Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Andrew Robb. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Andrew Robb. Afficher tous les articles

samedi 2 juin 2018

Australia's Quislings

The Labor Party's China problem
By Nick O'Malley

When Australia’s chief spy, ASIO boss Duncan Lewis, told a Senate estimates hearing last week that Australia faced a greater threat from espionage today than at any time since the Cold War he was careful not to specify which countries might be targeting us.
No one doubts that he was talking about China. 
The senators who were questioning him were undoubtedly talking about China.

Andrew Robb was one of the first Beijing henchmen in Australia

As evidence of Chinese efforts to influence Australian institutions mounts, both major parties have reason for self-reflection.
When he quit his role as an elected representative of the Australian people the Liberal trade minister Andrew Robb walked into an $880,000-a-year job with a billionaire closely aligned to the Chinese Communist Party.
Robb was the architect of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.
Tony Abbott was among a handful Liberal heavy weights who were embarrassed after they had to return a fistfull of designer watches worth around $250,000 to a visiting Chinese billionaire. 
They thought they were fake, they explained when the story went public.
An ABC investigation last year found that Chinese individuals and companies were the largest foreign donors to the two parties, pouring more than $5.5 million into Labor and Liberal coffers between 2013 and 2015.

Australia's Quisling: Bob Carr, aka Beijing Bob, is a pro-Beijing extremist paid by the pro-Beijing think tank, Australia China Relations Institute

But one faction of one party appears to be more conflicted than sections of Australian politics, the Sussex Street machine of the powerful NSW Right.
Sam Dastyari, who quit politics when it was revealed he had taken donations from Chinese businesses and then echoed Chinese government talking points, was a rising star of the faction.
Its most dominant figure is Bob Carr, aka Beijing Bob, the former foreign affairs minister and NSW premier now at the centre of the China influence controversy
Carr is the director of the Australia-China Relations Institute, which was established by Chinese-Australian businessman Huang Xiangmo, the prolific political donor (and a controversial source of funds to Dastyari).
The NSW Labor right’s ties to Chinese businessmen, some of whom have links to the Chinese Communist Party and its arm of international influence, the United Front Work Department, is causing increasing disquiet in the broader party, particularly members from Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia.
In writing this story Fairfax Media spoke to party members as well as figures in national security and intelligence circles who did not want to go on record for political and legal reasons.
But a common view is that the Chinese Communist Party did not specifically target the NSW Labor right -- indeed they have sought to influence both parties and other major Australian institutions -- but that the NSW faction proved to be an unusually fertile ground to seek influence.
Michael Danby, a Victorian Labor right figure said the NSW right was without political ideology and driven by a fierce sense of “whatever it takes” in the accumulation of power and the funds needed secure power.
Similarly Rory Medcalf, the head of the National Security College, Australian National University, says the NSW right has been “unusually comfortable” with donors in the business community, and in particular those in development circles.
Another security figure noted that the NSW right been a particularly fruitful target for those seeking influence because of the sheer power it wields within the party.
Medcalf believes there is now a background battle going on within Labor over Chinese influence and the NSW right’s ties to figures believed to be involved. 
Danby and Carr have gone public, trading blows over the issue in Fairfax Media this week, with Danby declaring that “Bob Carr is a pro-Beijing extremist paid by the pro-Beijing think tank, Australia China Relations Institute.”
Labor leader Bill Shorten’s Victorian background has so far inoculated him from the controversy, along with other key members of his team, such as foreign affairs spokeswoman Penny Wong.
Medcalf believes that members of the Labor left who might once have had a sentimental sympathy for the CCP are now concerned by China’s increasing authoritarianism. 
Some have resisted criticising the party’s ties with Chinese figures because they fear being labelled as racist. 
This, he says, is an unfair allegation and a propaganda victory for the CCP.
Medcalf believes not only that the threat is real, but the leadership of both parties are well aware that there are more revelations to come.
He believes that a mixture of cynicism and naivety on behalf of some Australian politicians -- particularly in NSW -- gave Chinese government access to levers of power in Australia.
Given the current public debate, he says, none can claim naivety any more.

mercredi 6 décembre 2017

Chinese Fifth Column

Australia's crackdown on Chinese influence is welcome, but merely a start
The Age

The Coalition government's proposed crackdown on Chinese manipulation of Australian public policy is welcome, if overdue, but its efficacy will be determined by details yet to be revealed, and it falls far short of the political donations reforms required to buttress public confidence in our democracy.
Democracy depends on transparency and accountability -- a carefully calibrated system of checks and balances that punish and deter undue influence, without placing undue shackles on political freedom and access to public debate. 
The Age has long advocated comprehensive changes to political funding. 
We cautiously endorse the mooted move to outlaw Chinese political donations and to create a public register of individuals and organisations representing the interests of Chinese government and corporations.
Beijing's stooge Sam Dastyari.

But the public will not have robust faith in the system until changes apparently excluded from the pending legislation are established. 
These include: real-time public disclosure of donations; a cut in the disclosure threshold from $13,200 to $1000; capped donations from individuals, corporations and lobbyists; ending unions' compulsory donations to the ALP; and capping spending by parties. 
To compensate for blocking murky private money, public funding should be augmented. 
Further, Australia clearly needs a national anti-corruption commission, with full judicial powers.
Contemporary politics is replete with examples of opaque influence-seeking. 
Labor Senator Sam Dastyari's complicity with Chinese interests is egregious to the point of disgraceful, and he arguably should resign from Parliament. 
Bought by China: Andrew Robb

Former Liberal Party trade minister Andrew Robb's $880,000 annual stipend from the Chinese-government linked company that bought the port of Darwin is also unseemly. 
His protestations that he is being unfairly labelled does not stand scrutiny. 
The proposed legislation would require him to register as a Chinese agent. 
Should he have nothing to hide, he should have no fear of transparency.
Senator Dastyari's behaviour, which included seeking and receiving Chinese money to cover personal expenses, while he advocated, in conflict with his own party's policy, for China's aggressive expansionism in the South China Sea, would, according to Attorney-General George Brandis, contravene the proposed law. 
The Senator's warning to a Chinese donor about likely surveillance by Australia's security forces beggars belief. 
The Liberal Party's receipt of hundreds of thousands of dollars from interests linked to the Chinese government is also evidence of the need to clean up political funding.
But it's not just Chinese influence that needs curbing. 
Former Liberal small business minister Bruce Billson's astounding failure to declare he was being paid by the $170-billion franchise industry's lobby group while still in federal parliament is appalling. Lobbyists are paid to influence lawmakers to tilt legislation in favour of the profitability of companies and/or the political power of foreign governments. 
We need to examine whether the legislation has loopholes – for example, allowing Chinese entities to funnel money via locally registered organisations – or goes too far by, say, preventing charities from participating in public policy debate. 
The law, should it pass, will inevitably be tested in the courts – one of the fundamental checks and balances of our democracy.

