mercredi 31 octobre 2018

UK confirms reports of Chinese mass internment camps for Uighur Muslims

Criticism is mounting over reports of concentration camps in the western colony of East Turkestan
By Lily Kuo

 Several countries, including the UK, have asked Beijing about East Turkestan ahead of a UN panel review in November of China’s human rights record.

British diplomats who visited East Turkestan have confirmed that reports of mass internment camps for Uighur Muslims were “broadly true”, the foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has told parliament.
Beijing faces mounting international criticism over its policies in East Turkestan, a far-western colony of China where an estimated 1 million members of Muslim minorities have been detained in a network of camps.
Hunt told parliament on Tuesday that diplomats had visited East Turkestan in August and “concur that those reports are broadly accurate”.
His comment puts pressure on Beijing before a UN human rights panel that will on 6 November review China’s human rights record. 
The UK, the US, the Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Norway, Germany and Belgium have asked about East Turkestan in questions submitted for China ahead of the process known as the universal periodic review (UPR).
Hunt said he had raised the issue with his Chinese counterpart, the foreign minister, Wang Yi, on a trip in July. 
“We continue to be extremely concerned about what is happening,” he said.
“A senior cabinet member raising the issue in parliament sends a message to China that the UK is serious about what’s happening in East Turkestan and China will likely hear more at the UPR,” said Frances Eve, a researcher at Chinese Human Rights Defenders.
Ahead of the panel, China has ramped up its defence of the camps, where ex-detainees have said they were abused, forced to learn Mandarin, as well as undergo political indoctrination.
After denying their existence, China has begun acknowledging them but described the camps as "vocational training centres" that embody the “humane management and care” of a campaign in the name of counter-"terrorism".

Chinese Masochism

Surprise: Many Chinese Actually Like President Trump, And Hope For His Great Deal
President Trump is the biggest foreign star on Sina’s Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter.

By Kenneth Rapoza

President Trump is a top draw on Weibo, China’s leading social network. Many Chinese like President Trump and understand his brand of nationalism. 

If you listen to the common Chinese citizen in Beijing and even in faraway places like Chengdu in Sichuan Province, they actually like President Trump and hope for the “great deal” he mentioned in an interview on Fox News Monday night.
Maybe “like” is too strong a word. 
They understand him. 
They seem to get his brand of nationalism. 
And they like his crass comments in the press. 
On Tuesday, President Trump was the 15th hottest topic overall on a day when populist novelist Louis Cha Leung-yung passed away and dominated Chinese socials. 
President Trump was the No. 1 non-Chinese story being shared on the massive social network because of his trade and immigration banter.
“I think that we will make a great deal with China,” President Trump told Laura Ingraham on Fox News yesterday before taking a swipe at China for helping dismantle much of the manufacturing labor in the country. 
He said he would like to make a deal before the end of the year, but said China was not ready for one.
More tariffs are in the works. 
Investors are warily moving from $250 billion in tariffs as a base-case scenario to tariffs on around $500 billion worth of goods.

President Trump is often the No. 1 trending foreign news on Sina’s Weibo social networking platform in China. His abrasiveness remains popular with many locals, despite his anti-China rhetoric. 

Word in China is that the U.S. is using the trade tariffs as a form of economic warfare. 
They believe the U.S. is behaving unilaterally. 
They prefer to settle things through the World Trade Organization, an organization which has done much to favor China and global corporations’ love for abundant, low-cost labor and lackluster regulations.
The official view in Beijing is that they are being victimized by President Trump. 
But much like President Trump, government officials from the Foreign Affairs ministry use similar language in saying they want a “great deal for two "great" peoples.”
For years, the U.S. China Business Council has pressured Washington to sign a bilateral trade agreement with Beijing. 
In a best-case scenario, President Trump’s end game is such a treaty. 
Meanwhile, U.S. companies on the ground largely feel like they are one step behind the Chinese and are forced to play by different rules. 
Companies have been willing to play by Beijing’s rules due to the size of the Chinese market, a market that continues to grow quickly and does not resemble anything in any other developing nation.
We are experiencing trade tensions, say the Chinese. 
Not a trade war.
America’s international trade has accelerated, and the deficit with China is not going down. 
Savvy exporters are switching numbers on U.S. Commerce Department trade codes that identify the product type in order to make it look like something else and avoid tariffs. 
Steel is coming into the country and being made to look like it is coming from Vietnam, for instance, trade sources told me on Tuesday.
Other workarounds are being employed, as well.
The U.S and China are the engines of global trade.
Total trade between them expanded 13.5% in the 12 months to August 31 versus 2016 to reach $4.16 trillion, according to Panjiva Research, the trade-data unit of S&P Global Market Intelligence. 
U.S. companies are building inventory to avoid imports in the event of a worsening trade war.
U.S. goods and services trade with China totaled an estimated $710.4 billion in 2017. 
Exports were $187.5 billion and imports were $522.9 billion, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. 
The U.S. goods and services trade deficit with China was $335.4 billion in 2017, but most of that is due to goods. 
China is the U.S.’ largest goods trading partner with $635.4 billion in total two-way trade last year. 
It will be even higher this year thanks to a stronger U.S. economy and inventory build.
Goods exports to China totaled $129.9 billion while goods imports totaled $505.5 billion, which is what President Trump wants to hit in full.
The trade deficit has been one of President Trump’s key reasons for going after China.

Containers sit stacked next to gantry cranes at the Yangshan Deep Water Port in Shanghai on July 10, 2018. China has the biggest ports in the world and has benefited greatly from globalization or, as China says, its “opening up.” 

China likes to point out that President Trump misleads on the trade gap. 
They say that the services trade is growing with the U.S. and China has a deficit there. 
But last year, trade in services—exports and imports both—totaled around $75 billion. 
Services exports to China hit $57.6 billion, leading to a services trade surplus with China of $40.2 billion last year compared to a goods trade deficit of more than $370 billion. 
The two are light years apart.
Despite the relatively mousey approach to President Trump, China continues to retaliate, and Beijing plans to to retaliate further if President Trump imposes more duties.
China could shift to export controls and currency devaluation. 
This last option is less likely as it would violate their agreements with the International Monetary Fund. 
The Chinese yuan is part of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights currency basket along with the major free-floating currencies of the advanced economies.

