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong “supports, understands and respects” Lam's decision to suspend the bill, the state-run Xinhua News Agency said on Saturday.
Beijing may be grateful for the political cover that Lam’s stance provided.
For the threatened damage to Hong Kong’s financial and business environment far outweighed any political benefits from drawing the city tighter into the mainland’s embrace.
The erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy has been well documented.
Many have cited the city’s declining relative importance to China's economy for the change to a more hard-line, interventionist policy.
When the U.K. returned the former colony to China in 1997, Hong Kong’s output was equal to around 16% of China’s economy; that was down to less than 3% last year.
This tells only part of the story, though.
Hong Kong remains crucial as a gateway to global capital markets for China. 
If anything, this role may be even more important as the trade war with the U.S. puts pressure on China’s economy and currency.
Since 2012, Chinese companies raised $156 billion from IPOs in Hong Kong, compared with $143 billion on mainland exchanges and around $48 billion selling shares in the U.S., according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Chinese borrowers have also been heavy users of the dollar bond markets through Hong Kong.
With funding constrained at home, even obscure local governments have started to sell U.S. currency debt, as Bloomberg Opinion’s Shuli Ren has written.
International bankers trust Hong Kong as a base to conclude deals with Chinese companies because of its independent legal system, relatively clean administration and civic freedoms, including the free flow of information.
Anything that detracts from these advantages and encourages businesses and financiers to relocate – even if that begins only as a trickle – is a long-term threat to the viability of Hong Kong's role as a global financial center.
There's a message here for the protesters – and for Beijing.
It’s easier to preserve the status quo than it is to enact change.
The common link between 2014 and 2019 is that the status quo has won in both cases.
It was also the result in 2003 – probably the closest direct parallel with today – when a proposed security law was shelved after an estimated 500,000 marched in opposition.
This means protesters have a better chance of success when fighting to preserve freedoms that already exist than when agitating for change.
For Beijing, the lesson is that Hong Kong became successful precisely because it has a different system from the mainland.
Tampering carries risks.
It’s still possible to kill the golden goose.

vendredi 14 juin 2019

Chinese Cyberattack Hits Telegram, App Used by Hong Kong Protesters

By Paul Mozur and Alexandra Stevenson
The police used tear gas as protesters came closer to the Legislative Council building in Hong Kong on Wednesday. Protesters used the app Telegram to organize, but the police were watching.

SHANGHAI — As protesters in Hong Kong retreated from police lines in the heart of the city’s business district, a new assault quietly began.
It was not aimed at the protesters. 
It was aimed at their phones.
A network of computers in China bombarded Telegram, a secure messaging app used by many of the protesters, with a huge volume of traffic that disrupted service
The app’s founder, Pavel Durov, said the attack coincided with the Hong Kong protests, a phenomenon that Telegram had seen before.
“This case was not an exception,” he wrote.
The Hong Kong police made their own move to limit digital communications. 
On Tuesday night, as demonstrators gathered near Hong Kong’s legislative building, the authorities arrested the administrator of a Telegram chat group with 20,000 members, even though he was at his home miles from the protest site.
“I never thought that just speaking on the internet, just sharing information, could be regarded as a speech crime,” the chat leader, Ivan Ip, 22, said in an interview.
“I only slept four hours after I got out on bail,” he said. 
“I’m scared that they will show up again and arrest me again. This feeling of terror has been planted in my heart. My parents and 70-year-old grandma who live with me are also scared.”
Past the tear gas, rubber bullets and pepper spray, the Hong Kong protests are also unfolding on a largely invisible, digital front. 
Protesters and police officers alike have brought a new technological savvy to the standoff.
Demonstrators are using today’s networking tools to muster their ranks, share safety tips and organize caches of food and water, even as they take steps to hide their identities.
The Hong Kong authorities are responding by tracking the protesters in the digital places where they plan their moves, suggesting they are taking cues from the ways China polices the internet.

Demonstrators on Tuesday night outside the Hong Kong government complex.