vendredi 16 juin 2017

Chinese political donations pose a threat to Australian democracy

Concerns are being raised over political parties accepting substantial payments from sources linked to the Communist Party of China
By DANIEL FAZIO 
On June 5, the ABC television show Four Corners shed light on substantial donations to the Liberal-National coalition (LNP) and Labor (ALP) parties from Chinese sources linked to the Communist Party of China (CPC). 
These revelations raise serious concerns that require immediate action to prevent the further corrosion of Australian politics and the undermining of the country’s national sovereignty.
Current Australian electoral laws allow political parties to seek and accept foreign donations, so there is no suggestion that the parties have done anything illegal.
However, being beholden to foreign donors risks corrupting and compromising Australian national sovereignty. 
Indeed, Four Corners revealed this is why ASIO, the country’s chief intelligence agency, warned senior Liberal-National and Labor officials that China is exercising undue influence in Australian politics.
ASIO is also concerned about CPC influence in Australian universities, its monitoring of Chinese students and Chinese media in Australia to ensure they don’t engage in activities contrary to Beijing’s views.
One thing is certain: the Chinese are not donating hefty sums of money to the LNP and ALP because they have an altruistic desire to aid Australian democracy. 
Beijing is seeking to exploit Australia’s economic reliance on China because it serves its geo-strategic interests.
China’s increasing assertiveness in the Asia-Pacific region and growing presence in Africa indicates a calculated strategic move beyond Deng Xiaoping’s axiom: “hide your strength, bide your time.”
By deploying its soft power to increase its hard power, China is no longer hiding its strength or biding its time.
Should Australian political parties continue accepting Chinese donations, they risk facilitating growing Chinese influence in Australian politics which will undermine national sovereignty and compromise future Australian governments into acting contrary to Australian interests.
Chinese influence in Australian politics is already evident. 
In 2016, it emerged Labor Senator Sam Dastyari had received gifts and payments for legal and travel bills from Chinese contacts.
During last year’s federal election, a Chinese donor threatened to withdraw a promised A$400,000 (US$303,700) donation to the ALP after its shadow defence minister, Stephen Conroy, expressed support for freedom of navigation laws in the South China Sea, which were contrary to Beijing’s claims in the area.
It has also transpired that Australia’s former trade minister, Andrew Robb, accepted an A$880,000 a year consultancy with a Chinese firm before he left parliament after having negotiated the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.
Australia needs to immediately ban foreign donations for all political parties and mandate full disclosure of all donations from all organisations and individuals.
Current Australian electoral law means donations below A$13,000 don’t have to be disclosed. 
Total transparency is the only way to minimize corruption and subversiveness of the political process.
The issue of the Chinese donations are symptomatic of the closed operational culture of the LNP and ALP. 
This lack of transparency plays into Chinese hands. 
Secrecy serves the designs of the political parties and those who seek to influence them.
Australian political parties are very opaque.
 
They operate in a democracy but their internal culture and workings are not open or democratic. 
Within the party structures, power and decision-making is concentrated in the hands of a very small number of individuals.
Dissenting views are not tolerated and it is almost impossible for those aspiring for internal party positions and a parliamentary career to make headway without currying favor with the power brokers. A political operative once told me “election day” is the only day democracy operates in Australian politics.
The current state of Australian politics offers little hope for genuine and transparent reform. 
Voters are becoming increasingly apathetic, cynical and disillusioned. 
The political parties are content to perpetuate this vicious cycle because a disengaged electorate allows them to avoid proper scrutiny.
Party officials, determined to keep power concentrated in their hands, vehemently resist calls to democratize
This singular focus on the pursuit and maintenance of power leaves parties open to be compromised by vested interests. 
This will further corrode the political process and weaken national sovereignty.
Political parties in comparable nations such as Britain, Canada and the US are much more democratic than those in Australia. 
The revelations about the Chinese donations are a warning to the Australian electorate to emerge from our apathetic stupor and deploy our collective power at the ballot box and demand openness and accountability from our elected representatives and their parties.
Lord Acton said, “power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” 
Transparency and accountability are the only real safeguards against undue Chinese influence upon the political process and national sovereignty.

jeudi 15 juin 2017

China’s influence Down Under

Beijing looks to Chinese Australians to serve its interests, just as it seeks to pressure those who agitate for democratic reform or human rights. 
The Australian

Bought by China: Andrew Robb

Beijing spokesman Sam Dastyari
Simon Zhou (L) and Huang Xiangmo (R): two Chinese foxes in charge of ALP henhouse


Last year, former trade minister Andrew Robb exited parliament and took up an $880,000 consultancy job with a Chinese billionaire aligned with the Communist Party. 
This is a “red-hot” issue, according to Bill Shorten.
It’s not suggested that Mr Robb breached the ministerial code of conduct but the arrangement is hardly calculated to restore confidence in the political class.
When it comes to questionable Chinese connections, Labor is the serious worry. 
In June last year, another Chinese billionaire, Huang Xiangmo, pulled a $400,000 pledge to Labor after its defence spokesman said Australia’s navy should challenge China’s contentious claims in the South China Sea, according to a Fairfax Media-ABC report. 
The next day, senator Sam Dastyari Mr Huang fronted a press conference for Chinese-language media with the senator contradicting ALP policy by declaring, “the South China Sea is China’s own affair”. (Huang says he expected “nothing in return” for his donations.) 
A week later, Labor announced that Simon Zhou, Huang’s political ally, would take a spot on Labor’s Senate ticket. 
At the press conference, Huang spoke to China’s state broadcaster, drawing a link between China’s rising power and efforts by overseas Chinese “to safeguard Chinese interests”. 
Huang is president of the pro-Beijing Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC).
The NSW Labor Party received at least $120,000 in donations from companies linked to Zhou. 
And the ACPPRC links with the NSW branch go deeper, as we report today.
We should make political donations more transparent with prompt online reports. 
Fair enough, too, for the government to review laws on espionage and foreign interference in our democratic process.
But policy changes are unlikely to end concerns about Chinese influence. 
Stridently nationalist, the one-party state looks to Chinese Australians to serve its interests (however offensive our citizens may find this expectation), just as it seeks to pressure those who agitate for democratic reform or human rights.
The indispensable task, then, is for the media to analyse pro-Beijing networks of influence as they take shape, and expose them to public scrutiny.

mercredi 14 juin 2017

Something is rotten in the state of Australia

Sam Dastyari trashed Labor policy on South China Sea for $400k donation
  • Sam Dastyari told Chinese media Australia should not meddle in China's activities in South China Sea
  • Julie Bishop attacked Bill Shorten for promoting Dastyari to deputy Opposition whip
  • Coalition also faces questions about Chinese donations
By Louise Yaxley
Sam Dastyari resigned from the frontbench because a Chinese donor paid a travel bill for him.