Some investment banks worry that China’s central bank will adopt a competitive monetary devaluation policy in retaliation to tariffs on all Chinese exports to the U.S. 

BNP Paribas estimates that full-blown tariffs would knock as much as 0.4 percentage points off U.S. GDP growth with the possibility of a sharp correction in the stock market. 
A one percentage point decline is plausible in China.
President Trump’s “America First” campaign prioritizes protecting domestic labor related to trade, investment, intellectual property and core infrastructure (think ports).
On the other side of the Pacific Ocean, Xi Jinping’s Made in China 2025 policy emphasizes domestic content of core materials (think high-tech properties and robotics), and developing advanced systems such as 5G telecom. 
Gone are the days when China made your Happy Meal toys and there were sew-and-stitch factories for Nike and Ralph Lauren.
The risks to the baseline scenario of no full-blown tariffs are about 50-50 at this point, BNP Paribas economists led by Bricklin Dwyer in New York and chief China strategist Xingdong Chen in Paris wrote in a ten-page report titled “The Long Haul, published on October 15.
A potential meeting between President Trump and Xi at the G20 Summit in Buenos Aires next month could help restore some trust. 
The perception that the two leaders are still “friends,” as Trump claims, could either give investors hope for a “great deal” or have them shelve the idea for a while longer.

Last Hong Kong bookshop selling titles banned in China shuts

The People’s Bookshop shut its doors after pressure from the puppet government
By Carlotta Dotto in Hong Kong

The last bookshop in Hong Kong selling titles banned by the Communist Party on the mainland has closed, marking the last chapter of the city’s historic independent publishing scene.
Human rights activists and publishers have raised grave concerns over the closure of the People’s Bookstore, a tiny shop in Hong Kong’s Causeway Bay district, known to be the last source of literary contraband in the city, in the latest example of China’s tightening pressure over the city.
The Guardian spoke to locals familiar with the matter who believe bookseller Paul Tang closed the shop under pressure from the government. 
A frequent visitor of the shop, who preferred to remain anonymous, said the city “was once the place where mainland readers came looking for the truth. But today, you’re afraid to even mention these forbidden topics.”
Fears that Beijing has hardened its policy on freedom of speech were raised earlier this month when the Financial Times’ Asia news editor, Victor Mallet, had his visa effectively revoked and the pro-independence Hong Kong National party was banned.
The closure follows the disappearance and detention of five city booksellers in 2015, who were linked to the Mighty Current publishing house that produced critical books about China’s leadership.
Joshua Wong, one of the leaders of the 2014 Occupy Movement, told the Guardian the closure “marks the definitive proof of Hong Kong’s lack of freedom”.
Benedict Rogers, co-founder and chair of the NGO Hong Kong Watch, said: “Hong Kong used to be a window onto China, a sanctuary for books that tell the truth about the mainland. But freedom of expression and of the press have been significantly eroded in recent years, and the closure of bookshops selling banned books is a further example of this.”
The former British colony has preserved much of its autonomy since its return to Chinese rule in 1997, including its own laws on liberal publication rights. 
Several publishing houses and bookshops flourished selling works that a couple of miles away were forbidden, attracting buyers from all over the mainland.
Tang discovered the niche market in 2004 and the boom came right after. 
“It was a crazy time,” said the bookseller, who attracted mainland customers with a portrait of Mao at the entrance of his shop. 
“Publishers printed a title after the other, and we were selling a hundred books a day,” he said.

Hong Kong bookshops pull politically sensitive titles after publishers vanish


High on the best-seller list of forbidden books were taboo topics such as politics, religion, and sex. From the private life of Mao Zedong to the history of the cultural revolution, mainland customers could leaf through books supporting the 1989 Tiananmen Square movement or essays on the struggles within the Communist party, as well as bluer topics such as oral sex bibles and sadomasochism guides.
When the Chinese government increased its pressure, “the industry experienced a significant turndown and banned book are not published any more,” said Malinda Ye, Acquisition Editor at the Chinese University Press.
“This is a very worrying situation,” said Agnes Chow Ting, social activist and member of the pro-democracy party Demosisto, who was recently banned from running for Hong Kong’s legislative council. 
“A lot of chained bookstores and book publishers in Hong Kong are controlled by liaison office of the Chinese government,” she said.
The closure of the shop leaves Hong Kong with no outlet that challenges censorship
Albert Cheng, renowned Hong Kong political commentator, said the concern was that “the ‘one country, two systems’ principle will gradually fade, while Hong Kong will become simply another Chinese city.”

National Security

US strikes at the heart of China's tech ambitions with chipmaker ban
By Sherisse Pham

US restricts Chinese chipmaker Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. from buying American parts.

Hong Kong -- The United States just delivered a sharp blow to China's lofty tech ambitions.
Its move to target a state-owned Chinese chipmaker over national security concerns goes to the heart of the clash between the two economic superpowers over technology and trade.
It also exposes China's lack of successful homegrown semiconductor companies as one of the biggest vulnerabilities in the country's bid to become a global tech powerhouse.
The US Commerce Department on Monday announced that it is restricting American companies from selling crucial software and technology to Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., saying it "poses a significant risk of becoming involved in activities that are contrary to the national security interests of the United States."
The ban could bring the chipmaker, which relies on foreign tech, to its knees. 
A similar US move against Chinese telecommunications equipment maker ZTE in April brought its factories to a standstill for months.
The US government didn't provide details about what potential activities it's worried about. 
But Fujian Jinhua, which is owned by the provincial government of Fujian in southeastern China, has been accused of stealing trade secrets by US chipmaker Micron Technology.
Fujian Jinhua, which has filed a countersuit against Micron in China, didn't respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
The Trump administration has said China's efforts to get hold of American technology are "an existential threat" to the future of the US economy. 
It has made the issue a central part of its trade fight with Beijing, imposing tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods and threatening more unless Beijing changes its industrial policies.