In mainland China, security forces track chat messages, arrest dissidents before protests even occur, and are increasingly detaining people over posts critical of the government. 
The Hong Kong police have visited the mainland at times looking at ways of stopping "terrorism".
“We know the government is using all kinds of data and trails to charge people later on,” said Lokman Tsui, a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Protesters used some of the same tools to organize in 2014, when the Occupy Central demonstration shut down parts of the city for more than two months. 
But their caution shows a growing awareness that the new digital tools can be a liability as well as an asset.
The police during the Occupy protests used digital messages to justify the arrest of a 23-year-old man, saying he used an online forum to get others to join in. 
One message that then spread over the WhatsApp chat service included malware, disguised as an app, that appeared to be for eavesdropping on Occupy organizers. 
Researchers said the malware came from China’s government.
“People are minimizing their footprints as much as possible,” Dr. Tsui said. 
“In that regard, it’s very different from five years ago. People are much more conscious and savvy about it.”
This week’s protests were sparked by the Hong Kong government’s plans to enact a new law that would allow people in the city to be extradited to mainland China, where the court system is closed from public scrutiny and tightly controlled by the Communist Party. 
On Thursday, city officials delayed plans to consider the legislation.
Telegram said on its Twitter account that it was able to stabilize its services shortly after the attack began. 
It described the heavy traffic as a DDoS attack, in which servers are overrun with requests from a coordinated network of computers. 
In his tweet, Mr. Durov said the attack’s scale was consistent with a state actor.
Beijing has been blamed in the past for attacks that silence political speech outside mainland China’s borders. 
In 2014, an informal online referendum about Hong Kong’s political future drew what at that time was one of the largest such attacks in history
A separate cyberattack in 2015 hijacked traffic from Baidu, the Chinese search engine, to overload a website hosting copies of services blocked in China, like Google, the BBC, and The New York Times.
In Hong Kong, the authorities focused on Mr. Ip, the chat room organizer, whom they saw as a ringleader. 
He said that the police arrived at his door with a warrant around 8 p.m. 
More than 10 officers demanded he unlock his phone, explaining that they were searching for extremists in the chat groups he administered.

Police officers stopped and searched people on Tuesday night ahead of planned protests.

At first he refused, but when they threatened to use a device to break into his Xiaomi 6 smartphone, he relented and entered the password. 
They then downloaded his chat records.
The officers searched his apartment, where he lives with his parents, but backed down after the parents complained that they were searching through things that were not his, he said. 
The police officers implied that they had found him based on his phone number, which was linked to his identification.
While Telegram conversations can be encrypted, the service does not have end-to-end encryption for its group chats, said Dr. Tsui, the communications professor. 
After Mr. Ip was arrested, groups distributed warnings to use new pay-as-you-go SIM cards or register foreign numbers online to join groups.
In a statement, the Hong Kong police’s Cybersecurity and Technology Crime Bureau said he had been arrested because he was suspected of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. 
He was released on bail, but the police said an investigation was continuing. 
Mr. Ip said he had not attended any protests this week.
Many of the protesters are college-aged and digitally savvy. 
They took pains to keep from being photographed or digitally tracked. 
To go to and from the protests, many stood in lines to buy single-ride subway tickets instead of using their digital payment cards, which can be tracked. 
Some confronting the police covered their faces with hats and masks, giving them anonymity as well as some protection from tear gas.
On Wednesday, several protesters shouted at bystanders taking photos and selfies, asking those who were not wearing press passes to take pictures only of people wearing masks. 
Later, a scuffle broke out between protesters and bystanders who were taking photos on a bridge over the main protest area.
For some, the most flagrant symbol of defiance came from showing one’s face.
On Wednesday, as demonstrators prepared for a potential charge by the police, a drone flew overhead. 
The protesters warned one another about photos from above, but Anson Chan, a 21-year-old recent college graduate, said she was unconcerned about leaving her face exposed, potentially revealing her identity.
Ms. Chan said she felt compelled to join the protests out of concern about the proposed law.
“Once people get taken to China, they can’t speak for themselves,” said Ms. Chan, who had traveled nearly two hours from Lok Ma Chau in northern Hong Kong to show support and hand out supplies after seeing scenes of violence on the news.
The mainland’s restrictions were on the minds of many.
“The bottom line is whether to trust Beijing,” said Dr. Tsui, the communications professor. 
“This is a government that routinely lies to its own citizens, that censors information, that doesn’t trust its own citizens. You can’t ask us to trust you if you don’t trust us.”
“These kids that are out there, all the young people, they’re smart,” he added. 
“They know not to trust Beijing.”