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has accused Labor senator Sam Dastyari of trashing the ALP's foreign policy for a $400,000 donation.
Four Corners has reported that Chinese donor Huang Xiangmo withdrew a promise to donate $400,000 last year because Labor's then-defence spokesman, Stephen Conroy, supported freedom of movement in the South China Sea.
The program pointed out that the day after the offer was withdrawn, Dastyari contradicted Labor policy by telling Chinese media that Australia should not meddle with China's activities in the South China Sea.
Dastyari later said he supported Labor Party policy on freedom of movement in the South China Sea.
He resigned from his frontbench position last year because a Chinese donor paid a travel bill for him.
Ms Bishop has lashed out at Dastyari and attacked Labor leader Bill Shorten for giving the senator a promotion to deputy Opposition whip.
"We now know that Dastyari's about-face on the South China Sea had a price tag attached to it — indeed a reported $400,000 was all it took for Dastyari to trash Labor's official foreign policy position," Ms Bishop said.
"What did the Leader of the Opposition do?
"In the face of the most extraordinary public admission of foreign interference and influence, he slapped him on the wrist, sent him to the backbench for a couple of months and Sam Dastyari is now back in a leadership position in the Labor Party.
"This Leader of the Opposition sold out our national interest."
The Coalition also faces questions about Chinese donations.
Greens leader Richard di Natale raised a Four Corners report that Huang Xiangmo also donated $100,000 to then-trade minister Andrew Robb's personal campaign fund on the day the free trade deal was signed with China.
Huang Xiangmo poses with Bob Carr at the University of Technology Sydney.
Chinese fifth column's Gang of Four -- An ASIO investigation sparks fears the Chinese Communist Party is influencing the Australian political system as questions are raised over foreign political donations. 

Attorney-General George Brandis refused to say whether a conflict of interest was raised in Cabinet, saying he could not reveal Cabinet discussions.
Senator Brandis said he was aware of the reports and allegations but did not know if they are accurate.
Andrew Robb now works for the Chinese-owned company the Landbridge Group, which has a 99-year lease over the Port of Darwin.
He began working for Landbridge the day before the election last July, but Senator Brandis said Robb had left Parliament when the election was called in May.
Senator di Natale said it was critical for the Greens to shine a spotlight on the issue because both major parties had connections to Chinese donors.
"You have got Labor and Liberal members of this Parliament implicated for their links to high-profile Chinese businessmen connected to the Communist regime in China," he said.

jeudi 8 juin 2017

Timeo Sinesos et dona ferentes

ASIO investigation targets Communist Party links to Australian political system
A joint Four Corners-Fairfax investigation by Nick McKenzie, Chris Uhlmann, Richard Baker, Daniel Flitton, Sashka Koloff

China's fifth column: Huang Xiangmo (second from left) with Ernest Wong, former prime minster Julia Gillard and Sam Dastyari. Huang has provided large donations to the major political parties.

The cold Canberra air had yet to be tempered by the dawn when plain-clothes agents from ASIO and a locksmith assembled outside an apartment in the upmarket suburb of Kingston.
The locksmith's work done, the agents filed past two wooden Chinese artefacts standing like sentries at the entrance, and up a single flight of stairs into the apartment. 
The living room was decorated with exquisite porcelain vases and a dozen half-melted candles on a table.
The apartment belonged to Roger Uren, a tall, bookish man with thinning silver hair. 
Before resigning in August 2001, Uren was the assistant secretary of the Office of National Assessments, the agency that briefs the prime minister on highly classified intelligence matters.
Uren's speciality was China. 
Foreign affairs sources in Canberra say he was regarded as one of Australia's leading sinologists. 
In 2011, prime minister Kevin Rudd was reportedly considering appointing him as Australia's ambassador in Beijing.
A close friend of Uren describes him as eccentric. 
Under the pseudonym "John Byron", he had penned a book on Mao Zedong's feared intelligence chief, Kang Sheng, who amassed a collection of erotic art that was seized by his Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. 
Uren shared Sheng's taste in art.
"When we visited the markets in Beijing, the erotic art sellers would call out his name because he was a regular customer," the friend recalls. 
Some of these artworks were on display as the agents from Australia's counter-intelligence agency searched the apartment in the early hours of October 7, 2015.
This raid was a small piece of a much larger picture. 
It reflects deep concern inside ASIO about China's attempts to influence Australia's politics.
The issue of foreign interference has exploded into prominence globally since the revelations of Russia's influence over the American election in favour of Donald Trump.
In Australia, it is the Chinese Communist Party causing the greatest concern, and Beijing's attempts at influence potentially extend to political players as senior as Labor's Sam Dastyari and the Liberal Party's Andrew Robb.
But neither of those men, nor even Uren himself, were the target of ASIO's 2015 raid which, until now, has remained one of Canberra's most closely guarded secrets. 
The agents were searching for evidence about somebody else entirely -- Roger Uren's wife.
Chinese mole Sheri Yan and her husband, Roger Uren

Sheri Yan 'a dynamic, active person'
Sheri Yan arrived in the United States in 1987 with $400 sewn into her clothes and a fierce desire to make something of herself. 
She met Uren, who was working as a diplomat at Australia's Washington embassy, and helped him research his Kang Sheng book.
By the time Uren returned to Australia to join the ONA in 1992, he and Yan were a couple. 
They moved together to Canberra. 
As Uren climbed the ranks of the intelligence assessment agency, Yan was forging a reputation as a fixer and lobbyist, able to open doors in Beijing for Australian and US businesses seeking access to Communist Party cadres.
She also sold her services to Chinese entrepreneurs wanting to build their fortunes overseas. 
By the time Uren resigned from the ONA in 2001 and moved with Yan to Beijing, her network was flourishing.
John Fitzgerald, a former Ford Foundation director in Beijing said he received a warning from an "old friend in Australia's security establishment" to "stay away from Yan".

Former Australian ambassador to China, Geoff Raby, who lived in the same exclusive St Regis apartment block as Yan in Beijing, described her as a "dynamic, active person, [who] speaks both languages perfectly, is charming, and comes from a well-connected background".
Yan's business network includes the US software tycoon Peter Norton, high-flying Australian corporate figure and Australia's former New York consul general, Phil Scanlan, and former ABC chairman Maurice Newman
She also knew several senior Australian politicians.
But not everyone trusted Sheri Yan. 
John Fitzgerald, a former Ford Foundation director in Beijing turned Swinburne University China expert, told Four Corners and Fairfax Media of a warning he received from an "old friend in Australia's security establishment" to "stay away from Yan".
"I understand that Sheri Yan is very closely connected with some of the most powerful and influential families and networks in China," Mr Fitzgerald said.
"Once you know that, you don't need to know much more."
Among Yan's Chinese clients was billionaire property developer, Chau Chak Wing
Chau is known in Australia for his large political donations, philanthropy and for buying the nation's most expensive house, James Packer's Sydney mansion, for $70 million, sight unseen.
He gave $20 million for the construction of the business school University of Technology, Sydney, which was designed by Frank Gehry, and is called the "Chau Chak Wing building".
And over the years, Chau donated more than $4 million to Labor and the Coalition. 
Among his contacts were senior politicians on both sides of the aisle, including John Howard and Kevin Rudd.
As ex-prime ministers, both have visited Chau's palatial conference centre and resort, Imperial Springs, in the thriving Guangdong province in China's south.
According to a close friend of Yan, Chau engaged her as a business consultant for 18 months around 2007 and again in 2013, when she helped entice global A-listers to his conference centre.
Then it all came tumbling down.