Trade war turmoil

Like the ZTE ban, the US move against Fujian Jinhua is likely to add to the tensions between Washington and Beijing.
"China opposes the United States' behavior of abusing the concept of national security and export control measures, as well as the United States' unilateral sanctions and its interference in normal international trade cooperation between companies," the Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement late Tuesday.
It urged the US government to "stop the wrong measures immediately" and "protect the legitimate rights of the companies."
Analysts see little chance of either side backing down anytime soon. 
Trade talks between the two sides have failed to make headway this year. 
Bloomberg News alarmed investors Monday with a report that the US government is set to move ahead with even more tariffs if a meeting expected to take place next month between Chinese dictator Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump doesn't go well. 
US stocks slumped, and the yuan fell to its lowest level in a decade in Asia trading.
President Trump suggested Monday on Fox News that he's not expecting quick progress.
"I'd like to make a deal right now," he said. 
"I just say they're not ready."

China's reliance on foreign tech
Xi has made building China's semiconductor industry a key priority, even comparing a computer chip to the human heart.
"No matter how big a person is, he or she can never be strong without a sound and strong heart," he said in April during a visit to a semiconductor factory in central China.
That heart is currently powered by foreign tech.
China buys more computer chips than any other country, consuming about $140 billion, or 38%, of the world's semiconductors, according to research firm IC Insights. 
Despite its voracious appetite, China produced just $18.5 billion, or about 13% of the world's chips.
Beijing is aggressively trying to close that gap, but developing a competitive chip industry is expensive, politically sensitive and takes time.
The government has invested billions in homegrown chipmakers like Fujian Jinhua, Tsinghua Unigroup and Innotron Memory to help them develop their own intellectual property. 
Even e-commerce company Alibaba is getting in on the game, announcing last month that it will set up a company focused on building artificial intelligence chips for cloud computing, internet-connected devices and other sectors.
Chinese companies have also tried to get their hands on technology by bidding for foreign chip businesses. 
But several attempts to buy stakes in American firms failed after US authorities objected to the deals on national security grounds.
Despite the hurdles, China is impatient to grow the industry. 
Beijing's "Made in China 2025" plan — one of the industrial policies singled out by the Trump administration as a concern — includes the ambitious goal of achieving self-sufficiency in high-tech industries, including semiconductors, by 2025.
The trade war is complicating that effort.
China needs foreign tech to keep developing its homegrown chip industry, according to SEMI, an international association for companies that supply the electronics industry.
"We need to face up to the fact that there is still a certain gap between the domestic semiconductor industry and that of [the] international advanced level," the group's head of China, Lung Chu, told reporters in Shanghai last month. 
"Therefore, international "cooperation" is the key to industry growth."

China's theft of intellectual property

Two Chinese intelligence officers accused of stealing US jet engine tech
By Ben Westcott and Mary Kay Mallonee

Two Chinese intelligence officers have been charged by the United States Justice Department with trying to steal the details for a type of jet engine technology from US-based companies.
Zha Rong and Chai Meng, intelligence officers with the Jiangsu provincial branch of the Ministry of State Security (MSS) in China, are accused of attempting to hack and infiltrate private companies over the course of five years in an attempt to steal the technology.
"This action is yet another example of criminal efforts by the MSS to facilitate the theft of private data for China's commercial gain," US Attorney Adam Braverman said in a statement.
"The concerted effort to steal, rather than simply purchase, commercially available products should offend every company that invests talent, energy, and shareholder money into the development of products."
The US Department of Justice statement does not explicitly state where Zha Rong and Chai Meng are presently located. 
The United States does not have an extradition treaty with China -- and if the men are in China, the Chinese government would be unlikely to give them up.
The charges come at a time when pressure is building on Beijing to address US concerns over the widespread theft of intellectual property by Chinese agents to fuel the country's economic rise.
The new charges mark the third time since September that charges have been brought against Chinese intelligence officers for trying to steal US intellectual property.
On October 11, the Department of Justice charged Chinese intelligence officer Yanjun Xu with attempting to commit economic espionage, including working to get aviation employees to reveal their trade secrets. 
In an indictment released by the Justice Department Tuesday, the US Justice Department alleged Zha and Chai from January 2010 began to work with a team of hackers to steal the technology for the engine which was being developed jointly by a French and a US-based company.
"At the time of the intrusions, a Chinese state-owned aerospace company was working to develop a comparable engine for use in commercial aircraft manufactured in China and elsewhere," the statement said.
Attempts to infiltrate the company weren't limited to hacking, according to the US statement. 
Two Chinese nationals working for the company, Tian Xi and Gu Gen were co-opted by Chinese intelligence and given malware to install in their employer's computer system.
"The threat posed by Chinese government-sponsored hacking activity is real and relentless," John Brown, FBI Special Agent in Charge of the San Diego Field Office, said in a statement.

mardi 30 octobre 2018

They Escaped China’s Crackdown, but Now Wait in Limbo

By Christina Anderson and Chris Buckley
Abdikadir Yasin, a Uighur Muslim from China seeking asylum in Sweden, with his wife and one of their children in emergency housing in the city of Gävle.

GAVLE, Sweden — Abdikadir Yasin and his wife waited for months, dreading a call telling them they would have to leave Sweden and return to western China, where the government has corralled hundreds of thousands of Muslim Uighurs like them into re-education camps.
The couple had joined an outflow of Uighurs from the Chinese colony of East Turkestan three years ago, when China’s clampdown on the minority group was intensifying.
They ended up in Sweden, where their asylum request was rejected, leaving them in fear of being deported and ending up in the camps.
Fleeing Uighurs have struggled to win acceptance and asylum in a world where the restrictions on them in China — including omnipresent surveillance and arbitrary detention — have won little attention until recently.
They face an array of pressures from the Chinese authorities and from host countries, some of which, like Sweden, have already taken in many people fleeing conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
“As long as you are a Uighur, it’s just a matter of time before you end up in a situation like this,” Mr. Yasin said in Gavle, a small city north of Stockholm that is the latest stop on their journey.
“Today it was me.”
This sense of precarious invisibility is often felt among the million or more Uighurs living beyond China’s borders, especially those who left in recent years.
Beijing’s rising influence has raised the risks of their being forced back to China.