Bribery scandal unfolds across Pacific

The covert ASIO raid of Yan and Uren's Canberra property in October 2015 was timed to coincide with events across the Pacific. 
In New York, Yan and several other Chinese business people were being arrested by the FBI for running a bribery racket in the United Nations.
According to US District Attorney Preet Bharara, Yan and her co-accused had paid kickbacks to the president of the United Nations general assembly, John Ashe, and in return, Ashe performed certain services for wealthy Chinese businessmen.
"For Rolex watches, bespoke suits and a private basketball court, John Ashe, the 68th President of the UN General assembly, sold himself and the global institution he led," Mr Bharara told journalists at a briefing announcing the arrests.
UN greed: For Rolex watches, bespoke suits and a private basketball court, John Ashe, the 68th President of the UN General assembly, sold himself and the global institution he led.

ASIO suspected, though, that Yan's activities extended well beyond bribery. 
Classified material shared between FBI counter-espionage officials and ASIO prior to the Canberra raid suggested Yan was working with Chinese intelligence.
And a Four Corners-Fairfax Media investigation has established that, in the apartment she shared with Uren, ASIO agents located highly classified Australian documents
Uren had apparently removed them from the ONA prior to his departure in August 2001.
The documents contained details of what Western intelligence agencies knew about their Chinese counterparts.
ASIO called in the federal police to launch an inquiry. 
Well-placed sources have confirmed Uren may face criminal charges.
But it is understood the documents are not the main game for ASIO. 
While the agency never comments publicly on its operations, it is understood the investigation into Yan involves suspicions she may have infiltrated or sought clandestine influence in Australia and the US on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.
In his brief interview, Uren labelled the notion "pure fantasy" concocted by the FBI.
"They think anyone who is Chinese is a spy," he said.
But professor Rory Medcalf, who directs the Australian National University's National Security College, says the ASIO raid would not have occurred without "the authorisation of the Attorney General" and input from "many parts of the Australian national security community."

Potential to cause harm to nation's sovereignty
Professor Rory Medcalf speaks with Four Corners
Professor Rory Medcalf says ASIO has a "real concern" about the Chinese Communist Party's influence in Australia.

Mr Medcalf believes the targeting of Yan reflects a small part of a "deep and real concern" inside ASIO about the Chinese Communist Party's secret interference to influence operations in Australia.
Eight serving government officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, broadly confirmed Mr Medcalf's assessment.
Several of these officials also confirmed that in the months leading up to the ASIO raid, the agency had been collating intelligence suggesting Australia was the target of an opaque foreign interference campaign by China on a larger scale than that being carried out by any other nation.
The Chinese Communist Party was working to infiltrate Australian political and foreign affairs circles, as well to gain more influence over the nation's growing Chinese population.
ASIO feared the campaign was succeeding. 
In comments to a Senate committee at the end of May (which were overshadowed by a controversy about refugees and terrorism), director general Duncan Lewis appeared to confirm this.
"Espionage and foreign interference continue to occur on an unprecedented scale and this has the potential to cause serious harm to the nation's sovereignty, the integrity of our political system, our national security capabilities, our economy and other interests."
Mr Lewis didn't name Beijing. 
But ASIO's serious concern about the Chinese Communist Party were on clear display when analysts working for Mr Lewis prepared an extraordinary document in the weeks before the Sheri Yan raid in October 2015.
It was created so that Mr Lewis could show it to the senior officials of Australia's Liberal, Labor and National parties to warn them about accepting political donations from China.
A number of people who have seen the document described it -- at the top was a diagram representing the Chinese Communist Party with lines connected this diagram to photos of two Chinese-born billionaires.
These two men were known to dislike each other. 
Both had amassed significant wealth in China. 
Both are significant donors to Australia's political parties. 
One of them was a businessman called Huang Xiangmo
The other was Sheri Yan's sometime employer, Chau Chak Wing.

Chau Chak Wing takes legal action against media

Chau Chak Wing was given the codename 'CC3' in a sealed indictment in a New York court. 

Chau Chak Wing is not directly named in court documents unsealed by US officials in the Sheri Yan UN bribery case, but he is referred to by a pseudonym, "CC3".
CC3 was an "old friend" of Yan whose firm had wired $200,000 to UN chief John Ashe to make the payment organised by Yan. 
There is no evidence that Chau knew it was illegal to pay a speaking fee to a UN official.
The money was paid to secure Ashe's appearance in his official capacity at Chau Chak Wing's palatial Imperial Springs conference centre. 
Several former politicians would be there, including Bill Clinton.
Under US bribery laws, Ashe's status as a serving UN official meant it was illegal for him to receive payments. 
He was charged alongside Yan, but "died" last year, shortly before a guilty plea from Yan led to her jailing for 20 months.
While she is still in prison, Chau Chak Wing has faced no criminal charges. 
He has taken legal action against Australian media outlets for any suggestion he is involved in impropriety and his representatives have assured his Australian political contacts that Chau has no connection to the wrongdoing of others targeted by the FBI.
Chau Chak Wing declined to answer questions put by Four Corners and Fairfax Media, and he appears to have shrugged off the matter. 
Two weeks after "CC3" was identified in FBI documents, former prime minister Kevin Rudd attended Chau Chak Wing's Guangdong conference centre to speak at a global leadership event.
Kevin Rudd in talks with Chau Chak Wing: There is not yet evidence that Rudd received money from Chau.

Chinese donors are channels to advance Beijing's interests
ASIO chief Duncan Lewis's document picturing Chau Chak Wing and Huang Xiangmo was essentially a prop. 
Three times he removed it from a black briefcase to display to three different men -- Brian Loughnane, the Liberal Party's federal director; George Wright, Labor's national secretary; and Scott Mitchell, the National Party's federal director.
ASIO's Duncan Lewis warned politicians of the risks associated with Chinese donations. 

They were at the time the most senior administrative officials of Australia's major political parties, and Mr Lewis's document conveyed a strong message: be wary of Chinese donors.
''[Lewis] said 'be careful','' says a source who is aware of what the trio were told.
"He was saying that the connections between these guys and the Communist Party is strong," says another political figure briefed about the content of the ASIO warning.
ASIO also warned this connection meant the donors could be channels to advance Beijing's interests.
In his briefings, Mr Lewis was careful to stress that neither Chau Chak Wing nor Huang Xiangmo was accused of any crime and that Mr Lewis wasn't instructing the parties to stop taking their donations. 
But he described how the Chinese Communist Party co-opts influential businessmen by rewarding those who assist it.
This meant there was a risk Chau Chak Wing's donations, which are made via the Australian citizen's companies, might come with strings attached.
Chau's ownership of a newspaper in China places him in effective partnership with Communist Party propaganda authorities, while his membership of a provincial-level People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) is also telling.
CPPCCs ostensibly oversee China's political and policy making system, but in reality they are used to entrench the Communist Party's monopoly power and advance its interests in China and abroad.
People such as Chau who make the cut as members of a CPPCC are screened by the Communist Party's United Front Work Department, a unique agency that aims to win over friends and isolate enemies in order to further the party's agenda.
In May 2015, Xi Jinping publicly championed the United Front and the CPPCC, describing their mission as "persuading people… to expand the strength of the common struggle".
"We have to assume that individuals like Chau have really deep, serious connections to the Chinese Communist Party," Mr Medcalf said.
"Even if they're not receiving any kind of direction, they would feel some sense of obligation, or indeed to make the right impression on the powers that be in China, to demonstrate that they're being good members of the party, that they're pursuing the party's interests."
Mr Medcalf said ASIO's decision to come out of the shadows and identify Chau in its briefings to the Coalition and Labor is "certainly unusual" ... "it would reflect very real concern," he said.

Political donations are made 'with a purpose'
The most recent head of Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Peter Varghese is also troubled by the willingness of political parties to take foreign money. 
He warns political donations are made "with a purpose" and large Chinese companies act in accordance with the interests of the Communist Party.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Secretary Peter Varghese during a Senate Estimates hearings at Parliament House in Canberra
Peter Varghese says Australia is on the cusp of significant changes.

"The Chinese system is such that the dividing line between a state decision, and a decision by a company that may be anticipating what is in the interests of the state, is rather blurred," he said.
The former DFAT chief is encouraging debate about Chinese interference because the stakes are so high. 
Any influence sought by Beijing may ultimately be aimed at advancing the strategic interests, activities and values of an authoritarian, one party state.
Australia is one of the few western countries that accepts political donations from foreigners, although the fact that Chau is an Australian citizen shows that a ban on donations from non-citizens may not mitigate the risk identified by Mr Varghese.
"It goes back to how we want to frame our laws on political donations and making sure people reveal their connections back to China if they are taking a position on a particular policy issue," he said.
If Chau has taken a position on any policy issue in Australia, he's not done so publicly. 
All he appears to have sought via his donations is access to some of Australia's most powerful men and women. 
But for the Chinese Communist Party, access to the right networks may be worthwhile in and of itself.
This is why Sheri Yan sought to compromise UN chief John Ashe, according to former CIA officer turned China-watcher Peter Mattis.
Mr Mattis said figures such as Yan who know how to cultivate networks of influence are "useful not only for getting things done, not only for injecting Chinese perspectives into [the networks], but also for being able to say, 'here are the players, here are the people who are important, here are their personal foibles'."
Chau Chak Wing may only ever have sought access, but the same can't be said of the second billionaire pictured alongside him in the ASIO briefing document.

Huang known by two formal identities
As with many men able to drop $100,000 at a casino or on a political donation, Huang Xiangmo is used to getting his way.
So it was with some consternation that, in early 2016, the lively businessman who sports a comb-over became worried his application for Australian citizenship was progressing more slowly than anticipated.
One thing bothering immigration authorities was the curious fact Huang Xiangmo had two separate formal identities -- he's also known as Huang Changran. 
But there was another reason for the delay. 
Huang's application was being assessed by ASIO.
Huang had likely become of interest to ASIO for a range of reasons. 
One was his leadership of the Australian arm of the Chinese Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China.
Former US Defence department China specialist Mark Stokes, an expert on Chinese Communist Party influence operations, said the Beijing headquarters of that organisation manages a "global outreach" project overseen by the Communist Party's United Front Work Department.
The "peaceful reunification" work of the council involves undermining the Taiwan and Hong Kong independence movements and asserting China's fiercely disputed claims over the South China Sea. 
Mr Stokes has also documented the Beijing-based council's links to Chinese intelligence agencies.
Huang's role as president of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China places him at the vanguard of the United Front's lobbying in Australia.
"He's a key member supported by the Chinese authorities, including the embassy or the consulate here," said Sydney University of Technology's China academic and communist party critic Dr Feng Chongyi.
Huang told Four Corners and Fairfax Media in a statement that, while it supported the one China policy, the ACPPRC was "an autonomous, non-government organisation", and it was "incorrect to describe… [it] as an affiliate" of the United Front Work Department or the Chinese Communist Party. The organisation "supports economic and cultural exchange programs and charitable causes," he said.
But according to Dr Feng, Huang's council role affords him immense influence and status, as well as a launching pad into Australian politics.
Sydney University of Technology's China academic Dr Feng Chongyi said Mr Huang's council role affords him immense influence and status.

'Life was a struggle'

The way Huang built his Australian network is all the more remarkable given his humble beginnings in the back blocks of southern China's Guangdong province.
As a 15-year-old, Mr Huang left school for a year to look after his impoverished family after the sudden death of his father.
"Life was a struggle, especially with five children to feed," he recently told a Chinese magazine. "Despite the hardships we were a close family."
In 2001, he scraped together enough funds to form the Yuhu Investment Development Company in Shenzen, a buzzing metropolis in Guangdong. 
He built upmarket villas and apartment blocks before diversifying into energy and agriculture. 
He also formed the close Communist Party connections expected of any billionaire property developer in China.
In 2011, Mr Huang moved to Australia. 
He claims to have been seeking new business opportunities and a place to raise his children where the "people are warm and friendly and the air is clean, very clean".
Australia was also free of the endemic corruption and corresponding anti-graft purges of the Chinese Communist Party that created an uncertain and sometimes hostile business environment for entrepreneurs.
Huang Xiangmo poses with Bob Carr at the University of Technology Sydney.
Beijing's stooges: Huang Xiangmo donated $1.8 million to help build the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney headed by Bob Carr.

In 2012, one of Huang's key Communist Party contacts in his home-town of Jieyang was targeted for corruption, a fact Mr Huang has privately brushed off as irrelevant.
After arriving in Sydney, Huang developed a shopping centre and launched a philanthropy blitz, donating millions of dollars to medical research and universities, including $1.8 million to help found the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.
The institute is headed by Bob Carr, whom Huang claims he hand-picked. 
Carr (who declined an interview request) disputes this, although it's unquestionable that Huang's large donation provided an open channel to the former foreign minister and premier.
Huang quickly became known as a "whale" in political fundraising circles. 
The nickname was earned with his very first donation: $150,000 to the NSW branch of the ALP on November 19, 2012. 
That same day, two of Huang's close associates, Chinese businessmen and peaceful reunification members Luo Chuangxiong and Peter Chen, gave an additional $350,000.
Huang and his allies' large donations were initially handled by the then ALP NSW secretary Sam Dastyari, along with Chinese community leader and ALP identity Ernest Wong, who quickly became one of  Huang's point men in Labor.
As well as encouraging Huang's campaign fundraising, Dastyari requested the developer donate $5,000 to settle an outstanding legal bill he had accumulated as party secretary.
In the Liberal camp, Huang was also dealing with high-flyers. 
They included trade minister Andrew Robb, whose Victorian fundraising vehicle was given $100,000 by Huang, and Tony Abbott, who encountered Huang at Liberal fundraisers where, in the lead up to the 2013 selection, the Chinese businessman donated $770,000.
Huang moved with ease across the political aisle. 
Dastyari and Robb both effusively praised Huang's "philanthropy" at charity or community events organised by the developer.
Huang Xiangmo and Andrew Robb in September 2014
For sale: Andrew Robb in September 2014 with Hoang Xiangmo

"He is a man of many dimensions from what I've already been able to determine," said Robb at a December 2013 charity event.
"He's a very thoughtful, cerebral fellow. I've had many interesting conversations already with Huang on an endless range of topics."
Robb said Huang's donation to Bob Carr's Australia-China Relations Institute showed he was a "visionary".
"China is going to be an integral part of all of our futures, and it is absolutely imperative that we build the closest possible relationship," Robb said.