Sweden denied Mr. Yasin’s family the right to stay, though they later won a reprieve from deportation. “The staff didn’t understand China,” Mr. Yasin said.

China has called them illegal migrants and dangerous extremists, although very few have headed toward trouble spots in the Middle East.
It has pressured and cajoled neighboring countries to return Uighurs who are caught without travel permits.
And increasingly since last year, the Chinese authorities have directly pressed Uighurs to return from abroad, contacting them over messaging apps or threatening their families in East Turkestan.
Since last year, the expansion of the indoctrination camps, which are designed to sever the attachment of Uighurs and other Muslim minorities to their religion and culture, has drawn an international chorus of criticism.
The Chinese government recently tried to blunt that criticism by presenting the camps as "comfortable job training centers".
Mr. Yasin and his lawyers said the Swedish officials who considered the family’s applications for refugee status seemed unsure about threats waiting for them in East Turkestan, which is the homeland of 11 million Uighurs.
Despite statements from lawyers that Mr. Yasin was likely to be detained if sent to China, the Swedish Migration Agency ruled that he did not qualify for asylum, he said.
“They didn’t believe that in East Turkestan there were so many problems for Uighurs,” Mr. Yasin said.
“The staff didn’t understand China.”
Tens of thousands of Uighurs left China over a period of years before a crackdown choked off the departures, leaders of the exile community say.
Many settled in Central Asian countries and in Turkey, others in Arab countries.
Some have tried to make it to the United States and other Western countries, which they hoped would offer more security.
But Uighur migrants often live in limbo, unsure of how long they can stay in their host country, fearful of returning to China and constantly worried about family members back home.
Many Uighurs must exploit loopholes and gray zones to get the passports and visas needed to go abroad.
Abdusalam Muhemet, 41, with his children at his home in Istanbul. The family sought refuge in Turkey after Mr. Muhemet was released from one of China’s indoctrination camps for Uighurs and other Muslims.

“Diaspora leaders have been frustrated with the lack of interest in the Uighur issue in general, but are particularly sensitive about Western governments and their lack of interest,” Işık Kuşçu-Bonnenfant, an associate professor at the Middle East Technical University in Turkey who studies Uighur migrants, said by email.
Only recently, she said, have diaspora leaders “been able to use the detention camp issue effectively to raise awareness among Western governments.”
Until a few years ago, Mr. Yasin and his wife had, like many urban, middle-class Uighurs, adapted to the ways of China and its vast Han ethnic majority.
Most Uighurs are Sunni Muslim, and their language and culture have much more in common with those of peoples across Central Asia and Turkey than with the Han’s.
Mr. Yasin, 36, learned Chinese and tried to stay aloof from politics, making a living selling cars in Urumqi, the regional capital of East Turkestan.
His wife, 30, was a preschool teacher who also ran a textile shop.
In the 2000s, China suffered a string of attacks which the government said were perpetrated by Uighur separatists backed from abroad.
In 2009, a spasm of deadly ethnic conflict rocked Urumqi.
The police tried to snuff out protests by Uighurs; tensions boiled over into anti-Chinese killings and counterattacks on Uighurs.
Even relatively wealthy, middle-class Uighurs who kept away from protests and political causes faced intensifying suspicion.
“Urbanized Uighurs I spoke to seemed to lose hope of a future in China due to economic discrimination and racial profiling,” said Henryk Szadziewski, a researcher with the Uyghur Human Rights Project, based in Washington. (Uyghur is an alternate spelling.)
“This subpopulation of Uighurs had the means to bribe officials in East Turkestan and obtain the visas and paperwork required to make the move.”
Mr. Yasin’s troubles began in 2015, when neighbors recruited him as their leader in a dispute over compensation for demolished homes, he said.
As the dispute heated up, the police detained Mr. Yasin.
Officers stunned him with an electric prod and forced him and other residents to sign documents admitting to offenses, he said.
He was detained again after he tried to publicize the dispute on social media and by contacting journalists.
This time, he said, he was beaten and tortured, then sent to a hospital to recover.
While he was there, relatives made preparations to spirit him out of China along with his wife and infant daughter.
The family caught a plane to Kazakhstan in Central Asia, where they spent a month, then flew to Russia and finally on to Stockholm, where they applied for asylum in May 2015.
After nearly two years and an appeal, the couple were formally denied the right to stay.
The Swedish Migration Agency accepted that Mr. Yasin was Uighur, but it did not believe his account of his escape, said Fedja Ziga, a lawyer who represented the couple and said he found their explanations to be consistent and reasonable.
After being denied, Mr. Yasin and his family slipped into Germany to seek asylum there.
But after a year of waiting, they were sent back to Sweden under a European Union rule that says people can apply in only one country.
At the Stockholm airport, waiting officials told them to find their way to Gavle, two hours away. They spent a first night there huddled on a bench.
The grinding fear has taken its toll on Mr. Yasin and his family, especially his wife, who did not want her name reported.
She had been pregnant with their third child but suffered a miscarriage in late September.

Chinese security personnel in the city of Kashgar, in the western colony of East Turkestan. Uighurs in East Turkestan have been subjected to surveillance and crackdowns on religious life, as well as the vast detention program.