At least $2.6m donated to the major parties

Huang first turned his political connections into a request for a favour in early 2013. 
Court records show it involved a minor immigration matter. 
His ally, Ernest Wong, was at the time an ALP deputy mayor, who Huang would recruit as an advisor to his Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China (Wong had, years earlier, been part of the council under its previous leadership).
Wong wrote a letter of support to help Huang secure a work visa for a Chinese employee. 
The Migration Review Tribunal later rejected the application because the proposed job referred to was not genuine.
Mr Huang at the launch of the chinese new year lantern festival in suit and tie with government officials
Huang (circled) at the launch of the Association's Chinese New Year Lantern Festival with Chinese and Australian Government officials.

Shortly after Wong penned the letter in question, in May 2013, he was parachuted into a NSW state parliament upper house seat left vacant by the resignation of former Labor member Eric Roozendaal
It was a curious affair, if only for the timing.
Roozendaal was suspended from Labor on November 7, 2012 over a corruption scandal.
This meant his place on the ALP's upper house ticket would need to be eventually filled.
Twelve days later, Huang and two fellow Peaceful Reunification council members donated $500,000 to the NSW ALP. 
After Wong took Roozendaal's place in the upper house, Huang employed Mr Roozendaal to work in his development firm.
Huang's donations to both major parties continued. 
Records reveal that over four years, Huang and his close associates or employees gave at least $2.6 million to the major parties.
It was these donations, along with Huang's Communist Party ties, that led to him being featured in the briefing spy chief Duncan Lewis gave the three political party chiefs in 2015.
The same qualification that applies to Chau Chak Wing also covers Huang --  Huang's donations were legal, and ASIO said the parties were under no obligation to refuse them.
Huang declined to answer detailed questions, but has denied any wrongdoing. 
In the right company, though, Huang himself has made no secret of his political views. 
Around the time of the ASIO briefing, he spoke at an event at the Chinese consulate to celebrate 66 years of Communist Party rule.
"We overseas Chinese unswervingly support the Chinese government's position to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity [and] support the development of the motherland as always," he said.
Huang's desire to champion Beijing's territorial claims eventually led to a clash with ALP policy. 
But in the months leading up to the election, Huang's most pressing concern was his application to become an Australian citizen. 
It had been temporarily blocked as ASIO attempted to understand his relationship with the Chinese Communist Party and other discrepancies in his application.
Huang did not know that Australian authorities had concerns, at least not initially. 
All he knew was that his application was taking far longer than he believed it should. 
The answer, he believed, lay not with a migration agent or lawyer, but with the intervention of his political friends.
"In China, the system works like that," explains a well-placed source.
Huang attempted to recruit a number of politicians to his citizenship cause, including former prime minister Tony Abbott. 
Several politicians agreed to help, but it appears only one followed through -- Sam Dastyari.
On four separate occasions over the first six months of 2016, Dastyari or his office called the Immigration Department to quiz officials about the status of Huang's application. 
The senator made at least two of these calls personally.
An Immigration Department spokesperson said citizenship was only granted for people of good character who could meet identity requirements, and who were not subject to adverse ASIO assessments.
"The Department is not influenced by representations, no matter who they are from, if the applicant does not meet the requirements of the Citizenship Act."
As for Dastyari's calls on Huang's behalf, one official said: "It shows a pattern of conduct, beyond a single call the department might get from a politician about a constituent".

$400,000 donation in question

Around the time of Dastyari's last call, and as the 2016 election neared, Huang promised the ALP another $400,000 in donations -- money the party desperately needed to fund its campaign. 
But then  Huang received some bad news. 
The ALP was publicly and unexpectedly challenging one of the core doctrines of Beijing's foreign policy.
At a lunchtime address on June 16, Labor shadow defence spokesman Stephen Conroy told the National Press Club that China's actions in the South China Sea were destabilising and absurd.
Labor, he said, was open to the Australian Navy conducting freedom-of-navigation exercises in the area.
In Beijing, the Chinese Communist Party viewed this as an unwelcome challenge. 
In Sydney, Huang decided to act.
He called ALP fundraising officials in Victoria. 
Mr Conroy's comments meant he could no longer deliver the promised $400,000 in donations. 
The ALP pushed for Huang to honour his commitment, but he stood firm. 
Mr Conroy had crossed the line and his comments would cost the ALP dearly.
Still Huang wasn't prepared to give up on Labor entirely. 
Just a day after Mr Conroy launched his South China Sea salvo, Dastyari and Huang spoke at adjacent lecterns at a press conference attended by the Chinese language media.
"The South China Sea is China's own affair," Dastyari stated. 
"On this issue, Australia should remain neutral and respect China's decision".
There is no suggestion Dastyari knew directly of the threat to the $400,000 donation.
Those comments cost Dastyari his frontbench job amid a storm of publicity after the election over why he had allowed Huang to pay for the $5,000 legal bill in 2014, and a second Chinese donor to contribute to pay a $1,670 office travel expense.
In response Dastyari said he had broken contact with Huang after "the events of last year".
Huang's use of a $400,000 donation as leverage over the ALP's foreign policy has remained hidden until now. 
It came about a year after ASIO had first put the political parties on notice about Huang's likely connections back in China.
"It's precisely the kind of example of economic inducement being turned into economic leverage or coercion," said Rory Medcalf from the ANU National Security College.
"It's a classic example of a benefit being provided, but then withheld as a way of punishment, and as a way of influencing Australia policy independence."
A few days after Huang said he would withdraw his offer of the $400,000 donation, he appeared at a Labor press conference to announce two Chinese candidates for the last two spots on the ALP's senate ticket.
One of the candidates was active ALP member Simon Zhou, a close associate and member of Huang's peaceful reunification council.
Zhou also helped raise funds for the NSW ALP, with two of his business associates donating $60,000 in May 2016. 
Huang also asked the NSW ALP to appoint Zhou as a multicultural adviser (the ALP insists he was appointed on merit).
At the event announcing Zhou and Han's candidacy, Huang told Chinese-language media "the Chinese realise that they need to make their voices heard in the political circle, so as to seek more interests for the Chinese, and let Australia's mainstream society pay more attention to the Chinese".
Huang's withdrawal of the 2016 donation is understood to have not only concerned some within Labor, but to have caused grave concern inside Australia's security community and the US embassy in Canberra.
Several sources have also confirmed that in September 2016, ASIO briefed Bill Shorten about Huang. 
Mr Shorten responded by directing his colleagues to cut ties to the donor. 
The opposition leader also issued a public call for a ban on foreign donations.

Call for reform on foreign donations
In Washington DC, Australia's role as one of the only western nations not to have banned foreign donations, continues to cause alarm.
But despite promises for donations reform from senior figures in both parties, nothing firm has happened. 
Many politicians still appear more interested in attracting foreign cash than ensuring the integrity of our political system.
It is clear the problem is not confined to donations and Australia's national security agencies continue to sound the alarm behind closed doors.
"There's an awareness of a problem, but the agencies themselves don't have the mandate or the wherewithal to manage the problem," Mr Medcalf warned.
"All they can do is sound the alarm and alert the political class. The political class needs to take a set of decisions in the interest of Australian sovereignty, in the interest of Australia's independent policy making, to restrict and limit foreign influence in Australian decision making."
After being briefed on the findings of the investigation by Fairfax Media and Four Corners and sent a list of questions, the Turnbull Government has stressed it is not only listening to the warnings but prepared to act.
In a statement, Attorney General George Brandis revealed Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had launched a major inquiry into Australia's espionage and foreign interference laws.
"The threat of political interference by foreign intelligence services is a problem of the highest order and it is getting worse," Mr Brandis said.
"Espionage and covert foreign interference by nation states is a global reality which can cause immense harm to our national sovereignty, to the safety of our people, our economic prosperity, and to the very integrity of our democracy."
Mr Brandis also flagged the introduction of new laws to "strengthen our agencies' ability to investigate and prosecute acts of espionage and foreign interference."
His statement is certain to rile Beijing. 
It will also concern certain political players in Australia, who will be hoping any inquiry is confined to finding gaps in the law and leaves alone the previous conduct of individuals.

Watch the Four Corners report "Power and Influence" on ABC iview.

mercredi 7 juin 2017

Der Anschluss Australiens 吞并澳大利亚进入中国

Australian Politics Is Open to Chinese Cash
Australia’s intelligence had identified two Chinese businessmen, Huang Xiangmo and Chau Chak Wing, who have donated millions across the political spectrum in recent years, as agents for the Chinese government.

By DAMIEN CAVE and JACQUELINE WILLIAMS

Huang Xiangmo, a prominent businessman of Chinese descent, in Sydney last year. Huang is one of two donors Australia’s intelligence chief had identified as agents for the Chinese government.

SYDNEY, Australia — As the United States investigates Russia’s efforts to sway last year’s presidential election, Australia is engaged in a heated debate over how vulnerable its own political system is to foreign influence — and whether China is already meddling in it.
The issue was thrust to the forefront this week by a report that Australia’s intelligence chief had identified two prominent businessmen of Chinese descent, who have donated millions across the political spectrum in recent years, as agents for the Chinese government.
One of the donors is said to have withdrawn a large contribution last year because of a political party’s position on the disputed South China Sea, suggesting a back-room effort to shift public discussion of a policy issue in Beijing’s favor.
The question of Chinese interference is a sensitive one for Australia, an American "ally" that has embraced Beijing as its largest trade partner and welcomed Chinese investors and immigrants in large numbers. 
The political establishment here has generally been reluctant to tackle the issue.
But the nation is now asking how a multicultural society should police a Communist power that has a record of mobilizing, and bullying, ethnic Chinese overseas to support its goals.
China’s attempts to translate its economic might into political influence have caused unease in many countries. 
But the challenge is acute in Australia.
Many Australians view good ties with China as critical to their future prosperity, and Australia is an especially enticing and easy target for Beijing because of its strategic value in the Pacific — and because foreign donations are both legal and difficult to track in its loose, opaque campaign finance system.
By contrast, such donations are largely banned in the United States, Canada and throughout most of Europe.

The Chau Chak Wing Building, on the University of Technology Sydney campus, is named after a Chinese billionaire property developer who gave $15 million to the school. Australia’s intelligence chief has identified Chau as a agent for the Chinese government. 
Australia's new master: Chau Chak Wing and John Howard share a toast.

It’s not so much that China is more active but that Australia is more receptive and more vulnerable,” said John Fitzgerald, a professor at Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia, who studies civil society in China.
Concern about the influence of Chinese money erupted with new disclosures about the two businessmen, both billionaire property developers: Chau Chak Wing, an Australian citizen, and Huang Xiangmo, a resident who has applied for citizenship.
Duncan Lewis, the director of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, warned leading political parties two years ago against accepting contributions from the men because of their ties to the Chinese government, according to a joint report by Fairfax Media newspapers and “Four Corners,” a current affairs television program.
But the Liberal Party and its governing coalition partners, as well as the opposition Labor Party, continued to take the money. 
The news organizations found that the men and their associates had made at least $5 million in political donations in Australia in recent years, including more than $820,000 since Mr. Lewis’s warning.
The most striking disclosure, though, revolves around a donation that did not occur. 
As a general election approached last year, Huang pledged to give an additional $300,000 to the Labor Party. 
But weeks before the vote, the report said, he rescinded the offer and made clear why: He was upset about a party official saying Australia should send naval patrols to challenge Beijing’s claims to the South China Sea.
The Pentagon has urged Australia to join it on such patrols, but the government has resisted.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said he was preparing legislation to ban foreign political donations. 
“Just as modern China was based on an assertion of national sovereignty, so China should always respect the sovereignty of other nations, including our own,” he said.
But the broader problem may be the role of big money in Australian politics. 
Campaign financing is largely unregulated, with no limits on fund-raising, donations or spending, and critics say that has resulted in a culture of corruption that Chinese donors have learned to exploit.
At the federal level, it takes seven to 19 months for the public to learn how much parties have raised and from whom, and donors are identified only if they have contributed more than 13,500 Australian dollars, or about $10,000. 
As a result, individuals, and corporations, can anonymously make multiple donations below that threshold. 
At the same time, Australian politicians are not required to explain what they do with the money.

Duncan Lewis, the director of Australia’s domestic intelligence agency, warned leading political parties two years ago against accepting donations from two prominent businessmen because of their ties to the Chinese government.

What we have is a thick shroud of secrecy regarding political donations at the federal level,” said Joo-Cheong Tham, an associate professor at Melbourne Law School. 
I think that clearly gives rise to corruption and undue influence.”
Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson hinted at Washington’s concern after meetings in Sydney on Monday. 
We cannot allow China to use its economic power to buy its way out of other problems,” he said.
A report by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation last year concluded that businesses and individuals “with Chinese connections” had donated more than 5.5 million Australian dollars to the main political parties from 2013 to 2015, “making them easily the largest source of foreign-linked donations.”
But defining what a “Chinese connection” is and when it should matter is contentious, because more than 4 percent of Australia’s population is of Chinese ancestry.
One of the donors flagged by Australian intelligence, Chau Chak Wing, immigrated decades ago. 
He has long maintained that his campaign contributions are benign and unrelated to the Chinese government. 
But his profile suggests close ties with the Chinese authorities, and his political contacts in Australia would enhance his stature in China.
His company, the Kingold Group, and its sprawling real estate empire are based in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou. 
He also has invested in a newspaper there, linking him to the state propaganda apparatus, and is a member of a provincial body that advises the Communist Party.
The other donor, Huang Xiangmo, moved to Australia six years ago and leads the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China, which promotes Beijing’s foreign policy positions, including its assertion that Taiwan is part of China and opposition to independence for Tibet. 
Though such views are common among Chinese, Huang’s fortune — the holdings of his Yuhu Group range from agriculture to malls — means his voice commands attention.