“This case must be seen in the context of the extremely overstrained Swedish Migration Agency, given the large influx of migrants from North Africa and the Middle East,” said Jojje Olsson, a Swedish journalist based in Taiwan, who first reported on Mr. Yasin’s case.
“China is neither widely reported nor discussed in Sweden, which leads to a big information gap.”
Sweden has deported Uighurs before.
In 2012, a Uighur man and woman who had sought asylum there were sent to China after their applications were rejected, Radio Free Asia reported.
In other parts of the world, deportation is more common.
The World Uyghur Congress, an exile organization, counted 317 cases of Uighurs being sent back to China in the 20 years up to 2017.
Peter Irwin, a project manager for the congress, said there had been at least 23 deportations since then, including a man sent back by Germany as result of a bureaucratic foul-up.
But the pressures from the Chinese authorities on Uighurs abroad are also increasing.
Many Uighurs are traveling on Chinese passports, and growing numbers of those passports will expire in the coming years, forcing some Uighurs to choose between returning to China or, in effect, living as stateless exiles.
“If we have a child, my child cannot get Chinese citizenship, because China refuses to give a passport, and Turkey is not going to give me passports,” said Guli, a Uighur student living in Turkey. She asked that her family name not be used, fearing that her family in East Turkestan could suffer for her speaking out.
“Our next generation will have big problems if she or he cannot get any citizenship from any country.”
Last month, Mr. Yasin and his family won a reprieve from deportation.
Amid rising attention on the crackdown in East Turkestan and on their case, the Swedish Migration Agency said it would stop repatriating any Uighurs and other minorities from that region.
But the family still feels anxious.
The couple and their two children are living in an emergency housing facility off a highway, with fast-food drive-ins and gas stations as their closest neighbors.
Winning the right to stay in Sweden is still uncertain.
“We don’t feel safe yet,” Mr. Yasin’s wife said.
“I watch the news, so I feel very glad when I see that people are starting to understand what is happening there.”

Cornell University suspends ties with China's Renmin over curbs on academic freedom

The Straits Times
Students in a class at Renmin University in Beijing, on May 31, 2013.

BEIJING -- Faculty members at Cornell University said on Monday (Oct 29) that they were cutting ties with a leading Chinese university after reports that it was harassing and intimidating students leading a campaign for workers' rights.
Scholars at Cornell's Industrial and Labour Relations School said they were suspending a six-year-old research and exchange programme with Renmin University in Beijing after the school punished at least a dozen students who joined a nationwide call for better protections for low-income workers in China.
The student activists, who describe themselves as followers of Mao and Marx, say they are fighting to defend the working class and the legacy of communism.
The governing Communist Party, which sees mass movements as a threat, has detained dozens of activists and ordered universities, including Renmin, to help suppress what has become one of the most tenacious student protests in China in years.
Dr Eli Friedman, an associate professor at Cornell who oversees the programme, said Renmin's actions -- including compiling a blacklist of student activists and allowing protesters to be sent home and monitored by national security officials -- represented a "major violation of academic freedom" that Cornell could not tolerate.
"Their complicity in detaining students against their will is a serious red line for us," he added.
Dr Friedman said he expressed his concerns this month to Liu Xiangbo, a vice-director of Renmin's School of Labour and Human Resources.
Liu responded by saying that the students had violated disciplinary standards, according to Dr Friedman.
The decision was a rare rebuke of China's increasingly violent abuses on human rights.
Many US universities, seeking money and a global presence, have compromised on values of free speech in forging partnerships with Chinese schools.
Despite the decision to suspend the programme, which The Financial Times reported on Sunday, Cornell will maintain other academic programmes in China, including a centre in Beijing.
Human rights activists applauded Cornell's decision to halt the programme.
"I'm sure Cornell's decision can have a positive effect on other universities, encouraging them to put principle above making money," said Mr Patrick Poon, a researcher at Amnesty International in Hong Kong.
Officials at Renmin did not respond to a request for comment, but student activists at Renmin praised the move by Cornell.
"We should have academic freedom," said Mr Xiang Junwen, 21, an economics major. 
Mr Xiang has accused the university of trying to intimidate his mother and of monitoring his activities.
The student-led movement for workers' rights began over the summer, when dozens of students converged in the southern province of Guangdong to help a group of factory workers seeking to form a labour union without the party's official backing.
The movement has since spread to college campuses across China, finding support among a small group of students steeped in leftist ideology, who say that workers are being neglected as China embraces capitalism.
The campaign has struggled to survive in the face of repeated efforts by police to crush it.
Several leaders of the effort are still in detention, including Ms Yue Xin, a recent graduate of Peking University in Beijing, who was one of the first to draw attention to the plight of workers in Guangdong.

Chinese Barbarity

Save A Rhino/Tiger, Eat A Chinese
China's Reversal of a Rhino Horn and Tiger Bones Ban Alarms Conservationists
By CASEY QUACKENBUSH / HONG KONG

A Malaysian Wildlife official displays seized rhino horns and other animal parts at the Department of Wildlife and National Parks headquarters in Kuala Lumpur on Aug. 20, 2018.

Reversing a 25-year-old ban, China announced Monday that it will allow the use and trade of rhino and tiger parts, enraging conservationists who warn the move will further jeopardize already imperiled species.
China’s State Council said the ban, enacted in 1993, would be partially lifted to allow tiger and rhino parts to be used for "medicine", scientific research and “cultural exchanges,” underscoring that the trade will be strictly controlled and the products must come from animals in captivity.
But wildlife activists are infuriated by the reversal. 
They say the move could further threaten to push tigers and rhinos into extinction by emboldening traffickers to poach and stockpile goods for a country that places exceptional value on the animals’ parts.
“If a poachers think that there’s even a possibility of laundering the product, that will be enough to increase their activities,” says Colman O’Criodain, a wildlife trade specialist at the World Wildlife Fund.
“Basically, people are betting on extinction.”
According to WWF figures, China has an estimated 6,500 tigers in captivity as of 2010. 
The number of rhinos still in the wild is estimated at 30,000, according to the New York Times.
The move marks a major about-face for China, which has portrayed itself as a leader of climate change initiatives and has recently taken steps to curb its image as fueling the slaughter and illicit sale of endangered animals. 
Earlier this year in a landmark move, Beijing announced a ban on all ivory trade in the country.
No reason was given for the Monday’s sudden lifting of the ban on tigers and rhinos. 
Experts attribute the pivot to China’s push to encourage Chinese traditional "medicine" (TCM), a "medical" practice based on natural and herbal remedies. 
According to TCM, rhino horns can be used to treat ailments like fevers and food poisoning, while tiger bones made into wine are believed to improve health and masculinity.
The practice of TCM is valued at more than $100 billion, with more than 500,000 practitioners, according to the Times.
“It’s a reassertion of Chinese traditional "culture", not to criticize that "culture", but the problem is that it doesn’t seem to exclude endangered wildlife,” O’Criodain tells TIME. 
“But in this day in age, we’re much more aware of effect on the ecosystem.”
According to the state announcement, tiger and rhinos products may only come from authorized distributors and can only be used by authorized doctors. 
But experts fear potential consumers will seek out the parts elsewhere, which will likely fuel a knock-on effect around the world, especially for tiger farms across Southeast Asia and rhino ranches in South Africa.
“We recognize this as a major threat to their survival, particularly for both of these species,” says O’Criodain.

National Security

U.S. to Block Sales to Chinese Tech Company
By Alan Rappeport
The United States will restrict exports to Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, a state-owned Chinese company. Micron Technology, an American semiconductor company, has accused Jinhua of stealing intellectual property.

WASHINGTON — The United States said on Monday that it would block a Chinese state-owned technology company from buying American components because it posed a national security threat, the latest volley in an escalating dispute between the world’s two largest economies.
The company, Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, a manufacturer of semiconductors, “poses a significant risk” of becoming involved in activities that might infringe on national security, the Commerce Department said.
[Behind accusations that Fujian Jinhua was stealing American technology to power China’s future.]
The move could cripple Jinhua, which relies on American components for its semiconductors, and followed similar action taken by the Commerce Department this year to block sales of components to ZTE, a Chinese telecom company. 
The ZTE ban was rescinded after President Trump — responding to a request from his "friend" Xi Jinping in May — asked the department to lighten the penalty. 
ZTE agreed to pay a large fine, reshuffle its leadership and undergo compliance monitoring by the United States.
But relations between the United States and China have worsened since then, and the Trump administration is taking an increasingly hard line on transactions involving Chinese entities. 
It is eager to prevent China’s ascendance as an economic and technological powerhouse and has begun aggressively scrutinizing foreign deals to prevent Beijing from gaining access to valuable American intellectual property.
This month, the Treasury Department outlined how it would use new powers that allow the United States to review a wider range of foreign transactions, including those in sensitive industries like technology and telecommunications.
“When a foreign company engages in activity contrary to our national security interests, we will take strong action to protect our national security,” said Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary. 
“Placing Jinhua on the entity list will limit its ability to threaten the supply chain for essential components in our military systems.”
Jinhua has been on the Trump administration’s radar for several months. 
Micron Technology, a computer memory company in Idaho, accused Jinhua last year of stealing intellectual property. 
In July, Micron was barred from selling some of its products in China after Jinhua and its Taiwanese "partner", United Microelectronics, accused Micron of violating their patents.
Jinhua is opening $5.7 billion factory in China’s Fujian Province and has become increasingly ambitious in its desire to become a global player in the memory chip business.
The United States and China have been engaged in a trade war, with Mr. Trump imposing tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods and threatening to hit all imports from China with levies. 
China has responded with its own tariffs, and the two countries have exchanged increasingly heated words in recent weeks.
The United States wants China to open its market to American businesses and end its longstanding practice of pressuring American companies to hand over valuable technology as a condition of doing business there. 
Mr. Trump and Xi are expected to meet in Argentina next month at the Group of 20 summit meeting, where they plan to discuss trade, North Korea and other issues.
While Mr. Trump’s tariffs have proved to be unpopular with Democratic lawmakers, his efforts to stop the theft of intellectual property have drawn praise even from his skeptics on trade.
“China’s state-owned & directed companies lie, cheat & steal at government’s behest,” Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida, said on Twitter on Monday. 
“Fujian Jinhua must be held accountable for being part of that illegality. This was the right move today to protect our tech knowledge.”

The Necessary War

Is a US-China war inevitable?
By James Reinl
US Navy in the South China Sea

New York City -- Chinese dictator Xi Jinping's recent talk of "preparing for war and combat" is just the latest example of tough language that has stoked fears of a military flare-up with the United States.
Last week, Xi told his military commanders in Guangdong province to "concentrate preparations for fighting a war", in comments distributed by government-run media following a four-day visit to the south.
Meanwhile, retired US Lieutenant-General Ben Hodges said it was likely the US would be at war with China within 15 years thanks to a "tense relationship and increasing competition" between the world's two greatest economies.
With sabre-rattling on both sides, two long-standing issues between Beijing, Washington, and others have come to the fore as potential flashpoints -- the disputed South China Sea and Taiwan, which China views as a renegade province.
Al Jazeera spoke with US-China experts who said while all-out conflict was possible, there remained little chances to negotiate, compromise and manage a competitive relationship between Washington and Beijing.
"They're both actively preparing for war," Bonnie Glaser, a former Pentagon consultant, told Al Jazeera.