Andrew Robb, second from right, the trade minister at the time, signing a trade agreement with China in 2015. Mr. Robb was reported to have received a part-time consulting contract worth more than $650,000 a year from a Chinese billionaire. 

In an editorial published in a state-run newspaper in China last year, he said coverage about Chinese contributions distorting Australian politics was racially biased. 
He added that Chinese in Australia had long been expected to pay tribute to politicians with donations but stay quiet on policy.
“The Chinese realize that they need to make their voices heard in the political circle so as to seek more interests for the Chinese,” he told reporters recently.
In a statement on Tuesday, though, he denied linking his donations to foreign policy. 
“I expect nothing in return,” he said. 
“While some seek to reinforce negative stereotypes about Chinese involvement in Australia, I am committed to more positive pursuits.”
Chen Yonglin, a former Chinese consular official in Australia who defected in 2005, said the donations disclosed so far were “very small compared to the transactions completed under the table,” including free trips to China and other gifts to politicians that can be impossible to track.
The uproar has focused attention on a revolving door in which politicians sometimes go to work for Chinese companies after leaving office. 
The former trade minister, Andrew Robb, who negotiated a trade pact with China, have received a part-time consulting contract worth more than $650,000 a year from a Chinese billionaire.
China’s growing leverage over academia has also come under scrutiny as universities have become increasingly dependent on tuition paid by Chinese students and, in some cases, donations from Chinese benefactors. 
Beijing is using this leverage to stifle critical views.
Chau Chak Wing, for example, gave $15 million to the University of Technology Sydney for a building that bears his name, and Huang’s money helped establish the Australia-China Relations Institute at the university, overseen by a former foreign minister, Bob Carr.
Feng Chongyi, a professor at the university who has criticized the Communist Party’s suppression of dissent, said the institute had repeatedly brushed off his efforts to get involved.
Professor Feng said Australia must decide whether money or values defined its politics. 
“The question is whether you’re willing to make sacrifices to fight these illiberal tendencies,” he said, in his tiny office near the gleaming Chau Chak Wing Building on campus. 
“If you don’t maintain your core values, it’s all just business.”

Australia: For Sale

  • Sam Dastyari contradicted South China Sea policy a day after Chinese donor's threat
  • Billionaire Huang Xiangmo took exception to Labor’s stance on disputed territory and threatened to withdraw a $400,000 donation.
By Gabrielle Chan

Australia's Quisling: Labor senator Sam Dastyari told the Chinese media in September 2016 that Australia shouldn’t interfere with China’s activities in the South China Sea, contradicting his own party’s policy.

The Labor senator Sam Dastyari contradicted Labor party policy on the South China Sea a day after influential Chinese billionaire Huang Xiangmo threatened to withdraw a promised $400,000 donation to the party, Four Corners has alleged.
The program, by Faifax’s Nick McKenzie, reports that Huang took exception to comments made by then Labor defence shadow Stephen Conroy that Australia’s defence force should be able to conduct freedom of navigation operations in the disputed area.
After Huang threatened to cancel the donation, Dastyari told the Chinese media that Australia shouldn’t interfere with China’s activities in the South China Sea. 
When the comments were reported, Dastyari denied he had split with the party on the policy, saying he wasn’t responsible for the way it was reported.
Four Corners also reported that Dastyari’s office asked the immigration department of the progress of Huang’s stalled citizenship application four times in the lead-up to the last election with the senator personally making two of the calls.
Huang is chairman of the Yuhu Group and had previously donated $5,000 to cover “legal bills” before Dastyari was a senator as well as larger amounts to both sides of politics and a number of universities as well as charities.
In a statement to Four Corners, Huang said he took “strong objection” to any suggestion he had linked his donations to any foreign policy outcome.
The report comes less than a year after Dastyari resigned from the Labor shadow ministry after it was revealed that he asked for and accepted a payment of $1,670.82 from Australian Chinese businessman Minshen Zhu.
At the time Dastyari said he had “fallen short” in his duty as a member of parliament but he was reinstated to the shadow minister in February this year as Senate deputy opposition whip.
The government is currently considering a report in March this year by the Joint Parliamentary Standing Committee on Electoral Matters which recommended a ban on foreign donations but split on donations from activist groups.
The government has yet to formulate a response to the report but it is understood it is very close. Malcolm Turnbull has previously said he favours a ban on foreign donations and it is also Labor party policy.
Huang gave $770,000 to the Liberals before the 2013 election and donated $100,000 to the then trade minister Andrew Robb’s campaign fundraising vehicle, as Robb signed off on the China Australia Free Trade deal.
Robb developed a close relationship with the billionaire and was quoted in a speech on Four Corners as a “thoughtful cerebral fellow” and a “visionary”.
Another Chinese based company, Landbridge, controversially won the 99-year lease on the port of Darwin in 2015 when Robb was still trade minister.
Four Corners revealed that Robb had been appointed as a consultant to Landbridge on 1 July, the day before he retired from politics. 

According to Four Corners, from 1 July 2016 Robb was paid $73,000 a month, or $880,000 a year, plus expenses. 
He told Four Corners he acted in line with his obligations as former trade minister.
The statement of ministerial standards states ministers should not lobby or advocate with the government for 18 months after their political retirement.
Prof John Fitzgerald of the Ford Foundation, Beijing, told the program “Mr Huang is very generous to all parties”.
“He could hardly be called partisan; he contributes to the Liberal party as well as to the Labor party,” Fitzgerald says. 
“He’s also a very generous employer of former party operatives.”
Huang has also employed former New South Wales Labor treasurer Eric Roozendaal.

The program also investigated the donations of an Australian Chinese citizen Chau Chak Wing who was a member of a Communist party advisory group known as a people’s political consultative conference (CPPCC).
The group carries out the work of a party lobbying arm called the United Front Work Department.

Chau has donated more than $4m to the major parties over the past decade, according to Four Corners.
Four Corners revealed that the Asio chief, Duncan Lewis, has become so worried about the influence of foreign donations that he organised meetings with the senior party officers from the federal Liberal, National parties and Labor parties to warn them that the donors could compromise the major parties.
The executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Peter Jennings, described such donations as naked influence buying.
“I think that this type of, frankly, naked influence buying, is something which is damaging to Australia’s political system.
“I would far rather have a regime in place whereby we, the taxpayer, pay for the cost of our elections than relying on parties to get donations from foreign sources, wherever they may come from.
“But you know, notably those foreign sources are primarily linked to Chinese business.”