Sharpening approach
Washington's efforts to manage and accommodate China's growing economic and military clout have shifted under US President Donald Trump, who has slapped tariffs on Chinese imports and accused Beijing of trading unfairly and stealing intellectual property.
This month, Vice President Mike Pence spoke at a think-tank about cyber-attacks, Taiwan, freedom of the seas and human rights in a policy address that highlighted a sharpening US approach to China beyond the bitter trade war.
China was waging a sophisticated effort to sway the elections against President Trump's Republicans in retaliation for the White House's trade policies. 
He vowed to continue exposing Beijing's malign influence and interference.
China was deploying anti-ship and anti-air missiles on artificial islands in the disputed South China Sea, Pence said.
He also accused Beijing of bullying smaller countries and destabilising Taiwan by pressuring three Latin American countries to cut ties with Taipei.
There have already been real-world consequences.
Last month, the USS Decatur was sailing near Gaven Reef in the South China Sea, when a Chinese destroyer approached within 45 metres and forced the US vessel to manoeuvre to avoid a collision.
Washington sends warships on freedom of navigation exercises through the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait to show they are international waters and counter Chinese claims, as well as bolster US allies in the region.
The Trump administration has struck two arms deals with Taiwan worth more than a $1.7bn combined.
In September, Washington slapped sanctions on China's military for buying fighter jets and missile systems from Russia.
China has responded by calling off high-level military-to-military talks, cancelling US Secretary of Defence James Mattis' visit to Beijing and conducting live-fire drills with bombers and fighter jets in the South China Sea.
While China's economic growth has been slowed by the trade war, it is still expanding more than twice as fast as the US' and the state is pouring money into new technologies, such as quantum computing, biotech and artificial intelligence.
According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, China has launched more submarines, warships and other vessels since 2014 than the number of ships currently serving in the combined navies of Germany, India, Spain, Taiwan and Britain.
Analysts recall past political crises between the US and China. 
In 2001, a US spy plane was forced to land on Hainan after colliding with a Chinese fighter jet. 
In 1996, then-US president Bill Clinton dispatched aircraft carriers to the Taiwan Strait over Chinese missile tests.
"There's a whole basket of issues that could lead to a US-China conflict," Gregory Poling, an Asia and maritime law expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Al Jazeera.
"The South China Sea is the thorniest. It gets right at the heart of US primacy in the region, the international order that Washington built up since World War II and China's willingness to bully neighbours and challenge that rules-based order."
The sea covers some 1.7 million square kilometres and contains more than 200 mostly uninhabitable small islands, rocks and reefs.
It is the shortest route between the Pacific and Indian Oceans and has some of the world's busiest shipping lanes.
Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam are involved in a complex set of historically based territorial disputes there.
China's claims, the broadest, cover all of the Spratly and Paracel Islands -- and most of the South China Sea.
The dispute has intensified political and military rivalry across the region between the rising power of China, which has been projecting its growing naval reach, and the long-dominant player, the United States, which is deepening its ties with Japan, the Philippines and others.
"Washington needs to wake up and realise that while the South China Sea is quiet right now, we are losing. Every day the Chinese position gets stronger, the positions of the other claimants gets weaker, and they have to question the credibility of the US more every day," Poling said.
There are also signs of progress, added Poling. 
This year, the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China started formal talks on a legally binding code of conduct to ease tensions over the strategic waterway.
Taiwan is also spoken about as a powder keg.
Last week, China's Minister of Defense Wei Fenghe vowed any effort to "to separate Taiwan from China" would result in China's armed forces taking "action at any price".
China has claimed self-ruled Taiwan through its "one China" policy since 1949 and vows to bring it under Beijing's rule - by force if necessary.
The US is obliged to help Taiwan with the means to defend itself under the US Congress 1979 Taiwan Relations Act.
War with China Casualties
2016 PopulationKilledSurvivors
CHINA1 373 541 2781 057 119 68977%316 421 589
UNITED STATES323 995 52819 089 7836%304 905 745
EUROPEAN UNION513 949 445371 356 95872%142 592 487
RUSSIA142 355 41530 924 81622%111 430 599
INDIA1 266 883 5981 158 499 17491%108 384 424
PAKISTAN201 995 540175 747 47387%26 248 067
JAPAN126 702 133114 241 88990%12 460 244
VIETNAM95 261 02184 340 68889%10 920 333
PHILIPPINES102 624 20992 732 90290%9 891 307
KOREA, NORTH25 115 31121 141 05084%3 974 261
KOREA, SOUTH50 924 17247 636 30294%3 287 870
TAIWAN23 464 78722 278 49095%1 186 297
4 246 812 4373 195 109 21475%1 051 703 223
 

lundi 29 octobre 2018

Chinese military researchers exploit western universities

Study shows US and UK scientists aiding high-tech progress for People’s Liberation Army 
By Kathrin Hille in Taipei







Chinese dictator Xi Jinping inspecting forces of the People's Liberation Army. A study shows the PLA's scientists have contributed to the development of Beijing's military technology by collaborating with researchers at western universities 

China has sent thousands of scientists affiliated with its armed forces to western universities — especially in countries that share intelligence with the US — and is building a web of research collaboration that could boost Beijing’s military technology development.
 About 2,500 researchers from Chinese military universities spent time at foreign universities — led by the US and UK — over the past decade, and they hid their military affiliations, according to a new report from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), a think-tank partly funded by Australia’s department of defence.
 The research effort focused on members of the so-called “Five Eyes” group of countries with which the US shares an intelligence relationship: the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
Over the past five years, researchers affiliated to the People’s Liberation Army published more joint papers with scientists from the UK and the US than with those of any other country. 
 The findings will fuel the debate raging in some western capitals over how to control the flow of cutting-edge and especially dual-use technology to Beijing — one of the main fronts in their struggle to adapt to a rapidly rising China.
 The PLA’s international research collaboration “focuses on hard sciences, especially emerging and dual-use technologies”, said Alex Joske, author of the report that is being published by ASPI today.
Dual-use technology has civilian and military applications.
 While the US and other western militaries have expanded exchanges with China’s armed forces, the scientists the PLA sends abroad usually have no contact with military officers in their host countries. Instead, the focus is on collecting knowledge to power China’s military technological progress. 
 In 2015, the science publication Shenzhou Xueren wrote about an interdisciplinary project between the PLA’s National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) and the University of Cambridge.
The article said the collaboration would produce the next generation of supercomputer experts for China and eventually “greatly enhance our nation’s power in the areas of defence, communications, anti-jamming for imaging and high-precision navigation”.
 Mr Joske found that navigation technology, computer science and artificial intelligence (AI) were the dominant areas of exchanges after reviewing collaborations between Chinese and foreign scientists since 2006 and statistics on Chinese researchers who were sent abroad.
 In one example, several researchers visited UK universities and are continuing joint research on topics such as combustion in scramjet engines, which could power hypersonic aircraft capable of flying at six times the speed of sound.
Wang Zhenguo, deputy chief of the PLA’s scramjet programme and head of the department of postgraduate studies at the NUDT, has co-authored 18 papers with foreign scientists.
 Huang Wei, an NUDT scramjet researcher and aircraft design expert for the PLA’s General Armaments Department, worked on his PhD while visiting the University of Leeds between 2008 and 2010, a researcher at the UK university told the FT.
Luo Wenlei, another NUDT scramjet researcher, wrote his PhD thesis on scramjet engines at Leeds in 2014.
 Both Huang and Luo, as well as Luo’s doctoral thesis supervisors, have published together with  Wang on scramjets.
Derek Ingham, a professor at Leeds and one of Luo’s thesis supervisors, did not respond to a request for comment.
 Qin Ning, a professor at the University of Sheffield involved in some of the exchanges with Chinese scramjet experts, said their joint research was "academic" in nature.
 He added that a number of EU-China collaborative projects strongly encouraged by the university — with the participation of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, which is administered by the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, China’s weapons industry regulator — had produced “fruitful collaboration”.
Scientists working in PLA universities do not mention this affiliation when applying to western universities or publishing in English, but present themselves as members of civilian-sounding academic institutions instead. 
 One of the persistent pushes for international technology collaboration has come from the PLA’s Rocket Force, which includes China’s missile and nuclear weapons programmes. 
Major General Hu Changhua, one of the leading missile experts at Rocket Force Engineering University, spent three months at Germany’s University of Duisburg-Essen in 2008, while Zhou Zhijie, another lecturer at RFEU, was a visiting scholar at the University of Manchester in 2009. Both concealed their affiliation with RFEU and named the Xi’an Research Institute of High Technology, a non-existent institution, instead, the ASPI report said.
They continue to publish in English under this fake affiliation, entries in digital science publication databases show. 
 Yang Jianbo and Xu Dongling, two professors at Manchester, published a book with Maj-Gen Hu and Zhou in 2011, and have continued to collaborate with RFEU researchers, according to entries on ResearchGate, the online database of scientific papers. 
Yang and Xu did not respond to requests for comment.
Zhou did not respond to a request for comment.
Maj-Gen Hu could not be reached for comment.
 Among universities in the US, which hosted about 500 visiting scholars from PLA-affiliated schools over the past decade, Georgia Tech scientists published the highest number of joint papers with PLA researchers, according to Mr Joske.
 Liu Ling, a professor at Georgia Tech’s College of Computing who works on big data and cloud computing, has co-published papers with scientists from the NUDT according to the digital library of IEEE, a scientists’ association.
 She told the FT that her work with NUDT visiting scholars “has been on pure (fundamental) research” and unrelated to military applications, adding: “While I am not familiar with all of Georgia Tech collaborations, I know for sure that I have never worked with PLA directly”.
 However, defence experts cast doubt on such a distinction. 
While many staff of PLA-affiliated universities are so-called civilian cadres who focus on scientific work and are not supposed to be used in combat, they are still members of the PLA.
NUDT is supervised by the Central Military Commission, China’s top military body.
 In 2015, the US government added NUDT to its list of organisations that require case-by-case licensing for the transfer of any item to them, including technology, under the Export Administration Regulations.

Many U.S. firms in China eyeing relocation as trade war bites

Reuters
An employee monitors a circular weaving machine at a textile factory in Shangqiu, China, on Sept. 8, 2018.

More than 70 percent of U.S. firms operating in southern China are considering delaying further investment there and moving some or all of their manufacturing to other countries as the trade war bites into profits, a business survey showed on Monday.
U.S. companies operating in China believe they are suffering more from the trade dispute than firms from other countries, according to the poll by the American Chamber of Commerce in South China, which surveyed 219 companies, one-third from the manufacturing sector.
Sixty-four percent of the companies said they were considering relocating production lines to outside of China, but only 1 percent said they had any plans to establish manufacturing bases in North America.
"While more than 70 percent of the U.S. companies are considering delaying or canceling investment in China, and relocation of some or all manufacturing out of China, only half of their Chinese counterparts share the same consideration," the AmCham report said.
The trade war is shifting both supply chains and industrial clusters, mostly towards Southeast Asia, the survey found.
U.S. companies reported facing increased competition from rivals in Vietnam, Germany and Japan, while Chinese companies said they were facing growing competition from Vietnam, India, the United States and South Korea.
Customers are slowing down orders or not placing them at all, Harley Seyedin, president of AmCham South China, told Reuters.
"It could very well be that people are holding back on placing orders until times are more certain or it could very well be that they are shifting to other competitors who are willing to offer cheaper products, even sometimes at a loss, in order to get market share," he said.
"One of the most difficult things about market share is once you lose it, it is very hard to get back."
Companies in the wholesale and retail sectors have suffered the most from U.S. tariffs, while agriculture-related businesses have been most hit by Chinese measures, the survey found.
The survey was conducted between Sept. 21 and Oct. 10, shortly after the U.S. imposed tariffs on another $200 billion worth of Chinese goods. 
That prompted Beijing to retaliate with additional tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. products, escalating a tariff war between the world's two largest economies.
The U.S. duties are set to rise sharply on Jan. 1.
Both Washington and Beijing appear to be digging in for a long battle, though U.S. officials say President Donald Trump would go through with plans to meet Chinese dictator Xi Jinping at the G20 summit next month if it looked like the discussions would be positive.
Nearly 80 percent of the survey respondents said the tariffs have knocked their businesses, with U.S. tariffs having slightly more impact than the Chinese ones.
Around 85 percent of U.S. companies said they have suffered from the combined tariffs, compared with around 70 percent of their Chinese counterparts. 
Companies from other countries also reported similar impacts as their American counterparts.
The top concern of companies surveyed was the rising cost of goods sold, which resulted in reduced profits. 
Other concerns included difficulties managing procurement and reduced sales.
One-third of companies estimated the trade dispute had reduced business volumes ranging from $1 million to $50 million, while nearly one in 10 manufacturers reported high-volume business losses of $250 million or more.
Nearly half the companies surveyed also said there had been an increase in non-tariff barriers, including increased bureaucratic oversight and slower customs clearance. 
Analysts have warned of such a risk to U.S. firms as China is increasingly unable to match U.S. measures on a dollar for dollar basis.